I think the research done by kateinfl is well worth a thought.....and interesting. What I can't tie together, and being one that doesn't know alot about satanism---nor wanting to,... is why would Hebrew markings be on a Christian symbol, and then Satanism collectively with the three vavs? Also, isn't the cross of Satanism one that is upside down? Unless it was crafted by the perp in his twisted thinking and beliefs linking them all? Oh, I so don't want to go there.
Some people are creeped by the discussion of "not intact"....me....it's this. Just {{{{{}}}}} creepy, but necessary.
I think it comes from the vertical lines on the cross... Not sure..
Yes, that was my reaction when I read the story in May too.I remembered the report about the jogger because I ride and bike around here, too, and was very startled that someone used chloroform and it was so scary and audacious.
No, it didn't. The attempted abduction of the 8-year-old boy took place a mile or two east, either on or near the Big Dry Creek Trail, from what I can tell, in the Westcliff neighborhood. There are some things about the story in the newspaper that don't line up (i.e., there is no creek that runs directly out Ketner Reservoir along a trail, and some stories are reporting that the toy gun was thrown in a lake vs throw in a creek), but all of them reliably talk about the Westcliff neighborhood.No, the attempted abduction of this boy was May 10th 2012 at Ketner Lake. Same lake where jogger attempted abduction occurred three weeks later.
What if the cross was found by the fence? What if LE feel that the perp got this necklace caught in the fence when dumping the body? Maybe that is the deal IDK?
The "runner" that grabbed the young boy in the park, was anything mentioned regarding the size of his calves or if they appeared muscular?
People are listening to a scanner and said they heard it. It's not on the news yet.
Would the answers to those questions tell us who the perp is? If it was found on Jessica's route, next to bp, inside/or outside the fence where remains were found or in a tree.....I don't see any of that really bringing us closer to knowing who the perp is.
Now, if there are pics from public gatherings prior to Jessica's disappearance....looking at those for someone wearing the cross might get us closer to figuring out who he is. Again, MOO.
I looked at that website and it was about Hebrew for christians. they are closely tied, although with their differences.
------------What if the cross was found by the fence? What if LE feel that the perp got this necklace caught in the fence when dumping the body? Maybe that is the deal IDK?
Only that it maybe was not purposely left their and was accidentally left because it got caught in the fence, therefore a big clue to who the person is..especially if they wore this as a necklace..and now they no longer have it.[/QUOTE
If someone wore it, LE is trying to find out who that person is. If it was left on purpose or not, it's still possible whoever had it may have worn it at one time or people that the perp is acquainted with may know of him owning it. So to me the bottom line is do we know of anyone that ever wore or owned this cross?
If the perp were wearing this particular cross on a necklace or chain of some kind and it dropped off his neck at the body dump site, chances are the chain or necklace or piece of leather (whatever was used to attach it around the neck) would have dropped with it or near it and been located by police.
That does not appear to be what happened. Police didn't say there was any kind of chain or leather with this cross. There isn't any wear pattern around the holes to indicate how this item was worn (if it was worn).
The item could have been in a pocket and fallen out. Or he could have placed it on purpose. We don't know and we won't know until information about exactly where the item was found is disclosed, which will be during a trial.
No they have not said anything about his calves. I doubt the kids even paid much attention to his calves.
You guys are conflating 2 events and cross-posting and confusing each other.
1. The child who was allegedly being kidnapped tonight, was not being kidnapped or abducted. That child was throwing a tantrum and not wanting to go or leave with the parents. That child was "found" as in "found safe, not abducted."
2. No information about the rest of JR's remains have been released. There have been no official searches conducted (at least, none involving the public). We don't know if whatever was missing from the initial body recovery site has been located or not located. So no, nothing has been "found" that we are aware of in the JR case, aside from that wooden cross.