Darlie Routier asks for DNA testing

I personally want to know whether there is a murderer running around or not I really dont think she did it and I live so close, well it would just be darn good info! right?

Sammie Luckus Cook, Jr.

The first witness was Virginia Smith.   That was not her true name, but she testified that it was the name which she wanted to go by for this trial.   At the time of the offense, Virginia Smith lived in an apartment complex in Dallas.   Virginia Smith testified that April 13, 2000, was a day that she will never forget.   She got to her apartment about 5:30 p.m., changed clothes, and went to check the mail.   When she got back to the apartment, she opened the patio door and started cleaning the kitchen.   While she was putting up the dishes, she heard a noise from the patio.   Then she saw a man standing in her living room.   She made a positive identification of appellant as the man who came into her apartment and assaulted her.

Virginia Smith said that she asked appellant what he wanted and that he kept telling her to “shut up.”   Virginia Smith testified that appellant grabbed her by her arm and pulled her into her bedroom.   Then he took her into the bathroom.   Appellant closed the bathroom door, and Virginia Smith could hear him in the kitchen going through the drawers.   When he came back to the bathroom, appellant had Virginia Smith's purse and a knife.   He told her to give him all the money that she had.   Virginia Smith said that appellant had the only sharp knife which she had in the apartment.   After he took all the money from her purse, appellant told Virginia Smith to get undressed.   Virginia Smith started crying, and appellant poked her with the knife until she complied with his demand.   Virginia Smith identified the pictures which showed the way she looked when the police came to her apartment later that night....

Proof at Punishment Phase

Six other victims of aggravated sexual assaults testified at the punishment phase of trial.   There was DNA evidence from each of those assaults which matched the DNA evidence from appellant.   These witnesses will be identified by the pseudonyms which they used during trial or by initials.

“Amy Harrison” testified about events on February 15, 1995, when she was subjected to two acts of aggravated sexual assault by an unknown man.   The police took her to Parkland Hospital for the rape kit examination.

"Mary Smith” testified about events on December 18, 1995, when she was subjected to an aggravated sexual assault by an unknown man.   The police took her to Parkland Hospital for the rape kit examination.  

M.C.R. testified through an interpreter about the events on March 28, 1996, when she was subjected to an aggravated sexual assault by an unknown intruder (in the presence of her five-year-old daughter).   The police took her to the hospital for an examination.  

“Joanna Smith” testified about events on May 7, 1996, when she was subjected to a series of aggravated sexual assaults by an unknown intruder.   The police took her to Parkland Hospital for the rape kit examination.

 “Beth Smith” testified about the events on May 19, 1996, when she was subjected to a series of aggravated sexual assaults by an unknown intruder.   The police took her to the hospital for a rape kit examination.

“Mary Becker” testified about the events on May 6, 2000.   These events occurred 23 days after the offense for which appellant was convicted.   After he committed several acts of aggravated sexual assault, appellant fell asleep in Mary Becker's apartment.   Appellant was arrested after she was able to escape and call the police.   The police took her to the hospital for the rape kit examination.   The police detective put appellant's photograph into the photographic lineup which he showed to Virginia Smith.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1450468.html

During the mid-to-late '90s, police were convinced that not one, but several, serial rapists were terrorizing northeast Dallas. Ultimately, a 34-year-old man named Ollie Ray Diles, who had been labeled "The Box-Cutter Rapist" after victims described the weapon used to subdue them, was caught in 1997, convicted for three sexual attacks and given three life sentences. Next to be apprehended was Sammie Luckus Cook Jr., 31, who was linked by DNA evidence to as many as 15 rapes dating to 1995.

The litany of details provided by Cook's victims was numbing: Their assailant, each reported, had worn a bandanna over his face and either gloves or socks on his hands to prevent leaving any fingerprints. Purse straps, belts or electrical cords were used to bind their hands and feet, and they were threatened with a knife or scissors. In one case, a woman told of coming out of her bathroom to find a man holding a kitchen fork to the throat of her 6-year-old daughter. The mother managed to grab the youngster but was eventually raped as the terrified child looked on. Another had been eight months pregnant at the time of her attack.

http://www.dallasobserver.com/2002-10-31/news/likely-suspect/full/

Gary Faison...

Police, however, were convinced Diles and Cook were not the only rapists terrorizing northeast Dallas.

There had, for instance, been the young woman who, after returning from a week's vacation, was awakened at 2 a.m. by an intruder who entered her apartment bedroom and placed a towel and a gloved hand over her face before raping her. During the attack he had threatened to cut out her eyes if she screamed or resisted. When he asked for money, the victim provided him with her ATM code number. Then, before leaving, he had forced her to shower in an effort to do away with any physical evidence of the attack. She would later tell police that she never saw the assailant's face.

There would, however, be a photograph of a man using the automatic teller machine near the woman's apartment after the assault. Additionally, a palm print was lifted from a window screen that had apparently been removed from the victim's apartment and found nearby.

Two weeks before Christmas in 1995, a 26-year-old SMU graduate student was attacked in the early morning hours by a man who had entered her apartment through a sliding glass door. The assailant covered her head with a pillowcase, bound her hands with a pair of pantyhose and raped her. Throughout the attack, he warned that if she screamed, he would cut her. Following the rape, he had also demanded that she shower before he disappeared into the night.

The victim, who never saw her attacker's face, could only describe him as being 5-foot-10 and weighing approximately 190 pounds. The only clues left behind were partial prints left by the intruder on the front-door deadbolt and a strip of tape used to disable a locking bar.

Unfortunately, as with the previous case, the police had no suspect with whom to compare the prints.

The following July, a young married woman whose husband was out of town on business was dressing for work when a man burst into her apartment bedroom and threw a blanket over her head before sexually assaulting her and taking $20 and a Discover card from her purse. Through the traumatic event, she later told investigators, she had talked of being the mother of a young son and begged that her life be spared. She also asked that her attacker use a condom during the rape. All she could remember the man saying in response was for her to "settle down and shut up."

Though she was unable to provide police with a description of the man who attacked her, a neighbor later told authorities of seeing a black man looking into the woman's apartment window. Another resident said she'd been walking her dog two days earlier and saw an unfamiliar African-American male near the rape victim's apartment.

While relatively certain the same person had committed all three rapes--and perhaps as many as a half dozen others--frustrated investigators had no real suspect on which to focus. The man they had been desperately searching for was little more than a faceless ghost. Until Gary Faison was arrested.

http://www.dallasobserver.com/2002-10-31/news/likely-suspect/full/
 
Hey,

Does anyone have any updates on Darlie or her family recently? Wondering what they've all been up to/doing in recent years. :)
 
Sammie Luckus Cook, Jr.

The first witness was Virginia Smith.   That was not her true name, but she testified that it was the name which she wanted to go by for this trial.   At the time of the offense, Virginia Smith lived in an apartment complex in Dallas.   Virginia Smith testified that April 13, 2000, was a day that she will never forget.   She got to her apartment about 5:30 p.m., changed clothes, and went to check the mail.   When she got back to the apartment, she opened the patio door and started cleaning the kitchen.   While she was putting up the dishes, she heard a noise from the patio.   Then she saw a man standing in her living room.   She made a positive identification of appellant as the man who came into her apartment and assaulted her.

Virginia Smith said that she asked appellant what he wanted and that he kept telling her to “shut up.”   Virginia Smith testified that appellant grabbed her by her arm and pulled her into her bedroom.   Then he took her into the bathroom.   Appellant closed the bathroom door, and Virginia Smith could hear him in the kitchen going through the drawers.   When he came back to the bathroom, appellant had Virginia Smith's purse and a knife.   He told her to give him all the money that she had.   Virginia Smith said that appellant had the only sharp knife which she had in the apartment.   After he took all the money from her purse, appellant told Virginia Smith to get undressed.   Virginia Smith started crying, and appellant poked her with the knife until she complied with his demand.   Virginia Smith identified the pictures which showed the way she looked when the police came to her apartment later that night....

Proof at Punishment Phase

Six other victims of aggravated sexual assaults testified at the punishment phase of trial.   There was DNA evidence from each of those assaults which matched the DNA evidence from appellant.   These witnesses will be identified by the pseudonyms which they used during trial or by initials.

“Amy Harrison” testified about events on February 15, 1995, when she was subjected to two acts of aggravated sexual assault by an unknown man.   The police took her to Parkland Hospital for the rape kit examination.

"Mary Smith” testified about events on December 18, 1995, when she was subjected to an aggravated sexual assault by an unknown man.   The police took her to Parkland Hospital for the rape kit examination.  

M.C.R. testified through an interpreter about the events on March 28, 1996, when she was subjected to an aggravated sexual assault by an unknown intruder (in the presence of her five-year-old daughter).   The police took her to the hospital for an examination.  

“Joanna Smith” testified about events on May 7, 1996, when she was subjected to a series of aggravated sexual assaults by an unknown intruder.   The police took her to Parkland Hospital for the rape kit examination.

 “Beth Smith” testified about the events on May 19, 1996, when she was subjected to a series of aggravated sexual assaults by an unknown intruder.   The police took her to the hospital for a rape kit examination.

“Mary Becker” testified about the events on May 6, 2000.   These events occurred 23 days after the offense for which appellant was convicted.   After he committed several acts of aggravated sexual assault, appellant fell asleep in Mary Becker's apartment.   Appellant was arrested after she was able to escape and call the police.   The police took her to the hospital for the rape kit examination.   The police detective put appellant's photograph into the photographic lineup which he showed to Virginia Smith.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1450468.html

During the mid-to-late '90s, police were convinced that not one, but several, serial rapists were terrorizing northeast Dallas. Ultimately, a 34-year-old man named Ollie Ray Diles, who had been labeled "The Box-Cutter Rapist" after victims described the weapon used to subdue them, was caught in 1997, convicted for three sexual attacks and given three life sentences. Next to be apprehended was Sammie Luckus Cook Jr., 31, who was linked by DNA evidence to as many as 15 rapes dating to 1995.

The litany of details provided by Cook's victims was numbing: Their assailant, each reported, had worn a bandanna over his face and either gloves or socks on his hands to prevent leaving any fingerprints. Purse straps, belts or electrical cords were used to bind their hands and feet, and they were threatened with a knife or scissors. In one case, a woman told of coming out of her bathroom to find a man holding a kitchen fork to the throat of her 6-year-old daughter. The mother managed to grab the youngster but was eventually raped as the terrified child looked on. Another had been eight months pregnant at the time of her attack.

http://www.dallasobserver.com/2002-10-31/news/likely-suspect/full/

Gary Faison...

Police, however, were convinced Diles and Cook were not the only rapists terrorizing northeast Dallas.

There had, for instance, been the young woman who, after returning from a week's vacation, was awakened at 2 a.m. by an intruder who entered her apartment bedroom and placed a towel and a gloved hand over her face before raping her. During the attack he had threatened to cut out her eyes if she screamed or resisted. When he asked for money, the victim provided him with her ATM code number. Then, before leaving, he had forced her to shower in an effort to do away with any physical evidence of the attack. She would later tell police that she never saw the assailant's face.

There would, however, be a photograph of a man using the automatic teller machine near the woman's apartment after the assault. Additionally, a palm print was lifted from a window screen that had apparently been removed from the victim's apartment and found nearby.

Two weeks before Christmas in 1995, a 26-year-old SMU graduate student was attacked in the early morning hours by a man who had entered her apartment through a sliding glass door. The assailant covered her head with a pillowcase, bound her hands with a pair of pantyhose and raped her. Throughout the attack, he warned that if she screamed, he would cut her. Following the rape, he had also demanded that she shower before he disappeared into the night.

The victim, who never saw her attacker's face, could only describe him as being 5-foot-10 and weighing approximately 190 pounds. The only clues left behind were partial prints left by the intruder on the front-door deadbolt and a strip of tape used to disable a locking bar.

Unfortunately, as with the previous case, the police had no suspect with whom to compare the prints.

The following July, a young married woman whose husband was out of town on business was dressing for work when a man burst into her apartment bedroom and threw a blanket over her head before sexually assaulting her and taking $20 and a Discover card from her purse. Through the traumatic event, she later told investigators, she had talked of being the mother of a young son and begged that her life be spared. She also asked that her attacker use a condom during the rape. All she could remember the man saying in response was for her to "settle down and shut up."

Though she was unable to provide police with a description of the man who attacked her, a neighbor later told authorities of seeing a black man looking into the woman's apartment window. Another resident said she'd been walking her dog two days earlier and saw an unfamiliar African-American male near the rape victim's apartment.

While relatively certain the same person had committed all three rapes--and perhaps as many as a half dozen others--frustrated investigators had no real suspect on which to focus. The man they had been desperately searching for was little more than a faceless ghost. Until Gary Faison was arrested.

http://www.dallasobserver.com/2002-10-31/news/likely-suspect/full/

BBM, Really? hmmmm!
 
Hey,

Does anyone have any updates on Darlie or her family recently? Wondering what they've all been up to/doing in recent years. :)

Darlie's son Drake was diagnosed with leukemia over the summer. Darlie filed an appeal in early November. The state has sixty days to respond so there won't be any news until January.
 
Don't forget this part...

Appellant closed the bathroom door, and Virginia Smith could hear him in the kitchen going through the drawers. When he came back to the bathroom, appellant had Virginia Smith's purse and a knife. He told her to give him all the money that she had. Virginia Smith said that appellant had the only sharp knife which she had in the apartment.

The guy showed up knowing exactly what he planned to do. He armed himself with a knife from her house. Sound familiar?
 
Darlie's son Drake was diagnosed with leukemia over the summer. Darlie filed an appeal in early November. The state has sixty days to respond so there won't be any news until January.


What about her husband? Are they still married? thanks!
 
Darlie's son Drake was diagnosed with leukemia over the summer. Darlie filed an appeal in early November. The state has sixty days to respond so there won't be any news until January.

Honestly, if she is ever proven innocent, Which IMO she is (dont yell at me peeps) this is so sad for her and the remaining famly I couldnt imagine not being to be with my child if they are sick.
 
Honestly, if she is ever proven innocent, Which IMO she is (dont yell at me peeps) this is so sad for her and the remaining famly I couldnt imagine not being to be with my child if they are sick.

I ain't gonna yell. I think she's innocent too. Plenty disagree... Those happens to be the same people who lie about things like bruises. Fact, both arms were bruised. Fact, the IV was in her left arm interior crease of elbow.... She had bruising to BOTH arms, backs of both hands and abrasions to the interior part of arms.

I'm busy reading the threads on here. It's laughable what is passed off as fact on here. And people just eat it up.... Unreal.
 
I ain't gonna yell. I think she's innocent too. Plenty disagree... Those happens to be the same people who lie about things like bruises. Fact, both arms were bruised. Fact, the IV was in her left arm interior crease of elbow.... She had bruising to BOTH arms, backs of both hands and abrasions to the interior part of arms.

I'm busy reading the threads on here. It's laughable what is passed off as fact on here. And people just eat it up.... Unreal.

Wow, I think I love you LOL!
 
Don't forget this part...



The guy showed up knowing exactly what he planned to do. He armed himself with a knife from her house. Sound familiar?

In one of the John Douglas books I have read. He writes of being absolutely convinced a man killed his wife because the murder weapon came from the home.

When the true perp was found he learned that the man learned while incarcerated that bringing a weapon to a crime scene shows premeditation and can garner an offender more time in jail. In his future crimes he always used weapons from the victims homes. He has spoken about this case and does not believe Darlie is guilty either.
 
=CathyR;


:floorlaugh: Yeah and I am working on my list for Santa right now.


Santa Claus is the embodiment of good people who cared about children,
The oldest Santa Claus story I have found is from Turkey where an evil ruler OFTEN PUT CHILDREN TO DEATH. A noble man, a merchant, who loved children would rescue them hide them in barrels and sneak them out of the country. He gave them the greatest gift of all he saved their lives. This story came from my Turkish sister-in law.

Many other tales all from different countries tell of men who gave presents and gifts to the children of their villages in secret on Christmas.

It is Jesus who commands us to give and to do so secretly so no one can say we do it for the praise, power, or political gain we might receive.

It is his birth we celebrate and his commandments we keep when we give to others and let someone else take the credit. Who better than a fat man who lives with elves and flies a magic sleigh led by reindeer.

Yes I believe in Santa and hope that good deeds are done for children every year through organizations like Toys for Tots, the Salvation Army, and Secret Santa organizations.

Your comment just put you on the "naughty list" expect coal in your stocking as your soul does not embrace the wonderment, magic, or wisdom of children.

Almost all our Christmas traditions are based on telling the story of Christ's birth.

The tree in our homes is an evergreen it never dies in the winter just like Jesus promised to all those who believe in him.

The lights we put on it are to remind us of the one true light Christ.

The decorations we also hang from the branches are to remind us of the beautiful gifts of the spirit we receive and how empty our lives are without him to guide and love us.

The poinsettias come from Mexico, and so does the sad story of a poor child who was starving and dirty. The church fed all who brought gifts to honor Christ. She died on the steps of the church holding her gift to honor Christ a simple ugly weed, THAT THE PRIESTS REJECTED AND DEEMED UNWORTHY. It turned into a beautiful flower in her her cold dead hands. It reminded the priests that no life is without value and no gift is too little. The flower was blood red in color and a gold crown is in the center. The blood Christ shed for us and the crown he wears in heaven. Her gift was more a reminder of what Christmas is all about than all the trappings of silver and gold that were given by others. Christ can transform an ugly weed into a beautiful flower which is what he does for each soul that truly takes him into their heart and worships him.

Yes I believe in Santa I feel sorry for you that you don't.
 
In one of the John Douglas books I have read. He writes of being absolutely convinced a man killed his wife because the murder weapon came from the home.

When the true perp was found he learned that the man learned while incarcerated that bringing a weapon to a crime scene shows premeditation and can garner an offender more time in jail. In his future crimes he always used weapons from the victims homes. He has spoken about this case and does not believe Darlie is guilty either.

I've heard of this as well. If an attacker is comfortable using a gun he's far more likely to bring one with him since guns are hit and miss or not easily accessible in an unfamiliar home. But if you're comfortable using a knife, 99.9% of most homes have a butcher block right on the kitchen counter. Unless your kitchen is hard to find or you lock your butcher block up every night, most criminals know a knife is going to be really available once he's in the house. As a bonus, the weapon can never be linked to the criminal because it was the home owners weapon... Not a hunting knife or other weapon that might be traced back to the criminal.
 
Ask him to put trial transcripts in your stockings. It might help you decipher non-fiction from fiction.

May as well use Santa Claus in this case, God knows Darlie and her fans have tried everything else to prove her innocence.
 
May as well use Santa Claus in this case, God knows Darlie and her fans have tried everything else to prove her innocence.

I don't know about the rest of her supporters but I prefer to use the facts of the case to prove her innocence.
 
Sinsaint;10047860
Ask him to put trial transcripts in your stockings. It might help you decipher non-fiction from fiction

I am quite familiar with the transcripts. I have followed this case from the beginning and all I would like for Santa to bring is news that they have set a date for her execution.

Darlie's crazy family and supporters can wish all you want, she will not get a new trial. She has been trying all these years and it isn't going to happen because there is no reason for a new trial. She did it, she was convicted and sooner or later she will die for it. As I have said before my only regret is that she will go so much easier than the two precious babies that she butchered.
 
Sinsaint;10047860

I am quite familiar with the transcripts. I have followed this case from the beginning and all I would like for Santa to bring is news that they have set a date for her execution.

Darlie's crazy family and supporters can wish all you want, she will not get a new trial. She has been trying all these years and it isn't going to happen because there is no reason for a new trial. She did it, she was convicted and sooner or later she will die for it. As I have said before my only regret is that she will go so much easier than the two precious babies that she butchered.

Well, the writ that was filed last month requesting further DNA testing will be granted. The state won't be able to fight it anymore. Once the tests results come back there's a very strong possibility of a new trial. One that doesn't include her family being called trailer trash, her being called a psychopath, a DA obsessed with making sure the jury knows about her breast implants or a forensic quack passing off his opinions as scientific.
 
I don't know about the rest of her supporters but I prefer to use the facts of the case to prove her innocence.

My comments about Santa Claus has nothing to do with the case only your disbelief .
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
182
Guests online
664
Total visitors
846

Forum statistics

Threads
625,688
Messages
18,508,324
Members
240,835
Latest member
Wowowow
Back
Top