I agree that the system didn’t lead to nor cause FD to murder Jennifer.
However, the CT Divorce system should not have allowed for Jennifer’s and so many others’ Divorce proceedings to drag on for so long... allowing those in contempt to get away with it.
And thus causing so much financial and emotional pain and hardships and destruction for those involved, including the children.
It’s been said over and over, and I agree, that the only ones who truly benefit in a CT Divorce are the attorneys, unfortunately.
MOO
Edited for spelling
I know. But aggressive litigants take advantage of due process rights. There's not much that can be done.
People who are parties to divorces often don't understand the ins and outs.
They assume too much. "Why does he keep getting away with this!!"
"Well, the judge hasn't read the motions yet because due to an impacted calendar we keep getting continued."
"Yes but he keeps doing all these terrible things! Look at all his emails and letters that I have to pay you to respond to!"
"The judge isn't reading all of that. I am. The judge only reads what's before her and set for that day. She has hundreds of cases and doesn't know every fact of every one. No judge could."
"But he keeps hassling me!"
"But the judge doesn't know everything he's done. She only knows what is before her in the subject of a motion."
And on and on.
The fact is FD absolutely did NOT get away with contempt. His rights to his kids were taken away for the most part. Contact was totally suspended for months. Which is super rare and super harsh as parents have constitutional rights to raise their kids. So this was a major punishment for contempt.
Next, he was given only minimal, supervised visits. Again for months. Lasting to the point when his contact was again halted.
For a guy who has high priced lawyers and is aggressive in litigation, he got an extremely poor outcome for himself. That was directly related to his contempt of orders not to expose his kids to his sidepiece.
There are consequences in court but it can take a long time and be a long process. The court has no choice but to entertain motions filed by the parties unless they're absolutely gibberish. Or repeat the same thing.
There's nothing much the court can do if someone has money and the means to litigate at this level of aggressiveness unless it is clearly frivolous.
But I can think of so much to slow the process that would be legitimate if my clients could afford it - intricate discovery (depos, request for admissions, special interrogatories, depositions), motions, requests for forensic evaluations, emergency motions, on and on.
And all would be valid.
Litigants like this take advantage of an impacted court system. Never enough judges for the caseload.
But while people complain they become super offended when they're asked to pay taxes to make the system run more smoothly and faster (such that special masters, for example, can be appointed on county dime and handle cases and bring them to a conclusion).
And frankly, I don't think that's the most important use of our stretched tax dollars right now.
Finally, I must point out that the docket shows Jennifer was a pretty aggressive litigant herself.