Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o Prejudice* #102

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #501
Not being able to meet proof positive presumption great at the preliminary which tilts toward the prosecution was a huge warning shot to the prosecution that the case was more weak than strong at that time. Unfortunately they were never able to get more evidence or strengthen the case prosecutorially…if that is a word. Finally if or when they find Suzanne it has to be within a specific time period that fits known and accurate data or they won’t be able to prove Barry moved her…not necessarily that he didn’t murder her but that he didn’t move her that day. Comparing this to the Stauch case is apples and oranges.

I am not comparing the overall Stauch case to the Morphew case. My response was directed to the portion of your post where you stated that finding Suzanne’s body in say, Utah or New Mexico, would not attach to Barry. I’m saying that finding Suzanne’s body elsewhere does not exonerate Barry, nor does it lead us directly to another killer. Suzanne went missing from the vicinity of her home. That’s the initial crime scene. The last person to see her alive was Barry.

As another poster aptly pointed out, there was biological crime scene evidence in the Stauch home, which helped to tie Tee to Gannon‘s murder. That’s not been found at the Morphew home. So comparing that part of the case - crime scene evidence - would be comparing apples to oranges.
 
  • #502
Nothing says " I want to find my wife" like selling her car, house, moving, and picking up a girlfriend. Of course, this is after another questionable judges decision to grant power of attorney to a suspected murderer.

I wish we could give Gold post awards here. This post is EVERYTHING.
1653243718134.jpeg
 
  • #503
Barry was literally the only person who could have been responsible.

A crumbling marriage, a threat of suicide, deleted texts, and a lie about the "perfect marriage."

Suzanne's digital footprint suddenly ceases, while she's talking to her lover and snap chatting her best friend. This breaks all established patterns.

Barry attempts to explain this away by describing the perfect night, in which they eat two steaks off two plates (like normal people), then one steak off two plates, and finally, one steak off one plate.

Then they make love and go to bed.

During this time his truck moves, his phone comes out of airplane mode, his phone shows 200 events (as opposed to the usual 0-2), his truck doors are opening and closing, his screen comes on, his phone is moving, her phone is moving, and Suzanne's phone powers down forever at the precise moment he needs it to.

He wakes to the alarm that he set, then he did not set. He drives straight to Broomfield, then makes a detour months later, when he's framed by a herd of elk that lead him right past the location of Suzanne's helmet.
SA Harris played him like a fiddle here, planting the idea in Barry's head that the truck telematics proved he was lying. Barry responded by once again changing his story to fit the evidence, a hallmark of murderers.

Not only is there no evidence of a bike ride, but there is overwhelming evidence it did not occur.

Miles Harvey said she wouldn't bike there. She didn't bring items she'd always bring. She would have had to have taken her powered down phone with her, which she uncharacteristically hadn't used for hours, and didn't use on that very important morning (Mother's day, best friend daughter's wedding, her daughters traveling home, etc).

Barry arrives in Broomfield, and spends all day traveling back and forth from the hotel and the wall.

Just kidding, that was a lie. He visited the wall once, and claimed he had time to kill so he dumped trash in 5 different receptacles.

The fact that 4 of these 5 dumps came prior to that, notwithstanding.

The Ritters call him, and he tells them he's "at the wall, with workers present."

Of course there were no workers, and he'd been in his room for 5 hours.

He repeats this lie to CBI multiple times, telling them he rushed from the wall back to his hotel room, where he left tools in the lobby.

Surveillance video proves this unequivocally to be the lie to end all lies. He leaves his room, stages tools in the lobby to make it appear he'd been working, and then hits the road.

The following day he speaks to Morgan on the phone, telling her that a lion got Suzanne. Then he encourages her to keep working, as it helps sell his alibi (this is really transparent and damning).

Nine months after the investigation began, Barry suddenly remembered that he had been chasing chipmunks around the backyard with his 22 rifle, when he arrived home on the day in question. He did this in response to phone data, that showed his phone moving erratically.

When Suzanne's Facebook began making friend requests in the days preceding her murder, Barry blamed a bear or a coyote for why his phone happened to be down by the river during this period.

To explain away the needle sheath in the dryer, Barry claimed to have shot two deer just weeks before, and illegally sawed their antlers off. This, despite previously claiming to have never fired a tranquilizer gun in Colorado.

Killers have a habit of confessing to lesser crimes, and Barry did this here, and when he suggested "immunity."

To explain his phone and truck indicating that he was creeping around the backyard on the afternoon of the murder (when he was supposedly having lunch with Suzanne), Barry blamed a long dead Turkey that he claimed to be searching for.

Of course Suzanne texted JL just prior, saying Barry wasn't home. His truck and phone show that he didn't enter the house, the meal he claimed to eat was from a day or two before (a little bit of truth..) and he called Suzanne minutes after sitting down with her for lunch (he clearly never entered the house)

When Barry initially arrived on scene, he immediately began attempting to cast suspicion towards a mountain Lion. He repeated this claim for months, offering it as a possibility to both investigators, and a reporter.

The average person knows that mountain lions don't commit bloodless kidnappings, toss bikes in ravines, and remove helmets and dump them a considerable distance away.

As a hunter and outdoorsman, Barry's actions are far more incriminating. Not only did he repeat this (Lion) scenario months later, but he kept searching the immediate area for months.

It allowed him to save face in regards to not doing anything to find his missing wife, while he got to enjoy the outdoors.

An innocent person doesn't have to lie about anything, and Barry lied about everything. Lies absolutely matter.

So to believe Barry is innocent, one would have to exhibit stunning ignorance, and then put stock in a theory for which there is not only no evidence, but no precedent:

Suzanne was kidnapped by a lion from "The Ghost and the Darkness."

A "Gone Girl" frame job on steroids.

The luckiest kidnapper on earth, who managed to get the prime suspect to tell lie after lie, and took advantage of dozens of coincidences.

In terms of factual guilt, I genuinely can't think of many cases this cut and dry.

There is no plausible alternative scenario, and no scenario that explains away all the evidence against Barry.

Everyone knows the husband is looked at first, and that's what happened here. He should have been able to be cleared very quickly, as any sign of life when he left that morning means he couldn't have killed her.

But that's when they hit a major hurdle in that regard, as not only was there no sign of life that morning, but there was no sign of life hours before that (extending back to the previous afternoon).

Barry's alibi was the most damning thing I've ever seen, from the Fotis Dulos like trash dumps, to the insane lie about his movements.

That hotel was full of cameras, and this moron had the gall to lie about where he was when he got that phone call from the Ritters.

The worst part is the lies started before he ever should have known a crime was committed.

Thank you for your detailed response, it's very helpful!
 
  • #504
Yes IMO it's a false narrative.
The problem that led to getting this case dismissed (w/out prejudice btw), IMO was poor communication, lack of follow thru and timely execution by the DA and all LE sectors. My sense is there were politics being played out and some egos getting in the way along with of course covid which everybody likes to forget. So deadlines got missed etc - we all know the history.
But the problem was a personnel and adminstrative issue. Not an issue with the evidence. If the prosecution had not been sanctioned regarding the experts ( up to everyone to form an opinion whether the sactions were too severe or not severe enough) we would be at trial right now getting close to a verdict.
Same goes for Barry being out on bail. The prosecution/LE droppd the ball on the dna and could not address it properly at the Prelim, leaving the Judge with unanswered questions so he was obligated to grant bail. He really had no choice.
Its not that the evidence/case is so weak it has no chance. The prosecution just could not get out of their own way for whatever reason.
I know in my line of work we sit down and do a postmortem if a project goes sideways. Not to assess blame really but to learn from mistakes so as not to repeat them and better prepare for the next time. I cross my fingers that happened here or if not, when we go to trial on this case I want a special prosecutor brought in. If I were family I would insist on it.
ALL JUST IMO
I agree that is what lead to the prosecutor asking for the case to be dismissed. If they had not, there was a pretty good probability that Barry could have been acquitted and prosecution would not have a second chance. They had enough to get Judge Murphy to bind it over to trial even without the characterization and hearsay. It's sad because prosecution in my opinion should have "learned" and continued to make clerical errors and were weak with the rebuttals when they had opportunity, in my opinion. If there is a next time, I presume they will have more actual evidence and have lessons learned.
 
  • #505
I believe one or more of the hunters or firefighters who spent time with BM came forward late in the proceedings, with information from which inferences were made.

Interesting - do you have any more detail on this?
 
  • #506
Barry was literally the only person who could have been responsible.

A crumbling marriage, a threat of suicide, deleted texts, and a lie about the "perfect marriage."

Suzanne's digital footprint suddenly ceases, while she's talking to her lover and snap chatting her best friend. This breaks all established patterns.

Barry attempts to explain this away by describing the perfect night, in which they eat two steaks off two plates (like normal people), then one steak off two plates, and finally, one steak off one plate.

Then they make love and go to bed.

During this time his truck moves, his phone comes out of airplane mode, his phone shows 200 events (as opposed to the usual 0-2), his truck doors are opening and closing, his screen comes on, his phone is moving, her phone is moving, and Suzanne's phone powers down forever at the precise moment he needs it to.

He wakes to the alarm that he set, then he did not set. He drives straight to Broomfield, then makes a detour months later, when he's framed by a herd of elk that lead him right past the location of Suzanne's helmet.
SA Harris played him like a fiddle here, planting the idea in Barry's head that the truck telematics proved he was lying. Barry responded by once again changing his story to fit the evidence, a hallmark of murderers.

Not only is there no evidence of a bike ride, but there is overwhelming evidence it did not occur.

Miles Harvey said she wouldn't bike there. She didn't bring items she'd always bring. She would have had to have taken her powered down phone with her, which she uncharacteristically hadn't used for hours, and didn't use on that very important morning (Mother's day, best friend daughter's wedding, her daughters traveling home, etc).

Barry arrives in Broomfield, and spends all day traveling back and forth from the hotel and the wall.

Just kidding, that was a lie. He visited the wall once, and claimed he had time to kill so he dumped trash in 5 different receptacles.

The fact that 4 of these 5 dumps came prior to that, notwithstanding.

The Ritters call him, and he tells them he's "at the wall, with workers present."

Of course there were no workers, and he'd been in his room for 5 hours.

He repeats this lie to CBI multiple times, telling them he rushed from the wall back to his hotel room, where he left tools in the lobby.

Surveillance video proves this unequivocally to be the lie to end all lies. He leaves his room, stages tools in the lobby to make it appear he'd been working, and then hits the road.

The following day he speaks to Morgan on the phone, telling her that a lion got Suzanne. Then he encourages her to keep working, as it helps sell his alibi (this is really transparent and damning).

Nine months after the investigation began, Barry suddenly remembered that he had been chasing chipmunks around the backyard with his 22 rifle, when he arrived home on the day in question. He did this in response to phone data, that showed his phone moving erratically.

When Suzanne's Facebook began making friend requests in the days preceding her murder, Barry blamed a bear or a coyote for why his phone happened to be down by the river during this period.

To explain away the needle sheath in the dryer, Barry claimed to have shot two deer just weeks before, and illegally sawed their antlers off. This, despite previously claiming to have never fired a tranquilizer gun in Colorado.

Killers have a habit of confessing to lesser crimes, and Barry did this here, and when he suggested "immunity."

To explain his phone and truck indicating that he was creeping around the backyard on the afternoon of the murder (when he was supposedly having lunch with Suzanne), Barry blamed a long dead Turkey that he claimed to be searching for.

Of course Suzanne texted JL just prior, saying Barry wasn't home. His truck and phone show that he didn't enter the house, the meal he claimed to eat was from a day or two before (a little bit of truth..) and he called Suzanne minutes after sitting down with her for lunch (he clearly never entered the house)

When Barry initially arrived on scene, he immediately began attempting to cast suspicion towards a mountain Lion. He repeated this claim for months, offering it as a possibility to both investigators, and a reporter.

The average person knows that mountain lions don't commit bloodless kidnappings, toss bikes in ravines, and remove helmets and dump them a considerable distance away.

As a hunter and outdoorsman, Barry's actions are far more incriminating. Not only did he repeat this (Lion) scenario months later, but he kept searching the immediate area for months.

It allowed him to save face in regards to not doing anything to find his missing wife, while he got to enjoy the outdoors.

An innocent person doesn't have to lie about anything, and Barry lied about everything. Lies absolutely matter.

So to believe Barry is innocent, one would have to exhibit stunning ignorance, and then put stock in a theory for which there is not only no evidence, but no precedent:

Suzanne was kidnapped by a lion from "The Ghost and the Darkness."

A "Gone Girl" frame job on steroids.

The luckiest kidnapper on earth, who managed to get the prime suspect to tell lie after lie, and took advantage of dozens of coincidences.

In terms of factual guilt, I genuinely can't think of many cases this cut and dry.

There is no plausible alternative scenario, and no scenario that explains away all the evidence against Barry.

Everyone knows the husband is looked at first, and that's what happened here. He should have been able to be cleared very quickly, as any sign of life when he left that morning means he couldn't have killed her.

But that's when they hit a major hurdle in that regard, as not only was there no sign of life that morning, but there was no sign of life hours before that (extending back to the previous afternoon).

Barry's alibi was the most damning thing I've ever seen, from the Fotis Dulos like trash dumps, to the insane lie about his movements.

That hotel was full of cameras, and this moron had the gall to lie about where he was when he got that phone call from the Ritters.

The worst part is the lies started before he ever should have known a crime was committed.
BAM! ALL of this happened, it's facts proven by digital evidence and Barry's own words, no manipulation, nothing ill done by LE to Barry.. he willingly talked and talked and talked and then tried to talk himself out of his own lies over and over again.

So ALL off that has to happen still and if some other random person did this, he just became the luckiest wife abducting murderer ever because his victims husband behaved in such a guilty way that nobody is looking for him.
 
  • #507
I believe one or more of the hunters or firefighters who spent time with BM came forward late in the proceedings, with information from which inferences were made.
I have a legal question about this and you seem very educated on legal proceedings. If it’s true that the prosecutors learned of this new information from one of Barry’s buddies, would the DA then have to disclose to the judge specific information about who gave this information to them at the time they requested the dismissal? Would they also have to disclose these details to the defense?
 
  • #508
I believe one or more of the hunters or firefighters who spent time with BM came forward late in the proceedings, with information from which inferences were made.
I hope this is the case!!
 
  • #509
MayBe Barry's Beloved BoBcat Betrayed him.

MayBe they got some important data Back, data they didn't have at the Prelim

Barry to his handBag BoBcat: BBBBBut I-I-I tr-tr-trusted youuuuuuuuu.

JMO
 
  • #510
@MassGuy - Great closing argument! Too bad your quote didn’t come for the ride :). There is no question Barry did it. Let’s hope he has to pay for what he did! MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #511
I have a legal question about this and you seem very educated on legal proceedings. If it’s true that the prosecutors learned of this new information from one of Barry’s buddies, would the DA then have to disclose to the judge specific information about who gave this information to them at the time they requested the dismissal? Would they also have to disclose these details to the defense?
Generally, if information is not in a document it need not be disclosed. If LE has conversations with a witness that are not recorded, they need not disclose the information provided in those conversations or the identity of the witness unless and until they decide the witness will be called at trial.

Also, Rule 16 has a specific exception to the disclosure requirement for informants who will not be called as witnesses for trial:

Rule 16 - Discovery and Procedure Before Trial, Colo. R. Crim. P. 16

Part I. Disclosure to the Defense

.....

(e) Matters not Subject to Disclosure.

.....

(2) Informants. Disclosure shall not be required of an informant's identity where his or her identity is a prosecution secret and a failure to disclose will not infringe the constitutional rights of the accused. Disclosure shall not be denied hereunder of the identity of witnesses to be produced at a hearing or trial.
 
  • #512
Salida webcams (at town street elevation) are showing more drizzle than accumulating snow but this was this morning in Steamboat-- 8 inches+!


@theWXwoman

8” and counting in #Steamboat! : Larry Pierce #9wx
Image

9:53 AM · May 20, 2022·
What a beautiful scene.
Where I live, rarely any signs of snow.
With few temperatures below 5 Centigrade, I am so cold, rugged up.

In this picture (or similar), if a body has been buried etc, how on earth will it be found, as there must be so many similar scenes.
Good luck to the searchers, I guess when the snow melts (throughout extremely large areas, many uninhabited, rugged, steep etc).
Seems a very difficult task ahead.
 
  • #513
I've tried hard to come up with any scenario that points to SODDIT (or whatever) and nothing works. BM's mountain of lies regarding Saturday afternoon and Sunday before 5am in the face of the digital evidence prove him guilty. If he had said that she was gone when he arrived home on Saturday, things might be different.
The prosecution must be allowed to present the evidence and the prosecution must provide clarity to a judge and jury amidst the obfuscation of the defense.
BM is guilty with or without a body and with or without a trial. A trial won't change anything except the punishment.
MOO
EBM

I believe BM is being punished NOW for his ugly actions: his body is being filled with thoughts, damaging chemicals floating about, affecting his health, as physically obvious inrecent photos.
Hoping BM's demise will be clearly seen,with further appearances.
Waiting patiently for a trial, all monies spent, resulting in a tired, ugly specimen.
 
  • #514
I agree that is what lead to the prosecutor asking for the case to be dismissed. If they had not, there was a pretty good probability that Barry could have been acquitted and prosecution would not have a second chance. They had enough to get Judge Murphy to bind it over to trial even without the characterization and hearsay. It's sad because prosecution in my opinion should have "learned" and continued to make clerical errors and were weak with the rebuttals when they had opportunity, in my opinion. If there is a next time, I presume they will have more actual evidence and have lessons learned.
BBM There was absolutely NOT a good probability he would have been acquitted. There was more than enough evidence to convict him.
 
  • #515
I believe BM is being punished NOW for his ugly actions: his body is being filled with thoughts, damaging chemicals floating about, affecting his health, as physically obvious inrecent photos.
Hoping BM's demise will be clearly seen,with further appearances.
Waiting patiently for a trial, all monies spent, resulting in a tired, ugly specimen.
Agree.
He looked bad on the GMA footage, I think it may have been @mrjitty that said something like, "bottle of gin a night bad", which was a brilliant description! Not like when he walked away from the courthouse on the day of his dismissal yelling to the reporters 50-100 feet behind, without turning to face them, "the killer's still out there".
I wonder if IE scolded him for that.
MOO
 
  • #516
MOO when IE kissed Bury she also whispered in his ear to keep his damn mouth shut. He may or may not have listened.
 
  • #517
A recent poster reminded us of how much Suzanne had to look forward to on that Sunday - ie Mothers Day, her daughters coming home, and the wedding of her friend's daughter. So sad and tragic that none of it happened for her, and never will.
 
  • #518
I agree that is what lead to the prosecutor asking for the case to be dismissed. If they had not, there was a pretty good probability that Barry could have been acquitted and prosecution would not have a second chance. They had enough to get Judge Murphy to bind it over to trial even without the characterization and hearsay. It's sad because prosecution in my opinion should have "learned" and continued to make clerical errors and were weak with the rebuttals when they had opportunity, in my opinion. If there is a next time, I presume they will have more actual evidence and have lessons learned.

Most of the poor characterization that was made was of Suzanne by Barry. “Drunk eyes”. ”Buying drugs off the street”. “Blaming God after being informed of the affair as a form of judgment on her and has stated repeatedly that God allowed this to happen."
 
  • #519
BAM! ALL of this happened, it's facts proven by digital evidence and Barry's own words, no manipulation, nothing ill done by LE to Barry.. he willingly talked and talked and talked and then tried to talk himself out of his own lies over and over again.

So ALL off that has to happen still and if some other random person did this, he just became the luckiest wife abducting murderer ever because his victims husband behaved in such a guilty way that nobody is looking for him.
The statistics of missing persons in the US by sex/age. 2021 was very low in disappearances (COVID?); however, how rapidly the numbers for women go down after the age of 21 is interesting.

If I were to bet, I’d bet on BM. Nr 2, much slimmer, possibility, is escaping willingly. I don’t think that anyone else but Barry abducted a 47 y.o. woman who just survived another bout of cancer, next to her house in Salida.

 
  • #520
Barry was literally the only person who could have been responsible.

A crumbling marriage, a threat of suicide, deleted texts, and a lie about the "perfect marriage."

Suzanne's digital footprint suddenly ceases, while she's talking to her lover and snap chatting her best friend. This breaks all established patterns.

Barry attempts to explain this away by describing the perfect night, in which they eat two steaks off two plates (like normal people), then one steak off two plates, and finally, one steak off one plate.

Then they make love and go to bed.

During this time his truck moves, his phone comes out of airplane mode, his phone shows 200 events (as opposed to the usual 0-2), his truck doors are opening and closing, his screen comes on, his phone is moving, her phone is moving, and Suzanne's phone powers down forever at the precise moment he needs it to.

He wakes to the alarm that he set, then he did not set. He drives straight to Broomfield, then makes a detour months later, when he's framed by a herd of elk that lead him right past the location of Suzanne's helmet.
SA Harris played him like a fiddle here, planting the idea in Barry's head that the truck telematics proved he was lying. Barry responded by once again changing his story to fit the evidence, a hallmark of murderers.

Not only is there no evidence of a bike ride, but there is overwhelming evidence it did not occur.

Miles Harvey said she wouldn't bike there. She didn't bring items she'd always bring. She would have had to have taken her powered down phone with her, which she uncharacteristically hadn't used for hours, and didn't use on that very important morning (Mother's day, best friend daughter's wedding, her daughters traveling home, etc).

Barry arrives in Broomfield, and spends all day traveling back and forth from the hotel and the wall.

Just kidding, that was a lie. He visited the wall once, and claimed he had time to kill so he dumped trash in 5 different receptacles.

The fact that 4 of these 5 dumps came prior to that, notwithstanding.

The Ritters call him, and he tells them he's "at the wall, with workers present."

Of course there were no workers, and he'd been in his room for 5 hours.

He repeats this lie to CBI multiple times, telling them he rushed from the wall back to his hotel room, where he left tools in the lobby.

Surveillance video proves this unequivocally to be the lie to end all lies. He leaves his room, stages tools in the lobby to make it appear he'd been working, and then hits the road.

The following day he speaks to Morgan on the phone, telling her that a lion got Suzanne. Then he encourages her to keep working, as it helps sell his alibi (this is really transparent and damning).

Nine months after the investigation began, Barry suddenly remembered that he had been chasing chipmunks around the backyard with his 22 rifle, when he arrived home on the day in question. He did this in response to phone data, that showed his phone moving erratically.

When Suzanne's Facebook began making friend requests in the days preceding her murder, Barry blamed a bear or a coyote for why his phone happened to be down by the river during this period.

To explain away the needle sheath in the dryer, Barry claimed to have shot two deer just weeks before, and illegally sawed their antlers off. This, despite previously claiming to have never fired a tranquilizer gun in Colorado.

Killers have a habit of confessing to lesser crimes, and Barry did this here, and when he suggested "immunity."

To explain his phone and truck indicating that he was creeping around the backyard on the afternoon of the murder (when he was supposedly having lunch with Suzanne), Barry blamed a long dead Turkey that he claimed to be searching for.

Of course Suzanne texted JL just prior, saying Barry wasn't home. His truck and phone show that he didn't enter the house, the meal he claimed to eat was from a day or two before (a little bit of truth..) and he called Suzanne minutes after sitting down with her for lunch (he clearly never entered the house)

When Barry initially arrived on scene, he immediately began attempting to cast suspicion towards a mountain Lion. He repeated this claim for months, offering it as a possibility to both investigators, and a reporter.

The average person knows that mountain lions don't commit bloodless kidnappings, toss bikes in ravines, and remove helmets and dump them a considerable distance away.

As a hunter and outdoorsman, Barry's actions are far more incriminating. Not only did he repeat this (Lion) scenario months later, but he kept searching the immediate area for months.

It allowed him to save face in regards to not doing anything to find his missing wife, while he got to enjoy the outdoors.

An innocent person doesn't have to lie about anything, and Barry lied about everything. Lies absolutely matter.

So to believe Barry is innocent, one would have to exhibit stunning ignorance, and then put stock in a theory for which there is not only no evidence, but no precedent:

Suzanne was kidnapped by a lion from "The Ghost and the Darkness."

A "Gone Girl" frame job on steroids.

The luckiest kidnapper on earth, who managed to get the prime suspect to tell lie after lie, and took advantage of dozens of coincidences.

In terms of factual guilt, I genuinely can't think of many cases this cut and dry.

There is no plausible alternative scenario, and no scenario that explains away all the evidence against Barry.

Everyone knows the husband is looked at first, and that's what happened here. He should have been able to be cleared very quickly, as any sign of life when he left that morning means he couldn't have killed her.

But that's when they hit a major hurdle in that regard, as not only was there no sign of life that morning, but there was no sign of life hours before that (extending back to the previous afternoon).

Barry's alibi was the most damning thing I've ever seen, from the Fotis Dulos like trash dumps, to the insane lie about his movements.

That hotel was full of cameras, and this moron had the gall to lie about where he was when he got that phone call from the Ritters.

The worst part is the lies started before he ever should have known a crime was committed.
This is excellent. <modsnip>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
102
Guests online
1,813
Total visitors
1,915

Forum statistics

Threads
632,748
Messages
18,631,144
Members
243,275
Latest member
twinmomming
Back
Top