Coronavirus COVID-19 - Global Health Pandemic #105

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #661
  • #662
MELBOURNE, Australia -- Novak Djokovic held a practice session Tuesday, a day after he left immigration detention, focusing on defending his Australian Open title even while he still faces the prospect of deportation because he's not vaccinated against COVID-19.

The top-ranked tennis star hit the show courts of Melbourne Park, where the tournament is held, within hours of winning a legal battle that allowed him to stay in the country.

At issue is whether he has a valid exemption to rules requiring vaccination to enter Australia since he recently recovered from COVID-19. A judge ruled Monday that he could stay, but the immigration minister could still send him home.

There were also new questions raised Tuesday over an immigration form, on which he said he had not traveled in the 14 days before his flight to Australia. The Monte Carlo-based athlete was seen in Spain and Serbia in that two-week period.
Djokovic's travel raises new compliance concern
 
  • #663
  • #664
  • #665
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #666
Watching our morning news ...... it is not over yet. Seems Djokovic lied on his travel declaration (the declaration you have to complete and give to Immigration, as you enter Australia).

"Have you travelled in the last 14 days?" "No."
(There is published evidence that he had travelled.)

The Immigration Minister is 'looking into it'. There are penalties for lying on this declaration.

The travel question is one we are asked again and again, during covid. I am asked it at the dentist office, at the dr office, at the hospital ...... among the other screening questions (like 'do you feel well today?')
I don't know if this is a common screening question everywhere, but it is here.

Questions raised about whether Novak Djokovic lied about his travel history on border entry form

Yes, he is on the news daily here, so clear that he lied. Videos! Most reporters just come back to his honoring his privilege, rather than the responsibility. He is an international traveler by profession, and has a lot at stake to want to win this competition. The Australian Open is a huge feat. He DOES have a responsibility, in my mind.
 
  • #667
So which is it? Positive or negative? Can't be both.

Q&A: the key questions that are still to be answered in Djokovic saga
...
Did Novak Djokovic actually test positive for Covid-19?
...
However on Monday, Der Spiegel claimed that when it scanned the QR code belonging to Djokovic’s PCR test at 1.19pm German time it said: “Test result Negative.” However an hour later, after another scan, it said: “Positive.”

Several others – including the New York Times journalist Ben Rothenberg – reported the same findings, with Rothenberg also posting a photo of the two different results. When the Guardian tried on Tuesday it returned universally positive results.

Meanwhile, on Tuesday, Der Spiegel said it had found an anomaly in the timestamp for the digital version of Djokovic’s positive test which, it claimed, indicated the result may actually be from 26 December and not the 16th.
...
 
  • #668

Life Insurance policies always make smokers pay more for insurance.

And that is just a personal choice smokers make. There is obviously some impact on others with second hand smoke, but it is mainly the damage to the individual that the actuaries are calculating.

Unvaccinated people are killing many people, and are damaging our health care system.
In the mere absolute act of measuring and managing risk and uncertainty, the unvaccinated should be valued differently.

I
 
  • #669
Life Insurance policies always make smokers pay more for insurance.

And that is just a personal choice smokers make. There is obviously some impact on others with second hand smoke, but it is mainly the damage to the individual that the actuaries are calculating.

Unvaccinated people are killing many people, and are damaging our health care system.
In the mere absolute act of measuring and managing risk and uncertainty, the unvaccinated should be valued differently.

I

oh ITA! still surprised though
 
  • #670
  • #671
Covid loses 90% of ability to infect within minutes in air – study

Coronavirus loses 90% of its ability to infect us within 20 minutes of becoming airborne – with most of the loss occurring within the first five minutes, the world’s first simulations of how the virus survives in exhaled air suggest.

The findings re-emphasise the importance of short-range Covid transmission, with physical distancing and mask-wearing likely to be the most effective means of preventing infection. Ventilation, though still worthwhile, is likely to have a lesser impact.
...
The study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, suggested that as the viral particles leave the relatively moist and carbon dioxide-rich conditions of the lungs, they rapidly lose water and dry out, while the transition to lower levels of carbon dioxide is associated with a rapid increase in pH. Both of these factors disrupt the virus’s ability to infect human cells, but the speed at which the particles dry out varies according to the relative humidity of the surrounding air.
...
"It means that if I’m meeting friends for lunch in a pub today, the primary [risk] is likely to be me transmitting it to my friends, or my friends transmitting it to me, rather than it being transmitted from someone on the other side of the room,” said Reid. This highlights the importance of wearing a mask in situations where people cannot physically distance, he added.
...
 
  • #672
Covid loses 90% of ability to infect within minutes in air – study

Coronavirus loses 90% of its ability to infect us within 20 minutes of becoming airborne – with most of the loss occurring within the first five minutes, the world’s first simulations of how the virus survives in exhaled air suggest.

The findings re-emphasise the importance of short-range Covid transmission, with physical distancing and mask-wearing likely to be the most effective means of preventing infection. Ventilation, though still worthwhile, is likely to have a lesser impact.
...
The study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, suggested that as the viral particles leave the relatively moist and carbon dioxide-rich conditions of the lungs, they rapidly lose water and dry out, while the transition to lower levels of carbon dioxide is associated with a rapid increase in pH. Both of these factors disrupt the virus’s ability to infect human cells, but the speed at which the particles dry out varies according to the relative humidity of the surrounding air.
...
"It means that if I’m meeting friends for lunch in a pub today, the primary [risk] is likely to be me transmitting it to my friends, or my friends transmitting it to me, rather than it being transmitted from someone on the other side of the room,” said Reid. This highlights the importance of wearing a mask in situations where people cannot physically distance, he added.
...

“The findings support what epidemiologists have been observing on the ground, said Dr Julian Tang, a clinical virologist at the University of Leicester, adding that “masks are very effective … as well as social distancing. Improved ventilation will also help – particularly if this is close to the source.”
 
  • #673
Covid loses 90% of ability to infect within minutes in air – study

Coronavirus loses 90% of its ability to infect us within 20 minutes of becoming airborne – with most of the loss occurring within the first five minutes, the world’s first simulations of how the virus survives in exhaled air suggest.

The findings re-emphasise the importance of short-range Covid transmission, with physical distancing and mask-wearing likely to be the most effective means of preventing infection. Ventilation, though still worthwhile, is likely to have a lesser impact.
...
The study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, suggested that as the viral particles leave the relatively moist and carbon dioxide-rich conditions of the lungs, they rapidly lose water and dry out, while the transition to lower levels of carbon dioxide is associated with a rapid increase in pH. Both of these factors disrupt the virus’s ability to infect human cells, but the speed at which the particles dry out varies according to the relative humidity of the surrounding air.
...
"It means that if I’m meeting friends for lunch in a pub today, the primary [risk] is likely to be me transmitting it to my friends, or my friends transmitting it to me, rather than it being transmitted from someone on the other side of the room,” said Reid. This highlights the importance of wearing a mask in situations where people cannot physically distance, he added.
...

"It means that if I’m meeting friends for lunch in a pub today, the primary [risk] is likely to be me transmitting it to my friends, or my friends transmitting it to me, rather than it being transmitted from someone on the other side of the room,” said Reid. This highlights the importance of wearing a mask in situations where people cannot physically distance, he added.
...


Ok, but if you are meeting up w/friends in a pub, how can you stay masked? I mean why bother being in the pub if you aren't drinking or eating?
 
  • #674
Received an email ad today from Menard's store with the subject line: "We have Covid Tests". They have in stock the Flowflex antigen self-test kits, approved for EUA by the FDA in October, 2021. You have to buy a pack of 12, and limit is one pack per customer. A pack is $143.88, ( $11.99 a test kit). There are two tests in each kit. Email says they are only available online.
 
  • #675
Received an email ad today from Menard's store with the subject line: "We have Covid Tests". They have in stock the Flowflex antigen self-test kits, approved for EUA by the FDA in October, 2021. You have to buy a pack of 12, and limit is one pack per customer. A pack is $143.88, ( $11.99 a test kit). There are two tests in each kit. Email says they are only available online.
Not affordable for low income families.
 
  • #676
Received an email ad today from Menard's store with the subject line: "We have Covid Tests". They have in stock the Flowflex antigen self-test kits, approved for EUA by the FDA in October, 2021. You have to buy a pack of 12, and limit is one pack per customer. A pack is $143.88, ( $11.99 a test kit). There are two tests in each kit. Email says they are only available online.

Correction to post above: Each self-test kit only includes 1 test, not two.
 
  • #677
  • #678
  • #679
Great. My daughter has dropped out of college. Since Spring Semester 2020, it has just been one drama after another on campus. They can't even commit to in person classes for next semester, which is supposed to start next week. Looks like she is not the only one...

College enrollment plummeted during the pandemic. This fall, it's even worse

That's actually tragic for her. My daughter never finished college. I swear she needs 2 classes of credits to finish. I really hope things work out for your daughter.
 
  • #680
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
106
Guests online
2,112
Total visitors
2,218

Forum statistics

Threads
632,774
Messages
18,631,629
Members
243,292
Latest member
suspicious sims
Back
Top