- Joined
- Jun 27, 2019
- Messages
- 15,950
- Reaction score
- 201,294
Agree. COVID-19 death rate is often misquoted by the media or politicians to support what they are selling. It isn't known and should never be used as a metric. As you say, it is defined by death % per infected people, and we don't know the number of infected people.
The LA study results were astounding but was deeply flawed in how the subjects were selected. But astounding enough that I have to believe it is being repeated right now in randomized studies. And it can be done pretty quickly to give us our first look at a decent estimate of actual COVID-19 death rate. Which is incredibly important to understand the best approach to stop it.
IMO, the actual death rate may be between 0.2 and 0.4% based on the various flawed information that is out there. Still very dangerous since there is no vaccine.
I hope it's closer to 0.2% of all humans but 0.4-5 seems more likely.
However of the symptomatic, it's obviously much higher (13-15% doesn't seem like a wild estimate). Do the asymptomatic individuals have permanent immunity? Or, as with measles, mumps, rubella and a series of other viruses, will the second hit get them too? We don't know yet.
0.2% means that 2 out every 1000 people will die. 1 in 500. The median age in the US is about 68-69, which means that half are under 69 (in the US, we have nearly as many people dying in their 40's and 50's as in their early 60's). Many reasons. 0.5% means 5 out 1000 or 1 out of 200. That's a lot.
Healthcare workers and other essential workers and nursing home residents will continue to lead in number of deaths. Of people who get serious symptoms, it may be more like 10-20% who die, depending on demographics - that's an enormous healthcare load, regardless of overall mortality rates.
We need to know the rate of total infection and how many people are (relatively) asymptomatic. Given that people consider themselves "not sick" when they are coughing, sneezing and have red eyes - but no fever - it's going to be interesting and difficult research to get done. The mildly symptomatic may include many of us.
The Santa Clara County showed a 3% infection rate (way lower than other places - San Francisco's study is 30% of people with antibodies). Both studies are problematic, but very different locales. New York's is about 30% last time I read - and I think that's true for Spain and Italy as well.
Last edited: