Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 #80 *arrest*

[steeltowngirl]

I Completely agree. I experienced this myself in my marriage prior to divorce. My own previous relationship had many similarities to this one, which is why it has grabbed my attention in the first place.
Also, If Barry was the one who sent the text to JL impersonating SM, how would her supposed selfie she sent be explained?

I think that was me that came up with the hair-brained idea that BM was impersonating SM to JL. You are right to question it, I am now side-eyeing my own theory also. Especially due to the timing and the 2:07 selfie sent to JL.

IIRC, Suzanne did asked JL to switch to WhatsApp during that final texting session. Was Barry playing around with her LinkedIn or FB messenger that morning? There were the random Facebook invites sent out the night before too.

The odd sounding texts may have just been coincidence. Still, something just feels ‘off’ about all of it, and my hinky meter alerted to that lunchtime visit, then Barry leaving again for DSI. Then again, I suppose everything we hear about that day will feel ‘off’, given it was the day Suzanne was murdered.

 

[marylamby]

I think that was me that came up with the hair-brained idea that BM was impersonating SM to JL. You are right to question it, I am now side-eyeing my own theory also. Especially due to the timing and the 2:07 selfie sent to JL.

IIRC, Suzanne did asked JL to switch to WhatsApp during that final texting session. Was Barry playing around with her LinkedIn or FB messenger that morning? There were the random Facebook invites sent out the night before too.

The odd sounding texts may have just been coincidence. Still, something just feels ‘off’ about all of it, and my hinky meter alerted to that lunchtime visit, then Barry leaving again for DSI. Then again, I suppose everything we hear about that day will feel ‘off’, given it was the day Suzanne was murdered.

I share that 'hair-brained idea' and am not so sure I'm 'side-eyeing' it just yet. Everything feels 'off' and granted, it should.
One does start to doubt everything when lies abound but in the case of Suzanne's phone? My hinky meter was off the charts. I think he was texting from both phones to each other AND to JL. I'm not 100% solid but I somehow can't help thinking it's possible.
IMO

 

[marylamby]

From your lips to the Court's ears.

I'm here to form a support group if not.

I will need you, if it were to come to that!

 

[marylamby]

The path from the campground/RV park over to Monarch is heavily hiked and biked and runs right behind the PP property. If he had dumped her that close, she would have been found in the first few days.

This was during the Covid lockdown. Maybe the hike to the RV park was an option but then again, could've been a ruse. He was down by the river which may have been a temporary grave, for lack of a better word.

 

[DizzyB]

I’m astonished that Barry was able to hide Suzanne’s body without detection. Between GPS, cameras, and cell phones, I thought there would be more precise data at the PH. I don’t need blood. There is no other reasonable explanation as to why Suzanne is gone, given the information presented. But I still want Barry’s butt to be more clearly in the crosshairs.

 

[Deleted member 222031]

except the judge has already alluded to his concerns that some evidence/content in the AA could probably not be used in court. so possibly something along those lines.

In the original post by @CGray123 the following bolded statement is incorrect:
"If the judge wants to continue to withhold public access, he must explain why and set a new date when public access will be allowed. He has followed Colorado law (and Constitutional Law) to the letter so far, and I expect he will continue to do so. Even the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition seems to agree: no appeal of his original order limiting access to the AA was filed."

See attached proof that it was "appealed." And the judge responded. I don't think either the MSM motion or the judge's response ever made it to the public docket. Haven't looked lately though.

I have ongoing concerns about the lack of redaction and release of the AA in a timely manner. If BM is not bound over on Sept. 17, we will never know what evidence LE has except for that released in the prelim.

Even if BM is bound over, I do not think the judge will release the AA unless ordered to do so by a higher court. Whatever he is protecting from public view must be very explosive - potentially more so than the known facts surrounding this murder, which I already find shocking.

Just my speculation & MOO.

 

[Murphy1950]

I’m astonished that Barry was able to hide Suzanne’s body without detection. Between GPS, cameras, and cell phones, I thought there would be more precise data at the PH. I don’t need blood. There is no other reasonable explanation as to why Suzanne is gone, given the information presented. But I still want Barry’s butt to be more clearly in the crosshairs.

Yep I'm just not seeing it, wish I could. Nothing about this whole tranquilizer business ties together, just seems like a sensational element to the story, IMO. but makes no sense.

 

[marylamby]

I agree. But they would not approach BM with a deal unless the prosecutor offered it. Then, it would be their obligation to take it to their client. In that context, the attorneys would be obliged also to have a candid conversation about the risks of trial and the certainty that the deal offers.

Not sure the prosecutor will offer a deal, though. In these cases they don't, sometimes.

It works both ways. The defense could go to the prosecution too, especially if the defendant would disclose where the body is. It may come to that. Hopefully that would mean 40 years as opposed to life without parole.
Then again, some seem to think they can spend HALF of their sentence or less and that would make my blood curdle.
Not enough. I hope no plea deal ever happens.

 

[marylamby]

Yep I'm just not seeing it, wish I could. Nothing about this whole tranquilizer business ties together, just seems like a sensational element to the story, IMO. but makes no sense.

Remember, his 'friend' said that if he were to get rid of a body, no one would ever find it. Barry also said that about a boy one of his daughters were dating, iirc.
JMO

 

[Auntie Cipation]

I’m astonished that Barry was able to hide Suzanne’s body without detection. Between GPS, cameras, and cell phones, I thought there would be more precise data at the PH. I don’t need blood. There is no other reasonable explanation as to why Suzanne is gone, given the information presented. But I still want Barry’s butt to be more clearly in the crosshairs.

My thought has been that if she is buried near PP (which I think is likely) she is either under one of the boulders (landscape boulders, not at the river) or she is to the south of the house, either just inside or just outside the property line.

Not in view of the hike/bike trail, he could have augered or scooped a hole in advance (or that night, wouldn't take long) and then re-spread pine duff over the area to hide the disturbance. If searchers had scraped the duff off the whole area they may have found it but otherwise it would quickly become undetectable except perhaps with GPR. Did they use GPR during the PP-vicinity searches or only at the Salida construction site?

MOO

 

[marylamby]

In the original post by @CGray123 the following bolded statement is incorrect:
"If the judge wants to continue to withhold public access, he must explain why and set a new date when public access will be allowed. He has followed Colorado law (and Constitutional Law) to the letter so far, and I expect he will continue to do so. Even the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition seems to agree: no appeal of his original order limiting access to the AA was filed."

See attached proof that it was "appealed." And the judge responded. I don't think either the MSM motion or the judge's response ever made it to the public docket. Haven't looked lately though.

I have ongoing concerns about the lack of redaction and release of the AA in a timely manner. If BM is not bound over on Sept. 17, we will never know what evidence LE has except for that released in the prelim.

Even if BM is bound over, I do not think the judge will release the AA unless ordered to do so by a higher court. Whatever he is protecting from public view must be very explosive - potentially more so than the known facts surrounding this murder, which I already find shocking.

Just my speculation & MOO.

"Even if BM is bound over, I do not think the judge will release the AA unless ordered to do so by a higher court."
We don't know one way or the other. When's he's held over, that may be the deciding factor to release the (redacted, if need be) AA. IMO, I think the reason for not releasing the AA might have more to do with witnesses identities than for the daughter's sake, at this point. AND, if it still has to do with gruesome details? Those details can be redacted too.

 

[crhedBngr]

Remember, his 'friend' said that if he were to get rid of a body, no one would ever find it. Barry also said that about a boy one of his daughters were dating, iirc.
JMO

We've heard this once too often.

If anyone is following the Danielle Stislicki case, the perp (FG) said the exact same thing.

“Danielle told Ann that Galloway had said he could make a body disappear without a trace and that it was strange,” Judge Phyllis McMillen wrote in a transcript of her February ruling. “Ann asked what that meant, and Danielle replied she didn’t know.”

Documents: Stislicki had strange conversation with her accused killer

 

[marylamby]

We've heard this once too often.

If anyone is following the Danielle Stislicki case, the perp (FG) said the exact same thing.


Documents: Stislicki had strange conversation with her accused killer

Hah, it means exactly what it's supposed to mean.

 

[Bluebythec]

"Even if BM is bound over, I do not think the judge will release the AA unless ordered to do so by a higher court."
We don't know one way or the other. When's he's held over, that may be the deciding factor to release the (redacted, if need be) AA. IMO, I think the reason for not releasing the AA might have more to do with witnesses identities than for the daughter's sake, at this point. AND, if it still has to do with gruesome details? Those details can be redacted too.

Do we know who the witnesses are that didn't get to speak because time ran out?

 

[marylamby]

• Are the plunder videos regarding the transcripts allowed or not. I though they were okayed.
  
• If they're here, I missed them.

 

[marylamby]

Do we know who the witnesses are that didn't get to speak because time ran out?

No, not as far as I know. I was referring to the potential trial.

 

[PaulaDC]

People can get their parole transferred to another location or state but yes they petition for the transfer. Another way it can happen is to set less frequent parole meetings and then the parolee just returns to the state to meet with the probation officer.

Not everyone who exits prison is on parole. Some serve their sentence and exit with no requirements.

 

[PaulaDC]

New upload from Plunder with court transcripts. Remember we can't link this YouTuber with any content other than transcript videos

[/QUOTE

 

[Momofthreeboys]

Do we know who the witnesses are that didn't get to speak because time ran out?

I thought the prosecution wrapped up several hours early at the preliminary?

 

[marylamby]

Barry sure loved to sneak around.

That scary story relayed by Sheila, seems to form a pattern, especially as far as the day of the murder goes (creeping around the house, when he claimed he was looking for a Turkey).

He spied on her physically, but also tried to access her phone, and keep tabs on her when she was away from him.

Also, it sounds completely in character for him to have been concerned about what Suzanne was telling others in regard to the state of their marriage, and using the girls as weapons (we also saw and example of this when Lauren recounted trying to interview Barry at his condo).

Whether one believes he is a murderer or not, I don’t see how anyone can argue that he isn’t a terrible human being.

Add to that his stalking of their home, headlights no headlights, Suzanne calling 911 scared out of her mind and they find him there when he's supposedly hunting in NM or wherever? That creeped me out bigtime!
I've been convinced for a long time, for many reasons, that he killed Suzanne. Anyone listening to this has to think so too.
The Judge thinks so, imo. The jury will think so, imo. AND this is only the preliminary hearing.
Just wait until the trial when witnesses will testify in person.