NCTeacher
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2016
- Messages
- 642
- Reaction score
- 3,564
We learned much about this early in the investigation from CB media interviews and MSM news quotes from family. Please see the Media Thread for this case-- it's a treasure trove!
For years, KB was living under false hope that she and PF would be purchasing their own ranch, and marrying. Engagement was not a joke to KB, but it sure was to PF. PF cited cattle market price decline for dragging his feet, and KB eventually purchased her own place.
IMO, PF was very comfortable living with SF, and had no intention of budging. KB had no intention of living with her MIL, and why would she want to. Yes, finance arguments a given under these circumstances.
Seattle, I am aware of ALL of this. I generally have a good knowledge of cases before I comment on them. One exception to your comment: KB wasn't under this impression for "years" in January 2017, it was only months. Which leads me back to my point:
It was AWFULLY early in their relationship to be at a point of having such a serious financial conversation that someone reportedly put a gun to his/her head. Obviously, after a period of months, we are not talking about serious financial concerns such as: divorce, taking someone's livelihood (property, retirement, inheritance), financing college for the children (there weren't any yet), or rearing children.
In other words, I'm doubting the veracity of these claims. I don't think this happened at all. KB strikes me as a mature, grounded, driven person who was not prone to emotional outbursts over finances with a man-child.