Or having their classmates or teachers die. That would be a lot more traumatic than missing school.
No kidding. And for others to label "missing school" as being traumatic puts in a league "home burned to the ground in a fire" or "parent hospitalized on ventilator for a month" (or worse).
How is it any better in private schools? It's still the same situation. Boarding schools just give more chance to transmit among each other, although not affecting the families as much.
Yes, the Boarding School model is predicated on the fact that kids of a certain age do not have symptoms and don't die, and some teachers are much less likely to die as well. So you put all of them together and let CoVid rip through the school (if it does - and it will). The people I know who are organizing this are venture capitalists, highly successful doctors and lawyers, and a few others. One group is looking for a property right now (a hotel in the mountains). In theory, what would happen is that the kids go off, have a time-honored type of education with outdoor activities and lots of science/math/engineering/logic and then, get CoVid at school without passing it to their aging parents. The teachers being sought are graduate students in various subjects, young and unlikely to die of CoVid (and very desirous of work right now since of course there are no TA positions for the most part).
Private schools have entirely different ways of dealing with CoVId. I live near 4 of them. One is basically using the Sweden or Georgia model, the rest are highly committed to reducing spread of CoVid (because the kids go home every day). Here are some things they are doing that most public schools cannot:
- Nearly all education outdoors. Awnings (not tents) put up in case of rain. I don't know why more public schools can't do this, but I don't actually know of many who have a firm commitment to outdoor education. I think the data show that socially distanced outdoor events have a very low level of transmissi.
- Smaller 'pods' of students. Student groups in the public schools in California are average 20 students - private schools range from 5-10 students per group (so if 10 students, half the risk right there)
- No teachers' unions, so no need to rehire the same teachers. No lawsuits about that. They're just hiring much younger teachers
- Way more money for testing and PPE. Clearly not all private schools can do this (the Catholic private school in my own town has closed, apparently for good). But the type of private school I'm talking about has monied parents.
- Way more compliance at home. Since the parents are now opting to pay $$$$$ to educate their kids, many are doing it precisely because of CoVid and a very strong desire not to die from it. Poorer people are still learning about CoVid, where I live. There are tons of kids whose parents are vastly uninformed and wouldn't take them for testing no matter what. There are parents who don't take their kids to doctors or dentists no matter what. They tend to be less well-educated and poorer.
In short, richer, better educated parents and their kids are leaving this system (private schools here are pivoting to allow more students - they're doing well financially). Parents who can work from home and have moved from California to, say, Wyoming can also enroll their children in online private schools or even have them start taking college courses (which is quite beneficial to the kids educationally). Some private colleges are trying to survive by offering courses online specifically for high school students - but the production values can be much higher than in our public schools.
This is why I keep talking about the unintended consequences of what the educational systems are choosing to do. Most of my friends who have school age kids are well educated, and they simply won't send their children into a physical school right now.
It's already a factor in our public schools (wealthier, more organized households whose parents are highly educated take their kids out of public schools - a subject that has been a personal interest in my own research).
I believe it's legal in all 50 states to homeschool kids (and better off families hire online tutors - which has been a thing for years now; many retired teachers or teachers who want to stay home with their own kids are teaching other people's kids all around the world - online). Some of these online "schools" have international students, teach several foreign languages, and use much more advanced assessment measures than the public schools. For example, some aim to have all their 5th graders certified in various software that adults go to school to learn - to get a job. They're already engaged in international software and engineering design contests by the age of 12. Other parents choose modalities that focus on the arts and it's been amazing to me to see those kids wind up with fairly successful careers in The Business, as we call it in California.
Sorry for the long post, but it's something very dear to my heart. My students do not come from privileged backgrounds. The loss of better students from the state university system is ongoing - but it's also true for the public high schools and elementary schools.
Kids learn better when there are a range of students in a class, and they can see that other children already know their shapes and the alphabet (in kindergarten). This experience creates better learners lifelong. When no one in the class knows the alphabet, it's harder to teach.
At that sweet spot when half the class is now humming along, the stragglers either work to catch up (most do) or get educational plans, thereby heading down the path of being labeled "educationally challenged" (which they are at that point).