Yes,
@Megnut is indeed blessed by amazing superpowers that us mere mortals can only dream of! Glad it worked! That post is a keeper and wish we could keep those posts as sticky items for reference.
Read it. So, do I task my snarky law librarian new friend with locating the CT Practice relevant sections as I believe that it might be correct to say, “Hartford we have a problem”?
I can’t honestly say I can recall ever watching a trial with so many issues relating to “candor”. Kudos to the ABA for picking such a wonderful word even though I am partial to using the word, “whopper”! But instead I will now simply instead question someone’s “candor”! Will be adding this wonderful word to the arsenal along with marshaling which has opened up new avenues of improved productivity from colleagues that I never expected. Very powerful word!
Would this “candor” guideline/rule possibly apply also to the issue of the Moody cite or could Horn simply not understand Moody? The response from Atty McGuiness left me thinking it could be both as my snarky law librarian friend believes the Horb cite to be a “nope”……