Laughing
Rarely Speechless
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2010
- Messages
- 15,583
- Reaction score
- 61,061
Alright-so at some point, there is a pretty good chance that this report is either going to be released to the public, or leaked. I had forgotten that JS was actually given a copy, so that now gets MT off the hook for sneaking either a copy of the report or at least the contents to JS. This is, 100%, about dirtying up Jennifer Farber’s reputation, because, since it has nothing to do with MT, it can’t salvage her reputation. Could this lawsuit be about JS pretending that there are deep dark secrets, and playing to a potential jury about the possibility that they are not getting all of the info they need, so they have to acquit MT-am I making any sense?
You're certainly making sense. Terrific point, as usual.
On the other hand, consider any juror who is divorced, or knows someone who is divorced.
Does the hypothetical juror like the idea of their own court transcript read aloud to anyone interested in listening???
Seems to me that Shoenhorn is saying 'your divorce isn't just yours, it is MINE and be prepared for me to drag you through court AGAIN!' JMHO please understand. Bwhahahahahaha.
jmho ymmv lrr