You know I don’t recall but did the prosecution ever state and prove what food was served at the Franch for thanksgiving?
Boy the defense could really have a field day with that.
Why try to hide that evidence?
That could be huge in this case
Lol.
You know I don’t recall but did the prosecution ever state and prove what food was served at the Franch for thanksgiving?
Boy the defense could really have a field day with that.
Why try to hide that evidence?
That could be huge in this case
Blood on the ceiling is easy to explain. Have you ever tried to wash something hard-surfaced in the sink and turned the water on at too high a pressure? It sends whatever you’re trying to wash off straight up (or straight into your face, depending on the angle). It creates splatter. We are more apt to turn a faucet too high when we are unfamiliar with it - i.e., in someone else’s home.Blood on the ceiling is a bit hard to explain in the bathroom.
Missed blood everywhere in visits prior is also a bit hard to explain whether the alleged murder that day was in the living room or the bathroom. Did Baby K's toys or anything test for bleach, dish soap or other residue from cleaning? The wiped down frig and more? I guess those answers will come.
As for search warrants and Swiffer (trademark) mop, more is always taken than matters on search warrants and much often ends up not mattering at trial. I doubt all numerous pairs of jeans and gray shirts and boots for instance are going to be relevant, or all teeth unless there are serial murders and teeth that are kept as trophies for him or his family.
As far as a Swiffer presumptive for blood, it could be KK gifting cleaning tools to SF after clean-up or they were even taken or loaned from SF and then returned, it could be SF cleaning up after KK or PF walking in with bloody shoes, it could be mopping up some hamburger blood after it leaked walking a package from the sink or butchering and more. We heard of presumptive tests but I do not recall confirmatory tests, a big difference, like iced tea powder being mistaken for drugs on initial testing and at preliminary but proven otherwise later and preliminary has a far lower threshhold than a verdict at trial.
Most people think highly of Sam, let's go back to a know affiliiate reporter in the area, a well known one now and way more familiar with the area and who was in the courtroom that day and some of his tweeted thoughts and how things came across to him at the preliminary. And some wonder why things are questioned. It is not even my opinion but it exists and it was tweeted from more than a few and commented on from people present in the courtroom, I think I will give their impressions and what they heard some credence versus people who were not present, myself humbly included.
BBM:
According to the courtroom updates on Twitter, Sheila Frazee invoked the Fifth Amendment, refusing to answer questions.
Sam Kraemer@SamKraemerTV
· Feb 19, 2019
Replying to @SamKraemerTV
Defense doesn’t have an opinion either way. Sheila’s attorney says he’s never seen this come up in a preliminary hearing. May says she has relevant evidence to this case (motive, certain dates when Krystal Kenney was here). @KOAA #KelseyBerreth #PatrickFrazee #KrystalKenney
Sam Kraemer@SamKraemerTV
May says she knows about a defendant showing up to her house on Thanksgiving. I’m assuming that’s Kenney, since Patrick lives with her. @KOAA #KelseyBerreth #PatrickFrazee #KrystalKenney
69
11:08 AM - Feb 19, 2019
This still exists today, it was not edited, called out as wrong nor taken down. See just for one link as an example: Patrick Frazee prosecutors put his mother on the stand at hearing in Kelsey Berreth murder case: Was Idaho nurse Krystal Lee Kenney in Colorado on Thanksgiving Day?
I also remind myself the entire plea deal is not public. What exactly was the hope and intent that day with ma called to the stand...
I still have hope KK is going as far down and for as many years or close to it as he is. I can dream.
<ModSnip> I do not bother to say much any longer here and never once have I thought PF is not guilty as sin as well. Perhaps even a few others, my mind is wide open to that.
To each their own but there is much here yet that should be worthy of discussion.
Just thoughts and jmo observations.
Blood on the ceiling is easy to explain. Have you ever tried to wash something hard-surfaced in the sink and turned the water on at too high a pressure? It sends whatever you’re trying to wash off straight up (or straight into your face, depending on the angle). It creates splatter. We are more apt to turn a faucet too high when we are unfamiliar with it - i.e., in someone else’s home.
It was still 'preferential' treatment. The bank manager stepped up to see if she could help them.
But that doesn't negate the fact that they were acting very shady and a call to LE was reasonable on her part. JMO
It notes in the SW that the Branch Manager reported PF was accompanied to the bank on 12/06 by an "unknown male."
Whoever this mystery dude with the wildly inappropriate "sense of humor" is that came in to the bank with PF probably isn't a valued customer, since the Branch Manager didn't know him from Adam. LE hasn't named the person publicly.
Yet.
The trial's still a long way off. I expect we'll be hearing names then, but not before.
JMO.
Blood on the ceiling is a bit hard to explain in the bathroom.
Missed blood everywhere in visits prior is also a bit hard to explain whether the alleged murder that day was in the living room or the bathroom.
Not just illogical but downright laughable.Yes. That assumption tweeted by Kraemer has led to some serious speculation on the threads but I think it's quite clear that assumption- not fact- was incorrect. Why? Because they didn't charge her with murder or accessory and LE knows fully well where she was on Thanksgiving by her phone pings, cell communications and witness statements, and they knew that fully well when she was interrogated and arrested.
Moreover, the evidence shows she asked to borrow a vehicle the day after and arrived in Colorado on the 24th, in that borrowed vehicle.
She was not seen at Kelsey's home the day of the murder, the last day Kelsey was seen alive, but PF was and KB's phone followed PF's that whole day, after he was last seen entering her home.
Further, cell records show he called KL's phone the day of the murder, soon after it was thought it have occurred, and that they had numerous calls on the 24th as she arrived in CO.
Kelsey Berreth case timeline: Everything we know so far
Some have tried to explain that away by saying KL was somehow in CO the day of the murder, drugged Kelsey to keep her alive for two days and then inexplicably drove back up to ID and down before killing her, or that she gave PF drugs to drug and hold Kelsey until KL could drive down and kill her.
Neither of those possibilities are remotely logical to me.
As difficult as it is to say, we can't assume PF didn't cut her body in half to fit it into the tote.Blood on the ceiling is easy to explain. Have you ever tried to wash something hard-surfaced in the sink and turned the water on at too high a pressure? It sends whatever you’re trying to wash off straight up (or straight into your face, depending on the angle). It creates splatter. We are more apt to turn a faucet too high when we are unfamiliar with it - i.e., in someone else’s home.
I believe that PF is fully capable of dismemberment, as he did burn Kelsey’s body after all.As difficult as it is to say, we can't assume PF didn't cut her body in half to fit it into the tote.
That would certainly cause some splatter or mist on the ceiling.
Vague memory of B*den-C*ay, he and his mistress. ???This may be off topic, but I'm racking my brains to remember what case we learned that this was something that escapes documentation. (Of when someone writes a draft in their email, but never sends it, but somebody else logs on to read it and then delete it.)
I believe you may be remembering General Petraeus and his lover. She was writing his autobiography or something and they had an affair and wrote drafts in an email account to communicate. I’m pretty sure it was them. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong.
Vague memory of B*den-C*ay, he and his mistress. ???
I remember thinking it was pretty clever of them at the time, as I had never heard of it before either. Wasn’t too clever. They got caught. LOL.Yes, thank you. I had never known it before that. It reminds me, I don't think we ever have actually seen it in a criminal case that I have followed here, just that one. I wonder if that still exists because I would think they would be able to see the ISP of people that log on, that is if they have a search warrant to do such and they thought it would make a difference at trial ?
Perhaps the difficulty is, is that the carrier does not capture and keep what was posted as the draft.
True statement, I am willing to bet they had verbal from KK exactly what was used for clean up, reason they confiscated the swiffer, bleach and green cleaner plus many more things. I also think SF would of had more cleaning products than just those 3, they were targeted with testing in mind. I would like to know of PF placed those things in the condo for KK to use on, or after the 22nd but before the 25 th.As far as the blood on the bleach bottle and Swiffer, I don't think it is that important. If it was the only possible evidence then it would matter. IMO, some tests for the presence of blood also react with bleach so further testing would be required to prove anything found was actually human blood. It would be nice for the prosecution if KB's blood is on the bleach bottle and/or the Swiffer. We don't know if there is some receipt floating around that shows PF or KK bought those products. We don't know if this might be the consumptive evidence that was initially thought to be very important. It is just one piece of the puzzle. MOO.
I think he most likely showered after the murder, he is a tall man and just shampooing his hair could of splashed blood spatter on the bathroom ceiling especially if his hands were bloody as well as other parts of his body.Yeah. That court testimony that I posted, had to do with the discovery of blood in the bathroom.
At the time, they believed that Kelsey may have been killed there.
This was before KK appeared, and gave her account to law enforcement.
I believe the blood is attributable to the cleanup efforts by KK, and likely PF as well.
Ha! I don’t know how you shower Hatch, but I’m not sure that’s it.I think he most likely showered after the murder, he is a tall man and just shampooing his hair could of splashed blood spatter on the bathroom ceiling especially if his hands were bloody as well as other parts of his body.
I think he most likely showered after the murder, he is a tall man and just shampooing his hair could of splashed blood spatter on the bathroom ceiling especially if his hands were bloody as well as other parts of his body.
Well apparently you two shower like a bunch of maniacs.Yep, agree with this completely, Hatch.
If PF showered at KB's after he murdered her, he could easily have splashed or sprayed blood up on the ceiling.
JMO.
Well the first thing in my experience is washing of the hair and getting your face wet to acclimate water temp, if PF did that and raised his hands to rub water off his face or put shampoo in his hands and went straight for the hair, I think he could of easily slung blood evidence on the ceiling.Ha! I don’t know how you shower Hatch, but I’m not sure that’s it.
I definitely think there’s a good chance that he did shower, but I don’t see that causing the blood on the ceiling.
I think it was some part of the cleanup process, likely a mop.