- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 45,429
- Reaction score
- 473,416
Can't even let my mind go there....Now, if - if! - CW was into choking during sex, am I the only one who finds this, and the fact that his daughters were probably choked, incredibly scary?
Can't even let my mind go there....Now, if - if! - CW was into choking during sex, am I the only one who finds this, and the fact that his daughters were probably choked, incredibly scary?
The choking itself is being done for different reasons. One is sexual and the other is to commit a murder. That aside, he may have felt comfortable with that method, and used it for an obviously nefarious purpose.Now, if - if! - CW was into choking during sex, am I the only one who finds this, and the fact that his daughters were probably choked, incredibly scary?
I've been told, and I've read, that choking is very common in domestic violence because it is the ultimate power and control; breath and life itself.The choking itself is being done for different reasons. One is sexual and the other is to commit a murder. That aside, he may have felt comfortable with that method, and used it for an obviously nefarious purpose.
Some serial killers will choke their partners during sex, and choke their victims during the commission of murder. In this case, both acts are sexual.
Now, if - if! - CW was into choking during sex, am I the only one who finds this, and the fact that his daughters were probably choked, incredibly scary?
Absolutely. And if you think about it, it’s a relatively easy, and clean, way to commit a murder, especially when you have a size and strength advantage. It takes time, but there isn’t much cleanup.I've been told, and I've read, that choking is very common in domestic violence because it is the ultimate power and control; breath and life itself.
The choking itself is being done for different reasons. One is sexual and the other is to commit a murder. That aside, he may have felt comfortable with that method, and used it for an obviously nefarious purpose.
Some serial killers will choke their partners during sex, and choke their victims during the commission of murder. In this case, both acts are sexual.
A couple of people have said this but the only thing I saw was the friend saying that he had heard CW and SW were thinking of selling the house. Like they had discussed it prior to the events. I haven’t seen anything (except on here) that made it sound like CW suddenly said he was going to sell the house after she went missingAnd talking to his friends about selling the house just a day after they disappeared. Well, he knew that they were not coming back, but you would think that he would at least put up a pretence that they were.
Didn't bother him.
I highly doubt it. If that’s the case, why not attempt to revive her and call 911. And why kill the kids? It also doesn’t explain the coverup, putting the kids in oil, and the lack of emotion.Or it could have been sexual initially and turned into a death.
I highly doubt it. If that’s the case, why not attempt to revive her and call 911. And why kill the kids? It also doesn’t explain the coverup, putting the kids in oil, and the lack of emotion.
Things like that do happen, but I don’t see that here, especially taken with the financial troubles and (potential) affairs.
No they gave the reason that he had been arrested with his wife and children’s murder.I thought maybe the reason Anadarko gave him when they fired him was they had him on camera trying to cover a camera.
Can they legally do that? Isn’t he innocent until proven guilty?No they gave the reason that he had been arrested with his wife and children’s murder.
Maybe it was some type of ARM mortgage with an adjustable interest rate. Perhaps the payment was lower and more manageable in the beginning but were raised eventually, leading them to an out of reach monthly payment.
Aparantly in that state companies can fire for no reason, I’m not American so I’m not sure on the technicalities but some people have written about it on here. There is a common misconception that because he was fired on the Wednesday and was arrested late Wednesday night, that he was fired before they arrested him. However IMO they fired him with effect from the Wednesday. However the actual communication to him probably never happened or a letter, email was sent after the fact. I can’t imagine him taking a call from work whilst in the police station or afterwards in jailCan they legally do that? Isn’t he innocent until proven guilty?
Yes, and shutting off their voice. I think that that is part of it.I've been told, and I've read, that choking is very common in domestic violence because it is the ultimate power and control; breath and life itself.
Unless he is a member of a union, then yes, a company can do this in most states.Can they legally do that? Isn’t he innocent until proven guilty?
No. He talked to his friends about selling the house when he was staying with them just a day after his family disappeared. It is in the interviews that the Thayers gave. No friends have been interviewed that said that they were both thinking of selling the house.A couple of people have said this but the only thing I saw was the friend saying that he had heard CW and SW were thinking of selling the house. Like they had discussed it prior to the events. I haven’t seen anything (except on here) that made it sound like CW suddenly said he was going to sell the house after she went missing
Wouldn't it just be that he was let go? An employer in my state doesn't have to give a reason, just like an employee that decided to quit can do just that.Unless he is a member of a union, then yes, a company can do this in most states.
I’m not sure what Colorado law is, but all media reports have used the word “fired.”Wouldn't it just be that he was let go? An employer in my state doesn't have to give a reason, just like an employee that decided to quit can do just that.
Has it been reported that he was actually fired?
Where I live you cannot be just let go without a reason and an employee who just quits can be denied, some, but not all of the benefits due to him/her.Wouldn't it just be that he was let go? An employer in my state doesn't have to give a reason, just like an employee that decided to quit can do just that.
Has it been reported that he was actually fired?
my apologies.....neither side has to give notice.I’m not sure what Colorado law is, but all media reports have used the word “fired.”