GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #70

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #761
In his Motion, JLS suggests that the Court should consider the federal standard where the Court must find the defendant poses a risk to the community to deny bail.

Is he serious?

5 children begged the Court to detain MT for 50 years because of the pain and fear she caused them and continues to cause them. ^^This from the woman who intentionally projected the sealed Herman Report in Court during her trial (in contempt of a Court Order) and is still waiting on the outcome of this pending criminal charge! :mad:
IANAL, but I can easily be confused.

So now defense attorney JS wants CT state to consider federal standard guidelines?

Um, dear client was convicted in a state court by states’ attorneys and wonderful investigative and prosecutorial work, and a state judge. So what might federal guidelines or requirements mean to that?

Perhaps he is hoping that the FBI and other federal authorities might continue to investigate his convicted client for federal crimes related to JF’s death and disappearance? Since her remains have not been recovered, perhaps FD and his now convicted conspirator may have transported portions of her remains or disposed of evidence across state lines? I hope federal authorities are looking at all possibilities.

I hope the convicted conspirator remains in jail, for what many contend is already a short sentence - in light of what she was convicted for in the death and disappearance of JF. A mother of five young children and daughter, and friend to many. Why do those last points always get forgotten? MOO
 
  • #762
I always wondered if a pot of gold wasn't waiting in Greece...

But in truth, at this point she's grifting her family. And they can't see it.

She is 100% 1-ply

JMO
I have zero problem with her grifting that bunch of lying, despicable grifters!
 
  • #763
Um, dear client was convicted in a state court by states’ attorneys and wonderful investigative and prosecutorial work, and a state judge. So what might federal guidelines or requirements mean to that?
After his conviction for the murder of Martha Moxley (years back when both were 15 yrs old) Michael Skakel spent over 10 years in prison, being denied bail on several motions filed on his behalf--to vacate, etc. Only after a trial court judge granted his appeal to vacate on inadequate representation by his counsel Mickey Sherman, and the prosecution subsequently appealed that decision, did MS get out on $l+ million bail while case was pending.
(The CT Supreme Court overruled the trial court. Skakel filed a motion for reconsideration. A new SC panel then ruled in his favor. The state declined to prosecute again. Skakel is free and is suing Town of Greenwich and an investigator.)

Timeline of case against Michael Skakel in 1975 killing
 
  • #764
IANAL, but I can easily be confused.

So now defense attorney JS wants CT state to consider federal standard guidelines?

Um, dear client was convicted in a state court by states’ attorneys and wonderful investigative and prosecutorial work, and a state judge. So what might federal guidelines or requirements mean to that?

Perhaps he is hoping that the FBI and other federal authorities might continue to investigate his convicted client for federal crimes related to JF’s death and disappearance? Since her remains have not been recovered, perhaps FD and his now convicted conspirator may have transported portions of her remains or disposed of evidence across state lines? I hope federal authorities are looking at all possibilities.

I hope the convicted conspirator remains in jail, for what many contend is already a short sentence - in light of what she was convicted for in the death and disappearance of JF. A mother of five young children and daughter, and friend to many. Why do those last points always get forgotten? MOO

Actually, JLS was referring the Federal Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3143 which IMO is not applicable since CT law is not silent on the issue of post conviction bail (i.e., this is not a U.S. Constitution or Civil Rights matter), and where the Court used it's discretion to deny MT bail.

In other words, they didn't like the decision under CT Law and shamelessly suggested that the Court may want to adopt a different rule... just for MT. MOO

1718137029169.png


 
Last edited:
  • #765
Actually, JLS was referring the Federal Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3143 which IMO is not applicable since CT law is not silent on the issue of post conviction bail (i.e., this is not a U.S. Constitution or Civil Rights matter), and where the Court used it's discretion to deny MT bail.

View attachment 509550


Great find and input Seattle1!^^ thank you for the details! And I also noted in that page (7) 3rd sentence from the bottom, that the defendant in the pleading ‘suggests this Court adopt a modified version of the rule for determining……’

It is not clear actually which ‘Rule’ is being cited by counsel IMO, since it is given as an Act in the earlier portion of the paragraph.

IANAL so my thoughts are worth less than nothing, but have to wonder if the defense counsel isn’t already acknowledging and conceding that it is inapplicable by suggesting it be modified? MOO
 
  • #766
Great find and input Seattle1!^^ thank you for the details! And I also noted in that page (7) 3rd sentence from the bottom, that the defendant in the pleading ‘suggests this Court adopt a modified version of the rule for determining……’

It is not clear actually which ‘Rule’ is being cited by counsel IMO, since it is given as an Act in the earlier portion of the paragraph.

IANAL so my thoughts are worth less than nothing, but have to wonder if the defense counsel isn’t already acknowledging and conceding that it is inapplicable by suggesting it be modified? MOO
I dunno, @I am not Sherlock H. I'm still SMH about how for the right price$$$, CT provides for 1st degree murderers to be released on bail!

I think we all know that denying FD bail would have seen him facing his day in court, and where perhaps one if not all of the co-defendants may have talked, sooner than later. JMO
 
  • #767
I always wondered if a pot of gold wasn't waiting in Greece...

But in truth, at this point she's grifting her family. And they can't see it.

She is 100% 1-ply

JMO
I actually think it might be worse than what you describe.

My speculation is that the Family ALL KNOW and have known from the beginning. They know MT, her history, her choices and are aware of 'all the things'. They knew about the divorce case and the civil case and FORE and on and on. Even if they publicly deny any of it, imo they knew. AND YET...they support her. MT left to her own sorry devices could not have posted ANY BOND as the only real asset she has it seems in the CO condo that is 1/2 owned by baby daddy and its a legal mind twister as to whether it could even be used to support a bond (my guess is it can't). So, she is nearly 50, nothing much in terms of assets and accomplishments and isn't even positioned to post her own bond. Not exactly living the American Dream of success! Nope, not at ALL.

For some reason the Family have chosen to support her and my guess is that for some reason they feel sorry for her for whatever reason. It could be as simple as the Mama Troconis statement about MT losing her twin brother when she was young (details on this entire situation are at best 'thin on the ground' imo). It simply seems that the family dynamic is that personal accountability is some for others and not for them and CERTAINLY NOT FOR MT. MT is some object of pity and someone who requires others to take care of her and get her out of jams that result from her life long propensity to make poor choices. She is now heading off to prison with a daughter bare 18 years old who will effectively be 'on her own' living in the SHARK TANK of the Troconis Clan.

Frankly, the daughter of MT is a victim but also imo based on her statement at the sentencing she is living in her own world and appeared absolutely self absorbed and probably not too different than most her age. Given her parents and extended family my guess is that her choices have been made simply to survive and I would have to give her credit for simply surviving given the cards she has been dealt in terms of how she grew up and what she was surrounded with and who her family is. Its a miracle she has made it to ski another day as the life cards she was dealt were poor at best imo.

MOO
 
  • #768
Actually, JLS was referring the Federal Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3143 which IMO is not applicable since CT law is not silent on the issue of post conviction bail (i.e., this is not a U.S. Constitution or Civil Rights matter), and where the Court used it's discretion to deny MT bail.

In other words, they didn't like the decision under CT Law and shamelessly suggested that the Court may want to adopt a different rule... just for MT. MOO

View attachment 509550


Just more 'blunt blowing' and billable hours along with more Horn horning.

Yawn. Horn was crushed the last time he went to the Appellate on the ridiculous issue relating to the Family Court document seal and Family Court Clerk that he spent over a year wasting time on (would love to see that bill and I do wonder if Mama Troconis paid it!?). Will love to see their response to his DEMAND to used Federal law on a decision made by a STATE Court jury and Judge.

I don't know the answer to this but I'm curious. Can the Appellate Court in CT decline to hear a matter simply based on the facts presented? Wondering if this demand for Federal Bail Reform Act reliance by Horn is simply preposterous on its face such that the Appellate Court simply says "NOPE" and says it won't be heard? It simply seems wacky to expect different treatment when the CT Law on the point as you clearly state is crystal clear on no bail for MT. Or, does the Appellate have to hear the ridiculous request and then it gets kicked to CT Supreme Court?

I do also wonder if the Appellate Court will be treated to a class "Horn Word Salad" on Constitutional Rights and Civil Rights? Should be amusing. I will never forget an Appellate Judge actually laughing out loud when Pattis went off on his constitutional law treatise when discussing the 'gag order'. It was a moment of pure comedy and so I do wonder if we will see that again?

It would be interesting though to see if some Federal Charges might be materialized against MT perhaps for her involvement in FORE or the rug 'import/export' business or IRS related matters etc. AND THEN Horn could horn on about Federal Bail Reform Act!

Simply seems like more madness. But the multiple references by Horn to the many appealable matters will no doubt send the Appellate Judges into peels of laughter as my guess is that they will be treated to an extravaganza of insane arguments from Horn. I hope that is televised for public view as my guess is that more than a few of the Judges will have some odd facial expressions listening to Horn horning!

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #769
Just more 'blunt blowing' and billable hours along with more Horn horning.

Yawn. Horn was crushed the last time he went to the Appellate on the ridiculous issue relating to the Family Court document seal and Family Court Clerk that he spent over a year wasting time on (would love to see that bill and I do wonder if Mama Troconis paid it!?). Will love to see their response to his DEMAND to used Federal law on a decision made by a STATE Court jury and Judge.

I don't know the answer to this but I'm curious. Can the Appellate Court in CT decline to hear a matter simply based on the facts presented? Wondering if this demand for Federal Bail Reform Act reliance by Horn is simply preposterous on its face such that the Appellate Court simply says "NOPE" and says it won't be heard? It simply seems wacky to expect different treatment when the CT Law on the point as you clearly state is crystal clear on no bail for MT. Or, does the Appellate have to hear the ridiculous request and then it gets kicked to CT Supreme Court?

It would be interesting though to see if some Federal Charges might be materialized against MT perhaps for her involvement in FORE or the rug 'import/export' business or IRS related matters etc. AND THEN Horn could horn on about Federal Bail Reform Act!

Simply seems like more madness. But the multiple references by Horn to the many appealable matters will no doubt send the Appellate Judges into peels of laughter as my guess is that they will be treated to an extravaganza of insane arguments from Horn. I hope that is televised for public view as my guess is that more than a few of the Judges will have some odd facial expressions listening to Horn horning!

MOO
IME, seldom will another Court consider interfering with the discretionary decision of another Court. But this is CT... so I guess there's that.

And it's not like JLS hasn't already tried all of his appellate complaints before (and failed on each). In other words, it's nowhere close to "more likely than not" that MT would be granted a new trial.
 
  • #770
I dunno, @I am not Sherlock H. I'm still SMH about how for the right price$$$, CT provides for 1st degree murderers to be released on bail!

I think we all know that denying FD bail would have seen him facing his day in court, and where perhaps one if not all of the co-defendants may have talked, sooner than later. JMO
Interesting question about tossing folks in jail to ponder their situation and how it might impact their choices?!?

In all the time MT has been subject to arrest warrants over the past 5 years she really only spent overnight in the cushy jail in New Canaan. Every time I think about this fact my mind simply wants to explode. Six serious charges for MT and no time in jail. I'm not even sure the old concept of 'white privilege' adequately covers as the only explanation I can come up with for this being allowed to happen given the charges is the absolutely corrupt CT Judicial system. Schorenstein was actually screaming at Judges that the MT 9 month (iirc) house arrest constituted a 'self imposed prison in CT that she had to pay for' and he went on to attack the ankle bracelet as an 'instrument of torture' and the CT Judges actually bought his lunatic arguments and so MT was allowed to leave the jurisdiction and ski to her hearts content FOR YEARS. Simply don't understand how any of this was possible and why the State was not able to prevail on any of these wacky pretrial motions? Its water under the bridge but I guess if there is a message here its that if you want to be a conspirator to a murder THEN CT IS YOUR STATE and your Judges are BLAWIE, WHITE and RANDOLPH as they collectively will make your skiing dream in CO ALL POSSIBLE!

MOO
 
  • #771
IME, seldom will another Court consider interfering with the discretionary decision of another Court. But this is CT... so I guess there's that.

And it's not like JLS hasn't already tried all of his appellate complaints before (and failed on each). In other words, it's nowhere close to "more likely than not" that MT would be granted a new trial.
I do wonder though whether a new trial might be a different Judge with a different way of doing things rather than the 'go along to get along' approach imo of Judge Randolph, be less sympathetic to the games and rule breaking of Schoenhorn and his sidekick and offer an opportunity for a much longer sentence? But, its CT as you say and so this probably is just a 'pipe dream' and 'blunt blowin' from me.... Sad, but we can only dream of Judges that stand for justice and upholding basic rules etc. Rare stuff in CT yet in other States people do take these procedural things seriously. Oh well.....

Clearly it could go the other way too. But, the reality is that her family most likely couldn't support her bond and pay whatever a monkey like Schoenhorn gets paid imo as they have to be close to be tapped out at this late date and its not like MT can work to generate cash to pay anything but I guess 'Only Fans' might be her only option at this point. The Family goal imo was to keep MT out of prison for as long as possible and so all these games have worked well given their goals. FD training MT well on the CT system as he was schooled himself by a collection of miscreant attorneys who play these games on rinse and repeat. It all works so long as you have the money to pay and I'm not clear how much money the Troconis family might have left? Mama Troconis might have to hit the telephono to speak to her corrupt family members in Venezuela to plead for more money for her niña.

The other issues I guess is the State and whether they have the stomach to do more trial work against MT? We don't even know if they have the stomach to pursue the dropped charge appeal in the MT trial.

What a place. Sad thing is that folks like Schoenhorn know it and so exploit it and sad saps like those of us here that have watched it play out for 5 years in Court just watch and cannot believe what is playing out in front of our eyes.

Do wonder though if we will see a Civil Case pop against MT and possibly extended family given their involvement in all that has gone on over the past 5 years from GF after the appeal? They don't have to wait but given the sentence imposed I do wonder if it might happen sooner rather than latter to simply crush MT?

MOO
 
  • #772
IME, seldom will another Court consider interfering with the discretionary decision of another Court. But this is CT... so I guess there's that.

And it's not like JLS hasn't already tried all of his appellate complaints before (and failed on each). In other words, it's nowhere close to "more likely than not" that MT would be granted a new trial.
@Seattle1 do you have any sense of Judge Randolph record on appeal? Haven't searched this out as frankly still haven't recovered from the sentencing circus with the church ladies and the Minister.
 
  • #773
I actually think it might be worse than what you describe.

My speculation is that the Family ALL KNOW and have known from the beginning. They know MT, her history, her choices and are aware of 'all the things'. They knew about the divorce case and the civil case and FORE and on and on. Even if they publicly deny any of it, imo they knew. AND YET...they support her. MT left to her own sorry devices could not have posted ANY BOND as the only real asset she has it seems in the CO condo that is 1/2 owned by baby daddy and its a legal mind twister as to whether it could even be used to support a bond (my guess is it can't). So, she is nearly 50, nothing much in terms of assets and accomplishments and isn't even positioned to post her own bond. Not exactly living the American Dream of success! Nope, not at ALL.

For some reason the Family have chosen to support her and my guess is that for some reason they feel sorry for her for whatever reason. It could be as simple as the Mama Troconis statement about MT losing her twin brother when she was young (details on this entire situation are at best 'thin on the ground' imo). It simply seems that the family dynamic is that personal accountability is some for others and not for them and CERTAINLY NOT FOR MT. MT is some object of pity and someone who requires others to take care of her and get her out of jams that result from her life long propensity to make poor choices. She is now heading off to prison with a daughter bare 18 years old who will effectively be 'on her own' living in the SHARK TANK of the Troconis Clan.

Frankly, the daughter of MT is a victim but also imo based on her statement at the sentencing she is living in her own world and appeared absolutely self absorbed and probably not too different than most her age. Given her parents and extended family my guess is that her choices have been made simply to survive and I would have to give her credit for simply surviving given the cards she has been dealt in terms of how she grew up and what she was surrounded with and who her family is. Its a miracle she has made it to ski another day as the life cards she was dealt were poor at best imo.

MOO
I hope those self-absorbed traits are normal and not of the same type displayed by her mother. They can be both inherited and taught traits….

And how much influence does the T family have on her?

As far as resources from the T family go, where has the money come from? You mentioned in an earlier post recently, and we have discussed this before, Mama’s tie to a corrupt government. Perhaps there was a windfall there. How deep are pockets of people who shop at Marshall’s?? Help me make it make sense!

Unusual rugs and shoe cover businesses? How much money will a business like that make? I have only seen rich rug businesses selling rare antique rugs from the Middle East. Not mere faux (hope the are fake) animal throws. And who do you know who actually buys and wear shoe rain coverings?? I don’t know one person and I even lived in London!

How far can they go? I come from a close family, but I have to admit if I were pulling the types of shenanigans that MT has pulled they would have told me that I made the bed to lie in long ago. They had to have believe something was in it for them and have been and still are working hard to protect it.
 
  • #774
I think we all know that denying FD bail would have seen him facing his day in court, and where perhaps one if not all of the co-defendants may have talked, sooner than later. JMO
I agree with this wholeheartedly.
 
  • #775
@Seattle1 do you have any sense of Judge Randolph record on appeal? Haven't searched this out as frankly still haven't recovered from the sentencing circus with the church ladies and the Minister.
I'm only familiar with paid subscriptions (such as Trellis Law Analytics) to easily access this information.

Otherwise, in CT, you can access only by Case Name, Attorney, or Juris #.

I can pull up his Supreme and Appellate Court record as an Attorney but not as presiding Judge:

State of Connecticut Judicial Branch​
Supreme and Appellate Court

Attorney Name = kevin%Randolph, Case Status = All​
Records: 12
* Docket No. Key: AC = Appellate SC = Supreme​




Case Namee
KEVIN RANDOLPHSTATE OF CONNECTICUT v JOSHUA JACOBSAC 10002NNHCR906317922T
02/26/1991​
Disposed
KEVIN RANDOLPHSTATE OF CONNECTICUT v SEAN SIERINGAC 12008MMXCR920118553T
12/23/1992​
Disposed
KEVIN RANDOLPHSTATE OF CONNECTICUT v RODNEY SUPLICKIAC 12053M09MCR920119461S
01/08/1993​
Disposed
THE LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN A. RANDOLPHDERREX CONNER v COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONAC 17620NNHCV970395741S
09/22/1997​
Disposed
THE LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN A. RANDOLPHTHOMAS GRAHAM v COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONAC 18296TSRCV920001537S
04/07/1998​
Disposed
THE LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN A. RANDOLPHSTATE OF CONNECTICUT v WALTER DECLAYBROOKAC 19076H13WCR970010445S
11/10/1998​
Disposed
THE LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN A. RANDOLPHThis case is not available at this timeMot SC 001188H13WCR970010445S
11/17/2000​
Granted
THE LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN A. RANDOLPHThis case is not available at this timePet SC 000361H13WCR970010445S
12/20/2000​
Denied
KEVIN RANDOLPHThis case is not available at this timePet SC 920445NNHCR906317922T
03/05/1993​
Granted
KEVIN RANDOLPHThis case is not available at this timePet SC 930239M09MCR920119461S
01/25/1994​
Denied
KEVIN RANDOLPHThis case is not available at this timePet SC 940133MMXCR920118553T
08/01/1994​
Denied
KEVIN RANDOLPHSTATE OF CONNECTICUT v JOSHUA JACOBSSC 14742NNHCR906317922T
04/13/1993​
Disposed
Version 1.33.1.0 Nov, 2023Copyright © 2024, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch​

Supreme/Appellate Case Look-up
 
  • #776
Interesting-- seems that Judge Randolph shares more in common with JLS than we know. Prior to law school, Randolph received a Masters Degree in Telecommunications and spent a few years working as a reporter and an editor at two radio stations.

 
  • #777
I hope those self-absorbed traits are normal and not of the same type displayed by her mother. They can be both inherited and taught traits….

And how much influence does the T family have on her?

As far as resources from the T family go, where has the money come from? You mentioned in an earlier post recently, and we have discussed this before, Mama’s tie to a corrupt government. Perhaps there was a windfall there. How deep are pockets of people who shop at Marshall’s?? Help me make it make sense!

Unusual rugs and shoe cover businesses? How much money will a business like that make? I have only seen rich rug businesses selling rare antique rugs from the Middle East. Not mere faux (hope the are fake) animal throws. And who do you know who actually buys and wear shoe rain coverings?? I don’t know one person and I even lived in London!

How far can they go? I come from a close family, but I have to admit if I were pulling the types of shenanigans that MT has pulled they would have told me that I made the bed to lie in long ago. They had to have believe something was in it for them and have been and still are working hard to protect it.

This article was sent to me that was published in a Venezuelan newspaper “The National” and translated to English. Quite interesting. Explains the Troconis family interpretation of this horrific tragedy that their daughter participated in and was convicted.


They violate their rights and unjustly sentence a Venezuelan woman to prison in the United States

This tragic story for the Venezuelan family dates back to 2016, when Michelle Troconis, residing in Miami, met the Greek-American Fotis Dulos at a water ski club.
By The National-
June 7, 2024
Michelle Troconis, a Venezuelan born in the United States, was brutally sentenced to fourteen and a half years in prison, plus five years of probation, on May 31. This occurred after a tainted jury from her hometown found her guilty in March in connection with the disappearance and death of Jennifer Dulos.

Michelle Troconis, a Venezuelan born in the United States, was brutally sentenced to fourteen and a half years in prison, plus five years of probation, on May 31. This occurred after a tainted jury from her hometown found her guilty in March in connection with the disappearance and death of Jennifer Dulos.

This tragic story for the Venezuelan family dates back to 2016, when Michelle, living in Miami, met the Greek-American Fotis Dulos at a water ski club. Without knowing his background, Fotis introduced himself to both Michelle and her family as a successful builder, semi-professional athlete, family man, father of five children, separated from his wife and in the process of amicable separation. divorce. This character met Michelle even though he was in another relationship and frequently attended the ski club with his nanny and her children, but never with Jennifer.

It was not until May 2019 that misfortune struck several families involved. Jennifer Dulos is declared missing after failing to show up for a medical appointment and failing to respond to several calls from family and friends. Immediately, the police force in the neighborhood of New Caanan, Connecticut, latches onto American statistics and suspects her husband Fotis and her partner, Michelle. However, the local media begins the unbridled persecution of morbidity to generate sensational news with high engagement and ratings, calling Michelle the “lover” of Fotis Dulos and his wife Jennifer as “the selfless mother of five children.” .

As the days, weeks and months proceeded, and the investigation that cost millions of dollars to the State, the police, through arrest warrants with fabricated and distorted information, and the signature of judges and prosecutors with dubious reputations and scandals of corruption, achieves the arrest of Michelle and Fotis. In four and a half years, Michelle underwent more than nine months of house arrest, she was stripped along with her daughter of the property where she resided with Dulos, forced to remain in Connecticut away from her support system. . Shortly after, Fotis Dulos commits suicide so as not to face the responsibility of the charges and leaves Michelle “carrying the dead” and 5 orphaned children.

Michelle spent more than 3 and a half years (1,404 days) with a GPS-cricket on her leg that required two to three hours of electrical charging per day. But the most serious thing was the forced separation from her only daughter, a youth Olympic athlete.

The American judicial system failed both Michelle and the Connecticut community, since the process was flawed from the beginning and based on pre-fabricated stories to fit Michelle as a “scapegoat” in a narrative that would make the family feel better. of the victim and justify to taxpayers the millions spent and the large number of police officers, detectives, FBI agents , experts, etc., that were used.

However, to this day Jennifer Dulos' body has not been found, nor has the weapon that was supposedly used to cause her harm, nor is it really known who and how her death occurred. Pure speculation.

But what is known is that a suspected Dulos employee, who was in New Caanan on the day of Jennifer's disappearance, was given legal immunity a few days before Troconis' trial and was rewarded with American citizenship. , for testifying and lying under oath to incriminate Michelle as a conspirator in “a crime” that she did not commit.

The judicial and legal process had enormous flaws, including:

She was subjected, along with an inept first private lawyer, to numerous interrogations with the police without the presence of a translator into Michelle's mother tongue who at the same time acted as another interrogator.

Other suspects were left out of the rigged trial, such as the employee, Fotis' friend and civil attorney, Kent Mawhinney, who coerced Michelle to answer a call to Fotis' phone on the morning of Jennifer's disappearance, and who supposedly will go to trial. in January. Kent has been accused by his wife of sexual harassment and attempted strangulation.

Michelle did not have the right to a speedy trial, which is in the fifth and sixth amendments of the constitution. Although it was arbitrarily granted in September by the judge, it was not executed as such. Jury selection was in October, followed by a long pause of two months before the start of the trial, exposed to public and media opinion unprecedented in American judicial history.

There was a long trial of 30 business days where more than 50% of the time was dedicated to the trial and conviction of Fotis Dulos (being dead to face his responsibilities).

We repeat, the main suspect turned star witness was given immunity.

There were four and a half years of an OJ Simpson-level media blitz, perpetuating a cruel and abhorrent image of Michelle, far from the reality of her true life story.

Michelle Troconis was as much a victim of Fotis Dulos as Jennifer and her children.

The trial showed a different reality from the Fotis Dulos that Michelle and all of us knew, who was bankrupt, financially dependent on the Farber family and a cunning 'serial adulterer'. Michelle was with the wrong man, in the wrong place, on the wrong days. This is Michelle's greatest regret, who, although innocent, has been unjustly convicted by public opinion of a crime that she did not commit.

During the day of the sentencing, the Farber family, Jennifer's children and friends vented their frustration, hatred and thirst for revenge towards Michelle, once again fabricating Hollywood-style stories, fed and channeled by the two prosecutors, alleging that Michelle wanted “replace Jennifer Dulos.” On the other hand, the Troconis family, close relatives, friends and people close to Michelle from the Connecticut community had for the first time the opportunity to tell for several hours who the real Michelle Troconis is, filling the courthouse with messages of love that They describe a charitable woman, committed to the faith, an exemplary mother, unconditional friend and sister, with an immense heart incapable of harming anyone, least of all another mother, or even of planning a conspiracy like the one that was condemned.

As a family, we call on the Venezuelan community to join our fight to find Michelle's freedom and to stand up to the media that spreads false and sensational information.
 
  • #778
This article was sent to me that was published in a Venezuelan newspaper “The National” and translated to English. Quite interesting. Explains the Troconis family interpretation of this horrific tragedy that their daughter participated in and was convicted.


They violate their rights and unjustly sentence a Venezuelan woman to prison in the United States

This tragic story for the Venezuelan family dates back to 2016, when Michelle Troconis, residing in Miami, met the Greek-American Fotis Dulos at a water ski club.
By The National-
June 7, 2024
Michelle Troconis, a Venezuelan born in the United States, was brutally sentenced to fourteen and a half years in prison, plus five years of probation, on May 31. This occurred after a tainted jury from her hometown found her guilty in March in connection with the disappearance and death of Jennifer Dulos.

Michelle Troconis, a Venezuelan born in the United States, was brutally sentenced to fourteen and a half years in prison, plus five years of probation, on May 31. This occurred after a tainted jury from her hometown found her guilty in March in connection with the disappearance and death of Jennifer Dulos.

This tragic story for the Venezuelan family dates back to 2016, when Michelle, living in Miami, met the Greek-American Fotis Dulos at a water ski club. Without knowing his background, Fotis introduced himself to both Michelle and her family as a successful builder, semi-professional athlete, family man, father of five children, separated from his wife and in the process of amicable separation. divorce. This character met Michelle even though he was in another relationship and frequently attended the ski club with his nanny and her children, but never with Jennifer.

It was not until May 2019 that misfortune struck several families involved. Jennifer Dulos is declared missing after failing to show up for a medical appointment and failing to respond to several calls from family and friends. Immediately, the police force in the neighborhood of New Caanan, Connecticut, latches onto American statistics and suspects her husband Fotis and her partner, Michelle. However, the local media begins the unbridled persecution of morbidity to generate sensational news with high engagement and ratings, calling Michelle the “lover” of Fotis Dulos and his wife Jennifer as “the selfless mother of five children.” .

As the days, weeks and months proceeded, and the investigation that cost millions of dollars to the State, the police, through arrest warrants with fabricated and distorted information, and the signature of judges and prosecutors with dubious reputations and scandals of corruption, achieves the arrest of Michelle and Fotis. In four and a half years, Michelle underwent more than nine months of house arrest, she was stripped along with her daughter of the property where she resided with Dulos, forced to remain in Connecticut away from her support system. . Shortly after, Fotis Dulos commits suicide so as not to face the responsibility of the charges and leaves Michelle “carrying the dead” and 5 orphaned children.

Michelle spent more than 3 and a half years (1,404 days) with a GPS-cricket on her leg that required two to three hours of electrical charging per day. But the most serious thing was the forced separation from her only daughter, a youth Olympic athlete.

The American judicial system failed both Michelle and the Connecticut community, since the process was flawed from the beginning and based on pre-fabricated stories to fit Michelle as a “scapegoat” in a narrative that would make the family feel better. of the victim and justify to taxpayers the millions spent and the large number of police officers, detectives, FBI agents , experts, etc., that were used.

However, to this day Jennifer Dulos' body has not been found, nor has the weapon that was supposedly used to cause her harm, nor is it really known who and how her death occurred. Pure speculation.

But what is known is that a suspected Dulos employee, who was in New Caanan on the day of Jennifer's disappearance, was given legal immunity a few days before Troconis' trial and was rewarded with American citizenship. , for testifying and lying under oath to incriminate Michelle as a conspirator in “a crime” that she did not commit.

The judicial and legal process had enormous flaws, including:

She was subjected, along with an inept first private lawyer, to numerous interrogations with the police without the presence of a translator into Michelle's mother tongue who at the same time acted as another interrogator.

Other suspects were left out of the rigged trial, such as the employee, Fotis' friend and civil attorney, Kent Mawhinney, who coerced Michelle to answer a call to Fotis' phone on the morning of Jennifer's disappearance, and who supposedly will go to trial. in January. Kent has been accused by his wife of sexual harassment and attempted strangulation.

Michelle did not have the right to a speedy trial, which is in the fifth and sixth amendments of the constitution. Although it was arbitrarily granted in September by the judge, it was not executed as such. Jury selection was in October, followed by a long pause of two months before the start of the trial, exposed to public and media opinion unprecedented in American judicial history.

There was a long trial of 30 business days where more than 50% of the time was dedicated to the trial and conviction of Fotis Dulos (being dead to face his responsibilities).

We repeat, the main suspect turned star witness was given immunity.

There were four and a half years of an OJ Simpson-level media blitz, perpetuating a cruel and abhorrent image of Michelle, far from the reality of her true life story.

Michelle Troconis was as much a victim of Fotis Dulos as Jennifer and her children.

The trial showed a different reality from the Fotis Dulos that Michelle and all of us knew, who was bankrupt, financially dependent on the Farber family and a cunning 'serial adulterer'. Michelle was with the wrong man, in the wrong place, on the wrong days. This is Michelle's greatest regret, who, although innocent, has been unjustly convicted by public opinion of a crime that she did not commit.

During the day of the sentencing, the Farber family, Jennifer's children and friends vented their frustration, hatred and thirst for revenge towards Michelle, once again fabricating Hollywood-style stories, fed and channeled by the two prosecutors, alleging that Michelle wanted “replace Jennifer Dulos.” On the other hand, the Troconis family, close relatives, friends and people close to Michelle from the Connecticut community had for the first time the opportunity to tell for several hours who the real Michelle Troconis is, filling the courthouse with messages of love that They describe a charitable woman, committed to the faith, an exemplary mother, unconditional friend and sister, with an immense heart incapable of harming anyone, least of all another mother, or even of planning a conspiracy like the one that was condemned.

As a family, we call on the Venezuelan community to join our fight to find Michelle's freedom and to stand up to the media that spreads false and sensational information.
So they interviewed the Troconis family…I wonder if Lindy Urso would like to see this?
 
  • #779
I thought she was bonded to her beloved Connecticut community.

Good to have that cleared up. "Forced to remain in Connecticut, away from her support system".
 
  • #780
I didn't know that English to Spanish back to English translations could flip truth.

But I know it now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
2,260
Total visitors
2,364

Forum statistics

Threads
633,127
Messages
18,636,289
Members
243,406
Latest member
lalalovetyler
Back
Top