As it should be..gone are those days the the little women cleans up the mess/hazards the male makes....LOL..But know most women..especially with kids or fur babies around..you will make sure all hazardous material is GONE!! LOL
I'm just catching up reading here... weren't there TWO Jurors questions??
:waitasec:
Thanks for the ALL the tweets and what's going on in the courtroom!! :tyou:
OHHHHHH Reporter is a SHE..she is in deep DO DO!! This reporter could be held in contempt separately..but suffice to say..She no longer has a job!!
he just went downstairs to his study in the basement....i am going to check now!
The Gold Patrol® ‏@thegoldpatrol · 1m1 minute ago
#theatershooting
Orman mentions the Daily Beast as a possible sister company to Newsweek
@thegoldpatrol: #theatershooting
Judge has 2 notes
737 - needs to talk to judge about something
640 - mom sent her text saying sentencing was this week
https://twitter.com/thegoldpatrol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes that's the tweet - but did they address the second juror #640 - or they let it slide? I didn't read anything on here regarding what happened to #640...
Yes that's the tweet - but did they address the second juror #640 - or they let it slide? I didn't read anything on here regarding what happened to #640...
USA Today, has an article written on July 22, 2015 at 4:54pm, stating Newsweek editor Grant Burningham was notified on Friday and "removed it early Friday morning''. That was part of a quote, but I do not know if it was the article or the name of the juror he was referring too.
Also in the article it stated that Newsweek 'forgot' to remove the tweets until Wednesday. That would be this Wednesday.
It appears Judge Samour was on top of the situation over the week end.
Still so glad the Foreman Juror was upfront and reported it.
sorry, do not know how to link it over....so I hope giving the info I did is okay with the Mods.
notified on Friday and "removed it early Friday morning''.
Ya think? :notgood:
I've never read a link here from Newsweek. WTF did they do? Send a 19 year old journalism grad to cover that had no idea of what is BASIC journalism for following a trial.
SMH..... I REALLY REALLY want a follow up on this. Wonder if NEWSWEEK will report the *Paul Harvey*..... or another media outlet... or GAWD.. that nothing will ever be said.
:notgood:
You folks don't think the jury thinks they need to prove all the aggravators? I think they're a smart careful jury. It is they only have to agree on one aggravator & they don't have to agree on the same one!
So, just agree on one. The first one is proven. What would they be hung up on? anyone.
A picture of the sun above the clouds with the words "Rise Above"? Why not throw some unicorns in there too! My goodness!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk