Isn't this attached sketch associated to those incidents?:
There is more than one suspect in the Arvada abduction/enticement attempts.
Isn't this attached sketch associated to those incidents?:
There's a gate on that road, at least from 82nd. If the gate is locked, then no. I don't know about on the north side though. Plus, a truck would be visible if located anywhere on the south side of the ridge, and the presence of a truck up there would attract more attention than a truck pulled off on the side of the road on 82nd. Not that it couldn't have happened, but it still seems like going out of the way.It seems to me that someone could have used the road that circles around behind the two shacks. The larger of the two shacks looks suitable for hiding a vehicle.
![]()
It's only a short walk from the larger shack to the smaller shack, and a shorter walk from the smaller shack to the location of the culvert.
![]()
No, there's no cabs or buses on those roads. From 82nd, it would be fairly easy to disappear into the nearby neighborhoods or the Arvada Reservoir open space though.if you live in Superior, you'd just hike down McCaslin to Indiana and voila, you're there. a long walk but I think it's all pretty flat out here. Coloradans really hike and bike a lot. very outdoorsy and in shape mostly. that would not be a big deal. It's abt 10 miles. 3 hours. maybe bused or cabbed it back?
While I am not actually considered "hearing impaired" there are times I think I must be. First, I am a "loud talker." Second, I often have trouble making out peoples' words. If I am looking them in the face, I have a better chance of understanding (sort of like lipreading) but while I usually hear the person speaking, I often have to ask them to repeat. If I still don't get it, I'll give some generic response, or shake my head or something that is noncommittal, rather than ask AGAIN.
So has it been decided she was posed? How? I'm sorry I missed it.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jessica-ridgeway-killing-police-suspect-abductions/story?id=17478819
Police in Arvada, Colo., are looking for a man suspected of trying to abduct two children a few weeks before 10-year-old Jessica Ridgeway's killing to see whether there is a possible connection.
In two reported incidents on Sept. 9 and Sept. 12, Arvada police said an 8- and 9-year-old were nearly abducted, according to police.
"Both of them said they were offered candy to get into the vehicle. In both incidences, they knew to run and tell an adult," Arvada police spokeswoman Jill McGranahan told ABC News affiliate KMGH-TV.
Yes I agree, I am reminded of the Carla Bruna case in Florida where her mother called her in missing within the hour and an amber alert was not done till the next day. They had suspicion of the parents for no reason or suspected a runaway. They brought out the dogs, that night but by that time she was long gone. Most of these perps kill within a few hours of the kidnapping. I read 75% kill within 3 hours.
LE would have thought she just did not want to go to school that day and was hiding. They would not have signaled the alarm till later in the day anyway. Sad to say but a lot of kids play hookie so it may not be taken seriously.
For the dedicated sleuthers -
Why the tree???????
:sleuth:
Re: Bolded part.
I mean no disrepect, but people should NEVER do anything like this. This sort of thing could have gone horribly wrong if an innocent bystander thought it was a real abduction and took out a concealed weapon and used it to "rescue the victim".
Again, I am reminded of Kenia M's case last year in Denver. The monster, Travis Forbes, (thank goodness he's behind bars), particularly commented on his use of the tree at the burial site. According to him, he thought the tree was pretty, and he said if it were him, he'd like to be buried somewhere nice like that, or something along those lines.
So, maybe this is a favorite place of the perp?
BTW, Kenia Monge's dad on Jessica Ridgeway's killer: 'He will strike again' ...
I agree with this statement but considering that CODIS has not apparently gotten a hit on this type of killing, we can then speculate that it can be a woman. <modsnip>
There was police activity all down the valley late into the night. The witness may have seen the fire truck boom with it's lights when it was raised or in another location. The lights shining on the hills were easy to see. But the spot next to the road where the body was found it not visible from any houses. The witness probably saw the intense search and investigation activity near Leyden, not what happened where the body was found.
Isn't this attached sketch associated to those incidents?:
I agree...my intent is not to insult a beautiful state.
There are a million, million places a perp with a vehicle can hide a body and it never be found.
Parking it in the only ugly part of Colorado is intentional.
Parking her backpack in the middle of a residential street is also intentional.
Why?
I expect this perp to attempt to make contact, or insert himself into the investigation.
In my opinion, this is personal for him, and designed to shock. Find out why and you find the killer.
:cow:
LE has come out and said that Jessica was abducted by a stranger and that her family was not involved.
Early on, LE said that they had a possible witness who saw Jessica that morning as she walked to school. Nothing more has been said about that witness, whether the sighting has been corroborated in some way, etc.
But it is completely clear that LE believes the family is not involved.
Even though we don't know the extent of the dismemberment, the fact that it has been mentioned at all is significant.
LE are under no obligation at all to make that part public.
They chose to, so it has become part of the tiny shreds of confirmed information we have on this case. It is fact so has become an aspect of the crime.
Those speculating on this disgusting aspect mean no disrespect, whatsoever.
The fact that it has occurred at all, and LE has told us it occurred, means that it is a clue and sleuthers cannot ignore it.
WARNING OFFENSIVE TO SOME
The fact that ID was only possible by DNA implies to me that the usual means of identification were removed, eg fingerprints and dental.
Dental not being available means no jaw and no jaw means no skull. No animal would move a skull far, so I am assuming this is part of what's missing.
From behavioural point of view this is interesting, as the body was not hidden. Why try to obscure the identification when you choose to display the body?
This apparent contradiction could indicate two offenders, in my humble opinion only.
:cow:
Even though we don't know the extent of the dismemberment, the fact that it has been mentioned at all is significant.
LE are under no obligation at all to make that part public.
They chose to, so it has become part of the tiny shreds of confirmed information we have on this case. It is fact so has become an aspect of the crime.
Those speculating on this disgusting aspect mean no disrespect, whatsoever.
The fact that it has occurred at all, and LE has told us it occurred, means that it is a clue and sleuthers cannot ignore it.
WARNING OFFENSIVE TO SOME
The fact that ID was only possible by DNA implies to me that the usual means of identification were removed, eg fingerprints and dental.
Dental not being available means no jaw and no jaw means no skull. No animal would move a skull far, so I am assuming this is part of what's missing.
From behavioural point of view this is interesting, as the body was not hidden. Why try to obscure the identification when you choose to display the body?
This apparent contradiction could indicate two offenders, in my humble opinion only.
:cow: