- Joined
- Jan 12, 2016
- Messages
- 16,085
- Reaction score
- 154,821
Respectfully I must disagree. I say that as I seriously do have great respect for your insight and contributions to these threads.
I saw the picture of the room in the article and I would have been alarmed also seeing this in the background of a virtual class. Fortunately, it was investigated and resolved as harmless and no official charges/complaints.
I would much rather have engaged teachers during this time, when so much goes on inside of a child's home and they aren't being in school in person for school officials to assess their well being, rather than teachers that overlook or are so disengaged that they don't notice potential dangers.
I really, really worry about children not having school as a safety net. That being said, I'm not in favor of in person classrooms at this point in time either. Such a dilemma
Agree to disagree.

It is a fine line when as a professional you go to a patient, client, or student's home. I have often felt that people should be more informed about the ramifications of having a professional, who has a "duty to report", as a mandatory reporter. But, no, we don't tell people that. It seems to be an ethics issue to me that is not discussed.
And it really is based on bias. I have a high tolerance for clutter. I don't judge people for having dishes in the sink, or clothes on the floor. Guns, are a part of life where I live, it wouldn't be an issue to me. But I can see how it could be an issue for the teacher.
It could have been managed better. INMO. But, how? I don't know. At least, people should have been informed about this.