GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #71

  • #581
  • #582
Attorney Frost frosts me. It's the media pool's fault for filming the laptop screen? No, the fault is MT's, for having it on her screen.

Even if there was no media feed, what she did was still wrong and in contempt of several Courts.

IMO Frost may be right about this much -- Michi may have had an expectation of privacy there, at Defense table, similar to her joyride on Albany Street. Concha hate it when cameras pick up your criminal conduct?

AF couldn't not have known it was on MT's screen, unless she was momentarily blinded by the glare-normous font.

Mama T knew enough to know to give MT an alarm tap. MT knew what the tap meant.

The real question, to whom was MT angling it? What questionable news source was going to lead with Inside the Sealed Report, obtained from an anonymous source?

Just like her selfie in the grocery store and her afternoon, while keeping the home fires burning, nothing MT does is accidental. Based on the cozy synchronization among AF, MT, and Mama T, something about that reeks of collusion. Oh, I don't know, like maybe it was scripted.

Caught red-handed, attempting to disseminate a sealed document, in front of the second judge to order it (to remain) sealed, while in the midst of her own trial for (conspiracy to) murder? That is next-level ballsy. And she can't even cop to it! Says an awful lot about her character. Or lack there of.

This judge who cited her for contempt is the same one and tossed a charge and ran her sentences concurrently because he thinks she has the opportunity to grow. I might have joined him in his Ted talk if I'd seen a shred of decency in MT. Honesty, remorse, if only I'd a known...

But there is none with her. No truth, no transparency, no remorse, no regret. Not her fault she had the report on her screen, aimed at a certain segment of the gallery. Signature MT. Deny what everyone can saw.

I wish the charge had some teeth to it. Because karma would like to take a bite out of her.

JMO
 
  • #583
Sick to death of CT court system. MT has more rights than Jennifer ever had. DISGUSTING.
 
  • #584
Memo to Atty Frost

Suggest reading the case files relating to your client prior to making declarations on behalf of your client in open court. Its a CT Courtroom and so unlike in other States where you would be called out by the Judge for the charlatan that you no doubt are, I offer a bit of advice. Here goes. It takes a bit of time to do the reading and prep work which you seemed quite fussed by at the hearing but its sadly necessary to mount a defense. I know. So annoying.

But, you don't want to fall into the bad habits of Atty Jon Schoenhorn who we sadly had to watch for over 4 years not do his reading and homework. It was painful to watch happen and his spectacular failure on behalf of his client spoke for itself imo.

I'm sure you learned a little about all this prep work before going to a hearing in law school. I haven't had a chance to check which law school you went to to make sure you did get the benefit of adequate training on these matters but I have to admit to being concerned as you didn't seem at all prepared.

Another tip, blaming the camera person for doing their job when your client was involved with illegal activity isn't a good look and really doesn't sound like a productive defense. If you could perhaps have a whisper conversation with dear Michelle to seek out some anger management and emotional regulation therapy in her Taj Mahal prison then that might serve her and your case well.

But, I do thank you for your comments in Court as they truly offered a good long giggle as they were truly preposterous! Is that the best argument you have to defend the indefensible actions of your client? Do better my friend and do some homework! You were just lucky to have a junior attorney from the States Attys office. My hope is that she will be replaced soon and your client will be convicted without wasting the time of a jury.

Today you asked a question about the discredited reports and so I did a quick read and in 2 minutes found the very clear order of Judge Blawie on the matter. Order was brief but quite clear. Quite unfortunate it wasn't enforced by Judge Randolph or Judge Blawie but more complaints for a different day.

BUT, also quite interesting that the note made by the Clerk referenced that the Report was given to Defendants Counsel. Mmmmm. SO, Atty Frost we have written confirmation as to where your client most likely got her report. Cannot wait for trial and testimony from both Atty Jon Schoenhorn and Audrey Felson about the report and how it made it to your client.

Tag you're it!

MOO

In case you don't have the time or inclination to go find the original reference here you go!

View attachment 545014
Just an FYI...Both he and Jon graduated from University of Connecticut School of Law.
 
  • #585
March.. lol
x.com
@MarissaAlter
·
19m

BREAKING: Michelle Troconis’ trial in the contempt case has been set for March 11. Troconis didn’t waive her right to a jury trial yet, but her attorney Robert Frost said it’s likely she will go with a bench trial.
@News12CT

Next status hearing per CT Court site 2/19/25 at 2pm

Record Count: 1
Defendant (Last, First)Birth YearCourtNext Activity/StatusNext Activity/Status DateHearing TypeDocket No.
TROCONIS MICHELLE
[td]
1974​
Stamford JDAwaiting Disposition02/19/2025 02:00 PM
 
  • #586
I do hope when they subpoena the video footage they get the whole length of the video'd interaction between MT and Felsen shortly before MT flashed the report (I wonder if either of them has seen it all, as I remember it) Tho' MT has the option to not testify, IMO Felsen can be called to testify about what she was telling MT that so animated MT, shortly before MT flashed the report. (If AF alleges attorney-client privilege, that doesn't pertain when it has to do with breaking the law.) Mami Troconis should be called to testify about why she gave MT a tap when she saw Carrie L going to the investigator. Did Mami recognize what MT was flashing? How did she know what it was--did she see it before? When? Did she know MT was going to flash it before she did?
JS should be called to testify if he gave MT a copy of the report. And about what he meant when he told a reporter (AIR) "She didn't get it from me. Norm Pattis had a copy of it." NEWS12 CT reporter should be called to testify as to what JS precisely said about Pattis--putting into evidence their online written report that JS alluded to NP regarding MT's display of the report. Put into evidence the actual video of JS saying whatever he did say about NP. MOO
I too am more than a bit 'frosted' by the grumpy whiney Atty Frost! What a petulant man child imo.

He honestly appeared no better than the worst behaved toddler imo and it wasn't a good look. How disrespectful imo. Seems like the perfect attorney for MT though.

So many Judges imo would have set him straight about his annoyance of actually having to be in court on a matter that he felt was ridiculous but sadly we saw none of that from Judge Hernandez during the hearing. Do we know if he is representing MT under her new 'indigent' status and so he was annoyed for treking to Court for $150/hr or whatever the State of CT rate is these days? Can't keep the BMW fired up on $150/hr! My recollection was that he was engaged prior to MT being declared 'indigent' so I wonder if this farce is proceeding on Mama Troconis's dime. Mama wasn't in Court that I saw so I do wonder where she might be? Perhaps she took the day off to go interview new attorney's for MT?

To see Atty "Frosty's" ire directed at the camera person just seems to smack of the classic game of pointing the finger at everything other than your sorry client and their even sorrier personal choices! He seemed to be making the preposterous argument that his client is entitled to undertake illegal activity while sitting in a State of CT Courtroom and the real issue is that she was captured doing so on video in error.

I do think that the intent of the Defendant in doing what she did perhaps has some relevance. What I will never forget about the entire event though was MT very intentionally turning her screen with the huge font so that it could be seen by someone or some people imo. MT wasn't sitting in her chair doing personal work imo. This intentional act by the Duchess demonstrated to me at least that she wasn't just reading through the report for personal reasons. NOPE! The intentional act of shifting the computer to her right and actually moving it on the table and also enlarging the font way beyond what would be required for normal personal reading showed the Duchess making a determined decision to BROADCAST the report. Atty Frostys statement about no witness being able to read the report is something I disagree with. I actually did an immediate screen grab at the time and was able to read most of what MT had on her screen. Later video online had the screen blurred. CL also clearly was able to see and read the report to know what it was too. Was MT taunting CL or was she communicating something to Mama Troconis and Audrey Felson/en or perhaps her best buds at NBC CT? Something was going on and so I hope all involved and sitting near are called to testify so that the mystery can be revealed. There is zero doubt imo that MT knew what she was doing and her actions were deliberately undertaken. I do wonder if it all was preplanned as some kind of last ditch effort to make the report public?

Having no faith in the CT Judiciary I do hope there is no way that the report or the page from the report can ever be made public. Sadly Judge Hernandez hasn't imposed a gag order or put demand in place that exhibits be submitted to the Court under seal. I can see MT and Mama T trying to get the discredited report public in any way that they can and if Schoenhorn and Felson/en told MT that this was the only way that it could happen then I can see MT taking the risk. If there is any risk of the report or any part of the report being made public then I would hope the State would plead out the case or the Judge take control to protect the report and its contents and make clear that it cannot be used for any other purposes such as MT appeal etc. Just seems like there is some larger game afoot that I'm simply not seeing but I can see shady operators like Schoenhorn and Felson/en making such a suggestion to MT as it seemed like all their other shady attempts to get the report into evidence failed at trial. What a group of unethical attorneys.

But, iirc we were also treated to a long word salad from another whiney attorney, Audrey Felson or en...can't be bothered to look, on the entire issue of the cameras in Court and some kind of agreement in place with the person responsible for the video feed as to how the video would be shot and presented. I do wonder what this agreement entailed and whether there was specific mention of the two tables where defense and prosecution sat with their computers?

I'm not sure what the presumptions are for privacy in a public space or even a Courtroom. I always assume no privacy and just protect my phone and electronics with privacy screens. What is a bit crazy though is that privacy screens for laptops are widely available and so if any of the attorneys were concerned about privacy then why no just slap a screen on your phone or laptop when sitting in the Courtroom? Why leave any possibility open for public display online live when screens are so easy to add to electronics these days. Just seems like a good choice and easy way to protect yourself and in the case of the Duchess of York, hide your illegal activity too.

I hope the Judge is well aware of the shady history of the MT attorneys as it relates to the report and does more than Judge's Blawie and Randolph to safeguard the discredited report.

Who ever would have thought that a sealed document from Family Court would not remain technically sealed and would not be safeguarded by the legal professionals involved...Judges, State Attorney and the shady MT attorneys....whole thing is unreal imo and so disrespectful not only to the Court but the late Victim and her entire family.

MOO
 
  • #587
Just an FYI...Both he and Jon graduated from University of Connecticut School of Law.
HaHa! Ground zero imo for problematic behavior seen in so many CT attorneys. Seems like the group of them need a remedial special course in Professional Conduct and ditto for the Judges. I need to check their accreditation status....wonder if they are on probation....IIRC Pattis is also an 'esteemed alum' of UCONN Law. What a collection of so called legal professionals.

One of our favourite 'reposters' Lisa Backus actually seemed to find the document filed by Atty Frosty as it seems he plans to go down the path of going after "Law and Crime".


Quotes from article:

"In his request for a subpoena, to be served at the offices of the Law & Crime network, which broadcast a livestream of the trial on YouTube that racked up tens of thousands of views per day, Frost says he wants to ask the videographer questions about what instructions he was given before the trial began and how he followed them.

In the filing, the lawyer said the question of whether the view of Troconis' laptop depicted on the livestream was "inadvertent" would "undermine the reasonableness of the state's current claim that the trial participants (including Ms. Troconis) knew or had reason to believe that virtually anything placed on a laptop screen would be seen by the public on the Law & Crime livestream."

It is unclear where those motions stood as of Thursday. Frost repeatedly has declined to comment on the case.
The report was drafted in 2019 during the contentious divorce and custody battle between Jennifer and Fotis Dulos. The document was sealed by a judge during a family court hearing that never was completed as Jennifer Dulos disappeared days later.
 
  • #588






Marissa Alter
@MarissaAlter

MORE TROCONIS: Michelle Troconis' family spoke briefly after the hearing about their continued push to get her conviction overturned. Troconis filed a habeus corpus petition, alleging violations of her consitutional rights during the Jennifer Dulos investigation.
@News12CT
1:58 PM · Nov 13, 2024


Carlos Troconis: "My daughter's wrongful conviction resulted from a violation of her constitutional rights, ineffective counsel & denial of due process. The state failed to perform on the agreement in exchange for her cooperation. Another suspect was granted immunity."
@News12CT
2:01 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Daniela Troconis: "My sister is innocent, and she's paying the price of the crimes of others. Critical evidence to her defense was excluded from the trial, leading to a misinformed jury & an unjust conviction. What you think you know about my sister is a fabrication."
@News12CT
2:03 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Marisela Troconis: "Even in incarceration, my sister continues to bring light & her lifelong dedication to serving others by learning Braille to transcribe books for visually impaired children in CT. She remains a caring presence even under difficult circumstances."
@News12CT
2:05 PM · Nov 13, 2024

BREAKING: Michelle Troconis’ trial in the contempt case has been set for March 11. Troconis didn’t waive her right to a jury trial yet, but her attorney Robert Frost said it’s likely she will go with a bench trial.
@News12CT
11:43 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Troconis is accused of displaying a sealed custody report from the Dulos divorce case on her laptop during her trial in connection to the disappearance and death of Jennifer Dulos.
@News12CT
11:45 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Troconis appeared in Stamford Superior Court today for a hearing in the case regarding motions filed by the defense. One was to subpoena the videographer that recorded the trial, who lives in Massachusetts. To testify for the defense at trial. That was granted.
@News12CT
11:47 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Another motion had to do with a request for a “bill of particulars,” and whether the state is alleging the crime was Troconis’ mere possession of the report or her publicly displaying it with purpose of getting that information out.
@News12CT
11:50 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Asst. State’s Attorney Elizabeth Moran said the state will be moving forward with both theories at trial.
@News12CT
11:52 AM · Nov 13, 2024

The defense also requested a copy of court orders sealing the report, which Moran said she’ll work on getting to them.
@News12CT
11:55 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Of particular note, defense attorney Robert Frost saying, “I’m surprised this is still being pursued.” His belief is this charge all boils down to the videographer shooting something he was told not to, Troconis’ laptop.
@News12CT
12:00 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Moran disputed that, saying the case isn’t just about that. She pointed out the state was alerted to the report by an audience member in court, not from someone who saw the livestream. It was only when the state investigated that they saw the report on the livestream.
@News12CT
12:06 PM · Nov 13, 2024

_____________________________

ETA: So much for news over the past months that the parties had been negotiating in good faith for a resolution when defense attorney Frost is now requesting a copy of the Court Order sealing the (Herman) report...

Is Frost playing dumb or was this just more arrogance that follows team Troconis that they could get the charges against poor MT dismissed? :mad:
 
  • #589
Next status hearing per CT Court site 2/19/25 at 2pm


Record Count: 1
Defendant (Last, First)Birth YearCourtNext Activity/StatusNext Activity/Status DateHearing TypeDocket No.
TROCONIS MICHELLE

[td]
1974​


Stamford JDAwaiting Disposition02/19/2025 02:00 PM


I think we need to start a pool and bet how long it will take for this case to be heard and whether MT will appeal the outcome?

My guess is that trial won't happen as scheduled and that depositions and discovery will take 2 years. Will we see Law & Crime or even the State of CT sued for the live stream? Possibilities are endless in terms of distraction and entertainment.

Does anyone know who the Judge was at the hearing? Thought it was Judge Hernandez but now I'm not sure.
MOO
 
  • #590

Marissa Alter
@MarissaAlter

MORE TROCONIS: Michelle Troconis' family spoke briefly after the hearing about their continued push to get her conviction overturned. Troconis filed a habeus corpus petition, alleging violations of her consitutional rights during the Jennifer Dulos investigation.
@News12CT
1:58 PM · Nov 13, 2024


Carlos Troconis: "My daughter's wrongful conviction resulted from a violation of her constitutional rights, ineffective counsel & denial of due process. The state failed to perform on the agreement in exchange for her cooperation. Another suspect was granted immunity."
@News12CT
2:01 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Daniela Troconis: "My sister is innocent, and she's paying the price of the crimes of others. Critical evidence to her defense was excluded from the trial, leading to a misinformed jury & an unjust conviction. What you think you know about my sister is a fabrication."
@News12CT
2:03 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Marisela Troconis: "Even in incarceration, my sister continues to bring light & her lifelong dedication to serving others by learning Braille to transcribe books for visually impaired children in CT. She remains a caring presence even under difficult circumstances."
@News12CT
2:05 PM · Nov 13, 2024

BREAKING: Michelle Troconis’ trial in the contempt case has been set for March 11. Troconis didn’t waive her right to a jury trial yet, but her attorney Robert Frost said it’s likely she will go with a bench trial.
@News12CT
11:43 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Troconis is accused of displaying a sealed custody report from the Dulos divorce case on her laptop during her trial in connection to the disappearance and death of Jennifer Dulos.
@News12CT
11:45 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Troconis appeared in Stamford Superior Court today for a hearing in the case regarding motions filed by the defense. One was to subpoena the videographer that recorded the trial, who lives in Massachusetts. To testify for the defense at trial. That was granted.
@News12CT
11:47 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Another motion had to do with a request for a “bill of particulars,” and whether the state is alleging the crime was Troconis’ mere possession of the report or her publicly displaying it with purpose of getting that information out.
@News12CT
11:50 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Asst. State’s Attorney Elizabeth Moran said the state will be moving forward with both theories at trial.
@News12CT
11:52 AM · Nov 13, 2024

The defense also requested a copy of court orders sealing the report, which Moran said she’ll work on getting to them.
@News12CT
11:55 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Of particular note, defense attorney Robert Frost saying, “I’m surprised this is still being pursued.” His belief is this charge all boils down to the videographer shooting something he was told not to, Troconis’ laptop.
@News12CT
12:00 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Moran disputed that, saying the case isn’t just about that. She pointed out the state was alerted to the report by an audience member in court, not from someone who saw the livestream. It was only when the state investigated that they saw the report on the livestream.
@News12CT
12:06 PM · Nov 13, 2024

_____________________________

ETA: So much for news over the past months that the parties had been negotiating in good faith for a resolution when defense attorney Frost is now requesting a copy of the Court Order sealing the (Herman) report...

Is Frost playing dumb or was this just more arrogance that follows team Troconis that they could get the charges against poor MT dismissed? :mad:
Sadly I think MT, Mama Troconis and now Atty Frosty are moving forward with their original plan that Horn and Felson/en failed to execute to get the discredited report admitted on the record somewhere come hell or high water...

If we have yet another stupid CT Judge taking their eye off the ball and not protecting the report and this report is allowed in and under public view then I am not sure what to say. The fact that they have the most JR member of the Stamford States Atty office handling this and we have NO GAG ORDER in place to prevent more Pattis and Horn style motion leaking games has me quite concerned. Where is Atty McGuiness or is he or Atty Manning excluded because he could be called as a witness? Where is the Stamford Supervisor of the States Attys who always seems to be absent when the 🤬🤬🤬🤬 is hitting the fan and why is he not trying this case rather than palming it off to the most junior member of staff.

Simply exhausting to follow this entire clown show of incompetence from the State of CT.

Atty Frosty shows up in Court complaining about not knowing about the prior Court Orders to seal the discredited report is preposterous imo. Horn spent over a year and a half first trying to get the report from Judge Blawie and then his personal quest against iirc the Clerk in Judge Heller's Courtroom that he took up to the Appeals Court iirc. I have never seen such lazy attorneys ever as how could you show up at a hearing and claim not to know the entire history of the sealed discredited report?

Just hope the States Atty Office has this all under control as imo that performance from Atty Moran didn't inspire much/any confidence.

MOO
 
  • #591
Does anyone know who the Judge was at the hearing? Thought it was Judge Hernandez but now I'm not sure.

Confirming MT appeared before Judge Alex Hernandez on 11/13/24.

 
  • #592
Frost, gunning hard to re-imagine it as videographer's crime. Then he says, no one read it. No one? Well, it was right there in front of MT for her to read. And Mama T must have been reading it, to know why to tap MT. And we know CL read enough of it to recognize it as the report.

Filming on livestream was secondary and really only caught MT committing a crime against the Court in front of the Court. That's what the issue is, Mr. Frost. The flagrant crime the ice princess commit.

I'm done listening to her family.

 JMO
 
  • #593
BREAKING: Michelle Troconis’ trial in the contempt case has been set for March 11. Troconis didn’t waive her right to a jury trial yet, but her attorney Robert Frost said it’s likely she will go with a bench trial.
@News12CT
11:43 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Frost knows he has no chance going before a jury with his unlikable client-- especially if MT's former defense attorneys (and Judge KA Randolph) are called as witnesses, and have to hear themselves be reminded by the Court on what was and was NOT ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE and WHY-- all in the presence of MT.

Perhaps the State can compile all the MSM reports and tweets detailing the same....

How could so many know about multiple Judges agreeing they were not willing to question the ruling of another Judge who sealed the (Herman) report, or the appellate who ruled against JLS seeking the transcript of the mistrial hearing even after he was granted a copy of the sealed (Herman) report.

IMO, I think only the bench could best see through, and appreciate the bs MT tried to pull during her live criminal trial when she displayed the sealed info in huge font on her personal computer screen.
 
  • #594
HaHa! Ground zero imo for problematic behavior seen in so many CT attorneys. Seems like the group of them need a remedial special course in Professional Conduct and ditto for the Judges. I need to check their accreditation status....wonder if they are on probation....IIRC Pattis is also an 'esteemed alum' of UCONN Law. What a collection of so called legal professionals.

One of our favourite 'reposters' Lisa Backus actually seemed to find the document filed by Atty Frosty as it seems he plans to go down the path of going after "Law and Crime".


Quotes from article:

"In his request for a subpoena, to be served at the offices of the Law & Crime network, which broadcast a livestream of the trial on YouTube that racked up tens of thousands of views per day, Frost says he wants to ask the videographer questions about what instructions he was given before the trial began and how he followed them.

In the filing, the lawyer said the question of whether the view of Troconis' laptop depicted on the livestream was "inadvertent" would "undermine the reasonableness of the state's current claim that the trial participants (including Ms. Troconis) knew or had reason to believe that virtually anything placed on a laptop screen would be seen by the public on the Law & Crime livestream."

It is unclear where those motions stood as of Thursday. Frost repeatedly has declined to comment on the case.
The report was drafted in 2019 during the contentious divorce and custody battle between Jennifer and Fotis Dulos. The document was sealed by a judge during a family court hearing that never was completed as Jennifer Dulos disappeared days later.
I think CT Superior Court hearings are automatically video'd by stationary cameras. If so in the case of that hearing, I wonder if the footage would be helpful--maybe if it recorded something that L&C missed?
 
  • #595
Hey Everyone,
We need your help keeping Websleuths ad-free.
Subscribe to
DNA Solves and make a monthly donation. Five dollars or whatever you can do is greatly appreciated. That's all you have to do to keep the obnoxious ads off of Websleuths.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR A MONTHLY DONATION TO DNA SOLVES
By subscribing and making a monthly donation, you will be helping the families finally get the answers they deserve.
Please do not discuss this on this thread. CLICK HERE if you would like to discuss further or have any questions.
Thank you,
Tricia Griffith
Manager/Websleuths.com
 
  • #596

Marissa Alter
@MarissaAlter

MORE TROCONIS: Michelle Troconis' family spoke briefly after the hearing about their continued push to get her conviction overturned. Troconis filed a habeus corpus petition, alleging violations of her consitutional rights during the Jennifer Dulos investigation.
@News12CT
1:58 PM · Nov 13, 2024


Carlos Troconis: "My daughter's wrongful conviction resulted from a violation of her constitutional rights, ineffective counsel & denial of due process. The state failed to perform on the agreement in exchange for her cooperation. Another suspect was granted immunity."
@News12CT
2:01 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Daniela Troconis: "My sister is innocent, and she's paying the price of the crimes of others. Critical evidence to her defense was excluded from the trial, leading to a misinformed jury & an unjust conviction. What you think you know about my sister is a fabrication."
@News12CT
2:03 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Marisela Troconis: "Even in incarceration, my sister continues to bring light & her lifelong dedication to serving others by learning Braille to transcribe books for visually impaired children in CT. She remains a caring presence even under difficult circumstances."
@News12CT
2:05 PM · Nov 13, 2024

BREAKING: Michelle Troconis’ trial in the contempt case has been set for March 11. Troconis didn’t waive her right to a jury trial yet, but her attorney Robert Frost said it’s likely she will go with a bench trial.
@News12CT
11:43 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Troconis is accused of displaying a sealed custody report from the Dulos divorce case on her laptop during her trial in connection to the disappearance and death of Jennifer Dulos.
@News12CT
11:45 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Troconis appeared in Stamford Superior Court today for a hearing in the case regarding motions filed by the defense. One was to subpoena the videographer that recorded the trial, who lives in Massachusetts. To testify for the defense at trial. That was granted.
@News12CT
11:47 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Another motion had to do with a request for a “bill of particulars,” and whether the state is alleging the crime was Troconis’ mere possession of the report or her publicly displaying it with purpose of getting that information out.
@News12CT
11:50 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Asst. State’s Attorney Elizabeth Moran said the state will be moving forward with both theories at trial.
@News12CT
11:52 AM · Nov 13, 2024

The defense also requested a copy of court orders sealing the report, which Moran said she’ll work on getting to them.
@News12CT
11:55 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Of particular note, defense attorney Robert Frost saying, “I’m surprised this is still being pursued.” His belief is this charge all boils down to the videographer shooting something he was told not to, Troconis’ laptop.
@News12CT
12:00 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Moran disputed that, saying the case isn’t just about that. She pointed out the state was alerted to the report by an audience member in court, not from someone who saw the livestream. It was only when the state investigated that they saw the report on the livestream.
@News12CT
12:06 PM · Nov 13, 2024

_____________________________

ETA: So much for news over the past months that the parties had been negotiating in good faith for a resolution when defense attorney Frost is now requesting a copy of the Court Order sealing the (Herman) report...

Is Frost playing dumb or was this just more arrogance that follows team Troconis that they could get the charges against poor MT dismissed? :mad:
FWIW my guess is Atty Frosty is simply another dumb and lazy member of the CT Bar simply following the orders of his client/s and just like all the other members of his lazy brethren on the sorry case of MT is simply trying to get access to the discredited report by any means possible such that it can be admitted into evidence and then used for whatever purposes MT and Mama Troconis wanted the report used in their 'defense' of the Duchess of York.

I personally don't believe that MT, her attorneys or her family will rest until the discredited report is made public via legal or illegal means (exhibit 1 the MT display on her computer screen in court and on live stream she knew was present) and they have the opportunity to continue their now 5 year campaign to slander and defame the victim that their daughter/sister conspired to MURDER.

No CT Judge has stepped up to do the right thing and impose a gag order on MT or her extended family as it relates to the discredited report or this case for that matter and I've long thought this was shameful.

So, SHAME on Judge Heller, Judge Blawie, Judge White, Judge Randolph and now Judge Hernandez. SHAME also on the absent "Victims Services Advocate" in CT who also did nothing to safeguard the contents of a sealed Family Court Document. SHAME on the sorry CT attorneys Norm Pattis, Jon Schoenhorn, Audrey Felson/en, Michael Rose, GAL Michael Meehan who all did their level best to get as much of the report into the Court record and public domain as they could even knowing it was SEALED. Special shout out for the disgraceful and imo unlawful behavior of Atty Michael Rose and GAL Michael Meehan who disregarded the guidelines imposed by Judge Heller on the report in Family Court and made it possible for the report to fall into the hands of Fotis Dulos and Michelle Troconis. Neither of these despicable attorneys was ever reported to the CT Bar and the CT States Attorneys and Judge Heller did zero to sanction their behavior either.

All these Judges, so called legal professionals along with the CT States Attorneys Manning, Moran and McGuiness imo have done ZERO to protect the murder victim, Jennifer Farber and her still living children from the ongoing references, leaks from attorneys and in Court displays on computer screens of the discredited report. What has been seen and heard from the so called legal professionals with regard to the discredited report imo countermands Judicial Orders in place (from Judges Heller, Blawie and Randolph) going back to the time of Judge Heller in Family Court and yet no sanctions or referral to CT Bar for discipline. Who can ever forget the disgraceful behavior of Audrey Felson/en in her cross of GAL Meehan and Atty Rose where an enraged Judge Randolph accused her of "crossing a double yellow line"! Not a peep from the States Atty during that performance by Atty Felson/en although I do think Atty Manning might have stood up for a second in Court. But Atty Manning NEVER sent any of the Horn or Felson/en behavior for referral for discipline and as we saw, Judge Randolph himself did zero to maintain the integrity of his ruling about the discredited report and maintain order even in his own courtroom. It was disgusting and wrong also imo to watch this all play out in front of the jury imo.

I made the personal decision long ago in this case to not speculate on the contents of the discredited report and frankly don't give much time to trying to puzzle out the disordered minds of MT and Mama Troconis. But, to continue to hear the imo equally disordered statements from members of the Troconis clan yet again spewing their lies aka as mis and disinformation (both exist imo from MT and Troconis clan) about "key evidence" not being admitted and then to see it reported/reposted by the local Press (Marisa Alter in this example via tweets) to trial has my blood boiling.

Marisa Alter who works for Channel 12 has been one of the few local reporters who are out and about in CT daily and I have long appreciated her coverage and presence, as to say the media landscape in CT is bleak would be an understatement. Marisa covers local stories that nobody else reports on and as it relates to Fairfield County at least she is really 1 of 1 out on the streets. It pains me to voice criticism of her latest actions but I've had enough after listening to the lies of the Troconis clan now for 5 years. IMO just because someone is saying something doesn't mean it has to be printed by the Press. BUT, if the Press does choose to print a statement then please put it in context providing a simple recitation of the facts so that the reader of said article can themselves assess the statements being spewed by the group of family members angry that their daughter/sister was held accountable by a jury for her actions following a long trial.

BUT, reading the family quotes presented in the @Seattle1 post above from Marisa I have to admit to being more than a bit angry as imo if there is anyone that has been covering this tragic case from Day 1, as Marisa has been, and who has read as many case documents and sat through the entire trial as Marisa did, to then continue to post aka 'reposting' statements from the Troconis family that imo she well knows to be false frankly in my book sadly makes her reporting on par with the likes of Shannon Miller of NBC CT or the various Hearst publications that simply spent years spewing the direct statements of first Pattis and then Horn.

The family have the right to say what they will within the confines of US laws but I do think the Press (loosely defined imo in the form of the CT Media landscape) have the obligation to 'fact check' and not provide a forum for the dissemination of mis and disinformation imo.
Marisa Alter in the case of this latest posting/article, chose to 'repost' the quotes from the Troconis family with zero context or qualification and imo this gives the reader of her reposting the false impression that MT was not only false accused but falsely convicted. No mention of the six charges that MT was charged and convicted of or that a jury of her peers unanimously convicted her on those 6 charges. Frankly imo this is on par with disgraceful behavior seen on air from Shannon Miller who cried following the verdict with MT convicted on all six charges.

Words matter imo, context matters, facts matter, truth matters and yet the Press such as seen in this article from Marisa Alter continues to simply focus on statements from the Troconis family that represent "their truth" BUT NOT THE TRUTH as determined by a Jury. Marisa knows all this AND YET we see these ongoing statements from the Troconis family not placed in context for readers who haven't been following this sorry case since day 1 and understand the facts of the case. Honestly, do better Marisa as this reposting article imo makes you look no better than a hired PR person from the Troconis family and by extension MT!

I guess I'm simply tired of ongoing sloppiness from the Media and I don't believe the Media have the obligation to print all that is said but if they do chose to print a quote then make an attempt to provide context and fact checking simply out of respect to the readers. Sadly its really a case of 'reader beware always' as it relates to MSM and I never thought I would be here saying it about Marisa Alter too but we are there unfortunately.

Marisa had the choice to NOT LIVE TWEET comments from the Troconis clan with no context and could have waited imo to do a proper article with context but didn't. So, the unknowing public just heard 'the personal truth' of the Troconis family members rather than 'the truth' putting their commentary and views in context of the convicted felon MT and the associated trial.

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #597
I think CT Superior Court hearings are automatically video'd by stationary cameras. If so in the case of that hearing, I wonder if the footage would be helpful--maybe if it recorded something that L&C missed?
I used to think this too but what I have seen is inconsistent video coverage of cases. I wonder sometimes if its that they simply 'forget' to turn on the cameras? But, I've gone looking for video that imo should have been there but wasn't. Not sure why.

Being a somewhat consistent critic of the imo awful CT Judiciary I do have to say that to have any of the Court coverage on video and online is a huge step forward relative to what is available in other States. I have long followed the Delphi murder case in Indiana and seeing how the local Judge there was able to 'turn off' the cameras in Court and impose coverage rulings for the Press and public to effectively close down public access to a criminal case was a wake up call as to how access to public trials still isn't transparent or accessible.
MOO
 
  • #598
Confirming MT appeared before Judge Alex Hernandez on 11/13/24.

Thanks for confirmation. Judge Hernandez ime is usually 'on it' and a straight shooter so not sure why he allowed those ridiculous comments from Atty Frosty. I think Atty Frosty was having a 'PR Moment' as he has supposedly been representing MT for many months and you would think that the first thing he might have tasked his paralegal with doing was tracking back all the prior rulings on the discredited report. If he didn't then he is even lazier and more stupid than he appeared in Court the other day. Idea that he stands up in Court and wonders 'why we are even here' is simply preposterous on the face to say nothing of being disrespectful to the Judge and the States Atty. Mansplaining at its worst too. It was gross to watch and the Judge should have shut it down with a quick reprimand. Perhaps it happened and we didn't have it on the clip? IDK.

I just hope that Atty Moran is replaced as the presentation made that we saw on video seemed weak and lacking intensity of any kind and so imo came off as absolutely ineffectual.

MOO
 
  • #599
Attorney Frost frosts me. It's the media pool's fault for filming the laptop screen? No, the fault is MT's, for having it on her screen.

Even if there was no media feed, what she did was still wrong and in contempt of several Courts.

IMO Frost may be right about this much -- Michi may have had an expectation of privacy there, at Defense table, similar to her joyride on Albany Street. Concha hate it when cameras pick up your criminal conduct?

AF couldn't not have known it was on MT's screen, unless she was momentarily blinded by the glare-normous font.

Mama T knew enough to know to give MT an alarm tap. MT knew what the tap meant.

The real question, to whom was MT angling it? What questionable news source was going to lead with Inside the Sealed Report, obtained from an anonymous source?

Just like her selfie in the grocery store and her afternoon, while keeping the home fires burning, nothing MT does is accidental. Based on the cozy synchronization among AF, MT, and Mama T, something about that reeks of collusion. Oh, I don't know, like maybe it was scripted.

Caught red-handed, attempting to disseminate a sealed document, in front of the second judge to order it (to remain) sealed, while in the midst of her own trial for (conspiracy to) murder? That is next-level ballsy. And she can't even cop to it! Says an awful lot about her character. Or lack there of.

This judge who cited her for contempt is the same one and tossed a charge and ran her sentences concurrently because he thinks she has the opportunity to grow. I might have joined him in his Ted talk if I'd seen a shred of decency in MT. Honesty, remorse, if only I'd a known...

But there is none with her. No truth, no transparency, no remorse, no regret. Not her fault she had the report on her screen, aimed at a certain segment of the gallery. Signature MT. Deny what everyone can saw.

I wish the charge had some teeth to it. Because karma would like to take a bite out of her.

JMO
She did not just have it on her screen-she turned her screen in that direction. The screen wasn’t facing herself-it was turned about 45 degrees to her right, which is why I call BS on her attorney’s claim that she “didn’t see it”.
 
  • #600

Marissa Alter
@MarissaAlter

MORE TROCONIS: Michelle Troconis' family spoke briefly after the hearing about their continued push to get her conviction overturned. Troconis filed a habeus corpus petition, alleging violations of her consitutional rights during the Jennifer Dulos investigation.
@News12CT
1:58 PM · Nov 13, 2024


Carlos Troconis: "My daughter's wrongful conviction resulted from a violation of her constitutional rights, ineffective counsel & denial of due process. The state failed to perform on the agreement in exchange for her cooperation. Another suspect was granted immunity."
@News12CT
2:01 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Daniela Troconis: "My sister is innocent, and she's paying the price of the crimes of others. Critical evidence to her defense was excluded from the trial, leading to a misinformed jury & an unjust conviction. What you think you know about my sister is a fabrication."
@News12CT
2:03 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Marisela Troconis: "Even in incarceration, my sister continues to bring light & her lifelong dedication to serving others by learning Braille to transcribe books for visually impaired children in CT. She remains a caring presence even under difficult circumstances."
@News12CT
2:05 PM · Nov 13, 2024

BREAKING: Michelle Troconis’ trial in the contempt case has been set for March 11. Troconis didn’t waive her right to a jury trial yet, but her attorney Robert Frost said it’s likely she will go with a bench trial.
@News12CT
11:43 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Troconis is accused of displaying a sealed custody report from the Dulos divorce case on her laptop during her trial in connection to the disappearance and death of Jennifer Dulos.
@News12CT
11:45 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Troconis appeared in Stamford Superior Court today for a hearing in the case regarding motions filed by the defense. One was to subpoena the videographer that recorded the trial, who lives in Massachusetts. To testify for the defense at trial. That was granted.
@News12CT
11:47 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Another motion had to do with a request for a “bill of particulars,” and whether the state is alleging the crime was Troconis’ mere possession of the report or her publicly displaying it with purpose of getting that information out.
@News12CT
11:50 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Asst. State’s Attorney Elizabeth Moran said the state will be moving forward with both theories at trial.
@News12CT
11:52 AM · Nov 13, 2024

The defense also requested a copy of court orders sealing the report, which Moran said she’ll work on getting to them.
@News12CT
11:55 AM · Nov 13, 2024

Of particular note, defense attorney Robert Frost saying, “I’m surprised this is still being pursued.” His belief is this charge all boils down to the videographer shooting something he was told not to, Troconis’ laptop.
@News12CT
12:00 PM · Nov 13, 2024

Moran disputed that, saying the case isn’t just about that. She pointed out the state was alerted to the report by an audience member in court, not from someone who saw the livestream. It was only when the state investigated that they saw the report on the livestream.
@News12CT
12:06 PM · Nov 13, 2024

_____________________________

ETA: So much for news over the past months that the parties had been negotiating in good faith for a resolution when defense attorney Frost is now requesting a copy of the Court Order sealing the (Herman) report...

Is Frost playing dumb or was this just more arrogance that follows team Troconis that they could get the charges against poor MT dismissed? :mad:
If I was Pawel Gumienny, I believe I would sue the Troconis family each and every time they referred to him as a “suspect”. He was not a suspect at any time. At worst, he may have been a “person of interest”, which ONLY means “a person we want to talk to”. Not at all the same thing as a “suspect”, and certainly not at all the same thing as a “convicted co-conspiritor in the murder of a mother of 5 children”.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
3,232
Total visitors
3,305

Forum statistics

Threads
632,110
Messages
18,622,089
Members
243,021
Latest member
sennybops
Back
Top