For focus VR added
Do I err in the interpretation here? I'm thinking not so much.
Thus, imo, the statute allows the state even wider latitude in retaining seized material(s), being tantamount to sole discretion.
[encore]
Thus the question as to whether or not
a/the case has "ended" is never reached.

sorrrry
Shoddy research/specious argument/par-for-the-course distraction ala
The Whirling One ? I'm thinking pretty much
[encore]
And thus I must affirm on review, Groome, J.'s own, albeit vigorous affirmation, to wit:
"Gladly" Gladly!"