Darlie Innocent? Then how do you explain... ?

[Kaiser Sousa]

Was here any blood in the garage? if so whose. Was Darlies blood on either boy or their clothes?

 

[annkitty0630]

Bolded by me.

annkitty, thanks for your reasoned response. In reading, it seems to me that your head is telling you one thing in this case, but that your heart is holding out for another outcome. Maybe that's why this case is so easy for me: I tend to be a "just the facts, ma'am" kind of guy, and all of the facts, to me, point only in Darlie's direction.

To reply to the sections I bolded, I know a lot of people take Cron's statements as proof that the police locked in on Darlie and never looked for an intruder. Here's my take on it. At my job, I talk to lots of children, many times when they are in trouble for something. After all these years, I can tell pretty quickly when the story doesn't make sense. Other observers might not see why I am so certain that the child is lying, but after a few pointed questions, the discrepancies become clear. What I am trying to say (probably uneloquently) is that when we have lots of experience at something, you develop an innate "hinky meter". The officers didn't end the investigation at that point, but it certainly prodded them to look in that direction. I would be clamoring for Cron's head if the police still didn't follow the evidence to where it led in this case. They did, and there was no evidence of any intruder to pursue.

Now, on to the sock. For many sleuths who have studied this case, that is the one piece that doesn't fit neatly in any scenario. There are certainly explanations for how Darlie left it there, as well as others have theorized how an intruder could have used it. But unlike TV/movie scripts, in real life not every clue always gets wrapped up neatly by the detective at the end. It's like a jigsaw puzzle where you can't make two pieces fit, no matter how hard you try. Even with those two holes in the puzzle, I can still look at it and know clearly what the picture shows, and that IMO is the case here.

We would be in grave trouble in this country if we had to account for every single piece of evidence before we could get a conviction. Murderers could walk free unless we could find out exactly where they purchased the gun. Molesters couldn't be held accountable if the child victim couldn't remember the dates of each incident. Scary thoughts.

In most cases, including the Routier case, it is the totality of all of the evidence that generally tips the scale to meet the beyond a reasonable doubt standard. That allows for the few loose ends, and is why we don't have to prove guilt beyond every glimmer of doubt.

Anyway, that is my thinking on those items. I am enjoying this dialogue with you, and I appreciate your willingness to consider all angles. Have a great day!

OK, I have tried to do this before, however, when I sent the message I believe it timed out.... So now here I will try again Rlaub44...
1st bolded, Yes thanks for the compliment, Even my hubby says it all the time, I love more than I see the truth!!! Sorry I guess that is how I have survived all these years!! :angel: 2nd bolded, OMG, you have the most unreal job, but the hardest to deal with these children that have been abused and to look in their sweet loving eyes must be a gift to see when they are lying because I have always known when a child lies to me, however, I tend to give in... I am a TOTAL SAPP!!! I have 2 kitties and 1 chihuahua and they are so unbelieveably spoiled. OK, again on to the point... I am going to send this before I get kicked off again!!!:waitasec::waitasec:

 

[annkitty0630]

Bolded by me.

annkitty, thanks for your reasoned response. In reading, it seems to me that your head is telling you one thing in this case, but that your heart is holding out for another outcome. Maybe that's why this case is so easy for me: I tend to be a "just the facts, ma'am" kind of guy, and all of the facts, to me, point only in Darlie's direction.

To reply to the sections I bolded, I know a lot of people take Cron's statements as proof that the police locked in on Darlie and never looked for an intruder. Here's my take on it. At my job, I talk to lots of children, many times when they are in trouble for something. After all these years, I can tell pretty quickly when the story doesn't make sense. Other observers might not see why I am so certain that the child is lying, but after a few pointed questions, the discrepancies become clear. What I am trying to say (probably uneloquently) is that when we have lots of experience at something, you develop an innate "hinky meter". The officers didn't end the investigation at that point, but it certainly prodded them to look in that direction. I would be clamoring for Cron's head if the police still didn't follow the evidence to where it led in this case. They did, and there was no evidence of any intruder to pursue.
Now, on to the sock. For many sleuths who have studied this case, that is the one piece that doesn't fit neatly in any scenario. There are certainly explanations for how Darlie left it there, as well as others have theorized how an intruder could have used it. But unlike TV/movie scripts, in real life not every clue always gets wrapped up neatly by the detective at the end. It's like a jigsaw puzzle where you can't make two pieces fit, no matter how hard you try. Even with those two holes in the puzzle, I can still look at it and know clearly what the picture shows, and that IMO is the case here.
We would be in grave trouble in this country if we had to account for every single piece of evidence before we could get a conviction. Murderers could walk free unless we could find out exactly where they purchased the gun. Molesters couldn't be held accountable if the child victim couldn't remember the dates of each incident. Scary thoughts.

In most cases, including the Routier case, it is the totality of all of the evidence that generally tips the scale to meet the beyond a reasonable doubt standard. That allows for the few loose ends, and is why we don't have to prove guilt beyond every glimmer of doubt.

Anyway, that is my thinking on those items. I am enjoying this dialogue with you, and I appreciate your willingness to consider all angles. Have a great day!

Hey Rlaub44, I am back... Anyhow, the 3rd bolded is what I truly feel about Cron... I have always believe that Cron should have been removed from the trial for his immediate rush to judgement and misgivings that were later found out!!! Anyway, #4 Bold my favorite but (not) what about the sock? I understand your way of minimizing this subject, however, did she really have time and did she really think this out so it would confuse all the sleuths out there??? And now I will add one just for the heck of it... What about the suppposed finger print that didn't match the kids, darin, darlie, etc.??? who was it??? how about the black car that was sighted many times in the neighborhood??? I have never agreed with the rush to judgement over the "Silly String" taping because they should have never taped it in the 1st place. Talk to you soon... Take Care, JMOO!!! Tuck in all your babies and keep them safe!!!:twocents::banghead:

 

[annkitty0630]

Hi annkitty,

I really know what you mean on the leap thing, I also had such a hard time coming to realize that anyone could do such a horrible thing to their children and the thing of it is is that it does happen way too many times in our society as sad as it is.
I really wish you could come off the fence that we both have been on.
Could you please tell me what you think of the absence of blood in the garage area? I really would like to know your thoughts on that.
You really do have a wonderful heart and I will never badger you for what you feel as I do believe that you will see one day that Darlie did do that to her beautiful boys.
I need to go read up on the Beason case. I sure hope the little girl will be totally healed from her injuries and that they find who did that to her and her family.
May God keep you safe dear one.

Hey Wonders, how are you doing honey??? Thanks so much for the compliment, however, that is just me... Heart and Soul!!! Anyways read my response to Rlaub44 and you may get a sense of where I am coming from. I never presume to believe I am right or wrong, just the defender side of me at work at all times. Trust me I would love to switch to the guilty side, however, my gut won't let me do it just yet.... Anyhow, did you check out the Beason Case??? This is huge??? How about the WM3??? Take care sweetheart and you stay safe and strong and SWEET!!! Ann:twocents::twocents::waitasec:

 

[wonders]

Hey Wonders, how are you doing honey??? Thanks so much for the compliment, however, that is just me... Heart and Soul!!! Anyways read my response to Rlaub44 and you may get a sense of where I am coming from. I never presume to believe I am right or wrong, just the defender side of me at work at all times. Trust me I would love to switch to the guilty side, however, my gut won't let me do it just yet.... Anyhow, did you check out the Beason Case??? This is huge??? How about the WM3??? Take care sweetheart and you stay safe and strong and SWEET!!! Ann:twocents::twocents::waitasec:

Hi Ann

I'm doing great. Hope this finds you doing well. You hit the nail on the head "Heart and Soul". Please tell me your thoughts on the absences of blood in and outside the garage? I did check the Beason case out the other day. Need to go look again for updates. I really wonder what the motive is in that case. I have been in the Caylee Anthony thread and still not done there after the doc dump on Friday. What is the WM3? Thank you Ann for your kind words to me. Write at you later. Take care.

 

[Rlaub44]

Hey Rlaub44, I am back... Anyhow, the 3rd bolded is what I truly feel about Cron... I have always believe that Cron should have been removed from the trial for his immediate rush to judgement and misgivings that were later found out!!! Anyway, #4 Bold my favorite but (not) what about the sock? I understand your way of minimizing this subject, however, did she really have time and did she really think this out so it would confuse all the sleuths out there??? And now I will add one just for the heck of it... What about the suppposed finger print that didn't match the kids, darin, darlie, etc.??? who was it??? how about the black car that was sighted many times in the neighborhood??? I have never agreed with the rush to judgement over the "Silly String" taping because they should have never taped it in the 1st place. Talk to you soon... Take Care, JMOO!!! Tuck in all your babies and keep them safe!!!:twocents::banghead:

annkitty,

Thanks for writing back. Regarding the fingerprint, it isn't that the print doesn't match; rather that it wasn't complete enough to be matched to any known person. Some of the Free Darlie websites portray this as if it were a clear fingerprint belonging to an unknown assailant, but this just isn't factual. It may belong to Darlie or either boy, but there aren't enough points of comparison to determine.

The black car seems to me like grasping at straws. Was the black car sighted outside at the time of the murder, speeding away? This would be meaningful; but the fact that a black car or cars happened to be in the neighborhood a few times wouldn't be unusual. There is nothing except hope to tie this car to the crime.

Cron really made no difference in this case, when you get right down to it. When children are killed in their home, the parents are always looked at and must be eliminated by the evidence. Unfortunately for Darlie's supporters, the evidence pointed squarely to her, and nothing exculpatory has ever been found. Much of the forensic evidence is very strong proof of her guilt, as we have discussed. Cron's early gut feeling was what was later borne out by the investigation, and the evidence proved his suspicion (at least in my mind and the minds of the jurors).

Thanks for your kind words - your family is lucky to have such a loving woman, and I admire how you look for the good in everyone! Take care.

 

[annkitty0630]

Hi Ann

I'm doing great. Hope this finds you doing well. You hit the nail on the head "Heart and Soul". Please tell me your thoughts on the absences of blood in and outside the garage? I did check the Beason case out the other day. Need to go look again for updates. I really wonder what the motive is in that case. I have been in the Caylee Anthony thread and still not done there after the doc dump on Friday. What is the WM3? Thank you Ann for your kind words to me. Write at you later. Take care.

Hi Wonders, good to talk to you again!!! I have not quite figured out the blood trail in and out of the garage because I was always told that there was an area outside the garage window that surely was not disturbed??? I wouldn't know, haven't been there. I have seen the pictures of the screen and heard about the blood inside that no other person left but Darlie. I still have a problem with the kitchen and possible contamination of the blood evidence there??? Again, JMOO, I AM always open to facts and other opinions. Never Closed Minded....... The WM3? That is a case I have followed for many years... It is called the West Memphis 3, awesome case of 3 young boys at that time were slaughtered and they arrested 3 you men and from there it goes on. They are all INNOCENT period!!! Check into the Paradise Lost 1 and 2 DVD's and the book the "Devils Knot". Right now they are in an appeal and I believe that 2 of them will be set free!!! Let's see what happens!!! Take Care and Keep in Touch!!! :twocents::furious:

 

[annkitty0630]

annkitty,

Thanks for writing back. Regarding the fingerprint, it isn't that the print doesn't match; rather that it wasn't complete enough to be matched to any known person. Some of the Free Darlie websites portray this as if it were a clear fingerprint belonging to an unknown assailant, but this just isn't factual. It may belong to Darlie or either boy, but there aren't enough points of comparison to determine.

The black car seems to me like grasping at straws. Was the black car sighted outside at the time of the murder, speeding away? This would be meaningful; but the fact that a black car or cars happened to be in the neighborhood a few times wouldn't be unusual. There is nothing except hope to tie this car to the crime.

Cron really made no difference in this case, when you get right down to it. When children are killed in their home, the parents are always looked at and must be eliminated by the evidence. Unfortunately for Darlie's supporters, the evidence pointed squarely to her, and nothing exculpatory has ever been found. Much of the forensic evidence is very strong proof of her guilt, as we have discussed. Cron's early gut feeling was what was later borne out by the investigation, and the evidence proved his suspicion (at least in my mind and the minds of the jurors).

Thanks for your kind words - your family is lucky to have such a loving woman, and I admire how you look for the good in everyone! Take care.

Hey rlaub44, I completely agree with you because I know they didn't have enough of the print supposedly to match to anyone. I surely have never been on the "Free Darlie" websites, however, I still stand by my own conviction of a human being that there was to much supposition, character assasination and innuendo for me to still come to the conclusion that she is GUILTY. As I said earlier, I do not in any way believe she is innocent, just don't believe with the evidence they have that it is a qualifying Death Penalty Case. I am SOOO on your side and Wonders and Cami's, just never gotten there yet. Seriously, do you believe that the "Silly String Tapes" should have been shown, which prejudiced the jury??? That is the one shred of evidence I DO NOT believe should have been shown to the jury???? Again, JMHO!!!! When the juror came out and said they didn't see all the pictures and that this evidence (Silly String Tape) influenced him (them), I was dumbstruck... Take Care Sweetheart, Talk to me and we (I) will finally come to the correct verdict??? Thanks and Sweet Dreams and keep your babies Close and Safe!! Ann :twocents::angel:

 

[kbl8201]

Hey rlaub44, I completely agree with you because I know they didn't have enough of the print supposedly to match to anyone. I surely have never been on the "Free Darlie" websites, however, I still stand by my own conviction of a human being that there was to much supposition, character assasination and innuendo for me to still come to the conclusion that she is GUILTY. As I said earlier, I do not in any way believe she is innocent, just don't believe with the evidence they have that it is a qualifying Death Penalty Case. I am SOOO on your side and Wonders and Cami's, just never gotten there yet. Seriously, do you believe that the "Silly String Tapes" should have been shown, which prejudiced the jury??? That is the one shred of evidence I DO NOT believe should have been shown to the jury???? Again, JMHO!!!! When the juror came out and said they didn't see all the pictures and that this evidence (Silly String Tape) influenced him (them), I was dumbstruck... Take Care Sweetheart, Talk to me and we (I) will finally come to the correct verdict??? Thanks and Sweet Dreams and keep your babies Close and
Safe!! Ann :twocents::angel:

i also remember on datline or something they showed the full video of where she is totally serious about the graveside vigil. unreal the defense didnt ( or couldnt) show that

 

[CyberLaw]

The only "evidence" of the grave site that could be shown is the video that the news network filmed.

You see Darlie invited the film crew, and that is the film shown in court.

Nothing else, as far as I know was filmed. The police did place wiretap devices and video devices at the grave site. Therefore it was illegally obtained and could not be entered as evidence.

The evidence that was entered into court was the "interview" she gave to the reporters that she invited to the so called service.

That would be why only the "portion" that was filmed by the reporters was shown in court.

Because if there was film that supported Darlie of "her mourning" at the grave site, you can bet your bottom dollar that the defense would have had a public screening, in addition to entering it as evidence.

Again, Darlie is her wisdom is her own worst advocate. The only film to date is her silly string" joyous" celebration of the death of her two sons at her grave site.

 

[annkitty0630]

The only "evidence" of the grave site that could be shown is the video that the news network filmed.

You see Darlie invited the film crew, and that is the film shown in court.

Nothing else, as far as I know was filmed. The police did place wiretap devices and video devices at the grave site. Therefore it was illegally obtained and could not be entered as evidence.

The evidence that was entered into court was the "interview" she gave to the reporters that she invited to the so called service.

That would be why only the "portion" that was filmed by the reporters was shown in court.

Because if there was film that supported Darlie of "her mourning" at the grave site, you can bet your bottom dollar that the defense would have had a public screening, in addition to entering it as evidence.

Again, Darlie is her wisdom is her own worst advocate. The only film to date is her silly string" joyous" celebration of the death of her two sons at her grave site.

Cyberlaw, As far as I remember, you are correct, there was a hearing in court about the wiretapped gravesite and it was inadmissable due to unauthorized wiretapping. Still that was a moment that should have been showed to the jurors just for the sake of it was a Death Penalty case. Jurors were flabbergasted at the thought that she could celebrate her childrens deaths with Silly String, when in actuality she was celebrating Devon's birthday. I don't know, when it comes to the death penalty, I believe everything must be investigated and jurors should have the right to choose what they believe and what they don't???? JMHO... Take Care All... I am still working my way there......... :twocents::twocents::sick::waitasec:

 

[kbl8201]

Cyberlaw, As far as I remember, you are correct, there was a hearing in court about the wiretapped gravesite and it was inadmissable due to unauthorized wiretapping. Still that was a moment that should have been showed to the jurors just for the sake of it was a Death Penalty case. Jurors were flabbergasted at the thought that she could celebrate her childrens deaths with Silly String, when in actuality she was celebrating Devon's birthday. I don't know, when it comes to the death penalty, I believe everything must be investigated and jurors should have the right to choose what they believe and what they don't???? JMHO... Take Care All... I am still working my way there......... :twocents::twocents::sick::waitasec:

ironic that the piece of evidence that works in her favor is thrown out cause it was was illeagaly being used by LE........

 

[cami]

so darin is either drunk drugged or in on it
i get the 40 minute timeline from the timeline posted in this thread

Rush to judgement on Darin don't you think? The tox screen shows no alcohol or drugs, except for Darlie's diet pills, were consumed that night. There is no 40 minute time line. There is no time line until the 911 call is placed.

 

[cami]

Bolded by me.

annkitty, thanks for your reasoned response. In reading, it seems to me that your head is telling you one thing in this case, but that your heart is holding out for another outcome. Maybe that's why this case is so easy for me: I tend to be a "just the facts, ma'am" kind of guy, and all of the facts, to me, point only in Darlie's direction.

To reply to the sections I bolded, I know a lot of people take Cron's statements as proof that the police locked in on Darlie and never looked for an intruder. Here's my take on it. At my job, I talk to lots of children, many times when they are in trouble for something. After all these years, I can tell pretty quickly when the story doesn't make sense. Other observers might not see why I am so certain that the child is lying, but after a few pointed questions, the discrepancies become clear. What I am trying to say (probably uneloquently) is that when we have lots of experience at something, you develop an innate "hinky meter". The officers didn't end the investigation at that point, but it certainly prodded them to look in that direction. I would be clamoring for Cron's head if the police still didn't follow the evidence to where it led in this case. They did, and there was no evidence of any intruder to pursue.

Now, on to the sock. For many sleuths who have studied this case, that is the one piece that doesn't fit neatly in any scenario. There are certainly explanations for how Darlie left it there, as well as others have theorized how an intruder could have used it. But unlike TV/movie scripts, in real life not every clue always gets wrapped up neatly by the detective at the end. It's like a jigsaw puzzle where you can't make two pieces fit, no matter how hard you try. Even with those two holes in the puzzle, I can still look at it and know clearly what the picture shows, and that IMO is the case here.

We would be in grave trouble in this country if we had to account for every single piece of evidence before we could get a conviction. Murderers could walk free unless we could find out exactly where they purchased the gun. Molesters couldn't be held accountable if the child victim couldn't remember the dates of each incident. Scary thoughts.

In most cases, including the Routier case, it is the totality of all of the evidence that generally tips the scale to meet the beyond a reasonable doubt standard. That allows for the few loose ends, and is why we don't have to prove guilt beyond every glimmer of doubt.

Anyway, that is my thinking on those items. I am enjoying this dialogue with you, and I appreciate your willingness to consider all angles. Have a great day!

I'm just adding my two cents on Cron. It's internet myth that he fixed on Darlie within minutes of his walk through. Once he had completed the walk through, he knew there was no intruder and it was an inside job. No names were mentioned.

Experienced criminalists know there is something wrong right away. As you stated their "hinky" meters rise. Homicide cops have seen everything and they know when something is out of place.

Annkitty, the way they know is the lack of evidence outside the home. There's no footprints and no blood outside the home. The white fence with the gate that dragged on the ground is also a good clue that no one went either through or over that fence..no scuff marks.

 

[cami]

Rlabu44, Okay so here I go... This is difficult so let's see how this turns out. I just finished answering Cami on many questions. Screen Fibers and Knife Evidence... Not really sure how I feel since I believe there was no disturbance ouside the window and dust was accumulated on the window sill? Been along time since I have looked this one up? Knife, actually this one I have always given to you guys because I truly don't believe the cops planted this evidence, however, I never did like Cron very much and didn't trust his rush to judgement! I have always believed if there was an intruder it was for money for an insurance payoff, however, the problem was always all the jewelry sitting on the counter that didn't add up??? That is unless the intruder freaked and left??? still haven't quite bought that one... LOL I have never bought into Darlie's story about sleeping downstairs because the baby kept her awake, why sleep downstairs with 2 young kids watching TV then?? No sense if the baby wakes you up crying why wouldn't 2 scream young babies?? What about the black car seen in the neighborhood and the attempted break-in in the neighborhood????? How about the cop's son that owned the black car???? The sock has always been stuck in my gut because that doesn't add up to me??? It is just one of those cases I have stuck with all these years and I can't get it to add up in my own mind since I follow all these case and see innocence when people are convicted!!! I know you understand where I am coming from in a sense. Take Care and thanks for the Chat!!! God Bless and Peace!!!:waitasec::angel::twocents:

I think you're a tad bit confused. The rubber dust from the screen was on the the knife as well as no dust disturbed on the window sill.

the bread knife found in the Routier's butcher block contained two pieces of evidence, a polyglass fibre and rubber dust.

Obviously, a that bread knife from the butcher block was used to cut the window screen.

 

[cami]

Was here any blood in the garage? if so whose. Was Darlies blood on either boy or their clothes?

There was no blood in the garage,except for a small transfer stain from one of the investigators.

Both boys blood is on the back of Darlie's nightshirt in cast-off patterns.

I don't know about her blood being on them, Devon was wearing only underwear and Damon a full set of clothes.

 

[cami]

i agree with you. when i read those supporter sites i found it too unreal to believe. then i read the trasnscripts police reports, ect (and especially the autopsy photos) from the first trial and i knew it wasnt garbage

Yes, I agree. That's why I'd prefer to read the court record.

 

[cami]

Hi Wonders, good to talk to you again!!! I have not quite figured out the blood trail in and out of the garage because I was always told that there was an area outside the garage window that surely was not disturbed??? I wouldn't know, haven't been there. I have seen the pictures of the screen and heard about the blood inside that no other person left but Darlie. I still have a problem with the kitchen and possible contamination of the blood evidence there??? Again, JMOO, I AM always open to facts and other opinions. Never Closed Minded....... The WM3? That is a case I have followed for many years... It is called the West Memphis 3, awesome case of 3 young boys at that time were slaughtered and they arrested 3 you men and from there it goes on. They are all INNOCENT period!!! Check into the Paradise Lost 1 and 2 DVD's and the book the "Devils Knot". Right now they are in an appeal and I believe that 2 of them will be set free!!! Let's see what happens!!! Take Care and Keep in Touch!!! :twocents::furious:

Annkitty, there is no blood trail out of the garage, just one going in...Darlie's blood and it stops in the Utility Room, doesn't go into the garage. There is an area outside the window that was not disturbed

I have the CS photos from the book MTJD and the clearest path for the intruder was through the mulch and up and over the fence. The mulch is underneath the window beside the exit window.

How do you think blood was contaminated in the kitchen?

 

[cami]

ironic that the piece of evidence that works in her favor is thrown out cause it was was illeagaly being used by LE........

It's not an offense to bug a grave. It's done in many many jurisdictions. That was just Mulder trying to throw something into the trial. If he could get the lead detective, then the jury might find reasonable doubt.

Then Routier and Kee, desperate for money, tried to sue the cops and the City of Rowlette.

As well, through discovery, the defense was handed the surveillance tape of the prayer service...it's right in the transcripts.

Mulder had the tape, could have shown it to the jury to impeach the Silly String tape. Obviously, it does not show a grieving Darlie.

Why isn't it on her website if it does? Why hasn't it ever been played in the media?

Does crying at a prayer service work in her favour? How so? Does it wipe out all the physical evidence that incriminates her?

 

[cami]

Hey rlaub44, I completely agree with you because I know they didn't have enough of the print supposedly to match to anyone. I surely have never been on the "Free Darlie" websites, however, I still stand by my own conviction of a human being that there was to much supposition, character assasination and innuendo for me to still come to the conclusion that she is GUILTY. As I said earlier, I do not in any way believe she is innocent, just don't believe with the evidence they have that it is a qualifying Death Penalty Case. I am SOOO on your side and Wonders and Cami's, just never gotten there yet. Seriously, do you believe that the "Silly String Tapes" should have been shown, which prejudiced the jury??? That is the one shred of evidence I DO NOT believe should have been shown to the jury???? Again, JMHO!!!! When the juror came out and said they didn't see all the pictures and that this evidence (Silly String Tape) influenced him (them), I was dumbstruck... Take Care Sweetheart, Talk to me and we (I) will finally come to the correct verdict??? Thanks and Sweet Dreams and keep your babies Close and Safe!! Ann :twocents::angel:

No one knows why that juror changed his mind..juror remorse maybe. We've already blown the myth that the jury did not see all the photos of her injuries and bruises. It's right in the transcripts and testified to by the medical staff and jurors other than Charlie have seen the bruises and discussed them on television programs....Leeza being one of them.

So that myth is blown.

The state had every reason to show that silly string tape. The judge allowed it into evidence. It's circumstantial evidence.

Did you even think the jury played it so many times, they were looking for signs that she had been crying...i.e. red, swollen, watery eyes, flushed face, etc.

It's the physical evidence that tells me Darlie committed this crime, not her jumping around at the grave site. That's Darlie playing for the cameras, she had her chance to "star."

What I condemn is the interview where she smiles and chews gum and said her heart is breaking and boys wouldn't want them to be sad. Well she sure doesn't look like her heart is broken to me.