CO CO - Kelsey Berreth, 29, Woodland Park, Teller County, 22 Nov 2018 - #42 *ARREST*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #61
Re the confusion on where the murder took place - the affidavit at 66 says living room but Sam Kramer reported the Slater testimony as having the murder take place in the back bedroom when he was tweeting during the hearing. See screenshot. Perhaps it was mistaken reporting but that is why there is confusion. Live blog: Patrick Frazee appears in court for preliminary hearing
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20190221-192454_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20190221-192454_Chrome.jpg
    90.2 KB · Views: 10
  • #62
I think it is a burner. They did say KK used burner phones.
I would think she would have had a Colorado number burner phone to pretend she was a neighbor of KB since she gave KB her number of the burner phone.
 
  • #63
Ok I see your point I guess I’m still unsure about why investigators stated that they have no information (google or phone pings) regarding her location during the “Berreth murder”. Shouldn’t they have been able to ping her in Idaho on Thanksgiving ? There is nothing aside from eye witness accounts stating she was there. I guess I just want proof she was in Idaho on nov. 21-22 2018.
Me too.
 
  • #64
What is a burner phone exactly? I know it's a "fake" phone, but did it get its name because you burn it at the end?

Yes, I seriously don't know.

A burner is a cheap, pre-paid phone that is difficult to trace if you pay cash for the phone and the minutes.
 
  • #65
It's one of those things that are SO BIZARRE to bring up


It would be helpful if they avoided the pronoun here, this is why it is so open to interpretation. Did they mean HIS phone was in the area or are they saying the other phone ALSO was in the area.
I interpret it to say the other (Idaho) phone pinged in Divide.
 
  • #66
I'm not saying I doubt she was in possession of the vehicle, I am doubting the date/reason it was switched. I am convinced KK made it a point to NOT have her own vehicle when driving to CO for nefarious purposes. I'm pretty sure KK asked the friend to switch, not the other way around.
Yes, and that would make MG dishonest, IMO. What else might this friend lie about to help KK? Did she lie about the date that they switched cars?
MOO
 
  • #67
Respectfully, the tower reference here applies to PF's phone and/or location, and NOT the instrument with an Idaho number.

PF was near KB's townhome when he called Idaho number, and his phoned pinged off a tower near KB's home (i.e., tower southwest of KB's townhome). When Idaho number called him back, his phone pinged from the same tower location (i.e., he was still near KB's townhome).

When PF received a 2nd call from the Idaho number, CBI Agent Slater said PF's phone pinged a tower near Divide -- which would be a tower near his home.

Also on 4/22, it was previously reported that PF called his Mom--SF, and PF's phone pinged the same tower near KB's townhome.

4/22?
 
  • #68
Noted in the Arrest Affidavit KKL was taped and recorded so her interview is evidence as of that date. Regardless of what transpires her testimony is fixed. She will be cross-examined but even if she is not available there is this evidence.
 
  • #69
The Gun? Why mention it to CB and why tell KK to take it to Idaho?
I think he said it was so it would look like KB had gone off to commit suicide, reportedly. Imo
 
  • #70
The Gun? Why mention it to CB and why tell KK to take it to Idaho?
They're idiots and just winging it,making stuff up as they go.
 
  • #71
And Divide is 10 min away from Florissant. Did the 208 (Idaho) number ping from the Frazee ranch?
That info wasn't divulged. It may have.
 
  • #72
Colorado law does NOT permit criminal trials to be live streamed.

There are only two criminal court hearings eligible for "Expanded Media Coverage" (EMC) (i.e., audio/video inside the courtroom) -- advisements and arraignments. These two hearings may be televised upon prior approval from the court.

Take note the last hearing on 2/19 was not eligible and/or live streamed because it was a preliminary hearing, which is not permitted.

not familiar with felony arraignments in CO but in many states they are not very long and sometimes take place via closed circuit tv links between the jail and the court. any idea what to expect in this case?
 
  • #73
Noted in the Arrest Affidavit KKL was taped and recorded so her interview is evidence as of that date. Regardless of what transpires her testimony is fixed. She will be cross-examined but even if she is not available there is this evidence.
She has to testify or they have no case. It would be hearsay unless she gives testimony.
 
  • #74
Yes, I'm very curious about that too. How do they not know who that number belongs to?
Oh, I think they know. All they had to do is subpoena records tied to the number. They just don't want us to know prior to trial.
 
  • #75
This trial will probably be a long ways off.

The arraignment is April 8.

With a case this complex, and the amount of evidence that has to be analyzed, it sure as hell won’t proceed to trial anytime soon.

I do think it’ll be televised though.

Edited to change “preliminary hearing” to “arraignment.”

I really, really hope this trial is televised!

I missed the previous thread being open while driving home, but wanted to say your posts #1100 and #1221 stood out ... you’re always the voice of reason in such a clear manner, which is why I enjoy hearing your thoughts.
 
  • #76
Does anyone think there may be a future arrest (s)?
 
  • #77
A burner is a cheap, pre-paid phone that is difficult to trace if you pay cash for the phone and the minutes.
Right, like a tracfone.
I've read that LE can have difficulty retrieving data from them, because even if the company is a big company like Verizon, they may call the company only to find out it has been leased by Tracfone. By that time the user may have replaced the phone with a new one. Imo
 
  • #78
So shortly after the first Idaho call he got in 4/22 he received a 2nd Idaho call which pinged from s tower in Divide. Divide is 36 miles from Colorado Springs. How shortly after???
 
  • #79
It's one of those things that are SO BIZARRE to bring up


It would be helpful if they avoided the pronoun here, this is why it is so open to interpretation. Did they mean HIS
Re the confusion on where the murder took place - the affidavit at 66 says living room but Sam Kramer reported the Slater testimony as having the murder take place in the back bedroom when he was tweeting during the hearing. See screenshot. Perhaps it was mistaken reporting but that is why there is confusion. Live blog: Patrick Frazee appears in court for preliminary hearing
.
I saw this as well. I had speculated that because the child was secured this is when a mom might go upstairs briefly. This would be a time to bring up a weapon. For some reason, I thought this was also used as an office.
 
  • #80
Does anyone think there may be a future arrest
Yes. Mays made no bones about it when he stated there could be more arrests. He put them on notice loud and clear.
MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
55
Guests online
2,434
Total visitors
2,489

Forum statistics

Threads
632,860
Messages
18,632,653
Members
243,315
Latest member
what123
Back
Top