Dan Rassier: Former POI **Wrongly accused**

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #61
Sas he's been interviewed by authorities many times, has never hid from them. Taken polygraph you name it. Hes not the guy.

Perhaps you misinterpereted what I was saying. He has told us he has information he can't share with the public "at this time". No follow up has occured.
 
  • #62
Perhaps you misinterpereted what I was saying. He has told us he has information he can't share with the public "at this time". No follow up has occured.

That's the authorities telling him to not discuss specific information with the public. Hes shared that with them already.
 
  • #63
Sas and human burning the midnight oil
 
  • #64
Play nice I gotta hit the sack
 
  • #65
That's the authorities telling him to not discuss specific information with the public. Hes shared that with them already.

They know more and I don't like that anymore. Not 25 and a half years later. I think people are ready for more information. Guess what, more information could pressure a confession after it becomes so obvious.
 
  • #66
They know more and I don't like that anymore. Not 25 and a half years later. I think people are ready for more information. Guess what, more information could pressure a confession after it becomes so obvious.

Keep on dreaming
 
  • #67
Any sightings of the POI?
 
  • #68
Dear Jacob, it has been 2 and a half years since I visited the site of the abduction for the first time. I came home determined to make a new voice for you, that the mystery surrounding the man known as a POI becomes known. I have worked your case every day as hard as I can, unfortunately, we are no further in this investigation then when I first posted 2 and a half years ago. It's still my opinion that at this time we still must get down to the mystery of why your neighbor is still a POI. We're running out of time. Mike
 
  • #69
Is someone ill and you believe info will be lost?
Dear Jacob, it has been 2 and a half years since I visited the site of the abduction for the first time. I came home determined to make a new voice for you, that the mystery surrounding the man known as a POI becomes known. I have worked your case every day as hard as I can, unfortunately, we are no further in this investigation then when I first posted 2 and a half years ago. It's still my opinion that at this time we still must get down to the mystery of why your neighbor is still a POI. We're running out of time. Mike
 
  • #70
Dear Jacob, it has been 2 and a half years since I visited the site of the abduction for the first time. I came home determined to make a new voice for you, that the mystery surrounding the man known as a POI becomes known. I have worked your case every day as hard as I can, unfortunately, we are no further in this investigation then when I first posted 2 and a half years ago. It's still my opinion that at this time we still must get down to the mystery of why your neighbor is still a POI. We're running out of time. Mike

What a strange post Sas
 
  • #71
  • #72
  • #73
I found the wording strange
 
  • #74
I found the wording strange
I found the post strange as well. But it did not lessen my suspicion or mitigate the point being made.
 
  • #75
A couple of things that stick in my craw....
1. DR saw 2 vehicles traverse his driveway(1 in the afternoon, 1 at the time of the abduction)....he stated he is 100% certain that the afternoon driver is the culprit. Therefore, he(the afternoon driver) is also the night time driver/abductor. This being the case.....the abductor exited the scene that night with Jacob....and he had a different vehicle...switching from a Monte Carlo with a tan finish, white top, to a smaller, darker vehicle.
2. #1 stated above being the case....why search the outbuildings when Jacob was spirited away in a vehicle? And beyond that.....why state that 'someone may have buried a body on the premises'? Why would an abductor abduct and then return to the scene of the crime? To conceal(bury) the body....?

*as an aside....how does DR know that the afternoon driver is also the night-time driver(abductor)?
 
  • #76
The flaw in your theory is he has been misquoted. He didn't have anything to do with this if you look at the information.
 
  • #77
The flaw in your theory is he has been misquoted. He didn't have anything to do with this if you look at the information.

The good points cGorg made above are straight from DR's mouth so no misquoting there.
 
  • #78
The flaw in your theory is he has been misquoted. He didn't have anything to do with this if you look at the information.

He collected newspaper clippings, recorded news stories, and wrote in his journal for 21 years. He is the only person in the area that may have saw something related to the crime and is gagged by LE not to tell all he knows yet. He became a interesting person in 2010, so he has something to do and more to share in this case.
 
  • #79
He collected newspaper clippings, recorded news stories, and wrote in his journal for 21 years. He is the only person in the area that may have saw something related to the crime and is gagged by LE not to tell all he knows yet. He became a interesting person in 2010, so he has something to do and more to share in this case.

Nope nothing to do with this. No evidence points to him and no motive either
 
  • #80
Nope nothing to do with this. No evidence points to him and no motive either

You sound like a very close friend or relative to have such intimate inside knowledge. .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
2,547
Total visitors
2,674

Forum statistics

Threads
632,144
Messages
18,622,666
Members
243,034
Latest member
RepresentingTheLBC
Back
Top