CO - Shanann Watts (34), Celeste"Cece" (3) and Bella (4), Frederick, 13 Aug 2018 *Arrest* #12

[Allabouttrial]

I am not sure how he can get his version of events admitted into the trial, unless he takes the stand. I guess he can rely upon his 'confession' tapes. But those aren't probably going to show him in a very credible light.

True, but the burden of proof is on the state to prove he did it. Although, nothing against public defenders, this is where he needs a good defense team. Mind you this could all be a moot point if the autopsies can prove he did it.........which I really hope they can. All MOO

 

[Seattle1]

Is your screen jumping to top of page even when typing post?

 

[Allabouttrial]

Is your screen jumping to top of page even when typing post?

Nope, I'm on PC.

 

[Jennifer17]

HOAX. This guy has been debunked. But that doesn't mean there aren't male hook ups out there, that he did meet on an app.

I am pretty sure he is hoaxing.

 

[Betty P]

I am pretty sure he is hoaxing.

What a bizarre thing to do, trying to insert yourself into the middle of such a heinous crime. I suppose some people will do anything for attention. Maybe he's mistaking this for someone else he met online or something?

 

[Talisman]

Oh my gosh, I’m behind, just seeing this, this has probably already been posted, has everyone here seen this video??? Wow just wow! How often does a victim get to tell her story like this! This video says so much I have so much feedback, wow just wow.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

What an amazing lady. I don't know how I missed this video either.
Thank you so much for posting this.

She was thrown away in a shallow pit ...
... and her very much loved daughters were put inside a crude/oil tank.

Just picture this:

Did their dad make sure Bella & Celeste were covered in the crude? Did he give their tiny bodies an extra push down into the crude with his hand? Sociopath - narcissist - psychopath - whatever you want to name it - CW is evil.

If I were able to give CW a personal message, it would be: Even in death Shanann's light will shine on! Even in death Shanann will always be more special than you! - and you will be forever known as a baby killer! The man who murdered a beautiful, pregnant, loving Mother!
That's what you will be remembered for. That and a waste of good clean air!

Shine on Shanann! We will always remember you, Celeste, and Bella. ♡

 

[Allabouttrial]

What a bizarre thing to do, trying to insert yourself into the middle of such a heinous crime. I suppose some people will do anything for attention. Maybe he's mistaking this for someone else he met online or something?

Bizarre but sadly all too common.

 

[kaykay543]

I know that we are not supposed to react, but that is just SO wrong. I'm disgusted that is allowed.

Agree. It always makes me sad to see women attack other women for what they look like. Not sure why so many women don't support other women.

 

[Inthedetails]

Soo....such developments in the case. Wow.

I was firm in my thoughts that financial ruin was the main motivator, with the added factor of wanting more sexual freedom. Now, I've changed my mind.

His squeaky-clean image as handsome father/husband was going to crash. Presenting their family as constant product endorsements likely didn't help (though I don't think the business was to blame for his actions, no way!).

SW's life was falling apart and he didn't have the guts, depth, smarts, decency to face his problems. Instead, he bundled up his vulnerable family members and threw them away and then gave himself a nice shave, put on a new t-shirt, and met the press.

Well, in a sense, his problems are solved. He'll be spending the rest of his life in jail and won't have to deal with finances, business, family, reputation. Of course, in the process, he devastated the lives of so many.

I think the meeting he wanted with his father at the police station was to brace his dad for the information that would come out about his son and perhaps alert the dad to things he might find in the house that would be upsetting.

jmo

 

[SN76]

Agree. It always makes me sad to see women attack other women for what they look like. Not sure why so many women don't support other women.

Jealousy.

 

[BabyButterfly]

Interesting. Im a homeowner in California and I didnt know this. I personally cant/wont live in a house that someone died in. I just cant. Nope nope nope. It freaks me out. Ill definitely be interrogating my real estate agent about the next house we buy..lol

I sat here and thought about this post. I realized, every single house I've lived in someone has died in. Some, more than one person. Died, not killed.

 

[mtnlites]

What a bizarre thing to do, trying to insert yourself into the middle of such a heinous crime. I suppose some people will do anything for attention. Maybe he's mistaking this for someone else he met online or something?

LOTS of people did it with the Delphi case. In fact, between the vloggers, bloggers, FB group leaders, and so-called "investigators" with their own web series, an entire cottage industry sprung up and ordinary joes who had never been to Indiana or met the family started thinking of themselves as rock stars of the case. Many, MANY people earned money from the crime (between the members only blogs, donations, t-shirt sales, etc) and they had zero to do with the case. They were sending the family (complete strangers) friend requests and then throwing their weight around SM and gaining groupies for supposedly being "in" with the family. My family up there now have to deal with "crime tourism" (people who drive hundreds of miles to see the murder site) and my LE cousin says they were getting hundreds of letters a week from strangers who hinestly believed they were "working the case" via the internet and then getting angry when LE wouldn't let them in on classified case info. I have no doubt that someone would've done something just like this with THAT case if they could have.

 

[PrimeSuspect]

Is your screen jumping to top of page even when typing post?

Yes, very strange.
Also, the site times me out even though I've ticked the 'stay logged in' box. Never happened on the old version. Gremlins

 

[Spellbound]

I can't imagine what kind of soulless, shadow of a human looks like that just days after he supposedly watched his wife murder his babies. He is evil. IMO he is evil. A horror of a person.

I watched the 3-part interview videos with no audio and even then I had the impression he was "nervous" but not really upset. There was a lot of licking his lips, some shrugs, he seemed to have a sense of controlled-calm.

JMO

 

[Inthedetails]

I watched the 3-part interview videos with no audio and even then I had the impression he was "nervous" but not really upset. There was a lot of licking his lips, some shrugs, he seemed to have a sense of controlled-calm.

JMO

He has some practice at hiding the truth.

jmo

 

[bears10]

Home of the free?

You are free to live in a home with no HOA, as many many people do.

 

[AllGrace]

Ok, DAdvocate. Silent after the People article. Pops back in with a handful of "I was wrong, he killed them all" and then silent again. In the meantime, "news" broke about one of the APs being interviewed. Many have asked DAdvocate to explain themselves.....waiting....

 

[Inthedetails]

My hunch with the hoaxer who was interviewed last night (and I do suspect he's a con artist) is that he did indeed see CW's online dating presence and then exploited that. I don't know if CW and this person hooked up - I'm kind of thinking no, but who knows.

If they did, I don't think CW would be that interested in him and frankly, CW could do better. (Geez, that's weird to say considering I think CW is horrible, but I hope you know what I mean.) In other words, I don't think this pair had a thing going for months. I think the hoaxer studied the SM of the couple and pretended to know about them. jmo

But, there is likely a grain of truth in that CW was seeking partners outside of the marriage and likely was tossing a wide net and keeping busy. Perhaps it all escalated sharply in the six weeks alone.

I also wonder, like someone posted above, if the dr appoint was to check for STDs. That is a very good question. In that case, it's entirely possible the friend knew about the appointment, but not CW. Just an idea, not fact.

jmopinion at the moment

 

[mtnlites]

My hunch with the hoaxer who was interviewed last night (and I do suspect he's a con artist) is that he did indeed see CW's online dating presence and then exploited that. I don't know if CW and this person hooked up - I'm kind of thinking no, but who knows.

If they did, I don't think CW would be that interested in him and frankly, CW could do better. (Geez, that's weird to say considering I think CW is horrible, but I hope you know what I mean.) In other words, I don't think this pair had a thing going for months. I think the hoaxer studied the SM of the couple and pretended to know about them. jmo

But, there is likely a grain of truth in that CW was seeking partners outside of the marriage and likely was tossing a wide net and keeping busy. Perhaps it all escalated sharply in the six weeks alone.

I also wonder, like someone posted above, if the dr appoint was to check for STDs. That is a very good question. In that case, it's entirely possible the friend knew about the appointment, but not CW. Just an idea, not fact.

jmopinion at the moment

That's kind of what I was thinking about the guy from last night, too. I can buy that CW had a male companion like that, just not buying that it was necessarily THIS guy. I mean, at this point I could probably offer enough details about CW to make people believe that I slept with him. A few general things here, a few specific things there, etc.

 

[castilloisno1]

I just went to study the news articles on the family and am shocked at how quickly the story about "this gay lover" has literally spread across the entire world! So many news sources are quoting the interview and the average person who reads it are going to take it as 100 % fact. I am really surprised that that the show allowed it to run and be unverified. I am in NO way a CW supporter,but I hate that this is becoming a huge circus,before the funeral of those 4 special people. The focus should be on them..IMO