Silver Alert CT- Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 #6 *ARRESTS*

[oviedo]

At least the kids are in NYC and he cannot leave Connecticut, then there isn't a chance he can surprise them. Thank goodness for the guard.

She can be ordered to bring them to CT IMO

 

[SuperTmo]

Interesting - prosecutor anticipated FD saying he had reason to be in the house and already had interviewed witnesses to counter this argument IMO. But I thought his visitation was only Saturday and Sunday and was supervised - how did he see the children on a Wednesday unsupervised???

Probably a midweek dinner visit. Pretty standard.

 

[BUF]

Because the law in Connecticut limits the bail bondsman fee to 7% when the bail amount is more than %5,000. Given the $500,000 bail, $35,000 is what the bail bondsman can charge.

2012 Connecticut General Statutes :: Title 29 - Public Safety and State Police :: Chapter 533 - Professional Bondsmen :: Section 29-151 - Maximum commission or fee. Reports to commissioner.

Ah thank you. It is usually 10% elsewhere.

 

[Jmoose]

If this money was an option, why didn’t he use it before? Also, wouldn’t a 401k withdraw be disallowed considering there is a pending divorce? Getting rid of assets isn’t allowed.

Just what I was thinking re: using assets that, in a divorce, normally wouldn’t be allowed

 

[BUF]

Ha...Pattis said they are looking for his passport. Can't be released without it. Wasn't it reported that he already turned that in during divorce proceedings?

 

[SuperTmo]

FD yes but its unclear on MT.

He could have just ordered a new one in the last months or weeks.

 

[beelin]

It’s so frightening to me that FD will be free to roam CT... but hopefully this freedom causes him to goof up and visit a disposal site, contact certain people, etc. One upside to all of this I guess is that much of CT’s population can recognize his face by now so his actions will be very closely monitored by both LE and the public. I hope we get the proof we need during his release

 

[Jodiwankenobi8]

Interesting - prosecutor anticipated FD saying he had reason to be in the house and already had interviewed witnesses to counter this argument IMO. But I thought his visitation was only Saturday and Sunday and was supervised - how did he see the children on a Wednesday unsupervised???

Once DNA found investigators would seek to determine if there was a legitimate reason for its being there. I’d assume that would be SOP.

Great question! I was wondering the same. Why would JD allow this to be at her home?

 

[afitzy]

Pattis is quite combative IMO to the press in his commentary thus far!

 

[Deleted member 229974]

IMO he has additional passport(s) that no one knows about. If he's THAT insistent on taking the kids and running off to Greece, there's no way he doesn't have more than one passport because I think he might be a dual citizen. Greek consulate has to make sure he can't walk as well.

Perhaps his MIL will hire a private detective to follow him where ever he goes.

 

[Noharg]

I’m finally caught up on this case.
So FD surrendered his passport, but what about MT?
Apologies if this has been established, but do we know her citizenship(s)?

TIA

 

[afitzy]

Pattis said that MT order includes her not contacting FD. Interesting.

 

[Deleted member 229974]

Pattis is quite combative IMO to the press in his commentary thus far!

Because he knows his client is guilty.

 

[Eli9]

Wow, Norm is really nasty. IMO

 

[Jmoose]

I guess it could've been epithelial. I wonder if MT knows what happened or doesn't and is about to scratch that "Dulos" off her bracelet.

Nope-she isn’t taking “Dulos” off of anything-she is all in

 

[bestill]

So according to Pattis MT abhors smoking.

 

[oviedo]

Her bail stipulation (see the warrant here: Lawyers for Dulos children, grandmother in court for custody status) is no contact with victim family and surrender passport.

Para 10 shows FD and his attorney provided his Iphone and the detective seized it because it could have evidence of a crime and/or lead them to JD. paraphrased by me. So if he provided it, and the detective seized it - why wouldn't it be allowed as evidence? And if he was innocent why wouldn't he just answer questions with his lawyer? Because he did it and knows it. IMO

 

[Jmoose]

Samara Abramson‏Verified account @Samara_Abramson 15m15 minutes ago




Norm Pattis says his client plans to tap into his 401K, and “if he is exonerated...” he should not have to pay increased taxes on it

Why not? Everybody else has to pay the taxes on it, regardless of what they use it for. Pattis is just trying to jack everybody up

 

[isabella88]

Wow, Norm is really nasty. IMO

Aw, he's just doing his job, IMO. Must be frustrating for him with all of the speculation. He's a good lawyer. Unfortunately. MOO

 

[Deleted member 229974]

I'll bet she's shaking inside, though.

Snooty B. Reminds me of Chris Watts’ girlfriend.