- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Messages
- 4,587
- Reaction score
- 43,461
Don't you think they would just shrug it off- all in a day's work, considering the clientele...?
Yes, probably. But the snarky part of me had my fingers crossed.
Don't you think they would just shrug it off- all in a day's work, considering the clientele...?
Well, if SW was bossy and thought she was his boss as some people have implied/stated, we can certainly see now that's what he was used to from the women in his life. Dad barely got a word in.
Agreed. And there is no way CW is an Aspie.
Oh and it didn't humanize him to show those photos. He looked sinister and devoid of emotion in each one.
But he smiled on the porch pretty wide after his family was dead. Is that one of their questions? Howbhe could smile and giggle and lie with a straight face? And state and spell his babies' names without flinching? Knowing where they were and what condition they were in?
I couldn't unmute it at first either but could move the sound slider up and got audio.
But where does the hate for her come from? Most of the people on this forum, who believed that she did it, based on some quite normal vids, did not even know her.
Is it enough that she is an attractive woman who looked on the bright side of life?
Is that enough for strangers to hate her?
I found Dahmer to be very interesting. In his interviews, he came across as intelligent, well spoken, and dare I say, likable.This we simply don't know. I am thinking about a horrible serial killer and necrophiliac, Jeffrey Dahmer. Today, there is a very strong reason to assume he had Asperger's. But, he had an IQ of 145. He went to college. He served in US Navy and was honorably discharged. He got jobs below his IQ, mostly because of drinking, but he held on to them. Now, can anyone say that this highly capable man did not know right from wrong because of Asperger's? He knew what he did was immoral and hedonistic, and most of all, he perfectly well understood it was illegal.
After the sentencing, if his parents continue to imply Shan'ann killed her girls, could his parents face legal action if her parents pursued it?.I don't think so. I think they'd have to show actual damages. I will research a bit.
But I think they probably will be annoyed but expect something like this.
They well knew what his family is like, IMO.
I doubt he does either but if he did they just lit the match with the remarks not only about him and his staff being anything but professional, their snide attitude toward SW, and no mention of Nico, etc. They don't even seem to grasp the prosecutors office didn't have direct contact with with their darling baby boy and his representatives had to be present when when evidence was gathered such as the prints and saliva they wanted, which we don't know if he ever complied with because he rushed into begging for a plea because he probably knew it would further implicate him.Oh I don't think he does either. That was just a mean thought I had because they want to insist he couldn't kill the kids but implied she could.
Yes. I had such hope that he would be the one that would see the truth and keep her quiet. Now I know ,none of them will ever face the truth.He was just as bad though. Don't you think?
Also I actually think he talked just as much. Or almost.
I get so angry at things like them totally refusing to ignore his attempt to get away with murder. So many LE agencies involved because he stood there and lied hisOh and it didn't humanize him to show those photos. He looked sinister and devoid of emotion in each one.
But he smiled on the porch pretty wide after his family was dead. Is that one of their questions? Howbhe could smile and giggle and lie with a straight face? And state and spell his babies' names without flinching? Knowing where they were and what condition they were in?
There were so many more questions he should have asked.I get so angry at things like them totally refusing to ignore his attempt to get away with murder. So many LE agencies involved because he stood there and lied hisoff while preening for the cameras. Their whole "yeah but what triggered it?" was irritating too. I guess they are in denial about his proven affair too.
Interesting they say that even they don't understand why he put the girls in oil tanks. So they don't want to talk about it.Because his mother is trying to show he's not a sociopath or psychopath. As if they all have to look like Manson or something.
They want to present this as if he killed her in a rage after the events he made up to try and save his ownfrom all of the murder charges. It's like they don't acknowledge that he gave interviews lying about their disappearance, smiling, laughing, talking about his cool shirt, and that he cost this state a huge amount of money and resources trying to get away with murder. They also insist he was leaving her because he told his dad he didn't love her anymore. They never even acknowledged Nico's existance which sickened me. It was like "Sure he killed her (as if she deserved it) but not the girls and no acknowledgement of the baby he also killed. I'm sorry but they made a bad impression on me with their smugness.
No, they are entitled to their opinion, even when it will be at odds with the facts and evidence to come out, IMO. But I also believe that mainstream media will be less and less interested in coverage of this opinion as the facts/evidence/reports come out as well.After the sentencing, if his parents continue to imply Shan'ann killed her girls, could his parents face legal action if her parents pursued it?.
Envy.
I agree. After the evidence is revealed, I think that they will be relegated to obscurity.No, they are entitled to their opinion, even when it will be at odds with the facts and evidence to come out, IMO. But I also believe that mainstream media will be less and less interested in coverage of this opinion as the facts/evidence/reports come out as well.