- Joined
- Apr 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,673
- Reaction score
- 17,074
This time of year, there are all sorts of Christmas decorations that can cause fires. Dry trees for greenery; faulty lights; faulty electrical decorations; candles.
Which brings up the point: except for the sheriff's statement that they are investigating this as a homicide, this death might have been accidental. For example, ML comes home to change clothes for the concert; puts clothes too close to a space heater and gets in the shower; the clothes start smoking heavily and eventually catch fire; ML gets out of the shower, starts screaming and throwing things around to try to put the fire out; she is overcome by smoke, passes out and dies of smoke inhalation.
In this case it sounds like it must have been pretty obvious.This struck me as odd the first time I heard it. . . .any thoughts on what this meant?: "Suspicious because of where the concentration of the fire is at."
This time of year, there are all sorts of Christmas decorations that can cause fires. Dry trees for greenery; faulty lights; faulty electrical decorations; candles.
If that were the case her body would have been easily found, the witness wouldn't have said *people* were arguing, witnesses wouldn't have seen a van leaving at a high rate of speed.Which brings up the point: except for the sheriff's statement that they are investigating this as a homicide, this death might have been accidental. For example, ML comes home to change clothes for the concert; puts clothes too close to a space heater and gets in the shower; the clothes start smoking heavily and eventually catch fire; ML gets out of the shower, starts screaming and throwing things around to try to put the fire out; she is overcome by smoke, passes out and dies of smoke inhalation.
Which brings up the point: except for the sheriff's statement that they are investigating this as a homicide, this death might have been accidental. For example, ML comes home to change clothes for the concert; puts clothes too close to a space heater and gets in the shower; the clothes start smoking heavily and eventually catch fire; ML gets out of the shower, starts screaming and throwing things around to try to put the fire out; she is overcome by smoke, passes out and dies of smoke inhalation.
In that exerpt.....the Under Sheriff says the one thing that has all of this community up in arms.
"NO BODY WAS FOUND AT THE FIRE SCENE"
For 6 days....people in this community hoped beyond anything that she was OK.
Did the SO outright lie?
That, or they have no idea what they are doingBaffling isn't it. The only plausible explanation that my brain keeps coming back to is that they are protecting someone.
Or they know exactly who is responsible or don't think the reported info is true so don't want the public chasing a false leadThat, or they have no idea what they are doing
I hope it doesn't come to that conclusion, but what if her remains are in the wooded area? Search parties always miss something the first time around.
~Who is the Belle Chasse John Doe?~
Oh. That is saddening to hear. Thank you for clearifying. This thread is long and I didn't get a chance to read all the replies.Body was found in house. No search parties were ever formed. They have a positive ID on the body. Law enforcement announced that last Thursday, Dec. 7. If you go back and read this thread, you will see how the investigation has unfolded.
It was definitely misleading, the way the communication was handled. I don't know why they thought it was okay to handle it the way they did. If they wanted her to be positively identified, then all they had to say was that they ML was missing, that they found a body, but that they were waiting to release a name until they had positive i.d.
They even could have postponed the announcement a reasonable time (24 hours?) to allow notification of next-of-kin. But then they needed to tell the public what was up.
People didn't know if she was dead or alive, if she had set fire to her house and run off, if she had been kidnapped, and I don't know how "no search parties at this time, continue to pray for the family, no danger to the public" is supposed to convey anything meaningful to the community.
If it was a tactic to fool the suspect, it was a bad one because they sure didn’t fool me. If a girl is missing and they are actively looking for her, you don’t ask if anyone had contact with her between certain hours the day she went missing. You ask if anyone has had contact with her ANYTIME since she left school.I keep coming back to the thought that they did it on purpose to try and get the suspect. Maybe by no mentioning the body the suspect might have thought she lived...or his fire cleaned up the eveidence. I think not mentioning a body was a tactic to try and get the suspect.
I also think they most likely identified her via dental records. So I imagine that took some time to get a confirmation.
The Emily Keyes murder will haunt me for the rest of my life. I'm a Colorado native, and I live about an hour from Bailey. Every time I drive past that high school I say a silent little prayer for Emily. Thank you so so much, Walter, for all the information you've shared!Look up Emily Keyes in Bailey Colorado.
The Emily Keyes murder will haunt me for the rest of my life. I'm a Colorado native, and I live about an hour from Bailey. Every time I drive past that high school I say a silent little prayer for Emily. Thank you so so much, Walter, for all the information you've shared!
Sent from my Alcatel_4060A using Tapatalk