GUILTY CO - Gannon Stauch, 11, found deceased, Colorado Springs, El Paso County, 27 Jan 2020 *Arrest* #70

  • #341
  • #342
  • #343

1/27/26

Letecia was not present in person at the Colorado Court of Appeals. Eric Samler, an attorney representing her, argued that her case should be reversed because of a juror on her trial and who that juror was related to.

In the 15 minutes allotted to each side for oral arguments on Tuesday, Samler told the appeals judges that a juror connected to Letecia’s trial had a son-in-law who worked for District Attorney Michael Allen’s office. Allen was the lead prosecutor in the case. Samler argued that Letecia’s defense team challenged the jurors’ family ties during the jury selection process. Despite the challenge, Samler told the appeals court that the trial judge did not get rid of the juror. In a court briefing, Samler argued, “This is structural error requiring reversal of the convictions.”
 
  • #344
 
  • #345
  • #346

1/27/26

Letecia was not present in person at the Colorado Court of Appeals. Eric Samler, an attorney representing her, argued that her case should be reversed because of a juror on her trial and who that juror was related to.

In the 15 minutes allotted to each side for oral arguments on Tuesday, Samler told the appeals judges that a juror connected to Letecia’s trial had a son-in-law who worked for District Attorney Michael Allen’s office. Allen was the lead prosecutor in the case. Samler argued that Letecia’s defense team challenged the jurors’ family ties during the jury selection process. Despite the challenge, Samler told the appeals court that the trial judge did not get rid of the juror. In a court briefing, Samler argued, “This is structural error requiring reversal of the convictions.”

Yikes. That seems significant to me.
 
  • #347
Yikes. That seems significant to me.
We need to know in what capacity the son-in-law worked and how big the office is.

Since the juror was questioned at the time, I would assume the SIL connection was not one that would interfere with the juror being fair. I hope.

jmo
 
  • #348
We need to know in what capacity the son-in-law worked and how big the office is.

Since the juror was questioned at the time, I would assume the SIL connection was not one that would interfere with the juror being fair. I hope.

jmo

I hope you are right, but it looks very awful to me. If the juror's s-i-l was actually employed by the DA's office, that's a big problem. If he was just walking through the office when delivering parcels while working for another employer, then that's not an issue.

What a shame that this juror wasn't removed from the pool before the trial began.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
67
Guests online
2,152
Total visitors
2,219

Forum statistics

Threads
638,876
Messages
18,734,205
Members
244,545
Latest member
mmmock97
Back
Top