Fotis Dulos says his children are ‘constantly on my mind’ while his lawyer suggests ‘revenge suicide’ is behind wife’s disappearance
"The status hearing before Judge Donna Heller in the two-year divorce proceedings and custody battle was called for by the court-appointed guardian ad litem of the children, Attorney Michael Meehan. Meehan on Tuesday filed a motion accusing Pattis of violating a court order when he commented publicly about parts of the sealed custody report and psychological evaluation completed for the couple’s divorce case — the file that Pattis seeks to have unsealed".
"In another motion filed by Pattis on Tuesday, he wrote that Dulos found a copy of the report in his Farmington home after he was released on bail and after at least one search of the home by state police investigators".
“It is the undersigned’s belief that Ms. Dulos was aware of the contents of the report, made statements about its recommendations to Mr. Dulos, and that she acted in accordance with her stated intention to do anything within her power to see to it that he was deprived of their children’s companionship,” Pattis said.
"During the hearing, an attorney for Farber Dulos said he was appalled that Dulos had the report, which should not have been in his possession".
"Pattis, in a motion seeking custody of the children, asked for the report to be unsealed. Heller instead ordered that all the copies of the report be given to Meehan. Heller told Pattis that he can view the report at court and take notes, but only in the presence of Meehan".
"Attorney Reuben Midler who represents Farber Dulos, attacked the veracity of the report, saying that it would not hold up in family court and was completed by an expert that would not be able to testify in family court. Heller said that the report would have no impact on her ruling".
After reading the above article and the above quotes I have grave reservations about the GAL in this case and seriously question why Judge Heller has done nothing to release him from the case effective immediately. HOW did FD get a copy of the report if not from the GAL? How can there be ZERO consequences to either FD or his atty No Case Norm for releasing the report to the public. Why is this being permitted to occur? Baffled.