It doesn't need to be that way. If we had flattened the curve enough, it would have allowed time for treatments and a vaccine to be developed. By following the Sweden model going forward, it is entirely possible that 60-70% will become infected prior to a vaccine, but it didn't have to be that way. With more self control, we could have stretched this out until early 2021, when hopefully a vaccine will exist.
Of course, we have those who now want to go with the "well, what if there is NEVER a vaccine" argument. Which makes it much easier for people to accept the fact that we might as well open up, because it's never going to get better, so we're only hurting ourselves hoping for something to come along. And sure, it is possible that will be the case, but not according to what most scientists are saying. Most seem to believe that an effective vaccine will be in production by 2021, and eventually it will be readily available. I have yet to hear anyone with intelligence say that it is unlikely a vaccine will be developed anytime in the next several years.
Mission, Role and Pledge | About | CDC
Mission
CDC works 24/7 to protect America from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and in the U.S. Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights disease and supports communities and citizens to do the same.
CDC increases the health security of our nation. As the nation’s health protection agency, CDC saves lives and protects people from health threats. To accomplish our mission, CDC conducts critical science and provides health information that protects our nation against expensive and dangerous health threats, and responds when these arise.
The best source is always CDCs own words, without censorship.
This is (SARS-CoV-2) very similar to the first SARS virus.Well, there's this guy. Fastest vaccine ever prepped for a virus was mumps (4 years). And it's hard to know what you mean by "several," but surely many people are not going to want to modify their behavior for 4 years. At least not in the US, not by a longshot.
And some nations seem to lack the economic ability to much (or the will, I guess): Brazil.
People really do differ on how many lives are worth the inconvenience and, perhaps also on how much loss of life from reshaping the economy so that the virus doesn't circulate.
I'm willing to sit it out for quite a while - but I'm older, am not trying to get a job or get a better job, plus I can mostly work from home. These are all big differences in how people see it, especially in the US where we have no social safety net.
I think these increases and the others being seen in other states now are the results of the attendance at the protests. MOOYesterday I posted about the highest New Cases total for Orange County, CA of 413. Today's # bests that with 434.
That means the 4 Highest Daily Totals since the beginning of crisis, have all happened in the last 8 days. (434, 413, 288, 297)
Amid Confusion About Reopening, An Expert Explains How To Assess COVID-19 Risk
I brought this over from the prior thread because i think Dr. Osterholm has the most comprehensive and useful information about this virus that i have read. it is a must read. It is scary because he says (and i did read this before) that eventually 60-70% of the population will become infected. Now that is a very scary statistic and means many more people will die from this virus. He basically states that the virus will do what it does-- it will circulate and kill people. We need to take precautions-- that being outdoors is better than being indoors; wearing masks is good---that surfaces in his opinion is not a serious vector of the disease and that we are "over the top" with disinfectants- this is an airborne disease.
He also says that he gets nasty emails and threats by people who think the virus is a hoax and is being hyped to go against the president - he has turned these emails over to the police.
I think they need personnel ( security guards) at the entrance to enforce it. We have some stores here who have guards ensuring customers only go in at the entrance and out at the exit plus make people take a trolley even if they only want one thing, because the trolley helps with distancing. Masks aren't mandatory at present in the UK except on public transport. Not sure how that is going as I haven't used public transport yet as I am limited to 5 miles except for essential or compassionate purposes. It is about to change soon but the rules are getting confusing now.@JaneEyre the stupidest thing ever, is the "suggestion" that businesses are responsible for enforcing that their clientele wear masks, or risk being closed.
It is working at Costco, probably because the people who go to Costco are from a higher SES. But other retail stores? Not so much.
My daughter (who works in retail) should not be held accountable to make some jerk who ignores a sign that requests patrons to wear a mask in the store. These people are already delusional, and as your article states, are predisposed to psychopathy.
Less expensive? I did but only for my daughters and grandchildren.People are moving to red states.
Hundreds test positive at Tyson Foods plant in Arkansas
Hundreds test positive at Tyson Foods plant in Arkansas
If this has been posted already, I apologize. Once again we embarrass ourselves on the World stage.
How’s this for a statement?
If you don’t like wearing a mask, you’ll hate the ventilator.
President Trump to attend 'Students for Trump' rally at Phoenix church on June 23
Trump will attend a rally in Phoenix--- he is planning more rallies as well.
Honestly, I have no words----
I think I call that mask shaming. Many people are on ventilators due to no fault of their own.
Where I live doesn't require masks. And do you have data that states you end up on a ventilator if you don't wear a mask? How did the old people in homes get it? How are these meat plant workers getting it?I don't see it as mask shaming: i see it as trying to convey a message: yes a mask may be uncomfortable but it is very important to wear it and if you choose not to do so you may be leaving yourself vulnerable to the virus and could wind up on a ventilator, which is a lot more uncomfortable than a mask.
Where I live doesn't require masks. And do you have data that states you end up on a ventilator if you don't wear a mask? How did the old people in homes get it? How are these meat plant workers getting it?
Well, there's this guy. Fastest vaccine ever prepped for a virus was mumps (4 years). And it's hard to know what you mean by "several," but surely many people are not going to want to modify their behavior for 4 years. At least not in the US, not by a longshot.
And some nations seem to lack the economic ability to much (or the will, I guess): Brazil.
People really do differ on how many lives are worth the inconvenience and, perhaps also on how much loss of life from reshaping the economy so that the virus doesn't circulate.
I'm willing to sit it out for quite a while - but I'm older, am not trying to get a job or get a better job, plus I can mostly work from home. These are all big differences in how people see it, especially in the US where we have no social safety net.
I do. It's not mandatory to attend or to watch it on TV. He had 4 million watch it live last time. So you can just do that safely if you don't want to attend.
In 1957, a vaccine for what was called the Chinese flu virus was developed in 4-5 months. Some are more complex than others, but we should have a vaccine in the next several months. JMO, it will be developed in Europe, Japan or China as US drug development has become too commercialized and is no longer geared to find real cures quickly. We've already wasted a lot of time testing existing therapies sitting on the shelf at pharma companies here.
WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 15 June 2020
15 June 2020
“Good morning, good afternoon and good evening.
Globally, more than 7.8 million cases of COVID-19 have now been reported to WHO, and more than 430,000 deaths.
It took more than 2 months for the first 100,000 cases to be reported. For the past two weeks, more than 100,000 new cases have been reported almost every single day.
Almost 75% of recent cases come from 10 countries, mostly in the Americas and South Asia.
However, we also see increasing numbers of cases in Africa, eastern Europe, central Asia and the Middle East.
Even in countries that have demonstrated the ability to suppress transmission, countries must stay alert to the possibility of resurgence.
Last week, China reported a new cluster of cases in Beijing, after more than 50 days without a case in that city. More than 100 cases have now been confirmed.
The origin and extent of the outbreak are being investigated.
===
Despite the ongoing global response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we cannot lose sight of other significant public health issues, including influenza.
Influenza affects every country every year, and takes its own deadly toll.
As we enter the southern hemisphere influenza season and begin planning for the northern hemisphere season, we must ensure that influenza remains a top priority.
Co-circulation of COVID-19 and influenza can worsen the impact on health care systems that are already overwhelmed.
More than 500 million people are vaccinated against flu every year, based on recommendations from WHO on the composition of flu vaccines.
These recommendations are based on data and virus samples collected and analyzed by WHO’s Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System, or GISRS.
The GISRS system has been functioning since 1952 and I would like to thank the more than 125 countries that participate in it.
Over the past 8 years, significant strengthening of the system has been made possible through the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework, and I would also like to thank the public and private sector partners that participate in this global system.
The infrastructure, people, skills and experience built up through GISRS, WHO Collaborating Centres, and national influenza centres have been the foundation for detecting COVID-19.
However, this well-established system is now seeing significant challenges.
Influenza surveillance has either been suspended or is declining in many countries, and there has been a sharp decline in sharing of influenza information and viruses because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Compared with the last three years, we’ve seen a dramatic decrease in the number of specimens tested for influenza globally.
We’ve also seen a 62% decrease in the number of virus shipments to WHO Collaborating Centres, and a 94% decrease in the number of influenza viruses with genetic sequence data uploaded to the GISAID database.
These decreases are due to a combination of issues, including the repurposing of staff and supplies, overburdened laboratories, and transport restrictions.
These disruptions may have short- and long-term effects, such as the loss of capacities to detect and report new influenza viruses with pandemic potential.
As many of you know, twice a year WHO convenes a group of experts who together analyze the circulating flu strains. Based on their analysis they select the viruses that should be targeted by flu vaccines for the upcoming season in each hemisphere.
To know which viruses are circulating, WHO relies on information from countries reported through GISRS, which we use to make recommendations for the composition of influenza vaccines.
This will help us to prevent more severe cases of flu and more deaths.
WHO has published guidance on how to integrate surveillance for COVID-19 into routine influenza surveillance as an efficient way to track both of these important respiratory viruses.
This is not only cost-effective, it’s also essential for protecting the world against the next flu season.
The Southern Hemisphere flu season is already underway. There is no time to lose.
I thank you.”
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.