- Joined
- Jun 16, 2022
- Messages
- 337
- Reaction score
- 3,893
@windrowerI must have missed it, but in the linked article, I don’t see the name of BM’s lawyer to whom the quotes therein are attributed.
I did read elsewhere that something-tongued Iris made a statement after the civil suit was dismissed. I hope she someday chokes on her fabricated/embellished/twisted “facts” of SUZANNE’s murder.
May they come back to bite her in the rear.
Could someone file a civil suit against her for filing a suit completely without merit? For her suit based on lies and fictitious material? I mean, the egregious DNA lie she fed Lamas is just one of many.
What a difference between Iris, a woman creating fables, and SUZANNE, a woman of truth and integrity.
IMO
I don't think it immodest if we concur here that "Great minds think alike", do you?
I, too, asked myself: Why the blazes not? For their costs in defense, at minimum?; perhaps special and punitive damages as well; and their concurrent/ attendant costs to bring such an action?
But then I remembered: MONEY
One has to have money and a pretty high risk tolerance to sue civilly.
A few of the good guys were backed by their employers; the majority, not so.
So our specious-suit-team could (1) be certain their targets were, for all intents and purposes, indigent, while (2) their firm's risk was limited by and large to their own costs.
For them, this was a - sadly not uncommon, imo - judicial lottery. Oh...and a lottery complemented with some always advantageous delay
