And we don't know that KKL drove from ID to CO and back home again.We don't know for a fact that KK has family in CO. We don't know for a fact which days KK was in CO. And we don't know whether or not she took her kids with her on that trip.
And we don't know that KKL drove from ID to CO and back home again.We don't know for a fact that KK has family in CO. We don't know for a fact which days KK was in CO. And we don't know whether or not she took her kids with her on that trip.
I would think so. The worse they make her look the more the jury will find her not believable. ImoThe defense can also call her as their own (hostile) witness, right? You know the prosecution will use her to maximum damage against Frazee so if she has further involvement in the crime that the defense knows about, they have nothing to lose by trying to rip her to shreds, right?
But we do have the R’s saying that MS begged KKL not to go. Implying that she went anyway.And we don't know that KKL drove from ID to CO and back home again.
Yeah. That is complete and utter BS.
He was making absolutely no effort to conceal the fact that he had a baby.
He didn’t appear to be making any effort to conceal his relationship with Kelsey.
“Implausible deniability” ain’t a thing.
Give me a break. She knew.
Yeah. That is complete and utter BS.
He was making absolutely no effort to conceal the fact that he had a baby.
He didn’t appear to be making any effort to conceal his relationship with Kelsey.
“Implausible deniability” ain’t a thing.
Give me a break. She knew.
And we don't know that KKL drove from ID to CO and back home again.
Good Morning all,
This I do not get because the Sonic video shows what kind of vehicle she is in.
And we don't know that KKL drove from ID to CO and back home again.
Two thoughts.
One, if KK’s best friend told the R’s about KK being solicited to commit murder (multiple times no less) months beforehand, why didn’t they recommend to the best friend that KK go to police or at least wear a wire? Seems like something lawyers would think of.
Both Idaho and Colorado are one party consent states. So why not talk to him over the phone about the murder plans and record it sometime in that 3 months?
Number two. I find it laughable that the best friend claims KK didn’t know PF was engaged and had a baby.
Most assuredly, when PF was asking KK multiple times to commit murder, he either explained why he wanted KB dead, or KK asked why.
Are we really expected to believe that motive for soliciting murder never came up?
Also didn’t this same best friend claim that PF wanted KB dead because she was crazy and dangerous to Baby K?
Clearly if that's the case, then KK knew who KB and Baby K were. Or are we supposed to believe that KK thought PF was just being a concerned citizen trying to save a random baby?
Good morning! It hasn't been reported in msm though, unfortunately, YET.
Buttttttt we did see what kind of vehicle she was in, another secret.![]()
Iirc, the motive was given in the R's interview. KB was crazy and he was afraid she was going to hurt baby K. So, she obviously knew about KB.Two thoughts.
One, if KK’s best friend told the R’s about KK being solicited to commit murder (multiple times no less) months beforehand, why didn’t they recommend to the best friend that KK go to police or at least wear a wire? Seems like something lawyers would think of.
Both Idaho and Colorado are one party consent states. So why not talk to him over the phone about the murder plans and record it sometime in that 3 months?
Number two. I find it laughable that the best friend claims KK didn’t know PF was engaged and had a baby.
Most assuredly, when PF was asking KK multiple times to commit murder, he either explained why he wanted KB dead, or KK asked why.
Are we really expected to believe that motive for soliciting murder never came up?
Also didn’t this same best friend claim that PF wanted KB dead because she was crazy and dangerous to Baby K?
Clearly if that's the case, then KK knew who KB and Baby K were. Or are we supposed to believe that KK thought PF was just being a concerned citizen trying to save a random baby?
I'm looking for my bucket. That nauseating feeling is coming over me againITA the whole "interview" is a bunch of disgusting lies and there is more to come I've read :\
I don’t buy that she was “scared,” and I have issues with the idea that he ever threatened her.
“Kelsey is so dangerous that she needs to be killed to protect the baby,” is one excuse.
But when you couple that with him essentially saying “I’m so dangerous that I will kill you if you don’t help,” it just doesn’t work.
Is Kelsey dangerous and that’s the justification? Or are both of you so dangerous that murdering to protect the baby is a moot point?
ETA: KK was likely still sleeping with PF, so he’s so dangerous that you are intimate with him? Ok then.
These are mutually exclusive ideas.