and he may have been a better driver than you or I.I am shocked he was allowed to get a driver's license. It doesn't sound like he needed to ever be behind the wheel of a car.
I am tired of hearing how AL was not capable of anything.
and he may have been a better driver than you or I.I am shocked he was allowed to get a driver's license. It doesn't sound like he needed to ever be behind the wheel of a car.
<mod snip>
We know there was access to many guns and we know that if that wasn't the case, this probably wouldn't have happened.
Agreed. They probably will eventually be donated, but I think it is too soon. When Caylee's remains were found off Suburban Drive, stuffed animals and dolls were placed there by the hundreds. I remember when they started taking them away and there was a huge uproar as it was too soon for many, many people. To this day, people still place things there for her.
The difference between these toys and Caylee's toys is that it appears that these toys will not be destroyed by the elements and they really should be donated sometime after the New Year.
This story, if it's true reporting, speaks volumes on the family disconnect...I wonder how much communication was between Nancy & Peter after the divorce?
If very little communication went on after their divorce, it validates in my mind Nancy was going alone on raising her boy
Peter Lanza -- Adam Lanza's father -- reportedly had almost no involvement in his son's life in the years leading up to the Sandy Hook shooting.
NBC News reports that Adam had cut off communications with Peter, refusing to see him, according to a source close to the family.
Peter and Nancy Lanza split in 2001 and in 2010, Peter started dating a new woman. The source said that's when Adam stopped speaking with his dad. The father and son hadn't seen each other since then, according to the report.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/peter-lanza-adam-lanza_n_2324979.html
and he may have been a better driver than you or I.
I am tired of hearing how AL was not capable of anything.
Would an economic collapse even remotely effect Nancy? She has been getting over $200,000.00 a year in alimony and we don't even know how much she was awarded (lump sum) in the divorce. She lived a very comfortable life. One that had she saved right, could live out the rest of her life comfortably.
There's video here of the ex-sister-in-law being interviewed.
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/nancy-lanza-survivalist-preparing-economic-
(first video)
Agree, we don't know the whole story and history. However, from the news reports, the dad and brother themselves stated that they had not spoken or kept in touch with Adam for at least 3 years, since the dad and mom got divorced. If they had tried to contact him, they did not say that. I can only go by what is reported by MSM. I think had they actually called/emailed/wrote letters to Adam and Adam did ceased the communication, they would have stated that upfront, and said "I had called/emailed/wrote a letter to him a few times, but he never responded". JMO
Yes, but there she is, and stating it as fact. The reporter's not exactly pulling teeth, it doesn't appear. Nothing sensationalized about it.Thanks wfgodot. The 6 minute raw audio published by the Chicago Sun Times allows one to understand the soundbyte in context whereas the sensationalized video clip you linked to does not. Interestingly enough, the Sun Times article about their interview with Marsha mentioned but didn't highlight the survivalist or prepper stuff because it was not the focus. If only the Sun Times didn't have a pay wall I'd love for everyone to hear it.
snip
Sorry. AL is not "a victim." He killed twenty first-graders in cold blood. He murdered his mother and six teachers.
To assign him status as "victim" insults those many among us who battle mental illness daily, and do not resort to violence.
This is something that REALLY bothers me. Have we actually heard from LE or a DR. that there is REAL documented evidence that he actually suffered from ANYTHING?
I'm purely speculating here, I don't have all of the facts yet...But If NL tried to dampen AL's interest in the military because of AL's behaviors I think part of AL's rage was maybe he was realizing his career options were becoming very limited
He may have come up with the military career idea simply to avoid possibly the group home/special needs option that has been discussed on this thread.
He likely realized he never would be allowed to have access to guns in a group home ( as far as the one's I know of from our brother's group home experience) and possibly be limited on using his computers, cameras, etc ...Having unlimited freedoms at the big home and not having to share or be forced into dealing with strangers seemed to be a big part of AL's life.
This reality could've really set up rage towards his mom for squelching his interests
Simply it is dangerous to jump to conclusions before the facts are known. (For more information: Jewell, Richard; Echols, Damien; Misskelley, Jr., Jessie ; Baldwin, Jason).
While I am not disputing the fact that Adam Lanza is the shooter (and only perpetrator), I highlight the above examples to show how rumor/speculation/misreporting can wrongly influence public perception.
I have followed this from the beginning, or almost the beginning since I am on the West Coast and the whole incident was over by the time I got up and became aware of "a shooting at a school".
To be honest in the first few hours, I really didn't pay a whole lot of attention. A shooting at a school, 2 people dead. Okay, so what else is new?
Then, by early afternoon here, all of a sudden, there were 20 people dead, then shortly after, 26, then, 27, then it took awhile to include the fact that the shooter was dead, leaving 28 people dead.
In other words, it didn't really capture my attention until ALL OF SUDDEN there were 20 people dead. From 2 to 20!!!
While I think the reporting has been atrocious, probably the worst I have ever seen in terms of totally made up interviews and stories, I put the blame squarely on the Connecticut State Police policy to reveal as little information to the public as possible.
That is Lt. Vance's job and he has been doing it for fourteen years. You can read of past cases where information about the investigation is basically not released to the public. Not even after the case is over.
I remarked on this early on. While people praised what a great job he was doing, (I think they thought he was personally investigating the case) I thought it was odd, that we weren't really learning anything at all in the press conferences. For instance it was three days before the names of the shooter and the victim in the house were officially named. And, initially, the name of the shooter they themselves leaked to the press was WRONG! I think that's appalling.
In addition, when the police held those families at that Fire Station for hours, without informing them that their kids were dead, that was the tipping point for me. The Governor finally took control and had the backbone to tell the parents that they were there because, yes, in fact, their kids were dead. I honestly believe had it been left up to the State Police, it would have been a few more days before the people were identified and the names given out.
That's just my opinion and how I saw it as it was unfolding. I think it will be years, if ever, that the Connecticut State Police finishes their investigation and releases a report.
Lt. Vance's only job is to obsfucate for the Connecticut State Police, and that is exactly what he has done.
I think the citizens of Connecticut deserve to know more about what their State Police are up to, in other words, they really deserve more transparency in their government.
You included him as a "28th victim" in the context of the Newtown tragedy.I agree he is not a victim of the shooting. I did not say all mentally ill are violent. Each individual is different. Adam Lanza was a victim of HIS own mental illness which is uniquely his -- not yours or anyone else's.
Yes, but there she is, and stating it as fact. The reporter's not exactly pulling teeth, it doesn't appear. Nothing sensationalized about it.
I said weapons, guns or otherwise. Although I support a ban on assault weapons, I don't think it would have stopped AL. He was intent on killing and he would have used whatever he had even if he had to make a bomb, imo. He planned this meticulously and he had the brains to do it.. We will never get rid of all guns in this country and I will not blame NL directly or indirectly for having guns. I wish someone at the school had a gun when he showed up.Would have resorted to guns then, you are saying. He killed because he had access to guns.
This is something that REALLY bothers me. Have we actually heard from LE or a DR. that there is REAL documented evidence that he actually suffered from ANYTHING?