GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71

  • #561
Efiled Icon
[td width="75px"]
AC 47734
[td width="100%"]
Case Information
[/td]
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHELLE TROCONIS
[td width="185px"]Status: Brief Due[/td]
[/td]

11/4/2024
[td width="175px"]
BRIEF
PDF Doc
[/td]​
[td width="175px"]
[/td]
[td width="165px"]
Clerk uploaded electronic version of Clerk Appendix​
[/td]​

 
  • #562
  • #563

Efiled Icon

[td width="75px"]
AC 47734


[td width="100%"]
Case Information


[/td]
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHELLE TROCONIS

[td width="185px"]Status: Brief Due[/td]

[/td]



11/4/2024

[td width="175px"]
BRIEF
PDF Doc

[/td]
[td width="175px"]


[/td]
[td width="165px"]
Clerk uploaded electronic version of Clerk Appendix

[/td]​


This is virtually all the evidence used in the trial.

No printable words for this type of legal brief...:mad:
 
  • #564
Wednesday, November 13th:
*Pretrial Hearing (re Contempt Charges) (@ 2pm ET) – CT – Jennifer Rebecca Farber Dulos (50) (May 24, 2019, New Canaan; still missing) – *Michelle C. Troconis (44/now 50) (Dulos’ GF) arrested & charged (6/1/19) & arraigned (6/3/19) with tampering with or fabricating physical evidence & hindering prosecution. Plead not guilty. $500K bond. Posted bond (on 6/3/19). These charges were dismissed (8/28/20) & recharged below. Stamford
*Charged (9/5/19) & arraigned (10/4/19) with tampering with evidence involving the borrowed car from work colleague [Count 5] & conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence [Count 4-dismissed] (for 5/29/19). Plead not guilty. $100K bond. Posted bond (on 9/5/19). Off GPS 4/6/23.
*Charged (1/7/20) with conspiracy to commit murder (for 5/24/19) [Count 1]. Plead not guilty. $2M bond. Bond reduced (1/8/20) to $1.5M & bonded out (on 1/9/20). Off GPS 4/6/23.
*Charged (8/28/20) with 2nd degree hindering prosecution [Count 6], tampering with physical evidence [Count 3[ & conspiracy to commit tampering with physical evidence [Count 2] (for 5/24/19). Plead not guilty. $500K bond. Posted bond. Off GPS 4/6/23.
After being found guilty - Bond changed (3/1/24) to $6M Cash/Surety Bond; house arrest. GPS monitoring. Passports surrendered. Appeal bond denied (5/31/24).
The declaration of death for Jennifer was officially issued by Judge William P. Osterndorf on October 24, 2023.
Trial began on 1/11/24. State rested their case on 2/21/24. Defense started their case on 2/21/24 & ended on 2/23/24. Closing arguments set for 2/27/24. Jury started deliberations on 2/28/24. Day1-Time: ~5 hours. 2/29 (Day 2)- ~6 hours. 3/1/24 (Day 3): ~1 hour.
Total deliberations: ~12 hours. Verdict:
Guilty of all charges. Sentenced on 5/31/24 to 14.5 years in prison.
Remanded to jail with bond change to $6M Cash/Surety. Inmate #433612.
Superior Court Judge Kevin Randolph presiding for trial. Assistant State’s attorney Sean McGuinness & Supervisory assistant State’s attorney Michelle Manning & defense attorneys Jon Schoenhorn & Audrey Felson.
Appeal filed 7/17/24 (A.C. #47734). Appeal attorney Sarah Howard assigned. Habeas Corpus Petition filed [9/14/24] by attorney Michael W. Brown.

Bond & Court info from 6/3/19 thru 1/10/24 & Trial Days 1-32 (1/11-3/1/24) & Verdict Watch Day 1-3 (2/28 & 3/1/24) & thru 8/5/24 reference post #291 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...-canaan-24-may-2019-arrests-71.718361/page-15

9/14/24 Update: Filed Petition for Release by Troconis. "The habeas petition argues that, at the very least, Troconis’ interviews to police should have been excluded from evidence, but ultimately she should have been granted immunity from prosecution. The petition alleges “incompetent counsel” by her initial attorney, Andrew Bowman. Troconis also says her right to due process was violated by then-Stamford State’s Attorney Richard Colangelo, who failed to honor an agreement in exchange for her speaking with police. The petition requests the court to vacate Troconis’ judgment & release her from custody within 90 days or a “reasonable period of time”. Filed by new attorney Michael W. Brown.
11/4/24 Docket update for Appeal: Status: Brief due.
*Charged & arrested (3/1/24) & arraigned (3/21/24) with criminal contempt of court (on 2/15/24). Bond $100. Plead not guilty (7/10/24).
Judge Alex Hernandez presiding. Asst. State Attorney Elizabeth Moran & Defense attorney Robert Frost.
Court info from 3/6/24 to 5/8/24 reference post #291 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...-canaan-24-may-2019-arrests-71.718361/page-15

7/10/24 Update: Troconis’ hearing on the contempt charge lasted just a couple minutes. A not guilty plea was entered. Troconis’ attorney in her contempt case filed a couple motions. One is for a bill of particulars from the State, meaning a more detailed written statement about the allegations against her to “prepare her defense for trial.” Another motion wants the court to compel the Law & Crime photographer who streamed Troconis’ trial—and who lives in Massachusetts—to testify if this case goes to trial. The prosecutor said she & Troconis’ will be meeting again & hope to have a resolution for the next hearing, which is set for 9/16/24.
9/16/24 Update: Troconis appeared briefly in court for her contempt case. Assistant State’s Attorney Liz Moran said both sides & Judge Hernandez had a conference this morning. She said no offer was put on the record but they are working towards a resolution. the prosecutor referred to motions Frost filed in July asking for more particulars on the contempt charge, as well as a request filed by the defense attorney to subpoena a Massachusetts videographer who operated a camera in the courtroom during the trial. In filings, Frost has asked a judge to order prosecutors to spell out the charges more precisely, and said he wants to ask the cameraman whether he meant to show Troconis' laptop screen on purpose. Next court date is 11/13/24 at 2pm at which time there may be a disposition or lawyers will be able to schedule a contempt hearing, Moran said.
 
  • #565
Hoping her appearance will be streamed. Field trip for the inmate. Hoping 14 years is off to a terribly slow start....every day slower than the one before.

1 minute news story on what to expect today.

 
  • #566
March.. lol
https://x.com/MarissaAlter
@MarissaAlter
·
19m

BREAKING: Michelle Troconis’ trial in the contempt case has been set for March 11. Troconis didn’t waive her right to a jury trial yet, but her attorney Robert Frost said it’s likely she will go with a bench trial.
@News12CT
 
  • #567
  • #568
  • #569
I suppose, why not? It's not like she had anything else to do.

What possible defense could she have? Didn't know what it was, when she enlarged the font for the whole room? Didn't know that she couldn't? Despite admonishment from how-many lawyers and judges? Thinks she can get it unsealed in order to defend her defenseless self with it? Thinks anyone believes there's anything in that sealed document that magically excuses her from participating in the (conspiracy to) murder of a mother with five young children?

I wish somehow the sentence could restore the full sentence of her (conspiracy to,) murder CONVICTION. No reduction. If only it could also undo 'concurrent' and slap her back to reality with consecutive sentences.

No mercy unless she helps Jennifer's children find their mother.

JMO
 
  • #570
In January 2019, I learned about a 16 year old girl who went missing from Moreno Valley, CA. She was last seen talking talking to a classmate at a park located at the end of the road from her residence, and her body has never been recovered.

Her classmate was later arrested and charged with murdering and disappearing this girl. He was finally sentenced on Friday, and now age 23, he will never leave prison.

Right or wrong, it was very satisfying to read Judge Hollenhorst say to the killer what I also felt about him! I also think it helps the family of the victim to hear this from somebody who saw and heard more evidence than they had access to. I'll never understand why CT believes the bench to be "perpetual neutral," and/or above this. JMO
So with you on this POV about commentary from the bench by Judges! CT Judges seem to side more with the criminals and not care at all that I can see about Victims. Judge Randolph was imo terrible in this regard and was almost as bad as the Judge in the KM spousal sexual assault case.

Its impossible to do justice to the institutionalized insanity of the entire CT Judiciary or how the State of CT evolved to the point where convicted and accused pending trial folks actually have more rights than in many other states to the point where I now kinda believe that other than actually sitting in a cell at York Prison, the Duchess of York actually has more rights than I do! She has full eduction, mental health support, telecommunication access, internet via ipad, gym, TV and all meals provided!

My feeble brain still cannot achieve any understanding as to how MT was able to remain out of jail for nearly 5 years pending trial when accused of Conspiracy Murder. You know the situation is bad when you explain the basics of the charges against MT to a Judge in CA and they actually ask you to repeat the facts of the case twice! MT was traveling and skiing year round pending her trial for Conspiracy Murder. Stunning stuff imo brought to you by the State of Corrupticut. All wrong imo. My guess is had MT spent her time pending trial in Prison or even Jail that much more information might have been forthcoming from MT against FD and KM. Its easy to thing 'all is well' when you can fly to Miami or hit the slopes pending trial. I think staring at 4 walls and a smelly toilet might have focused the thoughts of even the most self absorbed narc such as Michelle Troconis.

CT started to morph as it relates to the rights and treatment of criminals (can't call them that I guess but I will anyway....) many years ago and its hard to pinpoint the exact time nearly 20 years ago that the insanity started and spread but having one of the most prominent and liberal law schools in the country in the State no doubt furthered the spread of the toxic contagion imo until the views were widely held in Hartford and are now imo institutionalized in the Judiciary. CT imo works super hard to keep criminals out of jail and court and if by some miracle a conviction does occur then the prison reform early release guidelines have the miscreants serving less than 50% of their sentence.

I actually think Judge Randolph showed the world all they needed to know about the lunacy present in CT Courts when he allowed Michelle Troconis and Jon Schoenhorn to create the 'bible rivival' testimony farce at sentencing from people that knew Michelle Troconis only after her arrest and he still thought there was some fundamental value present in her as a human being such that she deserved a very light sentence imo. Did Judge Randolph exhibit any respect for the true victims of the crime at sentencing? IMO no as he allowed a totally disrespectful display to happen and last forever! He could have said that paper summaries were allowed only rather than the farce and drama that he allowed.

On what planet do the rights of the CONVICTED trump the rights of the victims? Only in CT and courtesy of Judge Randolph! Instead of seeing the worthless and frankly valueless parasitic life led by Michelle Troconis along with her never taking any accountability for anything ever in her life, Judge Randolph imo stupidly thought she deserved to get out in 14 years or so rather than sentencing her to the maximum possible which imo could have easily been justified in her case. Judge Randolph inexplicably saw value in MT who imo by virtue of the evidence at trial showed her as a valueless member of society and he has no doubt done the same drill with other convicted felons many times before on rinse and repeat. Judge Randolph saw much more evidence than the public ever did and he still acted as he did. Welcome to justice CT style folks.....its a total circus and imo has little to nothing to do with justice and oftentimes even less to do with the truth or even protecting the rights of victims.

The people advocating this soft on crime POV then created a bail system that provides zero disincentive to committing crimes and doesn't keep perps in jail pending trial except in truly horrific cases. But these folks then continued on with the idea that convicted individuals are also deserving of enrichment in prison, learning opportunities and full mental health support as well as very early release (think the stat is that most convicted folks serve no more than 50% of their sentence under the farcical rules in place that allow for their early release). There was really no need imo to formally '🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬' the police in CT as the Judiciary simply made it impossible for them to effectively do their jobs or testify to put perps in prison and one of the favorite tools used are arrest warrants. In what world did it make sense to have a 32 page (iirc) arrest document complete with pictures and time stamps in order to simply arrest MT and FD? Preparing those super long arrest documents took alot of time and imo simply gave the perps more time to burn and dispose of evidence etc. We all saw the impact of this delay in the evidence that was presented at trial. Was there no way given all the evidence to perhaps do a shorter document and scoop up the perps quickly to make it impossible for them to flee and not destroy more evidence and wash vehicles etc.? Guess not. It was a good thing MT and FD didn't flee but it wouldn't be the first time perps with money fled CT and CT police had to go to great lengths to return the perps. But, it was the Judge Randolph ruling on tossing MT cell phone due to lack of exigent circumstances and shortcoming in the arrest affidavit that had me expecting the worst for the poor victims ever seeing justice for their beloved mother.

Michelle spent 1 day in jail iirc and spent zero time in prison prior to her trial AND her dirtbag attorney had the audacity to then ask for bail pending appeal of her conviction. EVEN Judge Randolph said "Nope" to this insanity but I did sense a tiny bit of hesitation in his voice as he seemed to be considering it but EVEN he finally did see it as a bridge too far and denied the request. On what planet can you be convicted of 6 charges including Conspiracy Murder and you and your attorney think the right move is to request bail pending appeal? Welcome to CT folks! Michelle looked mighty miffed and started to cry when she realised she wouldn't be back on the slopes in time for the first CO snow in 2024!

As personal punishment, I watch most of the congressional hearings for Federal Judicial appointments. They oftentimes are better than the best of SNL imo. One of the more stunning hearings I can recall, where I was actually worried that there might be the need for ambulance transport of a few senators following cardiac events during the hearing, happened during COVID. IIRC the Nominee was a low level Professor at Quinnipiac Law School in CT by way of Yale Law School iirc. Anyway, this person actually wrote a letter to Gov. Ned Lamont (whose mental competency in recent years imo is on par with current sitting US President and has never expressed much interest or understanding imo of the CT Judiciary as he doesn't seem to understand much about it or even acknowledge that crime is actually up in CT big time as seen in the 'revised' FBI crime stats) demanding the release of all but the most heinous prisoners from all of the CT Prisons as they weren't safe in jail/prison due to COVID. In this persons letter it was fascinating to see not one mention that I can recall about the impact of emptying the jails/prisons on the broader population, who were also in lockdown at the time and how due to the job situation during COVID there was most likely no viable opportunities for the released felons to support themselves except by doing things that aren't in the best interests of the rest of CT citizens. It was hilarious to watch this person being interviewed and to see her not actually able to understand why emptying the prisons/jails was simply a bad idea, to say nothing of potentially dangerous for the broader population. The pushback from some (not all) of the Senators was stunning to watch but the low level professor simply seemed baffled why there was no appreciation for her plan to clear the prisons/jails. This imo nimrod of a Professor did get her appointment iirc.

It just never ends and being a sanctuary state is just the cherry on the top of the sundae. The sorry citizens of CT have some of the highest auto insurance premiums due to the prevalence of uninsured and unlicensed drivers along with dangerous and unpatrolled roads and highways because law enforcement just seems to have given up.

MOO
 
  • #571
I don’t think it has yet been proved that Dr Herman was a hired gun, but it’s been strongly implied, and let’s face it, absolutely in character for Fotis Dulos to use Jennifer’s money to pay for that “psych report” to say what it did. I think you may be right about the court’s desire to keep this chicanery hidden. Otherwise I imagine it could open up a whole host of issues for the family court in lots of other cases-I’ll just bet they don’t want all of that to see the light of day.
Sadly this issue was brushed under the carpet by Judge Heller (just like she fired Atty Michael Rose for presenting false financials to her Court behind closed doors) but it was discussed in the Atty Midler motion to dismiss GAL Meehan iirc along with the other document he presented to reject the Herman report.

There is zero mystery in my mind as to what all happened as Dr Herman 'left the building' rather than endure a cross examination by Atty Midler. Judge Heller knew what had happened and sealed and tossed the discredited report. In hindsight I think so much of what happened in Family Court was simply Judge Heller trying to cover up her ineptness as I don't think she cared about JF or the resolution of Dulos v Dulos. I do wish Judge Heller's investigation report as to how FD and his attorney Michael Rose managed to steal (or be given) a copy of the discredited report under the nose of GAL Meehan who has the well deserved reputation imo of fostering fathers rights exclusively was made public and not sealed. I would love to see a peer group analysis of Judge Heller performance in Dulos v Dulos and my guess would be they would assess her a grade of F-! Sadly she is still on the bench.

Judge Heller was a poorly trained and inept Judge with no understanding of high conflict divorce or DV imo but even she knew that the GAL had colluded with Atty Michael Rose and FD to give them a copy of the discredited report.

So much is clearer now that time has passed. Sadly nothing changed in Family Court after Dulos v Dulos and Judge Heller is sadly still on the bench. Can you imagine how many other victims of DV didn't get protective orders or judicial support in CT from Judge Heller in Family Court since the murder of JF? Hate to think of the number....

MOO
 
  • #572
This is virtually all the evidence used in the trial.

No printable words for this type of legal brief...:mad:
Another miscreant member of the CT Bar on public view at the hearing. Atty Frost is one for the record books as he actually had the audacity to appear annoyed to be in court as he seemed to think that Michelle did nothing wrong and that the time of LE would be better spent chasing down how Michelle got the report. Atty Frost is also so stupid as to make mention of his client, "doing something wrong" but only charged because it was caught on video. So, I guess its ok to do all the wrong things so long as you aren't seen! This attorney no doubt fits right in with the Troconis crew and I do wonder if he is best buds with like minded attorneys like Jon Schoenhorn. Judge Hernandez didn't even push back on the Atty Frost statements either which was outrageous but it was the poor and lackluster performance of States Atty Moran that has me believing that zero will ever come of this situation. Shameful and wrong. I actually set up a keyboard shortcut for 'shameful and wrong' as its all that seems to be happening on rinse and repeat from Michelle Troconis. Whole case is a dumpster fire! The case should have been dispatched with a hearing and decision from the bench! Outrageous to waste resources and jury time on this stupidity.

Here is this miscreant attorney in action via WFSB clip about the hearing. Whole thing stinks to high heaven imo but I do think States Atty Liz Moran needs to be replaced asap as she was absolutely ineffective and without any spark of outrage as to the facts of the case.

Actually it was possible to easily read the MT computer screen so I guess I could be the one witness for Atty Frost! But there were many others that read it live and discussed it extensively online.

WFSB clip on the insane hearing (Check the body language of Atty Frost!)!

 
Last edited:
  • #573
Seems to me KM made all his decisions when Fd was still alive-- including waving his right to speedy trial. KM, arrested around Jan 6, 2020, never had any money or power to call any shots here to protect himself. His co- defendants were out hustling and planning their next moves while KM was locked up without two nickels to rub together, let alone come up with $2M bail money!

I'm actually surprised Team Troconis hasn't tried blaming KM-- the same as PG. Especially once the State rested its case, and they knew KM was not going to testify. JMO

IDK, my guess is they don't want to 'poke the bear'. My guess is MT doesn't know all that KM knows not only about the murder but what he and FD might have discussed. My guess is also that MT has lots to fear from KM and the only way it all works is if they stick to the original plan and don't discuss each other.

Interesting to see if there will ever be a KM trial or if they plea it out.

MOO
 
  • #574
Memo to Atty Frost

Suggest reading the case files relating to your client prior to making declarations on behalf of your client in open court. Its a CT Courtroom and so unlike in other States where you would be called out by the Judge for the charlatan that you no doubt are, I offer a bit of advice. Here goes. It takes a bit of time to do the reading and prep work which you seemed quite fussed by at the hearing but its sadly necessary to mount a defense. I know. So annoying.

But, you don't want to fall into the bad habits of Atty Jon Schoenhorn who we sadly had to watch for over 4 years not do his reading and homework. It was painful to watch happen and his spectacular failure on behalf of his client spoke for itself imo.

I'm sure you learned a little about all this prep work before going to a hearing in law school. I haven't had a chance to check which law school you went to to make sure you did get the benefit of adequate training on these matters but I have to admit to being concerned as you didn't seem at all prepared.

Another tip, blaming the camera person for doing their job when your client was involved with illegal activity isn't a good look and really doesn't sound like a productive defense. If you could perhaps have a whisper conversation with dear Michelle to seek out some anger management and emotional regulation therapy in her Taj Mahal prison then that might serve her and your case well.

But, I do thank you for your comments in Court as they truly offered a good long giggle as they were truly preposterous! Is that the best argument you have to defend the indefensible actions of your client? Do better my friend and do some homework! You were just lucky to have a junior attorney from the States Attys office. My hope is that she will be replaced soon and your client will be convicted without wasting the time of a jury.

Today you asked a question about the discredited reports and so I did a quick read and in 2 minutes found the very clear order of Judge Blawie on the matter. Order was brief but quite clear. Quite unfortunate it wasn't enforced by Judge Randolph or Judge Blawie but more complaints for a different day.

BUT, also quite interesting that the note made by the Clerk referenced that the Report was given to Defendants Counsel. Mmmmm. SO, Atty Frost we have written confirmation as to where your client most likely got her report. Cannot wait for trial and testimony from both Atty Jon Schoenhorn and Audrey Felson about the report and how it made it to your client.

Tag you're it!

MOO

In case you don't have the time or inclination to go find the original reference here you go!

Screen Shot 2024-11-13 at 11.14.15 PM.png
 
  • #575
 
  • #576
 
  • #577
  • #578
I see by this video - next hearing is 2/19/25
Video says attorneys will meet in January to see if jury trial is waived.
 
  • #579
Video says attorneys will meet in January to see if jury trial is waived.

Must have missed that! Any "date" in January? TIA! :)

And I shall tag @Tink56 & @sds71 - anything in court site for a date? January & start times for Jan, & Feb. dates? TIA! 1731597963471.gif
 
  • #580
Another tip, blaming the camera person for doing their job when your client was involved with illegal activity isn't a good look and really doesn't sound like a productive defense.
I do hope when they subpoena the video footage they get the whole length of the video'd interaction between MT and Felsen shortly before MT flashed the report (I wonder if either of them has seen it all, as I remember it) Tho' MT has the option to not testify, IMO Felsen can be called to testify about what she was telling MT that so animated MT, shortly before MT flashed the report. (If AF alleges attorney-client privilege, that doesn't pertain when it has to do with breaking the law.) Mami Troconis should be called to testify about why she gave MT a tap when she saw Carrie L going to the investigator. Did Mami recognize what MT was flashing? How did she know what it was--did she see it before? When? Did she know MT was going to flash it before she did?
JS should be called to testify if he gave MT a copy of the report. And about what he meant when he told a reporter (AIR) "She didn't get it from me. Norm Pattis had a copy of it." NEWS12 CT reporter should be called to testify as to what JS precisely said about Pattis--putting into evidence their online written report that JS alluded to NP regarding MT's display of the report. Put into evidence the actual video of JS saying whatever he did say about NP. MOO
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
2,816
Total visitors
2,921

Forum statistics

Threads
632,097
Messages
18,621,950
Members
243,019
Latest member
joslynd94
Back
Top