- Joined
- Jun 1, 2012
- Messages
- 6,969
- Reaction score
- 18,890
If there is a phase 2!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, if jurors agree that at least one aggravator has been met.
If there is a phase 2!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So the reporter who gave out the Juror Foremans name...her name is not out there that I can see. Has anyone seen her name or has it been erased and 'protected' by Newsweek? Yes, I think the Juror should look into legal proceedings on his own after the trial.
How many WS think that the three defense witnesses will still testify tomorrow or at a later date now there has been a delay due to the objections by the defense over slides/power point, that took a lot of time. The defense should not promise the witnesses certain dates to testify, especially when they like to find ways to delay. Trials can be very 'date/ time changeable'.
I was glad to see the State object to the defense slides....the State has been very nice to the defense as far as objections. The defense throws anything on the wall to see if it sticks.
I think what is taking so long is they are not in agreement about intentionally killing a child under 12. It was one of their questions and it is a question of debate even on Websleuths. He took the "point" for killing Veronica and the unborn baby, he did it and he took credit for it.
Wow, Colorado only has 3 inmates on death row. CA where I live has 746. Colorado's last execution was 18 years ago. Either way DP or LWOP. It will still be LWOP. If DP he will use his mental illness defense in all his appeals so most likely his sentence will eventually be overturned anyway. My friend is an attorney and this is what he told me.
You're assuming he was rational and we know he wasn't. That's what really makes this tricky.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Apparently, that is it. However, they do not have to be in agreement on this aggravator! They just have to decide that one of the five factors has been proven. The first aggravator is - killed 2 or more persons in a single event. That is a proven one that they surely would agree on.
I'm thinking Texas is one of the States to prosecute for death and mean it----
I'm thinking Texas is one of the States to prosecute for death and mean it----
Perhaps they want to come back with the finding of all 5 aggravators to make a statement...thus trying to convince any holdout for #2 to see that he was aware of multi children in that theatre and he chose to go ahead with his mission to collect human capital anyway. claiming after he didn't want to hurt or kill children after the fact is rather disingenuous since he was aware..his mission was to kill as many theatre goer's as possible even with the knowledge it was full of youngsters!! So I'm not buying his regret nor remorse either!!
The lawyer guy they chat to on Denver 7 news is expressing his surprise that the jury is still out.
He said its to their credit that they are being very careful.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk