Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 #15 *ARRESTS*

[MrFixit]

Random thoughts tonight!

I wish LE would make another statement that wouldn’t compromise their investigation but drop a little innuendo to worry the accused and offer a little nod to the public that progress is being made.

IMHO during the assault in the garage JD was brilliant and brave and not only fought back but I think she warned him that her cleaning lady was arriving any minute so that he’d panic and she knew as a result he’d be hasty and sloppy thus leaving evidence to incriminate him.

I know and appreciate LE is working tirelessly on this case for Jennifer’s justice leaving no stone unturned as they know whom they’re up against and need an airtight case.... I just feel like I don’t want to presume things such as if they’re tracking/saving each and every single MSM statement, press interview, on radio/ tv etc. made by FD and his team of attorneys/family members/Greek parking attendant (is that what she was?) so that that when they try to change venues, they’ll be flatly denied. He and his posse is largely responsible for attempting to sway the public and potential jurors and therefore has no right or case to request a change. It just seems like the court has been so soft on both FD’s and MT’s ankle bracelet incidents that I’m worried.

It’s quite obvious that the prosecution and MT’s attorney are tight-lipped.

I also wonder if they’re reading all of JD’s blogs and will present them in court as they are a treasure trove. The one where she talks about the family bed and to paraphrase IIRC was how she was up with the littles all night long as they were out of sorts after traveling and she was trying to settle them down for the night one child after the next child waking up and moving from room-to-room and how she finally succeeded after hours and hours of patience and then FD got up at 4 am and noisily took a shower and turned on the lights. His selfishness is maddening and a testament to how he only cares about himself while she was the only nurturing and loving parent. Then she even commented that he was in a good mood the following day which was telling... as if most days he wasn’t in a good mood.
So many blogs with astounding revelations that the jurors should hear.

I agree with others that he used a drum but I really think he dug a super deep hole and used cement etc. as he had the trucks tools to bury her. He could’ve been digging far in advance on the Sturbridge or one of the Farmington properties without anyone batting an eyelash as they’re construction sites. Privacy and opportunity.

I think if it was buried deep enough in the dense woods on the property that the dogs wouldn’t be able to detect a scent. I am sure he would know how to cover it will soil, sod and greenery etc. so it didn’t look like it was freshly overturned. He may have even sprayed water so any scents were masked by the scent of soil etc.

Perhaps he used a wheel barrel to wheel the drum and that’s what made the metal banging noise. Then he covered the track carefully.

I apologize for being all over the place but I’m trying hard to keep the faith but worried about this case and these monsters.

Regarding burying a body very deep w/out dogs picking up a scent, is there a piece of scanning equipment that could scan the ground and notice pockets of disturbed less/more dense areas as compared to the surroundings?

 

[Eli9]

Regarding burying a body very deep w/out dogs picking up a scent, is there a piece of scanning equipment that could scan the ground and notice pockets of disturbed less/more dense areas as compared to the surroundings?

Yes. Although this site reminds me of Ghost Busters they have apparently worked with LE to find bodies.
How Ground Penetrating Radar Works - How Deep Can It Go - Global GPR Service

Also the NIST was working on a corpse detection system a few years back. Interesting article here New Technique Finds Buried Bodies Better

 

[enelram]

I have to wonder if it further complicated things for JD that HG had loaned them money.

It's one thing to tell your family you're getting divorced, but I would imagine even harder to deal with owing them money at the same time.

I always thought it strange that HG stipulated that payments had to be made in person. I wonder what the reasoning behind that was.

With a husband that was likely calling JD "less than" on a daily basis, she probably felt like she failed her entire family.

So sad.

I wondered aslso about the stipulation to FD to
make payments in person.
Here's my thoughts:
This would be a mandatory method of HF
forcing FD to sit down with HF and discuss
a status update on his building business-
his strategies, his future plans- and to basically
allow HF to have some oversight on the business and hopefully to insure he would get his investment back.
He didn't truly trust that FD knew what he was doing. But this was a subtle way of HF being
involved even though he wasn't. He knew FD
well enough that FD was a one man show and
didn't play well with others. This little meeting
w/ HF allowed FD to save face and believe he
was in charge of his own company.
MOO

 

[sds71]

184.86 07/21/2019 C ORDER

RESULT: Granted 7/21/2019 HON DAVID SHERIDAN No
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=17380647

 

[rjay]

When are going to hear something new from LE? Are they quietly working in the background to get theirs ducks in a row to lay additional charges or is there just not enough evidence? Is there still evidence from MIRA still being processed? I wish there would have been more information by now.

Praying for Jennifer and her children that this is resolved quickly. I’m sure the children are absolutely devastated about not having their mom.

 

[oceancalling]

They're in the spotlight that they seem to enjoy, and think it's just the usual paparazzi IMO, smile for the camera media circus, why not pose for a photo op??

They both, mother and daughter, have experienced and probably enjoyed media attention in the past around any situation.

MT is billed as a "CEO" and "socialite" in some headlines from her work at the Fore Group in CT, and prior to that, her time in FL when she and her sister started their own company selling Seal boots, before that she was in Dubai, Argentina, etc. working in promotion type high end organizations or corporations or interests. ETA: Plenty of photographs of MT posed with 'high profile' people.

MT's mother was tried for medicare fraud in her practice, also in FL so many years ago when MT & her sister were also in FL starting up and promoting their business (specialty footware for staying dry when walking in wet environs), but IIRC wasn't found guilty. (ETA: will look for a link, it was in the first couple threads).

IMO, MT & her mother smiling like that after a hearing where MT was facing serious criminal charges, no matter how simple the interaction was to continue the case, was partly 1) them being used to 'smiling for the camera' regardless of the seriousness of the situation, and 2) they are confident that MT is in the clear, and it will all blow over.

MOO

I believe her mother entered into a pretrial diversion agreement with the feds arising from charges that she submitted fraudulent Medicare claims for "ghost" patients. She apparently negotiated a deal that allowed her to avoid a felony conviction in exchange for her paying a certain amount of money back to the feds. This case was out of Southern District of Florida, which has one of the busiest federal criminal dockets in the country. In other districts, she probably would have gone to federal prison.

Mom knows the benefits of cooperation and she surely is trying to protect her daughter as much as possible from the consequences of her bad decisions.. So long as she is in the picture, I have to think that she is urging her daughter to cooperate. Since mom has been the subject of media scrutiny herself, she is well aware of how bad the optics are here, hence the smiles, the white clothing, the mother/daughter unity. Still, looking past all of that, she has to KNOW that her daughter needs to assist LE or face years of imprisonment. In this respect, I do not see mom in the picture as a negative thing.

Should MT be trusted unreservedly? Absolutely not. Can she provide useful information to this investigation? I believe so. Between agreeing to move into the family home of a married man to accompanying FD during the trash bag dump to talking to him before he went to the police station, she was right in the thick of his actions. There is just no way she did not see or hear information that will tie FD to this murder. For instance, where did he say he was going on the morning of the murder? Did he leave his phone at home that day? Who initiated the truck swap and why? What did FD tell her he was doing when he took her on the ride to dispose of the evidence of JD's murder? What did he tell MT when he "learned" his wife was missing?

Since FD and MT were never married, there is NO marital privilege, which means MT will be required to tell LE about every single conversation she ever had with her boyfriend about JD, the divorce, and the ongoing legal battles between FD and GF (I believe there may have been an element of revenge to this killing). FD was so obviously obsessed about winning those cases that there is simply no way he did not let something slip prior to and after murdering his wife...If MT is acting in her own best interests, she will not throw her lot in with FD.

 

[JillR]

View attachment 194418

Thank you for posting. She obviously is not a practicing Catholic and I am certain that Christians do not do this either . A crucifix ( cross pendant with Jesus on it ) is the most appropriate jewelry for any Catholic to wear. The only people who can get away with putting a rosary around their neck are small children. After seeing this, I know there is something really wrong with her.

 

[enelram]

Thank you for posting. She obviously is not a practicing Catholic and I am certain that Christians do not do this either . A crucifix ( cross pendant with Jesus on it ) is the most appropriate jewelry for any Catholic to wear. The only people who can get away with putting a rosary around their neck are small children. After seeing this, I know there is something really wrong with her.

So are you saying MT is a Heathen w/ rosary?

 

[Eli9]

I believe her mother entered into a pretrial diversion agreement with the feds arising from charges that she submitted fraudulent Medicare claims for "ghost" patients. She apparently negotiated a deal that allowed her to avoid a felony conviction in exchange for her paying a certain amount of money back to the feds. This case was out of Southern District of Florida, which has one of the busiest federal criminal dockets in the country. In other districts, she probably would have gone to federal prison.

Mom knows the benefits of cooperation and she surely is trying to protect her daughter as much as possible from the consequences of her bad decisions.. So long as she is in the picture, I have to think that she is urging her daughter to cooperate. Since mom has been the subject of media scrutiny herself, she is well aware of how bad the optics are here, hence the smiles, the white clothing, the mother/daughter unity. Still, looking past all of that, she has to KNOW that her daughter needs to assist LE or face years of imprisonment. In this respect, I do not see mom in the picture as a negative thing.

Should MT be trusted unreservedly? Absolutely not. Can she provide useful information to this investigation? I believe so. Between agreeing to move into the family home of a married man to accompanying FD during the trash bag dump to talking to him before he went to the police station, she was right in the thick of his actions. There is just no way she did not see or hear information that will tie FD to this murder. For instance, where did he say he was going on the morning of the murder? Did he leave his phone at home that day? Who initiated the truck swap and why? What did FD tell her he was doing when he took her on the ride to dispose of the evidence of JD's murder? What did he tell MT when he "learned" his wife was missing?

Since FD and MT were never married, there is NO marital privilege, which means MT will be required to tell LE about every single conversation she ever had with her boyfriend about JD, the divorce, and the ongoing legal battles between FD and GF (I believe there may have been an element of revenge to this killing). FD was so obviously obsessed about winning those cases that there is simply no way he did not let something slip prior to and after murdering his wife...If MT is acting in her own best interests, she will not throw her lot in with FD.

The only way I see her 'helping' FD is if she was way more involved in the planning and assisting of JD's murder. Otherwise I think, like you have written, there really is no reason to remain involved with FD. The legal and criminal ramifications are way to risky.

 

[Southernsnooper]

Thank you for posting. She obviously is not a practicing Catholic and I am certain that Christians do not do this either . A crucifix ( cross pendant with Jesus on it ) is the most appropriate jewelry for any Catholic to wear. The only people who can get away with putting a rosary around their neck are small children. After seeing this, I know there is something really wrong with her.

She broke more than one of the 10 commandments. Thank you MT for giving the case another thing to mention during court that she’s a poser and a religious fraud!

 

[Southernsnooper]

The only way I see her 'helping' FD is if she was way more involved in the planning and assisting of JD's murder. Otherwise I think, like you have written, there really is no reason to remain involved with FD. The legal and criminal ramifications are way to risky.

IMO she was in it from day one as she refused to cooperate with LE. That action has guilt written all over it. I think she helped with his phone moving around the properties to make it appear as if he was working meanwhile FD was elsewhere.

 

[MrFixit]

Yes. Although this site reminds me of Ghost Busters they have apparently worked with LE to find bodies.
How Ground Penetrating Radar Works - How Deep Can It Go - Global GPR Service

Also the NIST was working on a corpse detection system a few years back. Interesting article here New Technique Finds Buried Bodies Better

Thank you so much @Eli9 these articles are awesome!!

 

[Midwestmom2019]

Regarding burying a body very deep w/out dogs picking up a scent, is there a piece of scanning equipment that could scan the ground and notice pockets of disturbed less/more dense areas as compared to the surroundings?

Or metal? A watch, piece of jewelry even fillings or other dental work?
I wonder if she still has her weddings rings on? Surely he would not be that stupid to remove them and sell them? Omg. Maybe he threw them in one of the reservoirs?
Does OnStar keep records of where you’ve been? Or google? Apple? I’m forever getting requests “report this malfunction to us so we can better serve your location issues.” Or something along those lines.
Surely LE has chased those ideas down.

 

[afitzy]

184.86 07/21/2019 C ORDER

RESULT: Granted 7/21/2019 HON DAVID SHERIDAN No
http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=17380647

IMO this is disappointing. Hearing? No deposition? Wonder why this decision was made? How can there be a hearing with no deposition and zero financial information submitted by FD after GF has been asking for it for over a YEAR? FD didn't show for deposition 2x.

What is the judge going to say in a hearing? Let's schedule another deposition? FD didn't show for depositions 2x! Simply looks like Judge kicking can down the road to permit deferral for FD yet again which was his strategy from the beginning IMO.

I hope GF atty's file immediately to request alternative action if its possible as this situation has simply become a 'joke' IMO.

 

[Tink56]

I believe her mother entered into a pretrial diversion agreement with the feds arising from charges that she submitted fraudulent Medicare claims for "ghost" patients. She apparently negotiated a deal that allowed her to avoid a felony conviction in exchange for her paying a certain amount of money back to the feds. This case was out of Southern District of Florida, which has one of the busiest federal criminal dockets in the country. In other districts, she probably would have gone to federal prison.

Mom knows the benefits of cooperation and she surely is trying to protect her daughter as much as possible from the consequences of her bad decisions.. So long as she is in the picture, I have to think that she is urging her daughter to cooperate. Since mom has been the subject of media scrutiny herself, she is well aware of how bad the optics are here, hence the smiles, the white clothing, the mother/daughter unity. Still, looking past all of that, she has to KNOW that her daughter needs to assist LE or face years of imprisonment. In this respect, I do not see mom in the picture as a negative thing.

Should MT be trusted unreservedly? Absolutely not. Can she provide useful information to this investigation? I believe so. Between agreeing to move into the family home of a married man to accompanying FD during the trash bag dump to talking to him before he went to the police station, she was right in the thick of his actions. There is just no way she did not see or hear information that will tie FD to this murder. For instance, where did he say he was going on the morning of the murder? Did he leave his phone at home that day? Who initiated the truck swap and why? What did FD tell her he was doing when he took her on the ride to dispose of the evidence of JD's murder? What did he tell MT when he "learned" his wife was missing?

Since FD and MT were never married, there is NO marital privilege, which means MT will be required to tell LE about every single conversation she ever had with her boyfriend about JD, the divorce, and the ongoing legal battles between FD and GF (I believe there may have been an element of revenge to this killing). FD was so obviously obsessed about winning those cases that there is simply no way he did not let something slip prior to and after murdering his wife...If MT is acting in her own best interests, she will not throw her lot in with FD.

One of the more interesting details that emerged was the fact that she closed her practice and her attorneys moved into the office so federal officials could not access the records in the office. Mom can find some creative attorneys.

 

[afitzy]

The in person payment term of the contract has always interested me given that FD didn't live around the corner from NYC. Making the payment would have involved taking 1/2 day to go into city and return to Farmington IMO. The payment location I believe was the Farber apt and not their business manager or atty and I thought that this was an interesting aspect as well. When I first read the provision I thought that this was someone keeping a close eye on FD and making sure that payments were made on time and that the old 'check is in the mail' song and dance didn't happen. Maybe FIL knew FD quite well and wanted him on a short leash? MOO

 

[afitzy]

One of the more interesting details that emerged was the fact that she closed her practice and her attorneys moved into the office so federal officials could not access the records in the office. Mom can find some creative attorneys.

I didn't read the entire case file but your point from the case is an interesting one. I also wonder if MT mother was a cooperating witness with the Feds as well as there was a period of time where Medicare fraud was rampant and the feds were trying to clean things up. There must have been a reason for her never to go to prison which IMO was where abuse of this sort should end up!

I am always curious as well as totally disgusted when licensed professionals attempt to make a 'quick buck' off the backs of the US govt. via fraud of programs designed to help citizens who are older and possibly financially disadvantaged. The fact that this was the path of MT mother at least to me tells me who she is.

The fact also that she is non US citizen so far as we know in a way makes any strategy to exploit a US Govt program designed to help support mental health of Medicare patients when mental health funding by the US Govt is under fire for being inadequate in a way makes this crime simply despicable IMO.

 

[Midwestmom2019]

IMO this is disappointing. Hearing? No deposition? Wonder why this decision was made? How can there be a hearing with no deposition and zero financial information submitted by FD after GF has been asking for it for over a YEAR? FD didn't show for deposition 2x.

What is the judge going to say in a hearing? Let's schedule another deposition? FD didn't show for depositions 2x! Simply looks like Judge kicking can down the road to permit deferral for FD yet again which was his strategy from the beginning IMO.

I hope GF atty's file immediately to request alternative action if its possible as this situation has simply become a 'joke' IMO.

Probably no court action bc it probably would interfere with his Fifth Amendment rights. It’s called “in an over abundance of precaution” in the law biz. Used in civil cases, too, to make sure no mistake is made inadvertently. Dotting i’s and crossing t’s.

 

[Midwestmom2019]

I believe her mother entered into a pretrial diversion agreement with the feds arising from charges that she submitted fraudulent Medicare claims for "ghost" patients. She apparently negotiated a deal that allowed her to avoid a felony conviction in exchange for her paying a certain amount of money back to the feds. This case was out of Southern District of Florida, which has one of the busiest federal criminal dockets in the country. In other districts, she probably would have gone to federal prison.

Mom knows the benefits of cooperation and she surely is trying to protect her daughter as much as possible from the consequences of her bad decisions.. So long as she is in the picture, I have to think that she is urging her daughter to cooperate. Since mom has been the subject of media scrutiny herself, she is well aware of how bad the optics are here, hence the smiles, the white clothing, the mother/daughter unity. Still, looking past all of that, she has to KNOW that her daughter needs to assist LE or face years of imprisonment. In this respect, I do not see mom in the picture as a negative thing.

Should MT be trusted unreservedly? Absolutely not. Can she provide useful information to this investigation? I believe so. Between agreeing to move into the family home of a married man to accompanying FD during the trash bag dump to talking to him before he went to the police station, she was right in the thick of his actions. There is just no way she did not see or hear information that will tie FD to this murder. For instance, where did he say he was going on the morning of the murder? Did he leave his phone at home that day? Who initiated the truck swap and why? What did FD tell her he was doing when he took her on the ride to dispose of the evidence of JD's murder? What did he tell MT when he "learned" his wife was missing?

Since FD and MT were never married, there is NO marital privilege, which means MT will be required to tell LE about every single conversation she ever had with her boyfriend about JD, the divorce, and the ongoing legal battles between FD and GF (I believe there may have been an element of revenge to this killing). FD was so obviously obsessed about winning those cases that there is simply no way he did not let something slip prior to and after murdering his wife...If MT is acting in her own best interests, she will not throw her lot in with FD.

And FD can’t marry MT unless JD is declared dead. The noose keeps getting tighter.

 

[enelram]

I didn't read the entire case file but your point from the case is an interesting one. I also wonder if MT mother was a cooperating witness with the Feds as well as there was a period of time where Medicare fraud was rampant and the feds were trying to clean things up. There must have been a reason for her never to go to prison which IMO was where abuse of this sort should end up!

I am always curious as well as totally disgusted when licensed professionals attempt to make a 'quick buck' off the backs of the US govt. via fraud of programs designed to help citizens who are older and possibly financially disadvantaged. The fact that this was the path of MT mother at least to me tells me who she is.

The fact also that she is non US citizen so far as we know in a way makes any strategy to exploit a US Govt program designed to help support mental health of Medicare patients when mental health funding by the US Govt is under fire for being inadequate in a way makes this crime simply despicable IMO.

For an interesting study on Medicare Fraud,
look up the case of now Senator former Fl. Govenor Rick Scott. He exemplifies fraud with
a capital F.