Talking about the difference between competency and sanity evaluation.
She received the court order for evaluation, the previous evaluation, and discovery on the case including the interviews and phone calls.
Talking about how competency and sanity aren't in the DSM, they are legal terms.
She does a clinical interview to determine if they meet the threshold set out in the statute for competency.
She has to know a lot about the case to be able to assess competency.
She met with LS in Dec 2020.
She met with her for three hours and forty minutes. (She says it went for that long basically because LS loves to talk.)
She begins with a notification of purpose. She explains that she is not there to help, there is no confidentiality, then she checked that LS understood, she did. She made complaints about a conspiracy from her attorneys, but understood.
She's talking now about 'inconsistencies' in LS's original testing.
She did not see signs in LS of a severe mental illness.
LS 'engaged in some behaviours', humming, seemed too happy, put her head on the wall, talked to 'a vampire'.
The previous testers administered a PAI and MMPI-2/2R. Explained her test results suggested she was giving answers that suggested she was trying to 'inflate' the answers. It was 'uninterpretable' due to the answers given. Therefore the test results could not be relied upon.
Talking about the notes from the jail. Was on one med when the witness saw her. Consistently showed no behaviour that suggested serious mental illness. Mentions the kites which were incoherent, but did not match her behaviour.
She also reviewed the jail calls LS made, where she was having conversations with people she knew, not jail staff or inmates.
We're back to the vampires.
Jail calls. Some inconsistency between who she was talking to and what she was saying. Claiming to one person she was doing badly and losing her mind. Next call, same day, was to HH, coherent, telling her how to manage money, etc.