Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee County, 10 May 2020 #78 *ARREST*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #121
  • #122
Now would be a really good time for any former mistresses to make themselves known.
How embarrassing would that be!?!
 
  • #123
Great questions, I agree I would love to know all of this information. I too have so many questions about the girl's trip.

But unfortunately we can't sleuth any of this because they are not POI's:(

JMO
But they are fact witnesses.
 
  • #124
@NoSI - so gracious of you to defer to Lauren.
All of Suzanne's Team everywhere in the world are forever grateful for your kind heart.
Love to you for all you do from Los Angeles!
-Charm
Love and accolades from. the BIG APPLE!
 
  • #125
I wonder if BM was a fan of the RS. RIP CW. IMO:(
 
  • #126
But they are fact witnesses.
They may or may not be called to testify at trial, they may in fact be called as witnesses.

<modsnip: Witness testimony can be discussed, but witnesses can not be sleuthed>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #127
  • #128
Darn, I think I missed it. What did they say?
It was a short clip, and I’m sure it’ll be on the site shortly.

They said there was a lot for the judge to go over, so they understood.

They expressed confidence in their case.

Said this was a big team effort, and the investigation was still ongoing, as they continue to learn things.
 
  • #129
Now would be a really good time for any former mistresses to make themselves known.

How embarrassing would that be!?!

Kind of like how the guys who may have innocently put dna/fingerprints in SM's car -- car detailer, tire swapper, etc -- might have been happy to come forward, offer a buccal swab for comparison, etc -- but now after all the claims of [partial?] matches to sexual assaults, who would subject themselves to that kind of suspicion if they didn't have to? MOO
 
  • #130
  • #131
I've never followed a PH before. Does the judge have to explain his decision or can it just be a yes or no? Can the decision be disputed or over turned?
 
  • #132
Screw embarrassment. Doing the right thing is more important. :)
Cause, they have already flown back to Russia.
Or Hungry
Or Columbia
Or Brazil
Or South Korea.
Maybe. According to me mate Dave. IMO
 
  • #133
It was a short clip, and I’m sure it’ll be on the site shortly.

They said there was a lot for the judge to go over, so they understood.

They expressed confidence in their case.

Said this was a big team effort, and the investigation was still ongoing, as they continue to learn things.
Hasn't it been established that he could shoot the dart from a 22? Wouldn't that fit with the live shell being in the bedroom? The defense can try to muddy all they want but Barry is the only one who had the means, the opportunity and the motive to kill Suzanne. His alibi is hilarious, his destruction of evidence is a riot and his lies will be his undoing.
The witnesses will seal the deal.
 
  • #134
Barry had to load that dart with tranquilizer chemicals, which in and of itself would equal “deliberation.”

There is a frantic event in the backyard, which Barry admits to with the “chipmunk story.”

An expert said that Suzanne would likely be out in a few minutes.

So the theory appears to be that he shoots her, she runs and locks herself in her bedroom, and he breaks in, damaging the door.

Before she succumbs, she is able to scratch Barry on the shoulder with 3 of her nails (he’s probably on top of her strangling or suffocating her at this point).

So the data shows an event, but even if one doesn’t believe it, Barry says it’s true.

A syringe cap is found in the dryer, and darts in the garage. Barry explains that deer somehow come to his garage area, and he shoots them with darts. It’s as improbable as it is illegal, and no antlers are even found.

Taken alone, the physical evidence doesn’t mean much (darts, door, etc), but Barry’s insane stories shape a picture that seems pretty solid to me.
ITA and IMO BM's downfall will be getting his stories mixed up multiple times in his LE interviews and trying to keep his lies straight.

I do NOT anticipate seeing BM taking the stand........:)

JMO
 
  • #135
Hasn't it been established that he could shoot the dart from a 22? Wouldn't that fit with the live shell being in the bedroom? The defense can try to muddy all they want but Barry is the only one who had the means, the opportunity and the motive to kill Suzanne. His alibi is hilarious, his destruction of evidence is a riot and his lies will be his undoing.
The witnesses will seal the deal.
We really need the AA to get a grasp on this.

That live shell in the bedroom means something, but I don’t have a clue what that is.

The 22 also means something, but I don’t know what that is either.

Barry says he shot deer recently with the dart gun (different from the 22), but the initial investigator said it didn’t look like it could fire.

So I don’t know what the hell is going on.
 
  • #136
ITA and IMO BM's downfall will be getting his stories mixed up multiple times in his LE interviews and trying to keep his lies straight.

I do NOT anticipate seeing BM taking the stand........:)

JMO
ETA - There will also be the damning testimony of the eight (or nine) public officials he tried to "influence".

IMO, that will bury him...

JMO
 
  • #137
For the narcissist, triangulation is a much used strategy. I can see the dynamic played out here.

I absolutely agree with you about the triangulation @rainbowshummingbird !

Tragically, once they moved to Colorado, isolating Suzanne from her friends and other family members, it was a perfect setting for a narcissist.
 
Last edited:
  • #138
Yes I think of poor Cheryl Coker - her remains found and no evidence yielded / now I need to go check her thread as I’m quite certain of her killer
JMO
You and me both
And shocked no arrest yet
 
  • #139
We really need the AA to get a grasp on this.

That live shell in the bedroom means something, but I don’t have a clue what that is.

The 22 also means something, but I don’t know what that is either.

Barry says he shot deer recently with the dart gun (different from the 22), but the initial investigator said it didn’t look like it could fire.

So I don’t know what the hell is going on.
He also said the dart gun looked like it hadn't been fired in a while and was 'disabled'? Yet, didn't BM say he'd used it recently? Maybe he was hiding the fact that he did indeed use the 22 but wanted to veer away from that fact?
At this point, I'm not sure what caliber shell was found or how I think the dart can be fired by a 22. I looked into it but didn't save anything so I could be mistaken.
 
  • #140
BAM!
BAM!!
BAM!!!
Awww @NoSI you’re a good person & may your kindness come back to you tenfold!
Thank you!
Thank you!!
Thank you!!!
Thank you!!!!
Hey it’s impossible to top 3 BAMS (is that a record @Warwick7 ?) but at least I can give ya 4 heartfelt thank yous! :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
112
Guests online
1,264
Total visitors
1,376

Forum statistics

Threads
632,360
Messages
18,625,291
Members
243,111
Latest member
ParalegalEagle13
Back
Top