GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71

[BJarv]

As I recall, MT's trip to NY Probate Court never came up at trial, and it was never said that LE investigated it. I thought it was odd if they didn't.

I think it was discussed at a hearing but was excluded from trial as yet another example of 'prior bad acts'...I truly think 'prior bad acts' should be the name of Michelle Troconis biography!

 

[BJarv]

So…3 times the acceptable number of words in the brief…why does a judge allow this? When do the rules apply to this bimbo?

Welcome to the State of Corrupticut where convicted criminals have more rights the law abiding citizens!

Here is docket listing but the pdf of the file isn't available yet that I can see. The news agencies who are reporting they have the nearly 1000 page document must have gone to courthouse to get it.

Supreme/Appellate Case Look-up

 

[BJarv]

Habeas article:

https://archive.ph/NXZ4I

 

[BJarv]

For any that want to follow along with the Troconis misinformation campaign, here is their website:

Critical Evidence Restored in Michelle Troconis Appeal (The Herman Report and Giglio File Returned to Appellate Record)

What outraged me is that Judge Randolph returned the Herman Report to the docket for the appeal and so it looks to now be part of the record which is what the Troconis family wanted all along. Apparently the return of the document was one of the last thing the Judge did before his retirement.

Here is the Court Order from Judge Blawie on the Herman Report. IMO this is SHOCKING as this document was never admitted fully as evidence and marked in the original trial and NOW it appears the entire report will be added to the file. I have to go back and track back this sequence of events but so far a quick look indicates that the State has not objected to anything having to do with what the Troconis Appeals attorney has filed regarding making a change to the record. I will track back the sequence of events and report back after review as I'm finding it shocking that such a thing could occur as the trial only had 4 pages of the report marked for the record and NOT the entire report.:

https://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=O1R0lWb%2b7%2bDY0GnE5I4D7g%3d%3d

 

[waldojabba]

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/michelle-troconis-jennifer-dulos-conviction-appeal-21163331.php?utm_source=marketing&utm_medium=copy-url-link&utm_campaign=article-share&hash=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc3RhbWZvcmRhZHZvY2F0ZS5jb20vbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlL21pY2hlbGxlLXRyb2NvbmlzLWplbm5pZmVyLWR1bG9zLWNvbnZpY3Rpb24tYXBwZWFsLTIxMTYzMzMxLnBocA%3D%3D&time=MTc2Mjk3MzQwMDExMQ%3D%3D&rid=ZmM0MTBhYWUtNzE0Yy00NWViLTgwZTMtZTBjMDJlMGNhNGE1&sharecount=MQ%3D%3D

Gifted no paywall

“Troconis is appealing the conviction to the state Supreme Court, and also has sought to overturn the conviction and sentence in a habeas case based on ineffective counsel filed in a different court.

The brief describes a scene when Troconis was arrested for the first time, in front of her young daughter, after returning from a state police strip search about a week after Jennifer Dulos was reported missing.

"She was in her pajamas," the brief said. "The police told her to change into street clothes in the bathroom but not to close the door. Her child was crying. When she left the bathroom she was handcuffed …”

 

[Megnut]

Try her again. Let her get a worse sentence.

I'm so done with her.

JMO

 

[Megnut]

She is the grift that keeps giving.

No shame.

JMO

 

[Jmoose]

As I recall, MT's trip to NY Probate Court never came up at trial, and it was never said that LE investigated it. I thought it was odd if they didn't.

It did not come up in the trial; no idea why it didn’t, though-Gloria Farber’s lawyer attempted to elicit an answer from MT in another court hearing, but she was refusing to answer any questions, on the advice of Andrew Bowman, whose advice she thought was pretty good at the time.

 

[Jmoose]

For any that want to follow along with the Troconis misinformation campaign, here is their website:

Critical Evidence Restored in Michelle Troconis Appeal (The Herman Report and Giglio File Returned to Appellate Record)

What outraged me is that Judge Randolph returned the Herman Report to the docket for the appeal and so it looks to now be part of the record which is what the Troconis family wanted all along. Apparently the return of the document was one of the last thing the Judge did before his retirement.

Here is the Court Order from Judge Blawie on the Herman Report. IMO this is SHOCKING as this document was never admitted fully as evidence and marked in the original trial and NOW it appears the entire report will be added to the file. I have to go back and track back this sequence of events but so far a quick look indicates that the State has not objected to anything having to do with what the Troconis Appeals attorney has filed regarding making a change to the record. I will track back the sequence of events and report back after review as I'm finding it shocking that such a thing could occur as the trial only had 4 pages of the report marked for the record and NOT the entire report.:

https://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=O1R0lWb%2b7%2bDY0GnE5I4D7g%3d%3d

G*d d*mn it-are you kidding me?

 

[Megnut]

How can a second judge allow a report that the first judge sealed?

MR's fingerprints were on the trash bags. The trash bags containing JFd's bloody clothing, which had been cut off.

What possible defense could she mount now? What possible detail in that Herman report could exonerate her in the least?

All that volunteer Braille work she's doing in prison -- is she going to say she herself was blind? And that's how she didn't see what FD was putting in the bags? And driving back and forth to her solo fireplace social event? Whatever went up in smoke, she couldn't see that either? And the Tacoma two-step? Sightless? No idea what was so important in that truck that she had to divert PG's attention and keys in whatever manner she could?

If she wants any kind of mercy, she should consider the truth, for once. Let five children know what become of their mother so they can give her a proper burial. Or at least understand why it's not possible.

Show us your phone records, Honey.

Tell us what FD was doing over his lunch hour. Tell us about the ponchos. Tell us where he went and how long he was gone during the hours when his truck ate the telematics. Tell us why you're still hellbent on protecting FD.

In Spanish or English.

We're all ears.

JMO

 

[LosAngeles]

How can a second judge allow a report that the first judge sealed?

MR's fingerprints were on the trash bags. The trash bags containing JFd's bloody clothing, which had been cut off.

What possible defense could she mount now? What possible detail in that Herman report could exonerate her in the least?

All that volunteer Braille work she's doing in prison -- is she going to say she herself was blind? And that's how she didn't see what FD was putting in the bags? And driving back and forth to her solo fireplace social event? Whatever went up in smoke, she couldn't see that either? And the Tacoma two-step? Sightless? No idea what was so important in that truck that she had to divert PG's attention and keys in whatever manner she could?

If she wants any kind of mercy, she should consider the truth, for once. Let five children know what become of their mother so they can give her a proper burial. Or at least understand why it's not possible.

Show us your phone records, Honey.

Tell us what FD was doing over his lunch hour. Tell us about the ponchos. Tell us where he went and how long he was gone during the hours when his truck ate the telematics. Tell us why you're still hellbent on protecting FD.

In Spanish or English.

We're all ears.

JMO

This ridiculousness could completely disappear if Kent could step in and explain everything from Day One.

 

[Megnut]

This ridiculousness could completely disappear if Kent could step in and explain everything from Day One.

And since neither will, that tells us everything.

Blood on hands, both of them.

JMO

 

[sds71]

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHELLE TROCONIS

BRIEF OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT WITH SEPARATELY BOUND PARTY APPENDIX

A. Should Michelle’s convictions be vacated because the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of all the crimes? (pages 19-29)

B. Should Michelle receive a new trial because the court precluded the defense from introducing evidence pertaining to a highly relevant custody report while allowing the state to present evidence about the custody matter to support its theory of motive? (pages 30-44)

C. Was the manner in which police executed the search warrant for Michelle’s home unreasonable when they seized the home for four days and conducted a second search without obtaining a new warrant? (pages 44-53)

D. Were Michelle’s constitutional rights violated by the search of her home when the warrant lacked probable cause and it was not particular? (pages 53-61)

E. Did the court err by not suppressing Michelle’s statements which were the product of an illegal arrest and coercive behavior by police? (pages 61-82)

F. Should the court have vacated one of Michelle’s conspiracy convictions when the conspiracy to tamper with evidence was part of the conspiracy to commit murder and the two convictions violate double jeopardy? (pages 82-84)

Page 4 of 1015G. Did the court improperly fail to give the defense documents containing potential exculpatory or impeachment evidence? (page 85)

https://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=PkjN23KSdS7X6pizuI9CwA%3D%3D

 

[Eli9]

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHELLE TROCONIS

BRIEF OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT WITH SEPARATELY BOUND PARTY APPENDIX

A. Should Michelle’s convictions be vacated because the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of all the crimes? (pages 19-29)

B. Should Michelle receive a new trial because the court precluded the defense from introducing evidence pertaining to a highly relevant custody report while allowing the state to present evidence about the custody matter to support its theory of motive? (pages 30-44)

C. Was the manner in which police executed the search warrant for Michelle’s home unreasonable when they seized the home for four days and conducted a second search without obtaining a new warrant? (pages 44-53)

D. Were Michelle’s constitutional rights violated by the search of her home when the warrant lacked probable cause and it was not particular? (pages 53-61)

E. Did the court err by not suppressing Michelle’s statements which were the product of an illegal arrest and coercive behavior by police? (pages 61-82)

F. Should the court have vacated one of Michelle’s conspiracy convictions when the conspiracy to tamper with evidence was part of the conspiracy to commit murder and the two convictions violate double jeopardy? (pages 82-84)

Page 4 of 1015G. Did the court improperly fail to give the defense documents containing potential exculpatory or impeachment evidence? (page 85)

https://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=PkjN23KSdS7X6pizuI9CwA%3D%3D

If you are not in the mood to raise your blood pressure I suggest you avoid pages 30-44.

 

[Megnut]

If you are not in the mood to raise your blood pressure I suggest you avoid pages 30-44.

You warned me. I dove in anyway and I've only made it a few pages, starting at p.35.

My God.

This is insanity.

But revealing as hell.

IMO FD used information he'd gained from knowing JFd and his one million motions to stage a murder that would look like a gone girl.

That's what the murder's eve supper celebrated.

Resolve the divorce once and for all.
Eliminate JFd once and for all.
Gain control of the children once and for all.
Gain control of trust money and a nanny once and for all.
Solve his money woes.
Satisfy the paramour.

What FD didn't factor for was JFd, ambushed, fighting back, fighting to the death, writing his name in her blood. No other murderer would take the body with him.

We all know that FD didn't get great news. Maybe things were moving forward, maybe he get increased and unsupervised visitation in time but not in his time.

FD had every reason to be impatient.

I believe he also wholesale underestimated GF, perhaps assuming he'd be able easily to manipulate her into continuing to pay all his bills under his pretense of grieving widow, caring for five precious and expensive littles.

But three women were on to him. Four if you count CL. JFd, GF and the nanny. Which is how the nanny and GF mobilized so quickly when JFd couldn't be located.

All of this falls apart for MT. It was swiftly discovered that JFd met with foul play ...and therefore EVEN IF MT had had a strong feeling that JFd disappeared herself, it was immediately dispelled.

MT never believed JFd gone-girled. What she continues to hold onto is the alibi. The crime they agreed on was to look like JFd disappeared on her own.... that's what they conspired to pull off.

FWIW FD was never going to be content with mere divorce, with shared custody. Nor with one cent of child support. Murdering JFd was a lottery to him. Flipped the script. From broke and owing child support to flush with trust money...

Still, once MT was shown bloody clothes, the jig was up.

She had even less of a defense than before.

JMO

 

[Seattle1]

I’m working on trying to get a copy, but it’s expected to be incredibly lengthy. Last month, the judge signed off on Troconis’ attorney’s request to exceed the word limit by 6,500 words for a total of 20,000 words. The state has until Dec. 10 to file its brief in response, but I would not be surprised if that deadline is extended given the length of this appeal document.

^^rsbm

To be clear, appealing a criminal conviction is not a do-over. MT does not get to introduce new evidence or re-argue the case she lost. Instead, the appellate court allows the petitioner to scrutinize the trial court record for judicial mistakes, prosecutorial misconduct, or inadequate defense that may have led to an unjust conviction.

Considering only these three allowable elements, how MT came up with 20,000 words in her brief is beyond me. If I recall correctly, the petitioner also requested an oral argument. Another good reason to stick to the word count! JMO

 

[Seattle1]

What outraged me is that Judge Randolph returned the Herman Report to the docket for the appeal and so it looks to now be part of the record which is what the Troconis family wanted all along. Apparently the return of the document was one of the last thing the Judge did before his retirement.

^^rsbm

I don't think this is correct, but MT's spin on the facts.

A portion of the report (conclusion) appears in the brief, redacted, and Petitioner's Exhibit List appropriately identifies Exhibits from rectification hearing as sealed. (See page 12/1015). Also, it further appears Petitioner followed the practice book procedure outlined in Section 7-4B. Filing a record under seal, and 7-4C. Lodging a record. (See pages 1012-1013). In other words, only the Appellate is allowed to see what is being argued, but it remains under seal.

 

[LosAngeles]

^^rsbm

To be clear, appealing a criminal conviction is not a do-over. MT does not get to introduce new evidence or re-argue the case she lost. Instead, the appellate court allows the petitioner to scrutinize the trial court record for judicial mistakes, prosecutorial misconduct, or inadequate defense that may have led to an unjust conviction.

Considering only these three allowable elements, how MT came up with 20,000 words in her brief is beyond me. If I recall correctly, the petitioner also requested an oral argument. Another good reason to stick to the word count! JMO

How in the world can someone who doesn't speak english or understand the english language come up with 20K words?

 

[Megnut]

How in the world can someone who doesn't speak english or understand the english language come up with 20K words?

All the words in the world can't save her.

You can't appeal failed strategy.

LE had probable cause all the way through.

Ineffective counsel? She had effective counsel. Had she cooked her first attorney's advice, she'd have walked away with little or no time, they'd have nailed FD, he would never have had occasion then to suicide out, and she could sing to the rafters about how she was blinded by love, coerced by the velvet Don, fearful of him. All rubbish, of course, but she's be in a better position to croon it, if she'd turned on him.

Doubling down now that she believed the divorce was imminent, custody favorable, moving right along.

And quick to believe JFd disappeared herself. For reasons. Fighting tough and nail for custody, restricted visitation and then suddenly decides to abandon her beloved children. Sure, MT, that's credible.

MT no more wanted JFd in their lives. Divorce, visitation, not good enough.

That's what they were celebrating. Taking matters into their own hands.

I suspect there was a master script for that. Probably went up in smoke with all of the divorce papers.

Alibi FD for the morning.
Abduct JFd from her home.
Leave her vehicle and phone at the park.
Return to life as usual, nothing to see here, just hard at work. Easily by 9:30, hardly missed.
Disappear her body.
Gather up the children.
Broadcast innocence.
Start in on GF for money...
Continue to bill the Faber family as he always had.
Travel the world with the water and downhill skiing superstars.
Fob the littles on the nanny.

But JFd fought back. With the strength of a hundred thousand mothers --

And it blew up FD plan. Crime scene. Time line. Script. Blown up.

MT doesn't want to budge from the script.

It would be laughable if it were any kind of funny.

If she didn't think/ know FD was responsible, she wouldn't have known to cover for him. No reason to lie to LE. She'd be forthcoming about his actions and whereabouts.

Nope, she's not telling because she can't tell. Not without Mommy and Daddy finding out what she did, which IMO is even worse than the parts we know she did.

She missed her chance to say FD made me do it.

As it is, she got a grossly light sentence. I really wish she'd take that time to grow a conscience.

JMO

 

[waldojabba]

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHELLE TROCONIS

BRIEF OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT WITH SEPARATELY BOUND PARTY APPENDIX

A. Should Michelle’s convictions be vacated because the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of all the crimes? (pages 19-29)

B. Should Michelle receive a new trial because the court precluded the defense from introducing evidence pertaining to a highly relevant custody report while allowing the state to present evidence about the custody matter to support its theory of motive? (pages 30-44)

C. Was the manner in which police executed the search warrant for Michelle’s home unreasonable when they seized the home for four days and conducted a second search without obtaining a new warrant? (pages 44-53)

D. Were Michelle’s constitutional rights violated by the search of her home when the warrant lacked probable cause and it was not particular? (pages 53-61)

E. Did the court err by not suppressing Michelle’s statements which were the product of an illegal arrest and coercive behavior by police? (pages 61-82)

F. Should the court have vacated one of Michelle’s conspiracy convictions when the conspiracy to tamper with evidence was part of the conspiracy to commit murder and the two convictions violate double jeopardy? (pages 82-84)

Page 4 of 1015G. Did the court improperly fail to give the defense documents containing potential exculpatory or impeachment evidence? (page 85)

https://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=PkjN23KSdS7X6pizuI9CwA%3D%3D

Blahblahblah -

This whole sordid mockery of reality makes my head want to explode
A highly relevant CUSTODY REPORT ?

Stop the madness. It has no relevance - it never did - these people are beyond the pale
If I am Judge - I'd throw the whole thing out - Frivolous disregard for facts and a time wasting exercise for the court
Also she is using public defenders for this charade ?

Can't she just have a this tantrum on her own dime?

JMO