I thought this too. I thought I remember reading a discussion in the older threads here why she wouldn't take her phone with her.I recall that SM 'left' without her phone? Can anyone confirm this?
There you go. No Suzanne phone, and no activity since Saturday? I am waiting to hear what Barry says Suzanne and he did once he finally arrived home on Saturday after work/errands. They have his phone, so if Barry’s data shows he arrives, Suzanne’s phone still has activity, then nothing… And Barry’s phone continues to move and update. From that point forward (maybe with a late evening FB friend request exception), Suzanne’s phone does not move, and nothing goes in or out from it. I wonder if Barry knew that your iPhone records how many steps you take, whether you want it to or not.By all indications...it appears that Suzanne's phone went dark Saturday afternoon or late evening. We don't know if it reactivated at any point. What I am focused on during the "dark phase" is that Barry claims to have been with her, at first "to make the wife happy, hiking and biking"....and then, on Sunday, 5am. So....if Suzanne's phone was dark at the same time Barry claims to have been with her....explain that, Barry.
I wonder if SM contacted a lawyer sometime prior to her disappearance? I also wonder if either of them hired a PI. I can see grounds for either doing so. For SM, she would need to know what BM was up to while she was "confined" to home...and I can see BM, out of paranoia, or as part of the premeditation....hiring one.Many of you have made good arguments on both sides regarding who owned/used the spy pen. SM or BM?
If it belonged to SM, I'm going to assume BM didn't know about it and it was located during LE search warrants.
If it did belong to BM, I can kind of see him turning it over to LE or not trying to hide it from them. "see, my wife was up to no good". I can see him feeling validated by it's contents.
After the hearing last week my impression was it belonged to SM. Now, who knows... IMO
I recall that SM 'left' without her phone? Can anyone confirm this?
On the issue of Barry’s guilt or innocence, the only thing I can recall her saying is “well, you haven’t found the body.
Thanks for your thoughts @dkryder. I tried creating a new ID for my third device but the new ID only worked for the apps and iTunes since Apple used the phone number to link it to my initial iCloud!@Seattle1 off topic but google is similar . I think one way around it is to register subsequent devices with a different ID. If they use email addresses then change it slightly. This worked at Google but I don't use apple so I have no idea if it works there.
I think any storage units are likely to have been rented around the time Puma Path was sold.I took notes when listening to the 07/22/21 hearing.
According to the prosecution:
1. They are still looking for SM's body.
2 Items are still being processed for discovery; these items may include items from BM's condo, truck and (unfortunately) storage container(s).
I can't help but think that BM's attorneys wanted the judge to amend the primary charge from M1 to M2 for a particular reason. My guess is that they forsee an avenue of BM pleading to Manslaughter, as opposed to M2...in exchange for revealing all details and location of the body. That would be a huge departure from both M1 or M2...but, imo, they would have downgraded punishment substantially. Just a hunch...but I think they are after Manslaughter at the end of the day.
How do you think that works re: warrants? Barry vacated PP, with all of their stuff. I assume some things may have gone back to Indiana, some to his new condo, some to storage units. Does LE have to show some sort of chain of custody when looking for specific items that are listed in search warrants? Or do they ask for one warrant for an item that could be in any of those places? It’s a little hard to pin down.I think any storage units are likely to have been rented around the time Puma Path was sold.
Not all of their possessions would fit in that condo.
I imagine they have an extensive list of items they are looking for, and probable cause wouldn’t be an issue at this stage.How do you think that works re: warrants? Barry vacated PP, with all of their stuff. I assume some things may have gone back to Indiana, some to his new condo, some to storage units. Does LE have to show some sort of chain of custody when looking for specific items that are listed in search warrants? Or do they ask for one warrant for an item that could be in any of those places? It’s a little hard to pin down.
Lol -- just think how easy Apple makes it for LE/investigators to search only one cloud storage for multiple devices!