- Joined
- Apr 6, 2018
- Messages
- 2,507
- Reaction score
- 6,394
Martha Jean Lambert - Missing since 1985
I’m so glad Jonelle has finally received justice!!
I’m so glad Jonelle has finally received justice!!
Uh this is not really probable cause. Not even close.
Almost 36 years have passed since Jonelle's disappearance/murder. It is good to see that an arrest has been made. A big question lingers: How many others were there?
No way in the world is Pankey a serial killer.Former Idaho governor candidate charged in 1984 murder of 12-year-old Colorado girl | Daily Mail Online
wow. now i wonder how many others there were.
Jonelle’s sister, from your link:Rourke said Pankey had “intimate knowledge of the crime” that wasn’t known to the public — specifically that a rake was used to wipe out footprints in the snow.
The affidavit alleges that Pankey took Jonelle from her home on Dec. 20, 1984, and shot her during the kidnapping. It also said he had been watching Jonelle and other children walk home from Franklin Middle School, and that he exhibited strange behavior over the years, including muttering “false prophet” in 1985 during a church service when the pastor announced that Jonelle Matthews would be found safe.
The indictment states that Pankey’s ex-wife, Angela Hicks, provided much of the information on his background, which may have led to the charges, including “dumping” the family dogs before they went on their Christmas trip in December 1984. The dogs “were never seen again,” she said.
Weld County grand jury indicts man in 1984 Greeley cold-case murder of 12-year-old girl
Excellent idea with the dogs/ ballistics. One thing he could have buried was the blanket he said was taken from the house- I can’t recall if he reportedly said that to LE or a reporter. Link one page back...I bet if they could find the dogs' remains, the ballistics would match.
When they returned from the trip and he started digging in the yard, wouldn't the ground have been frozen? What was he trying to bury? Jonelle's personal items, the weapon or bullet casings, the dogs? Hmmm.
Odd too that a car would spontaneously catch fire in the dead of winter. Is that where the crime took place? What kind of car was it?
"The indictment states that Pankey’s ex-wife, Angela Hicks, provided much of the information on his background, which may have led to the charges, including “dumping” the family dogs before they went on their Christmas trip in December 1984. The dogs “were never seen again,” she said."
Boy, he must have divorced his first wife & married his 2nd shortly after executing 12 year old JM. His stevepankey.net site says he’s been married to his wife for 35 years. Either he’s embellishing things, or his life changed rapidly after Jonelle’s murder 36 years ago.Way too many pages to read to see if these have been posted already:
His website while running for governor: Steve Pankey For Idaho Governor
His website while running for sheriff: My Site
His political website: https://www.stevepankey.net/
His page about public safety and unsolved murders: Public Safety
And an open letter he wrote about same-sex marriage: https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.tow...-11e4-9413-0019bb2963f4/53ebe5e9bed39.pdf.pdf
It does seem like quite a few of the 26 statements regarding the 5 indictment counts are coinciding events- not incriminating. Like... where he lived, where he went to church, that he owned a gun, that he had been seen watching kids in the neighborhood, that he knew 2 police officers lived on JM’s street, etc. Then there’s the ex-wife’s testimony in statements 19-22, which at first glace, could be deemed retaliatory. But looking closer, most could be confirmed through other witnesses, receipts, material evidence, etc. I think the most damning parts are from his own bizarre statements over the years to reporters & LE- including that a rake was used to destroy the snowy tracks at JM’s home. I’m guessing that LE has much more that will come out at trial. They’ve been patient for 36 years, so why not wait a few more- unless confident with what they have? Jmo, moo, etc.Uh this is not really probable cause. Not even close.
I have always wondered if they found any evidence with her remains that he left behind. I need to read the indictment.It does seem like quite a few of the 26 statements regarding the 5 indictment counts are coinciding events- not incriminating. Like... where he lived, where he went to church, that he owned a gun, that he had been seen watching kids in the neighborhood, that he knew 2 police officers lived on JM’s street, etc. Then there’s the ex-wife’s testimony in statements 19-22, which at first glace, could be deemed retaliatory. But looking closer, most could be confirmed through other witnesses, receipts, material evidence, etc. I think the most damning parts are from his own bizarre statements over the years to reporters & LE- including that a rake was used to destroy the snowy tracks at JM’s home. I’m guessing that LE has much more that will come out at trial. They’ve been patient for 36 years, so why not wait a few more- unless confident with what they have? Jmo, moo, etc.
Reposting @crhedBngr’s indictment link:
SP_Indictment_JM_Case.pdf
I've been pretty inclined to think that they recovered fibers which was why they searched his house again after the remains were uncovered but I'd think they would have arrested him sooner if they'd found a match and it's not in the indictmentI have always wondered if they found any evidence with her remains that he left behind. I need to read the indictment.
30+ years is an awfully long time to go back and look for corroborating evidence and the church parishioners could be argued as unreliable. Probably less so the people at his son's funeral though.It does seem like quite a few of the 26 statements regarding the 5 indictment counts are coinciding events- not incriminating. Like... where he lived, where he went to church, that he owned a gun, that he had been seen watching kids in the neighborhood, that he knew 2 police officers lived on JM’s street, etc. Then there’s the ex-wife’s testimony in statements 19-22, which at first glace, could be deemed retaliatory. But looking closer, most could be confirmed through other witnesses, receipts, material evidence, etc. I think the most damning parts are from his own bizarre statements over the years to reporters & LE- including that a rake was used to destroy the snowy tracks at JM’s home. I’m guessing that LE has much more that will come out at trial. They’ve been patient for 36 years, so why not wait a few more- unless confident with what they have? Jmo, moo, etc.
Reposting @crhedBngr’s indictment link:
SP_Indictment_JM_Case.pdf
Not sure if anyone other than his ex heard the comment at his son’s funeral. Indictment only mentions that detail from her testimony alone. The church members have credibility though, imo. Indictment says several people had to remove him from the church for his outburst regarding JM. I can’t imagine anyone from that church not remembering that scene given the high-profile nature of the case back then. If Pankey has “more to offer”, I can’t imagine it’s worth much more than a sentence reduction- which at his age, won’t mean anything. Jonelle’s family has their daughter back and has given her a proper burial. Unless they want details of how it all went down, there’s nothing else he can provide, imo. UT is a DP state. Given Pankey’s statements on all his various websites, he may prefer DP for all the appeals, attention, and interactions with the court system.I've been pretty inclined to think that they recovered fibers which was why they searched his house again after the remains were uncovered but I'd think they would have arrested him sooner if they'd found a match and it's not in the indictment
30+ years is an awfully long time to go back and look for corroborating evidence and the church parishioners could be argued as unreliable. Probably less so the people at his son's funeral though.
It'll take a long, long time for this to come to trial - which I don't think it's expected to since Pankey has indicated he has additional information to offer. It'll take more pressure than this for him to crack. I wonder if he has the bail money.