Silver Alert CT- Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 #7 *ARRESTS*

[bestill]

Since when? Because Pattis said so? Ugh.

Of course, it's all according to Pattis.

 

[kaen]

Umm...

"'My understanding is … the police have ruled her out as a participant in any foul play in New Canaan,' attorney Norm Pattis told WPLR."

So Pattis is in charge of ruling her out?! What does LE have to say about that?

jmo

Notice he says ruled out in NC....not ruled out completely. He is a sly one.....

 

[Inthedetails]

Since when? Because Pattis said so? Ugh.

Exactly. The NYPost is playing right into Pattis' games. Disappointing (not surprising).

jmo

 

[LittleBitty]

https://nypost.com/2019/06/13/husbands-girlfriend-in-jennifer-dulos-case-ruled-out-as-suspect/

We definitely anticipated this. The three hours that she was there were for her alibi and the polygraph test.

Now is the accessory after the fact stuff. I just don’t believe he didn’t tell her something. That she didn’t know something after the fact. But it really doesn’t matter. Even if the only crime she committed was being a brazen sidepiece her reputation is mud and the odds of her continuing her recent lifestyle with Mr. Fotis are slim to none.

I think she knows stuff. Proving that is the issue. I’m just counting on accessory after the fact kind of stuff. Who knows?

 

[bestill]

Notice he says ruled out in NC....not ruled out completely. He is a sly one.....

Just like he said that FD's devices were at the Farmington home - he almost said FD but caught himself. He really is something.

 

[kaen]

And right next to New Canaan. But there is another reservoir that is closer to JD house which is the North Stamford Reservoir. Google Maps

Yes, there is parking intermittently but lots of traffic avoiding heavily used roads and is often fairly heavily patrolled.

 

[Elliot_Alderson]

Since when? Because Pattis said so? Ugh.

Exactly. I think I'll stick with LE's opinion on who is ruled in/out on murder cases and not defense attorney's opinions from PR spin radio show appearances but that's just me.

 

[BUF]

I just got in & am trying to catch up...so confused...help please?

This latest radar article says authorities are seeking a red Toyota Tacoma in connection to JD's disappearance. Is this the employee's truck...thought LE already had his vehicle. Didn't JD also have a Toyota Tacoma...thought LE had all his vehicles.

So is this another truck they are looking for?

TIA

 

[Kapua]

We definitely anticipated this. The three hours that she was there were for her alibi and the polygraph test.

Now is the accessory after the fact stuff. I just don’t believe he didn’t tell her something. That she didn’t know something after the fact. But it really doesn’t matter. Even if the only crime she committed was being a brazen sidepiece her reputation is mud and the odds of her continuing her recent lifestyle with Mr. Fotis are slim to none. I’m actually glad we know this now before other charges are filed. It’s been 20 days. At least she is no longer a focus of the murder and the laser focus can solely be on FD.

I mean it would be devastating to hear she played no role in the murder much further down the road. Better to know now and focus on FD.

I believe one of our attorneys, possibly Gitana, stated that there's no "accessory to murder" charge in CT. If she knowingly participated in any way, she can be charged with murder. If she's smart, or even if she's not so smart but listens to her attorney's advice, she will distance herself from him yesterday. MOO

 

[indicolite22]

She does whatever FD tells her to? She was suspicious and made him take her along? He needed her for moral support? He thought it would give them time to talk about what to say to authorities? She really is a clueless person? Many possibilities. He must have had a reason for wanting her there with him.

Yes, and to me a plausible reason involves her being in on it. She doesn't strike me as someone who is easily led and seems quite determined herself. IMO she's not clueless either. If she was suspicious, what would her tagging along change? She should have started asking questions much earlier in the day.

 

[ab01]

Its quite interesting that you might have found the same '3 hr gap' that Pattis is chattering about where he cannot account for his client. Curious.

I’m sure nothing nefarious happened during that time

Said by Norm *probably*

 

[spaz1959]

We definitely anticipated this. The three hours that she was there were for her alibi and the polygraph test.

Now is the accessory after the fact stuff. I just don’t believe he didn’t tell her something. That she didn’t know something after the fact. But it really doesn’t matter. Even if the only crime she committed was being a brazen sidepiece her reputation is mud and the odds of her continuing her recent lifestyle with Mr. Fotis are slim to none. I’m actually glad we know this now before other charges are filed. It’s been 20 days. At least she is no longer a focus of the murder and the laser focus can solely be on FD.

I mean it would be devastating to hear she played no role in the murder much further down the road. Better to know now and focus on FD.

Still doesn't explain away her involvement in dumping of trash bags with JD blood DNA in there! Ms.MT may be a lot of things, but innocent, and clueless aren't two of those things. Their going down on the Hefty Bag Ship, glub. .glub..glub. ...

 

[ab01]

Which begs the question - why would FD bring her along at all?

Surely he could come up with some excuse and do this by himself.

Alibi? Maybe he wasn’t planning on being caught by surveillance cameras?

 

[indicolite22]

Indeed, why? makes no sense unless FD had an ulterior motive and she truly did not know what was going on that day - I doubt it, but it is possible IMO

If she had no idea what was going on, wouldn't she be a little angry that she was implicated in a murder investigation? Would she still stay on his side?

 

[Inthedetails]

Of course, it's all according to Pattis.

The judge needs to gag him, imo.

 

[oviedo]

I just got in & am trying to catch up...so confused...help please?

This latest radar article says authorities are seeking a red Toyota Tacoma in connection to JD's disappearance. Is this the employee's truck...thought LE already had his vehicle. Didn't JD also have a Toyota Tacoma...thought LE had all his vehicles.

So is this another truck they are looking for?

TIA

I believe so - the article earlier posted said they have the employee's vehicle, computer and phone and that all FD's vehicles were seized. This is another vehicle. It's pretty distinctive IMO. I am also curious about MT's vehicles - were they searched/seized? We haven't heard anything that I can find.
Sources: The black Ford Raptor owned by Fotis Dulos’ company was in New Canaan on day Jennifer Farber Dulos disappeared — but he wasn’t driving it

 

[bestill]

There's still the DNA...

 

[indicolite22]

Maybe that was the point. FD and MT thought of getting rid of JD together, and FD wasn't hanging alone.

Yes, that's what I thought before MT started selling the story that she didn't know anything.

 

[CarefullyTaught]

Me thinks that thus protests to much. What's up with that. Pattis singing MT praises, her innocence? Huh? Where's her Defence attorney? Singing praises of FD? Is it Opposite day? Backwards Day?

Great questions @spaz1959 !

And as @Jodiwankenobi8 observes with apparently the same young ?lawyer? Intern? law clerk? publicly seen with MT defense team as was with FD defense team, unless this dog and pony show has a pair of identical twins summer clerking for different law firms/legal teams, someone may have just blown attorney-client privilege. (One can hope, at least).

 

[merrymary]

Don't close that tab or let the video run it's full course cause you won't get it back.
Listen to the part about where Pattis is talking about murder, manslaughter and criminal neg. homicide. I found it interesting that he went on to explain criminally neg. homicide as being reckless or negligent to some extraordinary degree to cause death. He then says one carries 60 years, the other 1 year. He states something about (explaining more on the murder or homicide) assuming she's dead as there is no body and then says something about how he's not sure she has been missing long enough for homicide. .

so jealous you have that tab open with the video.

I am listening to the audio...he said: One carries 60 years and is a felony, the other is a misdemeanor and carries 1 year. Without a body or any explanation as to the manner and means of death, assuming she is dead, we don’t know how she died. So, I don’t think there is a murder case to be had here. I don’t think she has been missing long enough to have a homicide even, um so what am I missing that would help my client? I would turn the question and say why do you think he is in such jeopardy?