So iirc, yesterday EOB was the deadline for the prosecution to deliver the 10,000 pages of discovery to the defense team. Wonder if that deadline was met, and if BM’s attorneys spent the night starting to pour over the discovery. Oh to be a fly on the wall to see/hear their reaction/discussion after going through all the evidence LE/DA have amassed against their client to date.
On another note, I understand one/part of reason that the defense wants the AA to remain sealed is to protect the Morphew daughters.
I really feel for and understand the daughter’s are victims, absolutely. IMO, they are victims of their selfish Father taking their Mother away from them and my heart truly breaks for MM & MM. They might not have even realized the full brunt/impact of everything they’ve been through this past year yet. I’m sure they love their Father and personally, cannot even imagine being in their position. I don’t know whether I’d want to read the AA or not, it’s totally their decision to make. I hope they are ok, have some loving support and find their way to some counseling at some point, if they haven’t already.
At any rate, I’ve never heard of this being used as a reason/request to keep an AA sealed, at least not that I can recall from previous cases I’ve followed, and wondering a couple things.
Isn’t protecting victims usually the DA/state’s responsibility, as in, providing witness/victim’s advocates, etc.?
I’m wondering if this is a request BM’s made/demanded of his attorneys? because he doesn’t want his daughter’s to be able to read the ugly truth, and/or stall tactic on his/his team’s part, don’t want to contaminate future jury pool? Combination of all of the above???
I mean, isn’t it just delaying the inevitable as it will all be coming out in court at future trial. Unless of course, BM still thinks he’s going to beat this and be absolved/released on bond/bail, or something? Yeah, I don’t think that’s gonna happen. Since he’s charged with M1, it’s my understanding he’s not eligible for bail in state of CO. Please correct me if I’m wrong. Also, state’s evidence is going to be presented at the Preliminary hearing in August, so yeah, I’m somewhat baffled by the request and reason to keep the AA sealed.
IANAL, but as it stands right now, the Judge is considering the defense request/reasons, the legality of said request/reasons and making a decision on whether or not to unseal the AA before the Preliminary hearing in August, is that correct?
Forgive me if this post is all over the place, sleepless nights are starting to catch up with me.
All of the above IMHOO
#FindSuzanne
#BringSuzanneHome
#JusticeForSuzanne