Coronavirus COVID-19 - Global Health Pandemic #69

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #621
If Hospitals do not have enough PPE (deplorable) how are Teachers going to have access :mad:


That may be a contributing factor. I do know our schools and county spend a lot of their CARES money on PPE. That was tbe first order placed, when the money arrived.

Also nursing homes are becoming a priority second to hospitals. VHA shows lack of PPE on our Virginia Dashboard for nursing homes. I've not seen severe shortages since May.

I think demand still exceeds supply.
 
  • #622
She reminds me of my sister who is 76. :)

I just edited and added it to my post.
I edited mine, but its ok. Had a sudden flash of worry for my aunt! Hope your sister is safe in *safer* Wales
 
  • #623
I saw a video today of a 77 year old having a tantrum sitting on the floor. I will have to find it again and post it. It was mask related. She had it on one ear.


Spoiled little brat. Very spry for 77 though!
 
  • #624
The article is saying US should have had a Europe travel ban earlier than March 3. It is not saying the China ban should not have been in place and neither am I. The point is noone knew it was even in Europe so how could a ban have been earlier? Travellers between NY and Europe, especially Italy, would have been enormous numbers from well before Christmas and New Year so the virus would have already been in the city completely unknowm at that time.

ETA First Italian case was diagnosed 20th February.

Diagnosing the first COVID-19 patient in Italy – Codogno, Italy

As late as March 6th, Dr. Fauci was saying that there was no need for social distancing or other mitigation strategies to be implemented across the country, other than in Seattle where there was community spread. Asked about other mitigation strategies, like eliminating more travel, etc., he said that no, we're not there yet as a country. He said that at that time, the White House Task Force was meeting daily, and on the phone several times a day.

Dr. Anthony Fauci: Social distancing not yet needed nationwide to fight coronavirus
 
  • #625
Governor about to give his weekly presser. I'm a nervous wreck (again) that he's going to close stuff. Our numbers are improving, and we're off the national "font page," so hopefully he gives the current orders more time. I assume most of it will be about schools, though.
 
  • #626
This is useful for patients who are very very sick and for whom there are few alternatives. As with all radiation, there's a significant risk. One time, if it helps, is not too bad, but it's certainly targeted enough to raise worries about longterm effects (in some people).

What we need to know is whether the GGO's in the lungs are permanent, and if they are, whether the radiation increases the risk of lung cancer.

I was wondering the same thing when I read this study. Will this not increase cancer risk? I also use the Emory hospital system so I find it interesting to at least know what treatments they are working on locally. I hope this is not something I ever need.
 
  • #627
Japan "extremely concerned" as 136 COVID cases reported on U.S. bases - CBS News
July 15

“Okinawa, Japan — The biggest coronavirus outbreak within the U.S. military anywhere in the world continues to grow. U.S. Forces Japan confirmed Wednesday another 36 infections among troops on the Japanese island of Okinawa, bringing the total to at least 136 since the U.S. military reported its first cases there last week.

Until then, all of Okinawa had seen only 148 confirmed cases of COVID-19 since February, with Japanese authorities managing to contain the spread of the virus that causes the disease.

In a sign of the growing tension between Japanese officials and the U.S. military in Okinawa, Defense Minister Taro Kono has pointed to "several problems" with the U.S. response to the pandemic. He notably avoided giving specifics when pressed by reporters earlier this week.”

—-

Coronavirus outbreak on U.S. bases in Okinawa grows, fueling anger in Japan
July 14

“Local officials and news reports have pointed to Fourth of July parties held both on and off the bases — attended by hundreds if not thousands of personnel and employees — as the likely root of the new outbreak.“

—-

July 13

“Mr. Tamaki added that he had “strong doubts” about the prevention measures reported by the United States.“

[...]

““When anything like this happens, when the military doesn’t provide essential information of how many people are infected or where they are from or where they have been outside of the base, the Okinawan people are really scared and frustrated and disappointed,” said Manabu Sato, professor of political science at Okinawa International University, which overlooks the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma.

“I’m scared,” said Tomonari Kiyuna, a worker at a noodle shop in Chatan, a neighborhood on Okinawa frequented by American soldiers. “We’re very careful, wearing masks, washing hands, and sanitizing,” Mr. Kiyuna said. “I want them to disclose the information. They are Americans but they are staying in Okinawa, Japan. Okinawans or the Japanese people have the right to know” about infections stemming from the bases.“

Coronavirus Outbreak at U.S. Bases in Japan Roils an Uneasy Relationship

I'd be angry too! They've done an amazing job keeping infections down and should not have to put up with the US military infecting their island because they can't be bothered to prevent spread and properly test.
 
  • #628
Governor about to give his weekly presser. I'm a nervous wreck (again) that he's going to close stuff. Our numbers are improving, and we're off the national "font page," so hopefully he gives the current orders more time. I assume most of it will be about schools, though.
What makes you think things might close if your numbers are improving?

(Sorry dont recall which state you are in)
 
  • #629
Melbourne's tower lockdowns reveal the precarious future of Victorian public housing
AABuwWD.img

Melbourne's tower lockdowns reveal the precarious future of Victorian public housing

By Alan Weedon

1 hour ago

BB16PFQX.img

© Provided by ABC Health Melbourne's public housing towers of this type were first constructed in the 1960s. (ABC News: Alan Weedon

upload_2020-7-17_8-0-29.png
(ABC News: Alan Weedon)
Long before gleaming residential towers of glass and steel emerged on Melbourne's streets, there were forebears that stood uninterrupted across the inner-city skyline for decades.

These were the vast public housing estates that were built from the 1960s onward, sprouting in traditionally working-class suburbs including Flemington, Fitzroy, Footscray, Prahran and South Melbourne.

Towering over nearby workers' cottages, these towers were conceptualised in the post-war period, where Government sought to provide everybody with modern homes and clear away Victorian and Edwardian-era slums that ringed the CBD.

In recent days, it has been these post-war towers that have shot to national attention, as residents of nine high-density estates in Melbourne's inner north-west were placed into an unprecedented lockdown to halt a coronavirus outbreak.

At the time of writing, one estate in North Melbourne remains under lockdown, due to the high number of active coronavirus cases in the tower.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2020-7-17_7-59-9.png
    upload_2020-7-17_7-59-9.png
    70 bytes · Views: 7
  • upload_2020-7-17_8-1-33.png
    upload_2020-7-17_8-1-33.png
    70 bytes · Views: 7
  • #630
too funny!
 

Attachments

  • 109787189_10217441160722078_8011396301972567083_n.jpg
    109787189_10217441160722078_8011396301972567083_n.jpg
    45.7 KB · Views: 52
  • #631
one more...(and yes, I went to Catholic School - these nuns are really good at this "making you social distance" stuff!)
 

Attachments

  • 105920692_2745031329119542_6688118412196167371_n.jpg
    105920692_2745031329119542_6688118412196167371_n.jpg
    31.1 KB · Views: 34
  • #632
Thanks for sharing, I thought it was much later, like Feb or March. I must be remembering the delay in declaring a pandemic.

I'll go back to the thread. But, thanks for correcting my boo boo. That's the way misinformation gets started.

Eta...Thanks for the timeline.

I started watching the daily talks in January too. They were definitely warning people and very clear for the potential for a pandemic and how action needed to be taken now.

But you are right they were delayed in calling it a pandemic. I remember us on the thread feeling really frustrated that we were meeting WHO's own criteria but they essentially changed it midstream. I think they were trying to avoid panic. But no one really took it seriously either until it was declared a pandemic. I remember sharing articles about it almost daily on FB and it was almost universally ignored till that declaration.
 
  • #633
Yes, we should have locked the barn door in early Dec, but China and WHO were reassuring everyone nothing's wrong.

This whole world wide pandemic could have been stopped before it left the boarders of China. But looking back don't change all the pain, suffering and death.

We just gotta buckle down and stop the spread.

Moo....

Hi Simply Southern,

WHO has NEVER said “nothing’s wrong”, ever. They have said precisely THE OPPOSITE ever since they knew about this virus and have been very seriously warning the world since as soon as they knew about it. Did you watch any of the January Press Conferences? They declared it a Public Health Emergency of International Concern which is their HIGHEST level of alert they had. Happy to bring forward information and timeline.

Eta:

Timeline of WHO’s response to COVID-19

Press briefings

Thanks for sharing, I thought it was much later, like Feb or March. I must be remembering the delay in declaring a pandemic.

I'll go back to the thread. But, thanks for correcting my boo boo. That's the way misinformation gets started.

Eta...Thanks for the timeline.

Here are some timeline notes, hardly an exhaustive list I’m sure / source:

31 Dec 2019
WHO’s Country Office in the People’s Republic of China picked up a media statement by the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission from their website on cases of ‘viral pneumonia’ in Wuhan, People’s Republic of China.

The Country Office notified the International Health Regulations (IHR) focal point in the WHO Western Pacific Regional Office about the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission media statement of the cases and provided a translation of it.

WHO’s Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources (EIOS) platform also picked up a media report on ProMED (a programme of the International Society for Infectious Diseases) about the same cluster of cases of “pneumonia of unknown cause”, in Wuhan.

Several health authorities from around the world contacted WHO seeking additional information.

1 January 2020
WHO requested information on the reported cluster of atypical pneumonia cases in Wuhan from the Chinese authorities.

WHO activated its Incident Management Support Team (IMST), as part of its emergency response framework, which ensures coordination of activities and response across the three levels of WHO (Headquarters, Regional, Country) for public health emergencies.

2 January 2020
The WHO Representative in China wrote to the National Health Commission, offering WHO support and repeating the request for further information on the cluster of cases.

WHO informed Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN) partners about the cluster of pneumonia cases in the People’s Republic of China. GOARN partners include major public health agencies, laboratories, sister UN agencies, international organizations and NGOs.

3 January 2020
Chinese officials provided information to WHO on the cluster of cases of ‘viral pneumonia of unknown cause’ identified in Wuhan.

4 January 2020
WHO tweeted that there was a cluster of pneumonia cases – with no deaths – in Wuhan, Hubei province, People’s Republic of China, and that investigations to identify the cause were underway.

5 January 2020
WHO shared detailed information about a cluster of cases of pneumonia of unknown cause through the IHR (2005) Event Information System, which is accessible to all Member States. The event notice provided information on the cases and advised Member States to take precautions to reduce the risk of acute respiratory infections.

WHO also issued its first Disease Outbreak News report. This is a public, web-based platform for the publication of technical information addressed to the scientific and public health communities, as well as global media. The report contained information about the number of cases and their clinical status; details about the Wuhan national authority’s response measures; and WHO’s risk assessment and advice on public health measures. It advised that “WHO’s recommendations on public health measures and surveillance of influenza and severe acute respiratory infections still apply”.

9 January 2020
WHO reported that Chinese authorities have determined that the outbreak is caused by a novel coronavirus.

WHO convened the first of many teleconferences with global expert networks, beginning with the Clinical Network.

10 January 2020
The Global Coordination Mechanism for Research and Development to prevent and respond to epidemics held its first teleconference on the novel coronavirus, as did the Scientific Advisory Group of the research and development (R&D) Blueprint, a global strategy and preparedness plan that allows the rapid activation of research and development activities during epidemics.

The Director-General spoke with the Head of the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. He also had a call to share information with the Director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Strategic and Technical Advisory Group on Infectious Hazards (STAG-IH) held its first meeting on the novel coronavirus outbreak.
10-12 January 2020
WHO published a comprehensive package of guidance documents for countries, covering topics related to the management of an outbreak of a new disease:

11 January 2020
WHO tweeted that it had received the genetic sequences for the novel coronavirus from the People’s Republic of China and expected these to soon be made publicly available.
Chinese media reported the first death from the novel coronavirus.

12 January 2020
WHO convened the first teleconference with the diagnostics and laboratories global expert network.

13 January 2020
The Ministry of Public Health in Thailand reported an imported case of lab-confirmed novel coronavirus from Wuhan, the first recorded case outside of the People’s Republic of China.

WHO publishes first protocol for a RT-PCR assay by a WHO partner laboratory to diagnose the novel coronavirus.

14 January 2020

WHO held a press briefing during which it stated that, based on experience with respiratory pathogens, the potential for human-to-human transmission in the 41 confirmed cases in the People’s Republic of China existed: “it is certainly possible that there is limited human-to-human transmission”.

WHO tweeted that preliminary investigations by the Chinese authorities had found “no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission”. In its risk assessment, WHO said additional investigation was “needed to ascertain the presence of human-to-human transmission, modes of transmission, common source of exposure and the presence of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases that are undetected”.

16 January 2020
The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare informed WHO of a confirmed case of a novel coronavirus in a person who travelled to Wuhan. This was the second confirmed case detected outside of the People’s Republic of China. WHO stated that considering global travel patterns, additional cases in other countries were likely.

The Pan American Health Organization/WHO Regional office for the Americas (PAHO/AMRO) issued its first epidemiological alert on the novel coronavirus. The alert included recommendations covering international travellers, infection prevention and control measures and laboratory testing.

17 January 2020
WHO convened the first meeting of the analysis and modelling working group for the novel coronavirus.

19 January 2020
The WHO Western Pacific Regional Office (WHO/WPRO) tweeted that, according to the latest information received and WHO analysis, there was evidence of limited human-to-human transmission.

20 January 2020
WHO published guidance on home care for patients with suspected infection.

20-21 January 2020
WHO conducted the first mission to first mission to Wuhan and met with public health officials to learn about the response to the cluster of cases of novel coronavirus.

21 January 2020
WHO/WPRO tweeted that it was now very clear from the latest information that there was “at least some human-to-human transmission”, and that infections among health care workers strengthened the evidence for this.

The United States of America (USA) reported its first confirmed case of the novel coronavirus. This was the first case in the WHO Region of the Americas.

WHO convened the first meeting of the global expert network on infection prevention and control.

22 January 2020
The WHO mission to Wuhan issued a statement saying that evidence suggested human-to-human transmission in Wuhan but that more investigation was needed to understand the full extent of transmission.

22-23 January 2020
The WHO Director-General convened an IHR Emergency Committee (EC) regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus. The EC was comprised of 15 independent experts from around the world and was charged with advising the Director-General as to whether the outbreak constituted a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC).

The Committee was not able to reach a conclusion on 22 January based on the limited information available. As the Committee was not able to make a recommendation, the Director-General asked the Committee to continue its deliberations the next day. The Director-General held a media briefing on the novel coronavirus, to provide an update on the Committee’s deliberations.

The EC met again on 23 January and members were equally divided as to whether the event constituted a PHEIC, as several members considered that there was still not enough information for it, given its restrictive and binary nature (only PHEIC or no PHEIC can be determined; there is no intermediate level of warning). As there was a divergence of views, the EC did not advise the Director-General that the event constituted a PHEIC but said it was ready to be reconvened within 10 days. The EC formulated advice for WHO, the People’s Republic of China, other countries and the global community.

The Director-General accepted the advice of the Committee and held a second media briefing, giving a statement on the advice of the EC and what WHO was doing in response to the outbreak.

24 January 2020
France informed WHO of three cases of novel coronavirus, all of whom had travelled from Wuhan. These were the first confirmed cases in the WHO European region (EURO).

WHO held an informal consultation on the prioritization of candidate therapeutic agents for use in novel coronavirus infection.

The Director of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) urged countries in the Americas to be prepared to detect early, isolate and care for patients infected with the new coronavirus, in case of receiving travelers from countries where there was ongoing transmission of novel coronavirus cases. The Director spoke at a PAHO briefing for ambassadors of the Americas to the Organization of American States (OAS) in Washington.

25 January 2020
The WHO Regional Director for Europe issued a public statement outlining the importance of being ready at the local and national levels for detecting cases, testing samples and clinical management.

WHO released its first free online course on the novel coronavirus on its OpenWHO learning platform.

27 January 2020
The WHO Regional Director for South-East Asia issued a press release that urged countries in the Region to focus on their readiness for the rapid detection of imported cases and prevention of further spread.

27-28 January 2020
A senior WHO delegation led by the Director-General arrived in Beijing to meet Chinese leaders, learn more about the response in the People’s Republic of China, and to offer technical assistance. The Director-General met with President Xi Jinping on 28 January, and discussed continued collaboration on containment measures in Wuhan, public health measures in other cities and provinces, conducting further studies on the severity and transmissibility of the virus, continuing to share data, and a request for China to share biological material with WHO. They agreed that an international team of leading scientists should travel to China to better understand the context, the overall response, and exchange information and experience.

29 January 2020
On his return to Switzerland from China, the Director-General presented an update to Member States on the response to the outbreak of novel coronavirus infection in China, at the 30th Meeting of the Programme, Budget and Administration Committee (PBAC) of the Executive Board. He informed the PBAC that he had reconvened the Emergency Committee on the novel coronavirus under the IHR (2005), which would meet the following day to advise on whether the outbreak constituted a PHEIC.

The Director-General also held a press briefing on his visit to China and announced the reconvening of the EC the next day. The Director-General based the decision to reconvene on the “deeply concerning” continued increase in cases and evidence of human-to-human transmission outside China, in addition to the numbers outside China holding the potential for a much larger outbreak, even though they were still relatively small. The Director-General also spoke of his agreement with President Xi Jinping that WHO would lead a team of international experts to visit China as soon as possible to work with the government on increasing the understanding of the outbreak, to guide global response efforts.

WHO held the first of its weekly informal discussions with a group of public health leaders from around the world, in line with its commitment to conducting listening exercises and outreach beyond formal mechanisms.

The United Arab Emirates reported the first cases in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region. The Regional Director affirmed that the Regional Office continued to monitor disease trends and work with Member States to ensure the ability “to detect and respond to potential cases”.

The Pandemic Supply Chain Network (PSCN) created by WHO, in collaboration with the World Economic Forum, held its first meeting. The mission of PSCN is “to create and manage a market network allowing for WHO and private sector partners to access any supply chain functionality and asset from end-to-end anywhere in the world at any scale”.

WHO published advice on the use of masks in the community, during home care and in health care settings.

30 January 2020
WHO held a Member State briefing to provide more information about the outbreak.

The WHO Director-General reconvened the IHR Emergency Committee (EC).

The EC advised the Director-General that the outbreak now met the criteria for a PHEIC. The Director-General accepted the EC’s advice and declared the novel coronavirus outbreak a PHEIC. At that time there were 98 cases and no deaths in 18 countries outside China. Four countries had evidence (8 cases) of human-to-human transmission outside China (Germany, Japan, the United States of America, and Viet Nam).

The EC formulated advice for the People’s Republic of China, all countries and the global community, which the Director-General accepted and issued as Temporary Recommendations under the IHR. The Director-General gave a statement, providing an overview of the situation in China and globally; the statement also explained the reasoning behind the decision to declare a PHEIC and outlined the EC's recommendations.

31 January 2020
WHO’s Regional Director for Africa sent out a guidance note to all countries in the Region emphasising the importance of readiness and early detection of cases.

2 February 2020
First dispatch of RT-PCR lab diagnostic kits shipped to WHO Regional Offices.

3 February 2020
WHO finalised its Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan(SPRP), centred on improving capacity to detect, prepare and respond to the outbreak. The SPRP translated what had been learned about the virus at that stage into strategic action to guide the development of national and regional operational plans. Its content is structured around how to rapidly establish international coordination, scale up country preparedness and response operations, and accelerate research and innovation.

4 February 2020
The WHO Director-General asked the UN Secretary-General to activate the UN crisis management policy, which held its first meeting on 11 February.

During the 146th Executive Board, WHO held a technical briefing on the novel coronavirus. In his opening remarks, the Director-General urged Member States to prepare themselves by taking action now, saying “We have a window of opportunity. While 99% of cases are in China, in the rest of the world we only have 176 cases”.

Responding to a question at the Executive Board, the Secretariat said, “it is possible that there may be individuals who are asymptomatic that shed virus, but we need more detailed studies around this to determine how often that is happening and if this is leading to secondary transmission”.

5 February 2020
WHO's headquarters began holding daily media briefings on the novel coronavirus, the first time that WHO has held daily briefings by the Director-General or Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme.

9 February 2020
WHO deployed an advance team for the WHO-China Joint Mission, having received final sign-off from the People’s Republic of China that day. The mission had been agreed between the Director-General and President Xi Jinping during the WHO delegation’s visit to China at the end of January. The advance team completed five days of intensive preparation for the Mission, working with China’s National Health Commission, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, local partners and related entities and the WHO China Country Office.

11 February 2020
WHO announced that the disease caused by the novel coronavirus would be named COVID-19. Following best practices, the name of the disease was chosen to avoid inaccuracy and stigma and therefore did not refer to a geographical location, an animal, an individual or group of people.

11-12 February 2020
WHO convened a Global Research and Innovation Forum on the novel coronavirus, attended in person by more than 300 experts and funders from 48 countries, with a further 150 joining online. Participants came together to assess the level of knowledge, identify gaps and work together to accelerate and fund priority research, with equitable access as a fundamental principle underpinning this work.

Topics covered by the Forum included: the origin of the virus, natural history, transmission, diagnosis; epidemiological studies; clinical characterization and management; infection prevention and control; R&D for candidate therapeutics and vaccines; ethical considerations for research; and the integration of the social sciences into the outbreak response.

The Forum was convened in line with the WHO R&D Blueprint, which was activated to accelerate diagnostics, vaccines and therapeutics for this novel coronavirus.

12 February 2020
Supplementing the SPRP with further detail, WHO published Operational Planning Guidelines to Support Country Preparedness and Response, structured around the eight pillars of country-level coordination, planning, and monitoring; risk communication and community engagement; surveillance, rapid response teams, and case investigation; points of entry; national laboratories; infection prevention and control; case management; and operational support and logistics. These guidelines operationalised technical guidance, such as that published on 10-12 January.

13 February 2020
WHO’s Digital Solutions Unit convened a roundtable of 30 companies in Silicon Valley to help build support for WHO to keep people safe and informed about COVID-19.

14 February 2020
Based on lessons learned from the H1N1 and Ebola outbreaks, WHO finalised guidelines for organizers of mass gatherings, in light of COVID-19.

15 February 2020
The Director-General spoke at the Munich Security Conference, a global forum dedicated to issues of international security, including health security, where he also held several bilateral meetings

In his speech, the Director-General made three requests of the international community: use the window of opportunity to intensify preparedness, adopt a whole-of-government approach and be guided by solidarity, not stigma. He also expressed concern at the global lack of urgency in funding the response.

16 February 2020
The WHO-China Joint Mission began its work. As part of the mission to assess the seriousness of this new disease; its transmission dynamics; and the nature and impact of China’s control measures, teams made field visits to Beijing, Guangdong, Sichuan and Wuhan.

The Mission consisted of 25 national and international experts from the People’s Republic of China, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Nigeria, the Russian Federation, Singapore, the United States of America and WHO, all selected after broad consultation to secure the best talent from a diversity of geographies and specialties. It was led by a Senior Advisor to the WHO Director-General, with the Head of Expert Panel of COVID-19 Response at the China National Health Commission (NHC) as co-lead.

Throughout the global outbreak, WHO has regularly sent missions to countries to learn from and support responses, at the request of the affected Member State. Particularly in the early stages of the worldwide COVID-19 response, missions went to countries facing relatively high levels of community transmission, such as the Islamic Republic of Iran, Italy, and Spain.

19 February 2020
Weekly WHO Member State Briefings on COVID-19 began, to share the latest knowledge and insights on COVID-19.

21 February 2020
The WHO Director-General appointedsix special envoys on COVID-19, to provide strategic advice and high-level political advocacy and engagement in different parts of the world:

  • Professor Dr Maha El Rabbat, former Minister of Health of Egypt;
  • Dr David Nabarro, former special adviser to the UN Secretary-General on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Climate Change;
  • Dr John Nkengasong, Director of the African Centres for Disease Control and Prevention;
  • Dr Mirta Roses, former Director of the WHO Region of the Americas;
  • Dr Shin Young-soo, former Regional Director of the WHO Region of the Western Pacific;
  • Professor Samba Sow, Director-General of the Center for Vaccine Development in Mali.
24 February 2020
The Team Leaders of the WHO-China Joint Mission on COVID-19 held a press conference to report on the main findings of the mission.

The Mission warned that "much of the global community is not yet ready, in mindset and materially, to implement the measures that have been employed to contain COVID-19 in China”.

The Mission stressed that “to reduce COVID-19 illness and death, near-term readiness planning must embrace the large-scale implementation of high-quality, non-pharmaceutical public health measures”, such as case detection and isolation, contact tracing and monitoring/quarantining and community engagement.

Major recommendations were developed for the People’s Republic of China, countries with imported cases and/or outbreaks of COVID-19, uninfected countries, the public and the international community. For example, in addition to the above, countries with imported cases and/or outbreaks were recommended to "immediately activate the highest level of national Response Management protocols to ensure the all-of-government and all-of-society approach needed to contain COVID-19".

Success was presented as dependent on fast decision-making by top leaders, operational thoroughness by public health systems and societal engagement.

In addition to the Mission press conference, WHO published operational operational considerations for managing COVID-19 cases and outbreaks on board ships, following the outbreak of COVID-19 during an international voyage.

25 February 2020
Confirmation of the second case in WHO's African Region, in Algeria. This followed the earlier reporting of a case in Egypt, the first on the African continent. The Regional Director for Africa called for countries to step up their readiness.

27 February 2020
WHO published guidance on the rational use of personal protective equipment, in view of global shortages. This provided recommendations on the type of personal protective equipment to use depending on the setting, personnel and type of activity.

28 February 2020
The Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission was issued, as a reference point for countries on measures needed to contain COVID-19.

29 February 2020
WHO published considerations for the quarantine of individuals in the context of containment for COVID-19. This described who should be quarantined and the minimum conditions for quarantine to avoid the risk of further transmission.

3 March 2020
WHO issued a call for industry and governments to increase manufacturing by 40 per cent to meet rising global demand in response to the shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health workers worldwide.

This call fits within a broader scope of ongoing engagement with industry, through WHO’s EPI-WIN network and via partners, such as the International Chamber of Commerce and World Economic Forum, the latter of which has supported COVID-19 media briefings at the regional level.

6 March 2020
WHO published the Global Research Roadmap for the novel coronavirus developed by the working groups of the Research Forum.

The Roadmap outlines key research priorities in nine key areas. These include the natural history of the virus, epidemiology, diagnostics, clinical management, ethical considerations and social sciences, as well as longer-term goals for therapeutics and vaccines.

7 March 2020
To mark the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases surpassing 100 000 globally, WHO issued a statement calling for action to stop, contain, control, delay and reduce the impact of the virus at every opportunity.

WHO issued a consolidated package of existing guidance covering the preparedness, readiness and response actions for four different transmission scenarios: no cases, sporadic cases, clusters of cases and community transmission.

9 March 2020
The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, an independent high-level body established by WHO and the World Bank, responsible for monitoring global preparedness for health emergencies,called for an immediate injection of US$8 billion for the COVID-19 responseto: support WHO to coordinate and prioritize support efforts to the most vulnerable countries; develop new diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines; strengthen unmet needs for regional surveillance and coordination; and to ensure sufficient supplies of protective equipment for health workers.

10 March 2020
WHO, UNICEF and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) issued guidance outlining critical considerations and practical checklists to keep schools safe, with tips for parents and caregivers, as well as children and students themselves.

11 March 2020
Deeply concerned both by the alarming levels of spread and severity, and by the alarming levels of inaction, WHO made the assessment that COVID-19 could be characterized as a pandemic.

Speaking at the COVID-19 media briefing, the Director-General highlighted how WHO had been in full response mode since being notified of the first cases and "called every day for countries to take urgent and aggressive action".

Recognising that COVID-19 was not just a public health crisis but one that would touch every sector, he restated WHO's call – made from the beginning – for countries to take a whole-of-government, whole-of-society approach, built around a comprehensive strategy to prevent infections, save lives and minimize impact.

Emphasising that "we cannot say this loudly enough, or clearly enough, or often enough", he stressed that "all countries can still change the course of this pandemic" if they “detect, test, treat, isolate, trace, and mobilize their people in the response”.

He stressed that “the challenge for many countries who are now dealing with large clusters or community transmission is not whether they can do the same – it’s whether they will”.

13 March 2020
The Director-General said that Europe had become the epicentre of the pandemic with more reported cases and deaths than the rest of the world combined, apart from the People’s Republic of China.

WHO, the UN Foundation and partners launched the COVID-19 Solidarity Response Fund to receive donations from private individuals, corporations and institutions. In just 10 days, the Fund raised more than US$70 million, from more than 187,000 individuals and organizations, to help health workers on the front lines to do their life-saving work, treat patients and advance research for treatments and vaccines.

16 March 2020
WHO launched the COVID-19 Partners Platform as an enabling tool for all countries, implementing partners, donors and contributors to collaborate in the global COVID-19 response. The Partners Platform features real-time tracking to support the planning, implementation and resourcing of country preparedness and response activities.

17 March 2020
WHO, together with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) published guidance on scaling-up COVID-19 outbreak readiness and response operations in camps and camp-like settings.

18 March 2020
WHO and partners launched the Solidarity trial, an international clinical trial that aims to generate robust data from around the world to find the most effective treatments for COVID-19.

While randomized clinical trials normally take years to design and conduct, the Solidarity trial was designed to accelerate this process. Enrolling patients in one single randomized trial was to help facilitate the rapid worldwide comparison of unproven treatments. This arrangement was also to overcome the risk of multiple small trials not generating the strong evidence needed to determine the relative effectiveness of potential treatments.

WHO published guidance on mental health and psychosocial considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak.

20 March 2020
WHO Health Alert, which offers instant and accurate information about COVID-19, launched on WhatsApp. It is available in multiple languages with users around the world.

21 March 2020
In light of many Member States facing shortfalls in testing capacity, WHO published laboratory testing strategy recommendations for COVID-19.


23 March 2020
WHO and FIFA launched the ‘Pass the message to kick out coronavirus’ awareness campaign, led by world-renowned footballers, who called on people around the world to protect their health, through hand washing, coughing etiquette, not touching one’s face, maintaining physical distance and staying home if feeling unwell.

25 March 2020
The UN Global Humanitarian Response Plan was launched by the WHO Director-General, UN Secretary-General, UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and UNICEF Executive Director.

WHO also updated its operational planning guidelines to help countries balance the demands of responding directly to COVID-19 while maintaining essential health service delivery, protecting health care workers and mitigating the risk of system collapse.

You’re welcome. Yes, it must be very clearly noted that WHO didn’t even get the memo until New Year’s Eve, so there’s no way we could’ve “locked the barn door in early December”.
 
Last edited:
  • #634
Let us see Covid numbers after a few days:(:(:(

Crowds flock to footy amid health warnings, with pitch invader up for massive fine

Crowds flock to footy amid health warnings, with pitch invader up for massive fine

9News Staff

5 hrs ago
BB16OZaA.img
© Getty A general view of play is seen during the round 7 AFL match between the Geelong Cats and the Collingwood Magpies at Optus Stadium.

It came on the same day Victoria recorded the nation's worst COVID-19 numbers to date, 317 new cases in 24 hours, threatening to plunge the state into a new level of lockdown.

The Australian Medical Association's WA president Dr Andrew Miller said the Perth event was a "huge gamble".

"What we're betting with is the health and livelihood of the whole of Western Australia," he said.
The WA government believes its safety measures will be enough to prevent outbreaks.

Only mobile phone tickets or card payments were accepted and every second row left empty.

Sanitiser stations were installed throughout the venue, and every toilet, bar and food outlet open to minimise queueing.

Any pitch invasion was to be considered a breach of quarantine rules and attract up to a $50,000 fine.

There were to be no post-game autographs or any interaction between players and fans.
 
  • #635
Thanks for sharing, I thought it was much later, like Feb or March. I must be remembering the delay in declaring a pandemic.

I'll go back to the thread. But, thanks for correcting my boo boo. That's the way misinformation gets started.

Eta...Thanks for the timeline.
IMO, declaring a pandemic was simply stating that the horses had already escaped the barn, the virus was already circulating widely on every continent, which was factually correct. It was not a statement that "now you have to take this seriously", it was more like "look, we've been warning you and nothing has happened, now it's too late to think that just closing borders is going to stop this".

How could WHO have declared a pandemic while it was still just isolated epidemics in a few countries? At that point, if other countries had been on the ball, they'd have cancelled flights from every country that was showing signs of the virus, and/or required travelers from certain countries to quarantine before going home to infect their families and friends. The fact that western countries hadn't had the will to do that, isn't the WHO's fault.
MOO
 
  • #636
I edited mine, but its ok. Had a sudden flash of worry for my aunt! Hope your sister is safe in *safer* Wales
She is last time we spoke - she is in Newport but Bucks, (same as you) not Wales.
 
  • #637
IMO, declaring a pandemic was simply stating that the horses had already escaped the barn, the virus was already circulating widely on every continent, which was factually correct. It was not a statement that "now you have to take this seriously", it was more like "look, we've been warning you and nothing has happened, now it's too late to think that just closing borders is going to stop this".

How could WHO have declared a pandemic while it was still just isolated epidemics in a few countries? At that point, if other countries had been on the ball, they'd have cancelled flights from every country that was showing signs of the virus, and/or required travelers from certain countries to quarantine before going home to infect their families and friends. The fact that western countries hadn't had the will to do that, isn't the WHO's fault.
MOO

Yes, and as it was happening in real time there was much explanation behind this. It’s all noted, including much discussion in the threads. Doc T addressed all this several times. It’s all in the conferences.
 
  • #638
  • #639
  • #640
She is last time we spoke - she is in Newport but Bucks, (same as you) not Wales.
I know it, v near to my work. MK was a little hard hit early on, I'm glad she's ok
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
76
Guests online
3,259
Total visitors
3,335

Forum statistics

Threads
632,110
Messages
18,622,094
Members
243,022
Latest member
MelnykLarysa
Back
Top