Crime Scene Animation by Websleuths Member grayhuze

Geevee, I personally can't make out what you see, but this is what I see. I'll go ahead and quote a post made by another WS member (on a 2013 thread) for reference.
Yeah I think the video I posted clearly shows the same thing The woman's arm should be up a little higher though since she is being Travis.
 
Geevee, I personally can't make out what you see, but this is what I see. I'll go ahead and quote a post made by another WS member (on a 2013 thread) for reference.
I appreciate how polite you were to Geevee. In reality it's not an opinion that is a foot and jeans and no other explanation is valid. It was even agreed upon by both the prosecution and defense. There is no doubt. zero.
 
Thank you for your work Grayhuze! I enjoyed your videos. And thank you for your opinion, after all it's just your opinion! We all have one.
 
I appreciate how polite you were to Geevee. In reality it's not an opinion that is a foot and jeans and no other explanation is valid. It was even agreed upon by both the prosecution and defense. There is no doubt. zero.

If that is a socked foot, where pray tell is the leg attached to the foot? Follow the arrow...

53216sock1arrow.jpg

P.S. I see no reason why my opinions/conclusions shouldn't be treated politely, although direct, and occasionally insistent, I have always been polite and respectful of others here, as they nearly always are with me. :)
 
If that is a socked foot, where pray tell is the leg attached to the foot? Follow the arrow...

View attachment 69736

P.S. I see no reason why my opinions/conclusions shouldn't be treated politely, although direct, and occasionally insistent, I have always been polite and respectful of others here, as they nearly always are with me. :)

<modsnip> The blue portion is the bottom hem of the pant leg. I showed you a video of exactly what is going on. Did you see it?
 
If that is a socked foot, where pray tell is the leg attached to the foot?

Keeping in mind that everyones' feet are different shapes, and the angle is a bit different/off (laziness on my part, I altered a premade graphic rather than draw one myself), but a general idea.

footinsock_zps3480a438.jpg
 
well, my opinions weren't treated politely by the same person. Just an observation. The blue portion is the bottom hem of the pant leg. I showed you a video of exactly what is going on. Did you see it?

Yes it is the pant leg hem, and look directly below it, no leg going to the "foot", you can see Travis back all the way under the pant hem. And look at the 'sock' edge, unless that's a bootie that only comes just above the sole beneath the not-there-ankle, it's no sock.

I'll look at the video.
 
Keeping in mind that everyones' feet are different shapes, and the angle is different, but a general idea.

footinsock_zps3480a438.jpg

Thanks for that SevenSins, it seems like the best someone could do to disspell the visible no leg beneath the pant leg (even though the toes are enormously long, look at the scale next to his shoulder) but I remain convinced it's not a socked foot but a towel.
 
Unfortunately we're never going to know exactly what happened that day, she'll never tell so all we'll be able to do is take the available facts and evidence and draw as reasonable conclusions as we can. I do appreciate the work you've put into the animations grayhuze, I myself have spent countless hours studying all of the photos trying to get as accurate a timeline as fits the evidence and logic. Well, my logic at any rate. lol
 
the toes are enormously long, look at the scale next to his shoulder

That would be an illusion of perspective based on where the camera was sitting and the distance between objects. Similar to how Travis's foot looks very tiny in relation to the parts of his body closer to the camera (you can see that same effect in the post I quoted on, I believe, the previous page).
 
Keeping in mind that everyones' feet are different shapes, and the angle is a bit different/off (laziness on my part, I altered a premade graphic rather than draw one myself), but a general idea.

footinsock_zps3480a438.jpg

yes, you really should have drawn one yourself....lol
 
That would be an illusion of perspective based on where the camera was sitting and the distance between objects. Similar to how Travis's foot looks very tiny in relation to the parts of his body closer to the camera (you can see that same effect in the post I quoted on, I believe, the previous page).

yes, it's a wide angle lens around 16mm. so near the edges of the lens or image you get distortion which you can see, again, in the video I posted above. around the 25 second mark is an animation. Not necessarily in the right spot in the bathroom but is an accurate representation of body positions and jodi's foot.
 
wow, thanks..look at all that space the bullet could travel through. I appreciate the supporting info....awesome.

What "space"?

If you mean the white areas, that's actually the skull.

The meninges (dura mater, etc.) where you think the bullet could have traveled, are barely visible, being only about 2.5mm thick.

skullimage1.JPG
 
Very impressive animation and scripting! Is it Revit with Maya or Max, or built directly in Maya/Max?

I hope you find, or have, work in Criminal Investigations somewhere, as that sort of animation is needed in courtrooms during trial (even though the Amanda Knox supporters labels this sort of animation: "cartooning".
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
203
Guests online
480
Total visitors
683

Forum statistics

Threads
625,780
Messages
18,509,862
Members
240,843
Latest member
KATCO3003
Back
Top