CPH Framejob

[ps149]

I do not think it is against TOS rules to post links to evidence that someone within the OB community has a motive to seek revenge. Here are the links;

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2003oct/51001191520021sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2007feb/5100116182005101sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2009jan/51001161820053sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2001dec/51002081020011sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2009mar/51000144720035sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2009mar/51000144720035sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2006feb/5100116182005100sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2005dec/51001161820051sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2009mar/51000144720035sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2004sep/51001020920041sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2007sep/5100014472003001sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2011mar/5100014472003006sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2001dec/51002081020011sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2006may/51001191520025sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2006jan/51001191520024sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2004sep/51001020920041sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2005nov/51001191520022sciv.pdf

Not mentioning any names to keep this perfectly within the scope of the TOS. Anyone is free to view those public documents and make their own rational decision.

 

[ps149]

I also think it's within the rules to post a copy of the section of the OIBA bi-laws that pertain to expelling members from the community;

Any member of the Association who fails to comply with the charter, By-Laws, rules and
regulations of the Association, or with any of the provisions of his lease with the
Association, may be expelled or suspended by a majority vote of the Directors present at
any Board of Directors meeting, provided the member has been notified in writing of the
charges against him and is given the right to be present at such meeting and to present a
defense.
A member so expelled or suspended shall have the right, by notice in writing delivered to
the Secretary of the Association within 10 days of notification of the Board of Directors
action, to appeal such expulsion or suspension to the next meeting of the members of the
Association, and, at such meeting, the membership may sustain or overrule such
expulsion or suspension by majority vote of those present. If no meeting of the
membership is scheduled within sixty days of the delivery of such notice of appeal, a
special meeting of the membership to consider such appeal will be called as soon as
practicable.
The status of a member who has filed such notice of appeal shall remain unchanged until
such appeal is acted upon by the membership.

If a member is expelled and no appeal to the membership is taken, or the membership
rejects such appeal, the member and his spouse, if his spouse is a party to the sublease,
shall surrender their sublease and all rights thereunder to the Association.
Unless such expelled member is prohibited fiom removing his buildings and other
property fkom the leasehold by the terms of his sublease or these By-Laws, or such
expelled member is indebted to the Association, he shall have the right within twelve
months after such expulsion to remove such buildings and property from the premises, or
to sell them to a person who has been approved for membership in the Association by the
Admissions Committee.
Article E, Section 3 provides:
The Board of Directors has the right to take away the privileges of any member who fails
to live up to the terms of his lease with the Association, the Charter, the By-Laws, or the
Rules and Regulations now in force or adopted at any future time.
A member whose privileges are so removed shall have the right, by notice in writing
delivered to the Secretary of the Association within 10 days of notification of the Board
of Directors action, to appeal such action to the next meeting of the Association, and, at
such meeting, the membership may sustain or overrule the Board’s action by majority
vote of those present. If no meeting of the membership is scheduled within sixty days of
the delivery of such notice of appeal, a special meeting of the membership to consider
such appeal will be called as soon as practicable.
The status of a member who has filed such a notice of appeal shall remain unchanged
until such appeal is acted upon by the membership.

Source of information

 

[deedee21]

PS 149 I am not able to open the links. Could you give a short brief. Without mentioning names of course.

 

[ps149]

PS 149 I am not able to open the links. Could you give a short brief. Without mentioning names of course.

Your computer is missing a simply .pdf reader. You can download one for free here- http://www.downloadinfo.co/review/adobe-reader/?kw=pdf+reader&subid=DIARUS&cust=pdf+reader&type=reader&gclid=CMDV5pC4zrUCFYSe4AodnkEAkA&utm_campaign=DIARUS&fwd=1

Honestly if I start quoting or writing about anything specific of what it says in those links we risk having this discussion deleted. I spent four hours today doing this and now all that work is gone with the lawsuit discussion.

 

[To Kill a Mockingbird]

I do not think it is against TOS rules to post links to evidence that someone within the OB community has a motive to seek revenge. Here are the links;

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2003oct/51001191520021sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2007feb/5100116182005101sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2009jan/51001161820053sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2001dec/51002081020011sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2009mar/51000144720035sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2009mar/51000144720035sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2006feb/5100116182005100sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2005dec/51001161820051sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2009mar/51000144720035sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2004sep/51001020920041sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2007sep/5100014472003001sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2011mar/5100014472003006sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2001dec/51002081020011sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2006may/51001191520025sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2006jan/51001191520024sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2004sep/51001020920041sciv.pdf

http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2005nov/51001191520022sciv.pdf

Not mentioning any names to keep this perfectly within the scope of the TOS. Anyone is free to view those public documents and make their own rational decision.

are you actually purporting that hackett's lawyer is going to
present EVERYONE OF THE ABOVE case decisions as PROOF
that the <modsnip> family has made him a victim of word of mouth
that cph = lisk as fluke has said about one hundred thousand times......

give me a break
you really do have a habit of wasting your time and energy
on negative things - or should i say extremely TOXIC behavior.

there is only ONE court pleading that matters
and its CPH's response to JR's lawsuit against him
but you can't even post it, can you?

therefore, you DON'T really speak for CPH.

 

[Justiceforever]

Thank you PS149 for what, in my very humble opinion, is important information.

 

[deedee21]

Statements Oak Beach residents made SUPPORTS MG claim. She knows what she was told. The phone bill cannot be disputed.

 

[ps149]

Thank you PS149 for what, in my very humble opinion, is important information.

You are very very welcome.

 

[Justiceforever]

Statements Oak Beach residents made SUPPORTS MG claim. She knows what she was told. The phone bill cannot be disputed.

Or, was MG's claim/ memory influenced and manipulated by OB residents?

MOO

To my knowledge, there IS NO record of the disputed call. Am I wrong?

 

[deedee21]

Or, was MG's claim/ memory influenced and manipulated by OB residents?

MOO

To my knowledge, there IS NO record of the disputed call. Am I wrong?

Read fieldnotes inquiry. She said the police have the bill.

 

[CriminalMinds]

Read fieldnotes inquiry. She said the police have the bill.

considering how vocal/public she has been, surprising she didn't make it public(unless asked not to)--or that it never was "leaked out"

 

[Justiceforever]

are you actually purporting that hackett's lawyer is going to
present EVERYONE OF THE ABOVE case decisions as PROOF
that the <modsnip> family has made him a victim of word of mouth
that cph = lisk as fluke has said about one hundred thousand times......

give me a break
you really do have a habit of wasting your time and energy
on negative things - or should i say extremely TOXIC behavior.

there is only ONE court pleading that matters
and its CPH's response to JR's lawsuit against him
but you can't even post it, can you?

therefore, you DON'T really speak for CPH.

I think that's exactly what needs to be done if these people are going to take the witness stand against the doctor. It would discredit their tesimony. It would show that they have an agenda. I don't want to live in a society that would allow someone who has a beef
with me to take the stand against me without the jury being made aware of said beef!

It HAS to be revealed to the jury IF they are witnesses! IMO

 

[Justiceforever]

Furthermore, I don't think it's "wasting time and energy, on negative things" or "extremely toxic behavior", to investigate fully the claims behind CPH's guilt.