Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #25

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #861
What is it with the three women involved with FD (JD, MT and first wife) all becoming Greek-ified? Don’t any of them have their own important cultures and families? First wife married him in Greece-FD probably sold that to her as a Destination Wedding, but the truth likely is that he would only have married her there, but nowhere else. We saw what happened with JD-kids could only have Greek names and Greek holidays-and now MT and the possibility that she wears a wedding ring on her right hand, in the Greek fashion, as well as possibly sporting a Greek pendant and worry beads. What is it with this guy? He can’t let his women be what they are? And are they ever malleable, it seems!

I understand that perspective. However, rather than perceiving the women as being malleable, how about focusing upon the personality of men like FD who are so domineering, overwhelmingly manipulative, and threatening, that they get otherwise-normal women like JD (I should say JF) - and his first wife (now a lawyer) to go along with his wishes because he is so demanding?

Perhaps, being flexible, kind women - Jennifer and the first wife went along with his wishes to keep the peace.
 
  • #862
Last edited:
  • #863
Here's a couple of earlier pictures that show the same unfamiliar pointer and middle finger togetherness...it seems unnatural to me, but maybe this is position in which she often holds her hands...Perhaps from riding horses? (Just guessing here...my daughter used to ride, but don't remember all the details, but I do recall having a rock in the palm of each hand.)
View attachment 205408View attachment 205408 View attachment 205409
View attachment 205409

Need to work on attaching photos....all the rest is MOO.
Thank you
 
  • #864
  • #865
Your post got me thinking about these ankle monitors, and that segued into a thought about the odds of both of these two mutts having faulty GPS monitors (remember, MT had to come back to CT after one day in NY, because her monitor was supposedly malfunctioning). Everyone here who knows about them seems to be saying that they rarely malfunction.
There's always someone seeking to get around the system. There are GPS blockers: GPS JAMMERS Lojack blockers anti tracking devices
 
  • #866
Is it the same Realtor who told GF's attorney that FD deliberately defaulted on the mortgage? Hmmm...
I suspect it is because of the foreclosure or pending foreclosure. Not sure of CT rules but would severely impact his ability to find a buyer and/ or his ability to actually sell the property.
 
  • #867
This makes me happy. I wonder what his retirement fund will reveal? IMO, his bail was paid by the "Greek benefactor", not his 401k. "The court, however, is unable to find that ruling in either this case or the companion case. Nevertheless, this court holds that these records are not protected by the privilege." Unable to find it because it was fabricated. MOO!
Absolutely a signal. Three times same gesture? Once, maybe. Twice, something fishy. Three times, and your out!
 
  • #868
  • #869
Here it is - add it to the others that were in the courtroom that I posted earlier - all are BLATANT signals. https://www.websleuths.com/forums/attachments/4312d21d-3bc8-4845-bbb6-813d0901c1c5-png.205301/

2 other pics of her signals when in the courtroom:
Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #25

An earlier one: https://www.websleuths.com/forums/attachments/upload_2019-9-19_14-5-15-png.205408/
My kids used to use the "two finger-sideways peace" sign"...and say "duces, I'm out"...they thought it was funny...moo
"A way to let people know that you are leaving for the evening. Usually done while holding up two middle fingers.
Alright I'm out of here yo, deuces b*****s!
MOO
 
  • #870
Why don't you get verified? That would be super helpful!

In the meantime, as I said, I'm fully aware of how it works. My law partner is a criminal defense attorney. What you're saying isn't logical to me.

You're saying that the new charges don't indicate that negotiations have broken down. Of course they have. I don't actually think you even need to be an attorney to figure that out.

You don't punish someone you're working with who is continuing to cooperate. That makes no sense.

This is a clear pressure tactic that signifies she has not cooperated to the degree they need nor struck a deal.

And if you've litigated for that long in this field then you well know that what they do with a defendant/witness like MT is discuss various hypotheticals and what will happen based on what the subject is willing to divulge and testify to.

She's not sitting in a room incriminating herself without a deal. They're not stacking charges if they're in the middle of working out a deal. That erodes trust.

It just doesn't make sense, with respect.

Clearly, what she's said she would give is not sufficient and/or any plea deal they thought they had had at this point eroded due to whatever she said through counsel or even possibly in an interview, not going anywhere.

All we need to do is compare this case to the Kelsey Berreth one. That's an example of how a plea deal with a co-conspirator works.
So are you saying the opportunity for some kind of deal has come and gone?

If LE thinks she was more involved or if they have enough to charge her with more serious charges can't they agree to not charge her further if she decided to cooperate and be a witness for the prosecution? If she agrees to tell them everything she knows?
Or is it too late? Imo
 
  • #871
  • #872
Here it is - add it to the others that were in the courtroom that I posted earlier - all are BLATANT signals. https://www.websleuths.com/forums/attachments/4312d21d-3bc8-4845-bbb6-813d0901c1c5-png.205301/

2 other pics of her signals when in the courtroom:
Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #25

An earlier one: https://www.websleuths.com/forums/attachments/upload_2019-9-19_14-5-15-png.205408/
Some searches pulled up sideways V sign, with palm towards persons body, to mean; Peace out, victory, love, sarcasm, or Over it.
 
  • #873
And a bit of "yesterday's MT fashion reviews" commented about her wearing a sweater around her waist. Want to bet it's related to the flash of panty and skin while getting out of the car in this video:

RAW VIDEO: Michelle Troconis arrives for court

Oh, my...
 
  • #874
I understand that perspective. However, rather than perceiving the women as being malleable, how about focusing upon the personality of men like FD who are so domineering, overwhelmingly manipulative, and threatening, that they get otherwise-normal women like JD (I should say JF) - and his first wife (now a lawyer) to go along with his wishes because he is so demanding?

Perhaps, being flexible, kind women - Jennifer and the first wife went along with his wishes to keep the peace.

Come to think of it, this ^ is precisely what MT could use in her defense (to possibly lessen her jail time) if she were to finally come clean and admit her involvement/knowledge, in my opinion.
 
  • #875
Some searches pulled up sideways V sign, with palm towards persons body, to mean; Peace out, victory, love, sarcasm, or Over it.

Well that's the common meaning, but when you are in a courtroom, as well as when you are trying to get into a car, and you know you're being photographed, and you cannot talk to someone to whom you NEED to get a message - someone whom you may well have helped to commit murder - well, then it takes on another meaning entirely. ;)
 
Last edited:
  • #876
Absolutely a signal. I just started hating her more.

If we didn't know she helped cover up a bloody murder and probably helped commit it, we might give MT a break and think of her signal like Carol Burnett's ear pull saying good night to her daughter.

But we do know.
 
  • #877
Did a quick look around Google for "effectiveness and problems with ankle monitors." The most recent I could find was 2013. It was not very reassuring. Lots of failures, issues with tracking and monitoring. The number of "false" alarms was surprising.
Too many alarms: Many electronic ankle bracelets go unchecked
LE showed up at my door 1-2 years ago, because someone’s ankle
monitor had been cut off and tracked to my garbage can, last known location before the battery died. The trash had already been emptied so they left but showed me a picture of the person.
 
  • #878
Come to think of it, this ^ is precisely what MT could use in her defense (to possibly lessen her jail time) if she were to finally come clean and admit her involvement/knowledge, in my opinion.
I don't think that worked too well for the Manson women, some of whom spent years in jail....even the ones who didn't kill anyone.
 
  • #879
I don't think that worked too well for the Manson women, some of whom spent years in jail....even the ones who didn't kill anyone.

Good point.
 
  • #880
Am doing the old skim and scan to catch up on the discussion. One of the things I don't understand about the monitoring devices is who is in charge of monitoring them?
From some of the discussions it appears that the bonding agencies do this. Is that correct? How often do the companies write reports to the court? What is considered a serious breach of security? For instance, if the battery went to zero, would the bonding company call the person wearing the device or notify local PD?

This entire situation is unclear to me.
@Tink56, I believe what we learned the last time on this is that the State of CT has an outside contractor that monitors the bracelets and the monitoring company reports issue to a parole person and I believe this parole person is supposed to alert the States Atty and the Judge. There was an issue with this chain of command previously I believe with MT and the timely notice of her return to CT, as I believe the States Atty had zero clue that she returned to CT after one day and only found out weeks later.

Having had the issues we have seen in the this case with MT quick trip and back to NY and States Atty and Judge not knowing and FD quick trip to NY due to an 'error' with WAZE rerouting etc. it seems like people aren't on top the situation. None of what we have heard here is inspiring confidence in State of CT LE and Judiciary.

IMO FD and MT represent flight risks and so need to be closely monitored. But what about very violent offenders that have these bracelets. Does the State of CT even know where they are? Not much confidence in this monitoring at all. I hope the Judge hauls in the parole person to explain how this has been allowed to happen and why the court is only hearing about it 4 months later.

MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
124
Guests online
3,128
Total visitors
3,252

Forum statistics

Threads
632,669
Messages
18,630,087
Members
243,244
Latest member
Evan meow meow
Back
Top