CO CO - Kelsey Berreth, 29, Woodland Park, Teller County, 22 Nov 2018 - #49 *ARREST*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,021
ITA. I think he was the instigator and she would have been fine with it if he'd done it without her involvement. I think he used her "love" for him to manipulate her.

I tend to lean this way as well.

Heck as crazy as it sounds, there are still people out there that are still convinced that NK was with CW when he killed his family....

And heck maybe they both were, but I haven't seen any evidence of it in either case. MOO
 
  • #1,022
I think the moment she confided in her friend was a pivotal moment. I think she'd started developing tunnel vision: the world shrank to PF, herself and KB. I think if you had suddenly asked her "where do you see yourself and PF in five years?", you would have gotten a blank look. She wasn't thinking that far ahead, or she would have realized there was no way she and PF were ever likely to be together. He was never going to leave the ranchette and she wasn't likely to be able to take her kids to join him there.

What saddens me is that her friend behaved the way she did. If someone I knew came to me with a story like this and I realized she was not talking hypotheticals, she was talking about real solicitations to commit murder, I would have lost it. I would have called her crazy and told her that if she didn't immediately notify LE in my presence, I'd notify them myself. I would have left her with no doubt in her mind that she had lost her mind.

The fact that the friend seems to have taken it all so passively probably only encouraged KK to go ahead.

Such great points. I see paragraph one a bit different but it is really the same. To me, she had no problem moving onto the ranchette in her limited vision. She already traveled miles upon miles to Colorado time and again, we know I think of at least two Vegas area trips (just in the time frame we have info on), etc. This woman and ma may have well got along (thus far). She may well have met her when she was 19 and now again. KK was not home playing mom well but who knows, maybe she did on occasion, but I would even wonder how involved that was except when she had to. I suspect she would have told herself her children were fine with her ex/their daddy and justified that and traveled to see them every so often after moving in with PF and ma. Or thought in her limited vision her own children would come to the ranchette and ride the range with her every summer and do an occasional trip to Sonic. Don't ask me where her 13 year old fantasies come from but it is not real world. I do agree she had not thought about a five year plan that was realistic but I would bet she had one that was very unrealistic.

She seemed to have an ex that whenever she needed she could come up with a lie and go and fly as she pleased. She lives no real life except for maybe her job and even with that, she is not the type that could sit home bored. She has never been able to handle real life. Too many princess movies, then Harlequin romances (where suspected bad guy often turns out to be a good guy and horses are often involved). She had rodeo queen and then started getting a taste of what real life was.

There is some reason her ex was still with her. I know the easy answer is parenting. I wonder though if he had reason to worry and it was better for the kids if he was around as much of possible because of her flighty ways (or more).

I actually agree I just think she did have a vision in her head that was very unrealistic nor thought out past juvenile dreams but it is basically the same thing.

The second paragraph, no kidding. I would have called LE in an instant if KK refused to. The attorneys said the friend came to them pretty upset so we know she took it seriously. Her friend failed, so did the attorneys. In degrees though KK failed, she knew the PF, the where, who KB was, that there was a baby involved, etc. Maybe they did too (from KK) but we have no indication of that.

Apologize for the longwinded post and all of it is jmo and speculation.
 
  • #1,023
I agree I think the actual act of KBs murder is pretty straight forward. It shouldn't take a group of rocket science jurors to be able to connect those dots....
And he didn't report KB missing, didn't plead for her return, told numerous lies to CB when she called, didn't appear at the press conference, etc.
 
  • #1,024
Something that never crossed my mind until just now. So PF and KK reconnected in whatever, like 2018 or some such right and before that a bit on a fundraiser before "reconnecting". >modsnip - using the name of a non-suspect< This would be when KB first showed on the scene in Colorado wouldn't it?

From the little we know, they were both rodeo circuit which is a circuit. He was her "first love". So I am now thinking I am having a bit of trouble believing this was the first encounter on the circuit after so many years. At least in even passing or recognizing each other and probably talking (KK and PF). How often did KB attend with him in her early days in Colorado? If, as relationships typically go, you do more of that in the "dating" phase/early on, involving yourself in the other's interests... And KK never knew about her...? Or knew she was with PF?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,025
Part 3 - Timeline updated
Timeline - PART 3
(March 1, 2019 - June 24, 2019)

March 1, 2019 - Friday
  • PF filed a motion in Teller County District Court asking a judge to deny a claim by Berreth’s parents. Colorado’s wrongful death statute clearly states that the Berreths have no standing to make a legal claim based on the alleged wrongful death of Kelsey Berreth, the motion says.
March 4, 2019 - Monday
  • PF - Legal Argument Hearing - 8:30 am
Inmate #: 2018001543
Booking #: 18-02029
Case #: D602018CR330
  • Judge agreed to unseal 22 of the 28 search warrants, he did not allow the exhibits displayed at the preliminary hearing to be made public. Both the prosecution and defense agreed that they did not want those released ahead of the trial. Some of the 22 warrants to be made public this week detail records from Verizon, Google and Facebook.
  • The state and defense agreed to move a decision about consumptive evidence testing until after PF’s arraignment. Consumptive testing involves evidence that can only be tested one time, likely due to the size of the evidence or the material in question.
March 6, 2019 - Wednesday
  • Search warrants released
Colorado Judicial Branch

March 7, 2019 - Thursday
  • Motion filed by defense
March 11, 2019 - Monday
  • PF Wrongful Death - Scheduling and Planning Conference - 1:30 pm (Vacated pending a ruling on motion filed by defense on 3/7/19)
Case: 19-cv-00027-PAB-KMT

April 4, 2019 - Thursday
  • Disposition Hearing (Custody) - 8:30am
Case #: D602018JV26
Colorado Judicial Branch - Court Docket Search

April 5, 2019 - Friday
  • PF - Arraignment - 8:30 am
Inmate #: 2018001543
Booking #: 18-02029
Case #: D602018CR330

June 24, 2019 - Monday
  • KK- Review Hearing - 11 am - Teller County
Case #: D602019CR17
(KK is allowed to appear for review hearings by phone until closer to sentencing)

KB, PF and KK’s cell phone communication and locations information between Nov. 22 - Dec. 4
  • Nov. 22, 2018 - The analysis of the cell phone data revealed that KB and PF cellular phones connected to the same Verizon tower in WP at 12:23 p.m when KB missed a call from PF at 12:31 p.m.
  • Nov. 22, 2018 - Both KB and PF’s phones were seen by towers near Cripple Creek in the evening, traveling in the same directions and often similar distances from the cell towers hen measurements were captured by the Verizon network. This would indicate the phones were likely together.
  • Nov. 22, 2018 - KK spoke with PF at 4:30 p.m. PF texted KK asking for her to call him. PF eventually called KK, saying, she had to get to CO because she had a mess to clean up. KK interpreted that as KB was dead. Cell phone records support this cell phone conversation.
  • Nov. 23, 2018 - both KB and PF’s phones utilized the Verizon cell tower in Florisant, along with the sector facing PF’s residence when PF’s phone called KB’s phone in the morning. Later in the day, both phones then appear to travel together from the area of PF’s residence towards the same area west of Cripple Creek and both phones had visited the prior evening before returning in the direction of PF’s residence.
  • Nov. 24, 2018 - Both KB and PF’s phones utilized the Verizon cell tower in Florisant, along with the sector facing PF’s residence when PF’s phone called KB’s phone first thing in the morning. Both phones eventually travel to same area west of Cripple Creek.
  • Nov. 24, 2018 - Call records indicate PF and KK communicated at 7:23 a.m., 10:47 a.m., 11:39 a.m., 1:06 p.m. and 5:21 p.m. (KK initially told LE she was at PF’s residence at this time)
  • Nov. 24, 2018 - KK’s cell phone was connected to a cell tower and also to a sector of that tower that would service KB’s residence on the morning of Nov. 24, 2018. The tower is some distance from the PF residence and likely wouldn’t service his residence.
  • Nov. 24, 2018 - KK sent Meghan a text message in the afternoon, asking if she could stay the night at her house because she had too much to drink. Meghan said the content of the message was false and was only meant to establish an alibi in case CL checked KK’s phone or called Meghan to see where KK was.
  • Nov. 24 and or Nov. 25, 2018 - KB’s cellular phone likely traveled from CO via I 70 into Utah and I 15 through Salt Lake City into Idaho during the evening of Nov. 24 and/or the morning of Nov. 25.
  • Nov. 24 and or Nov. 25, 2018 - KK’s phone traveled back to Idaho on the 24th or 25th of November. KK’s phone was connected to the exact same tower an sectors in a remote area of the Colorado/Utah border on the morning of Nov. 25. KK’s phone was connected to the tower at approximately 4:13 a.m., 4:17 a.m. and 4:23 a.m. KB’s phone was connected to the tower at approximately 4:11 a.m. and 4:16 a.m.
  • Nov. 25, 2018 - Last activity for KB’s phone at 5:13 p.m. approximately 6.38 W/Sw from a Verizon cell tower in Gooding, Idaho. That distance placed the phone at or near Malad Gorge State Park, which is supported by additional tower measurements from Verizon in the minutes leading up to that data point.
  • Nov. 25, 2018 - KK was in cell phone communication with PF on her return trip to Idaho, including shortly after the last activity of KB’s cell phone.
  • Dec. 4, 2018 - KK lost her cell phone and purchased a replacement Samsung device. (same day LE seized PF’s cell phone.
  • Dec. 4, 2018 - LE seized PF’s cell Phone
LINKS:
Colorado Judicial Branch Docket Search: Colorado Judicial Branch - Court Docket Search
Teller County Jail Lookup: Archonix XJail Public
4th District Cases of Interest: Colorado Judicial Branch - 4th Judicial District - Homepage
People of CO v. PF: Colorado Judicial Branch
People v. KLK: Colorado Judicial Branch
Custody Docket: Colorado Judicial Branch - Court Docket Search
Case#: D602018JV26
Year = 2018
Case Class = JV
Case Sequence = 26

Amended Civil Action Complaint: http://media.graytvinc.com/documents/Amended+complaint+vs+Patrick+Frazee.pdf

Sam Kraemer Twitter: Sam Kraemer (@SamKraemerTV) | Twitter
Clayton Sandell Twitter: Clayton Sandell (@Clayton_Sandell) | Twitter
Kayna Whitworth Twitter: @KaynaWhitworth
Becky Perlow Twitter: @gobeckygo
Carol McKinley Twitter: @CarolAMcKinley
Emily Shapiro Twitter: @EmilyShapiroABC
Lance Benzel Twitter: Lance Benzel (@lancebenzel) | Twitter
KB Twitter Search: kelsey berreth - Twitter Search
 
  • #1,026
I would be curious to learn what all was actually in the report from SS on the day that Baby K was born. CB says that PF was mad at the nurses bc of him and KB not being able to be with the baby immediately after giving birth. But she also says that the baby was taken away until SS could determine weather PF was abusive towards KB. So it begs the question of not only what PF was saying to the nurses, but what was he saying to KB? Seems like there must have been some pattern of abuse in their relationship, as people like PF generally are even more abusive when somebody is not watching.
 
  • #1,027
March 11, 2019 - Monday
  • PF Wrongful Death - Scheduling and Planning Conference - 1:30 pm (Vacated pending a ruling on motion filed by defense on 3/7/19)
Case: 19-cv-00027-PAB-KMT





Could it be possible that the motion by the defense was that the evidence that likely would be presented could have an effect on PF criminal trial?

Or would it be totally unrelated?
 
  • #1,028
Something that never crossed my mind until just now. So PF and KK reconnected in whatever, like 2018 or some such right and before that a bit on a fundraiser before "reconnecting". Didn't Chad say something about 2016 she was cheating with PF on him? This would be when KB first showed on the scene in Colorado wouldn't it?

From the little we know, they were both rodeo circuit which is a circuit. He was her "first love". So I am now thinking I am having a bit of trouble believing this was the first encounter on the circuit after so many years. At least in even passing or recognizing each other and probably talking (KK and PF). How often did KB attend with him in her early days in Colorado? If, as relationships typically go, you do more of that in the "dating" phase/early on, involving yourself in the other's interests... And KK never knew about her...? Or knew she was with PF?


2006
  • KK told FBI she and PF met each other at a dude ranch in 2006.
2010
  • KK and CL married.
2016
  • CL stated KK and PF dated in college and the two were involved in a sexual relationship during at least 2016 and possibly into 2017.
April 29, 2016 - Friday
  • KK filed for divorce from CL
June 27, 2016 - Monday
  • Idaho court records - KK/CL final Judgement and Decree occurred on June 27, 2016
January 1, 2017 - Sunday
  • Around New Years Day 2017, PF took KB’s gun because the couple was arguing about finances and KB said “maybe I would be better off dead.” And pointed the gun to her head.
October 2017 (going by tweets - unsure if 2017 or 2018)
  • Slater says KK & PF reconnected in Oct. 2017 talking about a fundraiser.
March 2018
  • KK came out to Colorado in March 2018 and started a intimate relationship with PF at that time. KK says she didn’t know about KB or Baby K.
May 2018
  • KB purchase home - 2 bedroom, 1 bath Duplex/Townhouse
Summer of 2018
  • Arrest Affidavit - KK and CL divorced (married for 8 years and still share a home in Idaho together raising their 2 children) - (Idaho court records - KK/CL final Judgement and Decree occurred on June 27, 2016)
August 2018
  • KK told police she didn't know about KB and the Baby K until 5 months after they started seeing each other. (which would be around this time if going by March 2018)
  • KB admitted herself in an anxiety and depression clinic for 2 weeks. Slater said the clinic KB went to a center for anxiety and depression treatments. KB was there in August of 2018. The clinic is the Nedley Clinic in CA. It doesn’t address drug/alcohol issues. The clinic told CB that KB didn’t check in there in November.
September 1 - November 22, 2018
  • PF asked KK to kill KB on three separate occasions during this time period.
 
  • #1,029
Yeah, somewhere along the way, the tote became a bag.

It isn’t, although that’s where my mind goes when I hear the word “tote.” I think reporters likely made the same mistake.

I too, am puzzled about the discoloration on the hay.

I suppose that it’s possible that when PF brought the tote into the house, he rolled it or placed it on top of Kelsey’s blood.

That’s the only explanation I have as so how blood could get into the hay (if it was blood).
I believe the discoloration is as simple as the temperature differentiation of a cooling body, causing moisture differences in hay. Hay is very particular to moisture changes, this the efforts to put it in a covered storage or tarp it.
 
  • #1,030
March 11, 2019 - Monday
  • PF Wrongful Death - Scheduling and Planning Conference - 1:30 pm (Vacated pending a ruling on motion filed by defense on 3/7/19)
Case: 19-cv-00027-PAB-KMT





Could it be possible that the motion by the defense was that the evidence that likely would be presented could have an effect on PF criminal trial?

Or would it be totally unrelated?
I’m thinking it could be. Any idea how and when we hear what this motion by defense was?
 
  • #1,031
I believe the discoloration is as simple as the temperature differentiation of a cooling body, causing moisture differences in hay. Hay is very particular to moisture changes, this the efforts to put it in a covered storage or tarp it.
That would make sense. No matter what, the discoloration in the hay, as well as subsequent hits by a cadaver dog, support KK’s account that PF kept Kelsey’s body there.

It’ll be interesting to see what the lab results say.
 
  • #1,032
Something that never crossed my mind until just now. So PF and KK reconnected in whatever, like 2018 or some such right and before that a bit on a fundraiser before "reconnecting". Didn't Chad say something about 2016 she was cheating with PF on him? This would be when KB first showed on the scene in Colorado wouldn't it?

From the little we know, they were both rodeo circuit which is a circuit. He was her "first love". So I am now thinking I am having a bit of trouble believing this was the first encounter on the circuit after so many years. At least in even passing or recognizing each other and probably talking (KK and PF). How often did KB attend with him in her early days in Colorado? If, as relationships typically go, you do more of that in the "dating" phase/early on, involving yourself in the other's interests... And KK never knew about her...? Or knew she was with PF?

During those years (college 'breakup' to 2016) both of them were in relationships at times. KK got married and presumably was in love and faithful, at least for a while, and PF had at least two relationships before KB, IIRC - the woman he cheated on while she was in hospital and the woman who was on Dateline a few days ago.

I'm curious about the 2016 to March 2018 period. KK's ex-husband says KK was seeing PF during 2016 and possibly (his word, IIRC) into 2017. KK says she and PF started hooking up again in March, 2018.

Was there a period from sometime in 2017 and March 2018 when KK and PF weren't 'seeing' each other?

I looked to see when 'rodeo season' is - I didn't get a solid answer, but generally, it seems to run from March to September. If there was a period when PF and KK weren't seeing each other, it might have coincided with the rodeo off-season. I'm wondering if she wasn't a rodeo hookup until he decided to enlist her to kill KB.
 
  • #1,033
March 11, 2019 - Monday
  • PF Wrongful Death - Scheduling and Planning Conference - 1:30 pm (Vacated pending a ruling on motion filed by defense on 3/7/19)
Case: 19-cv-00027-PAB-KMT





Could it be possible that the motion by the defense was that the evidence that likely would be presented could have an effect on PF criminal trial?

Or would it be totally unrelated?

I don't know how it is in Colorado but I know in other states it has happened that a civil case can bring out information that a criminal case cannot. There are often depositions and testimony that in criminal cases is not always allowed. I do not think he has the option either of not testifying as he does in the criminal trial, etc. I watched one once where the civil trial helped bring a murder case that had never been able to be brought because the defendant told an entirely different story in sworn testimony than he told in the criminal case when questioned by authorities. It provides sworn testimony that can be used in the other case and help, and especially if a contradictory story is told.

It though can also hinder the criminal case--I think there is the ability to subpoena an officer, etc. as it relates to the civil case and jump the gun on the criminal case with facts that are not out there yet or things like that, cause more prejudice to a jury pool who may hear he was found guilty in the civil trial.

They cannot question PF as he is lawyered up in the criminal case but he would not have the same protections in the civil case I don't think. It could be helpful or cause damage.

I certainly do not know and am no expert whatsoever but this is based on what I have both seen personally and been advised. I don't want anyone taking my word for it though, just based on seeing some things--it would be a great question for an expert to weigh in on.

I wondered when it was first filed if there may be some reason for it as there is no rush... Except for the fact that they may want to file it while he still may have some assets which he likely will not once convicted.
 
  • #1,034
I don't know how it is in Colorado but I know in other states it has happened that a civil case can bring out information that a criminal case cannot. There are often depositions and testimony that in criminal cases is not always allowed. I do not think he has the option either of not testifying as he does in the criminal trial, etc. I watched one once where the civil trial helped bring a murder case that had never been able to be brought because the defendant told an entirely different story in sworn testimony than he told in the criminal case when questioned by authorities. It provides sworn testimony that can be used in the other case and help, and especially if a contradictory story is told.

It though can also hinder the criminal case--I think there is the ability to subpoena an officer, etc. as it relates to the civil case and jump the gun on the criminal case with facts that are not out there yet or things like that, cause more prejudice to a jury pool who may hear he was found guilty in the civil trial.

They cannot question PF as he is lawyered up in the criminal case but he would not have the same protections in the civil case I don't think. It could be helpful or cause damage.

I certainly do not know and am no expert whatsoever but this is based on what I have both seen personally and been advised. I don't want anyone taking my word for it though, just based on seeing some things--it would be a great question for an expert to weigh in on.

I wondered when it was first filed if there may be some reason for it as there is no rush... Except for the fact that they may want to file it while he still may have some assets which he likely will not once convicted.

Off topic

I wonder what assets he currently has?

I presume some cattle?

other livestock?

Truck?

I'm guessing the land is in SF name?

I'm not sure he has too many assets?
 
  • #1,035
I don't know how it is in Colorado but I know in other states it has happened that a civil case can bring out information that a criminal case cannot. There are often depositions and testimony that in criminal cases is not always allowed. I do not think he has the option either of not testifying as he does in the criminal trial, etc. I watched one once where the civil trial helped bring a murder case that had never been able to be brought because the defendant told an entirely different story in sworn testimony than he told in the criminal case when questioned by authorities. It provides sworn testimony that can be used in the other case and help, and especially if a contradictory story is told.

It though can also hinder the criminal case--I think there is the ability to subpoena an officer, etc. as it relates to the civil case and jump the gun on the criminal case with facts that are not out there yet or things like that, cause more prejudice to a jury pool who may hear he was found guilty in the civil trial.

They cannot question PF as he is lawyered up in the criminal case but he would not have the same protections in the civil case I don't think. It could be helpful or cause damage.

I certainly do not know and am no expert whatsoever but this is based on what I have both seen personally and been advised. I don't want anyone taking my word for it though, just based on seeing some things--it would be a great question for an expert to weigh in on.

I wondered when it was first filed if there may be some reason for it as there is no rush... Except for the fact that they may want to file it while he still may have some assets which he likely will not once convicted.
Thanks that makes a lot of sense.
 
  • #1,036
During those years (college 'breakup' to 2016) both of them were in relationships at times. KK got married and presumably was in love and faithful, at least for a while, and PF had at least two relationships before KB, IIRC - the woman he cheated on while she was in hospital and the woman who was on Dateline a few days ago.

I'm curious about the 2016 to March 2018 period. KK's ex-husband says KK was seeing PF during 2016 and possibly (his word, IIRC) into 2017. KK says she and PF started hooking up again in March, 2018.

Was there a period from sometime in 2017 and March 2018 when KK and PF weren't 'seeing' each other?

I looked to see when 'rodeo season' is - I didn't get a solid answer, but generally, it seems to run from March to September. If there was a period when PF and KK weren't seeing each other, it might have coincided with the rodeo off-season. I'm wondering if she wasn't a rodeo hookup until he decided to enlist her to kill KB.

Agree on the 2016 to 2018 for sure would like to know more.

I guess in the times before I wonder because to have a flame in your heart or head for all those years even through marriage, etc. says something. I would bet there are people that can identify with that (not with what she did, just with that first true love never gotten "over").

There could have always been hookups at such events but I certainly do not know that, just speculation, even while involved with others. At the very least though, I guess what I mean is he is her "first love" and if she saw him at other events through all of those years, she at least would be well aware of him when present at the same event. Based on her own first true love remark or however, it was put. Or only true love. I think it has been reported various ways, go figure :)

But yes, the 2016 to 2018 is interesting because it is also when KB came on the scene... That is the key part...
 
  • #1,037
I’m thinking it could be. Any idea how and when we hear what this motion by defense was?

A reporter tweeted earlier that it was a defense motion to stay case proceedings and discovery.

Eventually, one of the news networks will probably share the filing and we can learn more.

Otherwise, Colorado Court sites have links to fee based court record services where you can obtain the documents.
 
  • #1,038
Off topic

I wonder what assets he currently has?

I presume some cattle?

other livestock?

Truck?

I'm guessing the land is in SF name?

I'm not sure he has too many assets?
Per CB it didn’t sound as if he had a lot citing that they were having financial difficulties due to the price of livestock.
 
  • #1,039
2006
  • KK told FBI she and PF met each other at a dude ranch in 2006.
2010
  • KK and CL married.
2016
  • CL stated KK and PF dated in college and the two were involved in a sexual relationship during at least 2016 and possibly into 2017.
April 29, 2016 - Friday
  • KK filed for divorce from CL
June 27, 2016 - Monday
  • Idaho court records - KK/CL final Judgement and Decree occurred on June 27, 2016
January 1, 2017 - Sunday
  • Around New Years Day 2017, PF took KB’s gun because the couple was arguing about finances and KB said “maybe I would be better off dead.” And pointed the gun to her head.
October 2017 (going by tweets - unsure if 2017 or 2018)
  • Slater says KK & PF reconnected in Oct. 2017 talking about a fundraiser.
March 2018
  • KK came out to Colorado in March 2018 and started a intimate relationship with PF at that time. KK says she didn’t know about KB or Baby K.
May 2018
  • KB purchase home - 2 bedroom, 1 bath Duplex/Townhouse
Summer of 2018
  • Arrest Affidavit - KK and CL divorced (married for 8 years and still share a home in Idaho together raising their 2 children) - (Idaho court records - KK/CL final Judgement and Decree occurred on June 27, 2016)
August 2018
  • KK told police she didn't know about KB and the Baby K until 5 months after they started seeing each other. (which would be around this time if going by March 2018)
  • KB admitted herself in an anxiety and depression clinic for 2 weeks. Slater said the clinic KB went to a center for anxiety and depression treatments. KB was there in August of 2018. The clinic is the Nedley Clinic in CA. It doesn’t address drug/alcohol issues. The clinic told CB that KB didn’t check in there in November.
September 1 - November 22, 2018
  • PF asked KK to kill KB on three separate occasions during this time period.


Thank you, Tippy Lynn!

A couple things:

I would like to know who initiated the October 2017 (2018?) 're-connect' over the fundraiser?

If KK is to be believed, she found out about KB and Baby K around August, 2018 - and PF started 'soliciting' her sometime in September 2018.

He didn't waste much time, did he?
 
  • #1,040
A reporter tweeted earlier that it was a defense motion to stay case proceedings and discovery.

Eventually, one of the news networks will probably share the filing and we can learn more.

Otherwise, Colorado Court sites have links to fee based court record services where you can obtain the documents.
Thank you!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
72
Guests online
3,218
Total visitors
3,290

Forum statistics

Threads
632,659
Messages
18,629,793
Members
243,238
Latest member
talu
Back
Top