Proof isn’t required in the preliminary hearing. I’m sure they have the ping data however.Not to argue, but that isn't proof. I read the affidavit and quoted it in my earlier post.
Proof isn’t required in the preliminary hearing. I’m sure they have the ping data however.Not to argue, but that isn't proof. I read the affidavit and quoted it in my earlier post.
I saw today on HLN that iirc her sentence will be imposed after PF’s trial, is there a specific reason for that? (Sorry for rehash, I’m beyond the point of catching up)
Also, Where do you guys think he disposed of her remains that he “scooped up”?
Her deal was contingent upon her willingness to testify against him.I saw today on HLN that iirc her sentence will be imposed after PF’s trial, is there a specific reason for that? (Sorry for rehash, I’m beyond the point of catching up)
Also, Where do you guys think he disposed of her remains that he “scooped up”?
She must meet all requirements of the plea deal before she is sentenced. If she screws up, no deal!
Her deal was contingent upon her willingness to testify against him.
Once his trial is over, she will have fulfilled her end of the bargain.
As for where he dumped the remains, anything is possible really.
He could have put them in trash bags, and thrown them in a dumpster.
Or he could have dumped them in a river, dispersed them in the woods, possibly buried them.
I don’t think she’ll ever be found.
Yeah. This was about showing that they had enough evidence to proceed against HIM.Proof isn’t required in the preliminary hearing. I’m sure they have the ping data however.
whats the opposite of embellishment?That’s a hell of a story to make up.
There will be cell phone and financial transactions that support those trips, as well as her aunt’s statement.
I was shocked that she’d admit to something that made her look so horrible. But a deal’s a deal.
Wait but hasn’t she already? Sorry if this is a dumb question, I mean she already told them everything right, what else is there to do? What are the other requirements? Again sorry for rehash. It would be hard to find this answer in all these posts so thanks for answering.
Yeah, I definitely think she glossed over some details that would have made her look worse.whats the opposite of embellishment?
its like shes told the whole ugly story but removed the creamy (self incriminating ) layer.
the cleaning dried blood finished and outta dodge never to return....in 3-4 hours and time stamped trip to sonic after it just stinks false to me.
most of it gels just not that.
imo
whats the opposite of embellishment?
its like shes told the whole ugly story but removed the creamy (self incriminating ) layer.
the cleaning dried blood finished and outta dodge never to return....in 3-4 hours and time stamped trip to sonic after it just stinks false to me.
most of it gels just not that.
imo
Yes. She arrived WP the morning of 11/24.
Proof?
PF's trial and her speaking at the trial will determine a lot more. Questioning her will be the key and how she answers vs what she said before trial. IMO
You’re so right. Makes sense and thank you, major brain fart here. Don’t know why that wasn’t obvious to me...this is all so much info but you’re right, there’s so much more to go.m, thanks lindaromas![]()
Also, KB was very beautiful and independent. Imagine KB dating other men and telling PF and his mother that she wants sole custody and has found another man to marry to be "(step)daddy". Imagine the rage. I bet PF thought about all of this and I believe it was a motive, along with (I believe) humiliation from KB.
SF wasted NO TIME in filing for custody of baby K once PF was arrested.
I don't think there is solid proof, but they say her phone pinged in Idaho on Nov22 and 23 I believe. Was she with the phone? Great question, she had a few burners.
I wonder how many days it takes to mail a phone from Idaho to Colorado? I'm so new here, I don't know how to maneuver around and find files, Anyone have copy of pings for KK's phone Nov 22-24?
I think, the two nurses (Ma + KKL) agreed in fullest, that it would be easier for PF and themselves, KB would disappear forever. Further I think, one older nurse knew exactly, what possibilities the younger nurse would have at her workplace (taking drugs for anesthesia) and might have suggested something in that direction. SF might have suggested it to PF and PF to KKL, perhaps.
I'm behind and not able to read all posts, because my laptop always gets overheated on a current and high frequented thread. So my mentioning of some points maybe outdated. Excuse me, please.
I want to mention for example: There was blood all over KB's home - why, if a strong, overly raged, angry and hateful man did the beating? Why, if the beating was so very violent, that a tooth broke out of KB's sweet mouth? If KB's blood got on PF shoes, then it would explain some "large" (?) bloody footprints in the home, but it wouldn't explain spread blood on walls in more rooms than the "attack" room.
Btw: When I'm looking at pics of PF in his striped outfit, I don't recognize "large" feet, rather a smaller size (for men).
PF allegedly knew, he had knocked out one of KB's teeth including root and told KKL, where exactly to find the little tooth and collect it?? Why didn't mimosa PF collect it himself - I don't understand. KKL threw the tooth away (told about it) - but PF couldn't do it? You have to shake your head in disbelief, IMO.
I'm not sure, whether I can believe each part of KKL's story ......
Here’s a post from @Seattle1:
CO - Kelsey Berreth, 29, Woodland Park, Teller County, 22 Nov 2018 - #41 *ARREST*
Media thread (found on first post of every thread):
CO - CO - Kelsey Berreth, 29, Woodland Park, Media, Maps and Timelines *NO DISCUSSION*