Just knowledge of when Maggie supposedly arrived home around 4Are your saying that's what the tenant said? Because really he's the only one that would know.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Just knowledge of when Maggie supposedly arrived home around 4Are your saying that's what the tenant said? Because really he's the only one that would know.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Maggie's last post on her Instagram account lists the concert being Friday, Dec. 1 at 7 with the caption "Don't miss this show for the world."
Actually it supposedly happened above the living room - but it wouldn't matter either way. You can't actually know what was heard or not.And this apartment is right above the kitchen where everything happened,.
I haven't read through everything so sorry if it has been discussed but has the tenant been ruled out as having something to do with this?
The police said he was ruled out, but that doesn't mean anything. I've seen other cases where they "rule out" individuals when the reality is that those individuals are the only ones they're looking at, so I don't put a lot of stock in that.
The thing that bothers me the most in this case is that we believe Maggie got home about 4pm, and was expected to come right back...by 5pm people were already asking where she was....and the 911 call didn't come in until 7:01pm. So whatever was happening to Maggie had to have started pretty quickly after she got home...as it doesn't sound like she planned on being home very long, maybe 15-20 minutes, so the murderer(s) had to have either been there when she got home, or got there by 4:30 or so...definitely before 5pm. And they were still there at 7pm. No random thief who is just there to grab and go is going to spend 2+ hours in a home they are robbing. Whoever was there had to know damn well what they were after, and how long they had to get it. If there was a safe that they couldn't just pick up and take, then they took the time to break into it, and either they knew damn well they had plenty of time to do it, or were ready and prepared to kill anyone that may happen to come home during that time.
This was either an "inside job" or a "professional job", IMHO.
It seems to me that the person/people must have been comfortable enough in the home to stay there for the 2 or 3 hours he/she/they were most likely there for. Would they not be worried to see cars in the driveway? What if someone else were to stop by the house?
I'm curious as to whether she actually said she'd be right back. Not that it really matters, but if she wanted to shower or change or if she had to heat up the hot dogs and/or wrap them all of that would change the timeline.The police said he was ruled out, but that doesn't mean anything. I've seen other cases where they "rule out" individuals when the reality is that those individuals are the only ones they're looking at, so I don't put a lot of stock in that.
The thing that bothers me the most in this case is that we believe Maggie got home about 4pm, and was expected to come right back...by 5pm people were already asking where she was....and the 911 call didn't come in until 7:01pm. So whatever was happening to Maggie had to have started pretty quickly after she got home...as it doesn't sound like she planned on being home very long, maybe 15-20 minutes, so the murderer(s) had to have either been there when she got home, or got there by 4:30 or so...definitely before 5pm. And they were still there at 7pm. No random thief who is just there to grab and go is going to spend 2+ hours in a home they are robbing. Whoever was there had to know damn well what they were after, and how long they had to get it. If there was a safe that they couldn't just pick up and take, then they took the time to break into it, and either they knew damn well they had plenty of time to do it, or were ready and prepared to kill anyone that may happen to come home during that time.
This was either an "inside job" or a "professional job", IMHO.
Yes he was
I think Lugos comment was deleted And therefore your reply wasCan anyone explain what happened to my comment replying to something Lujo said?
Now that the memorial service is over and the sheriff's office isn't saying anything, this case has passed outside of the collective consciousness, and you won't see any more media stories. Might as well close this thread.
For those not from here, I just want to say that Pine Junction, where the restaurant and liquor store are, is a VERY SMALL community, and Bailey, where the other restaurant is (although it's been closed for months) is also very small. Even if you had both restaurants full every night, and had a line out the door at the liquor store, there is just only so much money you could make in these small towns, even in the summer with tourists. I struggle to understand how they afforded their huge home (I believe county records show they paid $531k for it.) We know that Maggie worked in the restaurants, but she also worked cleaning the Venue theater to help pay her program fees (tuition) there. Of course, it could be that her parents didn't just pay for everything to teach her responsibility, but I just can't see how they could have been pulling in a whole lot of money, and even less with one of the restaurants shut down for the past 6 months or so. And let's not forget that not only did they have the $531k house here in Bailey, they also owned a home in Conifer and one in Littleton. And if they were so rich as to be a target for something like this, why were they renting out the attic of their house? I don't understand the finances of the family at all, and would love to know where their "real" money came from...which adds to the mystery of who may have been at the home.
Sorry for rambling, just my thoughts this morning.
Did people in the community have questions about how they made their money prior to Maggie's death?For those not from here, I just want to say that Pine Junction, where the restaurant and liquor store are, is a VERY SMALL community, and Bailey, where the other restaurant is (although it's been closed for months) is also very small. Even if you had both restaurants full every night, and had a line out the door at the liquor store, there is just only so much money you could make in these small towns, even in the summer with tourists. I struggle to understand how they afforded their huge home (I believe county records show they paid $531k for it.) We know that Maggie worked in the restaurants, but she also worked cleaning the Venue theater to help pay her program fees (tuition) there. Of course, it could be that her parents didn't just pay for everything to teach her responsibility, but I just can't see how they could have been pulling in a whole lot of money, and even less with one of the restaurants shut down for the past 6 months or so. And let's not forget that not only did they have the $531k house here in Bailey, they also owned a home in Conifer and one in Littleton. And if they were so rich as to be a target for something like this, why were they renting out the attic of their house? I don't understand the finances of the family at all, and would love to know where their "real" money came from...which adds to the mystery of who may have been at the home.
Sorry for rambling, just my thoughts this morning.
For those that live down CR 43, do you recall their gate being left open with any frequency?
I don't recall seeing it open through the years but I don't drive by daily. If it's an automated gate, which I suspect it is, I don't know that there would be any reason to leave it open.
If the gate requires a code to get in, which I would also suspect, it would seem to help narrow down the possible suspects.