- Joined
- Feb 9, 2020
- Messages
- 9,502
- Reaction score
- 67,091
That's pretty misleading. There is no evidence the cases are connected to the party.
totally agree.
That's pretty misleading. There is no evidence the cases are connected to the party.
geeez...
This is typical Daily Mail, right?????
'At this time we're not aware of any cases connected to the Obama party,' Tisbury health agent and boards of health spokesperson Maura Valley told DailyMail.com. 'It's a little too early and the only way we're going to know is through comprehensive contact tracing.'
Of any group, I would expect this group to be the least susceptible to conspiracy theories and among the most able to research and find the facts.
Maybe not...
People with PhDs Least Likely to Get the Covid Vaccine – Investment Watch
It is just some blogger...I don't believe this. Everyone I know with advanced degrees have been vaccinated.
I clicked on the link and the tweet doesn't seem to be there any more.
Of any group, I would expect this group to be the least susceptible to conspiracy theories and among the most able to research and find the facts.
Maybe not...
People with PhDs Least Likely to Get the Covid Vaccine – Investment Watch
I never heard that... do you have links?
I had zero reaction to second dose of Moderna, but my son was so ill.... had to go to the ER multiple times.
I personally felt as if I had a bit of an adrenalin rush after the second shot....
Detroit Free Press
This is a great article- I hope it is not behind a paywall since I do subscribe to the Free Press. If you don't read any other article you should read this one. It really goes into depth about the confusing messages we have been getting during the pandemic, from leadership and scientists. One thing I agree with wholeheartedly is that I think the people from CDC and others, including Fauci should have said from the beginning: there are lots of things we don't know: For example when they suggested at the beginning of the pandemic we did not need masks, they should have qualified that with what their reasoning was and how, this being a novel virus, recommendations were subject to change as they learned more information. So often they make suggestions that flop (for example in May suggesting that vaccinated people should stop wearing masks.). They should have recognized that Delta was on the horizon and could be a game changer. Anyway, it is a very informative article.
From what I remember, early on I kept reading that masks needed saving for those in healthcare. There were massive shortages of masks for healthcare. And that is one reason why they were not encouraging people to go out and buy those masks to wear in everyday life situations, but keep them for healthcare, and if you were nursing someone at home who had tested positive, then to use one when you go into the sick person's room.
Then we started getting all the cloth masks appearing in stores, and that coincided with the messaging change that we should use 'face coverings'.
So the Fauci thing isn't a big issue for me for the reasons you've said and for the way I actually remember things being with masks.
The problem as I see it was that Fauci and the surgeon general didn't tell the citizens why they shouldn't wear masks- they didn't say there was a shortage of masks for healthcare: instead they said we didn't need them and Dr. Adams actually said they were not effective. That is what I recall anyway.
I can't say I like the presentation of the article. "Gene therapy"? I always thought that was like treatments for conditions where the body doesn't make the 'healthy' gene and so they have gene therapy to help the body produce that gene?
That isn't what the vaccine is doing, so I don't understand the use of the term?
One of the groups that used to be the heaviest smokers was doctors... And not all PhD's are in medical sciences. So we should be careful of what we read into studies like this.
From what I read in a more reputable source, most attendees were vaccinated, they were all required to have a negative covid test prior to the party, masks were available for all, 3/5 of the invitees were uninvited to reduce the numbers, and the party was held outside on their 20 acre property.
(Which is in stark comparison to the rallies that are currently being held by another former notable, where people receive the ticket they paid for, then see the disclaimer on the back that basically says "If you catch covid, don't blame us".)
"He had also hired a “Covid coordinator,” or compliance officer, to ensure the safety of guests."
What Is Going on With Obama’s 60th Birthday Bash?
This is just some weird blogger......
"Harry Black" ???? Who is Harry Black?????????
In the UK I distinctly remember it being said that they were needed for healthcare more than for general use at that time. Especially in the earlier days when there were very few wild cases and most of the headlines were about a small, but increasing, number of cases.
It was impossible to get the 'medical style' masks or the dust masks from hardware stores, yet there weren't all that many cases in the wild then..maybe there were more than we knew about though as not everyone got tested during the first wave.
I don't recall it being said over here that they weren't effective, I just remember people wanting any edge they could get against the virus and asking why masks weren't being recommended for everyone to wear. But there were terrible difficulties even getting them for the NHS in the UK back then. And then there were people sitting on trains and not even wearing them properly, touching the outside of them and all that sort of thing, and so there were queries on whether they should be recommended for general use if not enough people were strict enough and knowledgeable enough in how to use them to the greatest effect and not do things like touch the mask and then shake someone's hand.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.